A Real Fighting Chance Print
Wednesday, 14th June 2006 (by J.D.)This article is about Cars, Real-Life
Yesterday I mentioned Fighting Chance, a service designed to help consumers get the best price on a new car. Here’s one reader’s first-hand experience using their techniques. VinTek writes:
I rarely buy cars, but I’m going to tell you the story of how I purchased two cars last February on the very same day.I’d been driving a 1994 Mitsubishi Galant GS, which was still running well on the original engine and tranny. I’d bought the sucker new, paying $1,000 below dealer’s invoice, so I thought I’d gotten my money’s worth. When the radiator started to leak at 211K miles, I decided to cut my losses and replace the car.
My wife was driving a 1992 Toyota Corolla with 130K miles on it. I hated that car. It was utterly reliable, but I had to grit my teeth trying to accelerate whenever I got onto a freeway onramp. When my Galant got into trouble, I decided to replace the Corolla as well, justifying the purchase for safety reasons.
We decided on a pair of Hondas — a Civic and an Accord V-6 — figuring we wanted one “nice” car and one “economy” in the family. I already knew that Honda didn’t have rebates going, so I didn’t factor that into my expectations. Following the Fighting Chance method, I did the following:
- Looked up each dealership and determined who the fleet or sales manager was. I didn’t want the Internet guy; I knew that in a lot of cases, the Internet guy at a dealership was only somebody who was authorized to offer a specific discount, but not close a deal below the standard discount.
- Composed letters to each dealership in the area (33 of them) and listed the cars I wanted, the colors I wanted, the accessories I wanted, and the MSRP and Dealer Invoice prices for the vehicles and accessories. If Honda had been issuing rebates, I would have listed these on the letter too.
- A week before the end of the month, I faxed the letters out. I didn’t e-mail them because some sales managers are old-school and don’t read their e-mail. I was careful to call each dealership beforehand to make sure that the fax went directly to the sales or fleet manager. No sales flunkies for me.
- Within two days, I had responses from about half of them. I called the one with the highest prices and thanked him, telling him that I was going with Dealer X, who offered the lowest price. Sometimes he offered to beat the price; sometimes he didn’t. If I got a lower price, I thanked him and told him that I still had to call the other dealerships. Then I used the new lower price from the last guy to go through my spiel again. By the time I was done, I had firm bids for the Civic EX at dealer’s invoice price ($1,638 below MSRP) and the Accord V-6 EX at $810 below dealer’s invoice price ($3,533 below MSRP).
I went to the dealership to test drive the cars (to make sure there were no squeaks or rattles, and that everything worked, and that it was fully equipped as negotiated) and bought both cars. Paid cash for both of them.
Now this little story is akin to your post on April 29th about having dealers bid against each other. I’ll tell you why the Fighting Chance method works. Every manufacturer has sales targets for its models. If a dealer reaches his target for the month, he not only gets a rebate for that particular car, but for all of the cars of that model that he sold that month. The target can vary for each dealership, depending on size. And when you go shopping for a car, you have no idea if a dealer is below his target, over his target, or just close.
Let’s say that I’m a dealer, and I’ve got a hypothetical $500 rebate per car if I sell 200 Accords that month. A guy named J.D. comes in looking for a car at the end of the month. If I’m nowhere near my target, I’ll be motivated to sell him the car, but I can’t cut him a whole lot of slack on price because I won’t have that $500 rebate and I sure as hell won’t sell a car at a loss. So I might shave something off my profit, maybe a grand off MSRP, to make him happy and sell the car. Or I might be over my target. I can sell him the car and even more because I know I’m getting an extra $500 J.D. doesn’t know about. I can even split the rebate with him if he’s a tough customer and bring my price down to $1,250 below MSRP to temp him to buy the Accord. But supposed I’ve sold 198-199 Accords that month and I’m about to run out of time to sell Accords. What price would I be willing to sell the Accord to J.D. for if getting over the top will get me a total rebate of $100,000 ($500 x 200 cars)? Hell, I’d lower the price to below even my own invoice price if he puts me over the top because I’d not only get it back, but more!
That’s the way it works. You have no idea what a dealer’s target is and how close he is to it. So you blanket the area to weed out the guy who is desperate to sell and reach that target. The next month, it might be a different dealer. If a car is hot, like a hybrid, stores won’t deal, because they know that in 30 minutes, some other guy will come in and buy the car. But if it’s not something where demand exceeds supply, the buyer is in the driver’s seat. Because at the end of the month, you’re going to have an easier time finding a seller than the seller is going to have finding a buyer.
Again: I have no association with Fighting Chance. I receive no money from them, and had never heard of them before VinTek sent me his story. But I think that for $35 the service easily pays for itself.

RSS Feeds
Facebook
Twitter

June 15th, 2006 at 6:29 am
This is one of those situations where you have to calculate the value of your time and effort.
Sure the poster saved, let’s call it $1200, on the car, but how much time and effort was involved? If he only purchases a new car every 12 years, that’s only $100 a year. I can think of many easier ways to save $100 over the course of a year.
Personally, I have always been more concerned about not getting nickeled and dimed to death on repeated purchases than getting the absolutely best deal possible on an infrequent purchase.
If you can shave $5 or $10 a month off your cable or phone bill that pays off forever. Getting $50 or $100 off a new dryer is a once every 10 year event.
June 15th, 2006 at 6:49 am
200 cars @ $500 rebate is $100,000, not $10,000.
June 15th, 2006 at 7:48 am
Peter,
You’re assuming that I spend 12 years buying a car, not the few hours that I actually spent. And after you factor in the fact that I would have spent even more time running around from dealer to dealer had I purchased a car in the conventional manner, the return on my time is even higher. Do you just walk into a dealership and pay sticker when you buy a car? A extrapolation of your logic would suggest that you do.
Chris,
You are abolutely correct. Typo on my part. But the point remains valid. Thanks for the catch.
June 15th, 2006 at 8:13 am
VinTek - I don’t pay sticker price. I probably do all the same upfront research you do. But I don’t have to make 33 phone calls, send 33 faxes and do all the follow up to save maybe an extra $500. Once I decide what is a fair price and a payment I can live with it’s just a matter of being very upfront and asking if they want to sell it at that price.
The last 2 cars I bought required going to maybe 2-3 places.
My point was more that a single phone call to remove an unused $5/month service from your phone bill will save $720 over 12 years with much less time and effort than you spent. I just don’t care about getting the absolutely lowest rock bottom price on something I only buy once every 10 years.
June 15th, 2006 at 8:24 am
VinTek - I just wanted to add that perhaps there was less effort involved on your part than I thought.
I just think that many times people say “Sure, I’ll sign up for that extra service, it’s just an additional $5 a month.” $5 doesn’t seem like much once, but over time that really does add up. Sure saving $600 at one time feels better than $5 a month for 10 years but the result is the same. It’s very easy to concentrate on the big purchases and forget the same amount of savings can be had on smaller, ongoing expenses by making simple one-time changes that pay off month after month.
June 15th, 2006 at 10:40 am
Peter,
I am in total and complete agreement with you that you can do lots of little things requiring little effort to reap large rewards over time.
But I am also in favor of reaping large rewards in one shot even if the opportunity doesn’t present itself very often. Let’s say you visit 3 dealers and go through the spiel for 30 minutes in each place. That’s an hour and half right there. And let’s say that you have to drive a half hour each to see 2 different dealers, plus you have to drive another half hour to go back to the dealer that had the best deal. That’s another hour and a half. So we’re up to 3 hours. On top of this, you’ve expended gasoline and perhaps have spent 3 hours of your spouse’s time, if you’ve involved her in the process.
You and I both have to go through the following process: we have to test drive the car, go through the spiel of saying no to accessories and extended warranties, get the registration done, and sign the papers. Except I don’t have to wait for the car to be washed and prepped because they know I’m buying the car before I come in.
So instead of spending 3 hours running around to 3 dealers, I spend maybe 3 hours (actually, it was less) faxing 33 dealerships and taking 5 minute calls from 15 dealerships (remember, about half of them don’t respond). For the same investment in time as you, I’ve saved let’s say $1,200 and was actually entertained in the process! I’ve also saved gas and saved my wife’s time by only involving her in the checkout process. And I’ve saved myself a considerable amount of stress in not having to play the game of “Well, my sales manager didn’t like the price I gave you, so how about $200 more?”
If someone told you that you could save $1,200 by putting no more time and effort into a process than the one you were going to use, wouldn’t you do it? Even a 1-time savings of $1,200 is still a savings of $1,200. If someone offered you $1,200 tax-free with no extra effort, wouldn’t you take it?
This certainly doesn’t take away from the things that you can do that save money on a daily basis. It’s not a situation where you have to choose to do one or the other. You can do both and save even more!
June 15th, 2006 at 11:09 am
When shopping for a product that will need service down the line (car, appliance, motorcycle, etc) more often than not, I am shopping for a dealership, not a price. My time is valuable - dicking around for 6 hours to save an extra few hundred bucks isn’t worth it.
Other point - why buy new? 9 month old lease returns / demos / etc save more money. 2 year old saves even more. Yes, it’s a lot harder to get a ‘good deal’ on a used car. Basically, use the Kelly Blue Book Trade Value (basically auction wholesale price) as a starting point. Add 1 or 2% profit for the dealership, none for a private seller. Cars.com integrates all that in one webpage. 10 minutes, 2 phone calls and a paypal deposit, and I’ll have the car I want at the price I want.
Hmm. Maybe that’s why I am not a millionaire. I value time over money.
June 15th, 2006 at 12:32 pm
I don’t buy the 10-minute argument. You spend 10 minutes and the car magically appears in your driveway? You’re not going to run down and pick it up? You’re not going to do walkaround to make sure the car is in the condition the seller says? You’re not going to take it on a test drive to determine that it doesn’t have parts falling off as you drive? You’re not going to take it to a mechanic you trust and have him check it out? There’s a lot of time involved in buying a used car unless you like operating on blind trust.
Also, how you value your time depends a lot on what you were going to do with it. If your life is packed with activity then yeah, don’t bother spending time looking for a better deal. But if I was going to spend the time going to a movie and I was offered a chance to save $1,200 to skip that movie (including drive time, previews, etc.) and do something else, what do you think I’d choose? Do you make $400/hour? I don’t.
Finally, I fully agree that the best bet is to buy used. I routinely recommend that to friends. Why don’t I do it myself? Because I don’t know the history of the car. Sure, I can read an odometer, but I don’t know how those miles are racked up. My wife does the worst kind of driving: short trips, less than 2 miles each direction, twice a day. She definitely shortens the life of any car she drives, even though you can’t see it. Since I don’t buy a car very often, I want a car that doesn’t have a mystery history. Sure, I take a big depreciation hit up front, but I make up for it at the back end. And since I buy so infrequently, I like to have the latest safety features when I drive, like curtain side airbags. I’m willing to pay a premium for that and for the peace of mind with a clean history, because that’s where I place my value.
June 15th, 2006 at 3:35 pm
@VinTek: Glad to hear you also had a great experience buying a new car with FC.
The other thing that hasn’t been brought up yet is that for the $35, the owner will also take your phone calls and answer any questions you might have about the car-buying process. He’s a 70-year-old man who’s been doing this for the last 14 years. I called him twice with questions; the second time, I left a message on his system, and he returned my call promptly.
He told me that’s the part of the business he loves best, actually talking to his customers. He’ll also help with leasing and financing situations, though I don’t have any first-hand experience with this portion of FC.
June 16th, 2006 at 8:59 am
Hi Ricemutt,
I read about your experience regarding your Bimmer and I’m glad that you had a similar experience. He’s a character, isn’t he? 70 years old and still playing baseball. I only hope that he’s still providing this service when I buy my next car, probably 12-15 years into the future.
I didn’t take advantage of his counsel this time around because I’ve been through the drill before, but I find that his Big Picture analysis is invaluable for helping me gauge what the potential bottom line is. Real prices paid by real buyers. You can’t get that anywhere else, so far as I can determine.
February 19th, 2007 at 4:08 pm
[...] me out a lot, learned a lot of hold back and incentive, also read this ad on the fax/email attack Get Rich Slowly ? A Real Fighting Chance __________________ TyranT 2007 Nissan Altima 2.5S CVT Dark Slate/charcoal/ Symrna 2000 Volvo [...]
March 5th, 2007 at 7:46 am
[...] The best way to buy a new car and A real fighting chance [...]
August 31st, 2007 at 11:17 am
[...] A real fighting chance is the best story of the bunch, I think, because it describes a $35 tool that can save you thousands of dollars. [...]
March 3rd, 2008 at 11:01 am
[...] The best way to buy a new car and A real fighting chance [...]