<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hot Window Breeze or Cool Car Breeze?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2006/07/14/hot-window-breeze-or-cool-car-breeze/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2006/07/14/hot-window-breeze-or-cool-car-breeze/</link>
	<description>Common sense advice on money saving tips, how to get out of debt, high interest savings accounts, cd rates, money market accounts, mortgage rates, money management and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:17:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tahrey</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2006/07/14/hot-window-breeze-or-cool-car-breeze/comment-page-1/#comment-97757</link>
		<dc:creator>tahrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 01:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2006/07/14/hot-window-breeze-or-cool-car-breeze/#comment-97757</guid>
		<description>Windows up, fan on, AC off
Or, windows down and a low speed, what i once heard referred to as &quot;55/2&quot; :)

My last car didn&#039;t have AC or sunroof, so it was a choice between fan and/or windows only. Given the amount of noise produced, the windows tended to be closed and the fan kicked up a notch (though it was already being backed up by air ram-scooping through the vents) around 50-60mph. Not sure it saps a huge amount of economy even so - it wasn&#039;t a hugely powerful beast (topped out around 90mph) and times I actually had the windows down and my foot to the floor it didn&#039;t seem to be appreciably slower, which is what I&#039;d expect if the drag was increasing worth a damn (a 1hp effective difference would still have been just about noticable).

Certainly at city speeds the window venting is basically free, and better than the fan without high-speed airflow backup. I don&#039;t think my current car&#039;s AC draws more power than having the windows down at it&#039;s higher top speed would, but it still makes a noticable dent in the idle rpm when turned on, until the idle control kicks the throttle open wider and it picks up speed again (and the car&#039;s good for anything between 20 and 30mph in 5th with no throttle input depending on it&#039;s chosen idle speed - so it&#039;s making a not inconsiderable amount of power in this configuration)

the best thing you can do is experiment with your own car, particularly if it has a trip computer with MPG readout</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows up, fan on, AC off<br />
Or, windows down and a low speed, what i once heard referred to as &#8220;55/2&#8243; <img src='http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My last car didn&#8217;t have AC or sunroof, so it was a choice between fan and/or windows only. Given the amount of noise produced, the windows tended to be closed and the fan kicked up a notch (though it was already being backed up by air ram-scooping through the vents) around 50-60mph. Not sure it saps a huge amount of economy even so &#8211; it wasn&#8217;t a hugely powerful beast (topped out around 90mph) and times I actually had the windows down and my foot to the floor it didn&#8217;t seem to be appreciably slower, which is what I&#8217;d expect if the drag was increasing worth a damn (a 1hp effective difference would still have been just about noticable).</p>
<p>Certainly at city speeds the window venting is basically free, and better than the fan without high-speed airflow backup. I don&#8217;t think my current car&#8217;s AC draws more power than having the windows down at it&#8217;s higher top speed would, but it still makes a noticable dent in the idle rpm when turned on, until the idle control kicks the throttle open wider and it picks up speed again (and the car&#8217;s good for anything between 20 and 30mph in 5th with no throttle input depending on it&#8217;s chosen idle speed &#8211; so it&#8217;s making a not inconsiderable amount of power in this configuration)</p>
<p>the best thing you can do is experiment with your own car, particularly if it has a trip computer with MPG readout</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-97757" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
