The GRS discussion forums have become spam magnets. They weren’t used much anyhow, so I’m taking them down. (To be replaced by something better in the future.) I don’t want to lose any of the contributions from readers, though, so I’ll move the best posts to this blog over the next few weeks. This first post is an introduction to mutual funds from VinTek — original thread here.
This is a very basic introduction to mutual funds.
Stocks and Mutual Funds
In the beginning, there were stocks, and that was good. You could invest in companies that you believed would prosper, and you could prosper with them. The trouble was, if you made a bad choice, you’d get hammered. That’s life. You have to take the bad with the good.
Then came mutual funds, and that was better. Now you could reduce the risk of getting saddled with a loser by buying a basket of stocks. You were likely to have losers, but there would also be winners. Your risk was tempered by the diversity of the stocks you held. And to help you through it all, you had a fund manager who would use your money to buy the stocks he thought would do well, and sell the stocks he thought would do poorly. Of course, he didn’t work for free. He’d take a percentage of your money every year (say 2%, more or less) as his fee for picking stocks. But if he wasn’t good at what he did, you might wind up with more losers than winners. Another hammering. Maybe years of hammering, if the manager was a doofus.
Index Funds
Then came index funds, which were hailed as the ultimate in investing. You’d invest not in just a basket of stocks, but in the entire market. Since the manager wasn’t required to do research and pick stocks (all he had to do was buy it all and hold it), his fee was reduced to a fraction of an actively managed fund’s fees (about 0.2%). Yes, you could have years of losses (2000, 2001 and 2002 were the most recent), but studies show that the market always recovered, even if some of the companies in the index didn’t. If you wanted put your investing on autopilot and be assured of a long-term (any 20 year period since the 1920s had an average gain of 10% per year) winner, this was the way to go.
Do I own index funds? You bet! I think they’re an essential part of any portfolio. Are they the only funds I own? Nope. I think that if you work hard, it’s possible to find winners. Of course, there are a lot of people smarter than me who disagree. But it’s my money, and if I want to gamble on some some funds that I think will perform better, then that’s where I’ll put my money. But note that most of the money in these funds is money I can afford to lose if I pick a bad fund. Some of these funds do much better than the index; some of them do much worse. Overall, I’m doing well, but to be honest I’m not sure if I’m good or just lucky.
The Big Three
There are four big mutual fund families, but I’m eliminating American Funds from this discussion because they’re sold by brokers and are thus load funds. I can’t see paying $50 out of every $1000 you put into their funds. Do their funds perform well? Yes, there’s no denying that some of their funds have terrific performance. But there are no-load funds that perform just as well, so why pay the load?
I call these fund families the Big Three not only because they’re enormous, but also because they have a variety of funds that cover every investment style and segment you could wish for. The Big Three are:
If you’re just starting out, you should probably pick one family and stay with it. You’ll be able to track all your investments more easily in one place.
The Big Three cover it all: index funds, managed funds, large-cap, small-cap, mid-cap, value, growth, blend, sector funds, international, emerging markets, etc. With any of these guys, you should be able to find the fund(s) that will suit your targets for growth and fit your tolerance for risk. As you get more savvy, you can expand beyond one family into the others, or even to fund companies outside of the Big Three. Some people do just that, attempting to fine-tune their portfolios to their liking. Others never leave the fund family they start with, content in the variety it already offers.
Go to the web site of any one of the Big Three and there are not only funds to look over, but also a wealth of investment advice.
Conclusion
If you have any questions, feel free to comment here. In the meantime, here are some good articles about mutual funds:
- Building wealth: 11 keys to picking a great mutual fund
- Five Factors that Trump Short-Term Returns
- ETFs vs. mutual funds
I’ll post more from the forums here in the future, including more from Vintek on Index Funds.
This article is about Basics, Investing Monday, 2nd October 2006 (by J.D. Roth)


RSS Feeds
Facebook
GRS Twitter







October 2nd, 2006 at 9:12 am
I like the evolution spin you put on your post today but I would say you missed the next step. After index funds you can leap to Exchange Traded Funds. Why just sit and let the index funds grow when you could be squeezing call premiums from them?
They are also far superior in that they offer instant liquidation if so desired.
October 2nd, 2006 at 10:53 am
Well, I’m actually going to get to ETFs, but haven’t gotten around to them. Thumbnail version: they’re really good tools, but if you are DCAing a little every month, the trading costs can be prohibitive, relative to funds. Also, instant liquidation runs a little counter to the “Get Rich Slowly” philosophy. Why would you want quick in-and-out capability unless you were market timing?
Again, I have nothing against ETFs per se. I think they’re good tools. Then too, I’m troubled by the fact that as of August, of the eight sectors Lipper tracks, just one — financial services — had ETFs posting superior returns to their mutual-fund counterparts over the past 12 months. That’s food for thought.
http://www.smartmoney.com/etffocus/index.cfm?story=20060802
October 2nd, 2006 at 11:53 am
Vanguard:
Account Maintenance Fee
Each Vanguard index fund (except the REIT Index Fund) charges a maintenance fee if the balance is below $10,000. The fee of $10 is deducted annually…
An annual $10 fee is generally deducted for each nonretirement fund account with a balance of less than $2,500. In addition, the fund account may be liquidated if the balance falls below $500.
Traditional, Roth, and SEP IRAs. $10 a year for each fund account with a balance of less than $5,000.
Vanguard is Fees Fees Fees.
They shout Low Fees, but in actuality, they are not. I love their “ideals” but I won’t touch Vanguard unless they get rid of these fees. The IRA fee is crazy since most people’s limit per year is less than $5000. So even if someone puts in 100%, they will be slapped with a fee. This is NOT looking out for the little guys. Especially the get rich slowly guys.
October 2nd, 2006 at 12:57 pm
Jim,
I agree completely that Vanguard has implemented policies that have disincentivized out many of smaller investors who are just getting started. Still, $10/year beats $84/year (assuming that you’re buying ETFs every month via a low-cost broker like ScottTrade) or more.
Also, consider that the administrative costs of an account are the same for the small account holder as the large one. This is one small way of making the little guy shoulder a little more of the cost he’s generating (i.e. a guy with a $3,000 account is generating way more in admin costs than the expense fees his account is generating).
That said, there are still other firms like T Rowe Price and Fidelity Investments that do a good job, and I urge any beginning investor to fully research all their options. The nice thing about a free market is that everyone is free to invest with the company he feels best suits his needs.
October 2nd, 2006 at 1:35 pm
I imagine Vanguard would argue that the fees pay for the overhead of the account holding the fund. But still, the fees target small investors while giving big investors a break. (Note also for many funds bigger investors get a further break by being able to convert to the lower-charging Admiral share class.)
Odd too that the maintenance fees are specific to Vanguard’s flagship index funds, and don’t apply on their managed funds — why charge only on the funds which exemplify your values?
(FWIW, you can sidestep the maintenance fees while staying mostly indexed by buying one of their lifestyle funds — although make sure the asset allocation is suitable for you. I hold one of the Target Retirement funds in my IRA.)
And another thing that really bugs me: high minimum investments. You need $3K to get started in *anything* at Vanguard, apart from the STAR fund.
I moved here from the UK and the contrast to the unit trust indestry there is striking. In the UK fund managers fall over themselves to get small investors into ISAs (tax-free savings/investment accounts). My first one was opened with a GBP 50 initial and monthly investment. The barriers to small investment in the US seem a lot higher!
So, what should a small investor with an interest in index funds do? Fidelity’s minimum investment is even higher. Save up $3K and face Vanguard’s charges until the balance is high enough to avoid them? Save up smaller lumps and invest in ETFs through Sharebuilder’s $4 plan?
For a regular investor it’d seem the mutual fund route is slightly better: no transaction charges, so you can invest small amounts more often and take benefit of dollar cost averaging. Do ETFs have other benefits?
October 2nd, 2006 at 7:44 pm
Yes, ETFs do offer 2 other benefits: they typically carry lower expense ratios and are slightly more tax efficient because they do not make distributions based on capital gains. If you’re interested in index funds (which are very tax efficient in and of themselves), the ETF’s advantages are slight but very real. In my mind, they are often not enough to offset the transactions costs for an “ordinary” investor squirreling away $100 per month.
Yes, I agree that the minimums set a high barrier to entrance for many a small investor. Yet I have to think that if you believe that it’s important to have an emergency fund covering 3-6 months’ expenses before investing, sticking money into a CD until you have enough to open a fund account would not be an insurmountable obstacle. Remember again that the small investor generates proportionately more costs than a large investor. Or do you think a “fee for service” system, where every investor pays a fixed fee for the annual reports, Web site, research, etc. would be more equitable? After all, the small investor gets the same reports as the large investor, has the same online account access, etc. Do you think that the small investor’s fees would go down…or up?
October 2nd, 2006 at 10:57 pm
I recall that T. Rowe Price charges a $10 annual fee on their IRA’s also unless you have $100k in T. Rowe Price accounts. That takes a bit longer to hit than Vanguards $10k limit at $4-5k/year.
October 8th, 2006 at 7:24 pm
[...] Get Rich Slowly » An Introduction to Mutual Funds (tags: investing money) [...]
October 8th, 2006 at 10:56 pm
[...] Get Rich Slowly has a very basic introduction to mutual funds for beginners. “In the beginning, there were stocks, and that was good… Then came mutual funds, and that was better.” (795 words; 8 comments) [...]
October 15th, 2006 at 4:31 pm
Round Up of Carnival of Personal Finance #69…
The Carnival of Personal Finance #69 was a great carnival of information sharing with over 50 superb posts. Our post was published at Carnival #69 of Personal Finance Our post Investing - Dilbert’s Personal Finance was published at this carnival. Som….
November 1st, 2006 at 1:01 pm
[...] Oct. 1st: An introduction to mutual funds (a guest entry) [...]
November 2nd, 2006 at 8:19 am
Thanks for this article. It is definately helpful, since I am deciding on where to open my Roth IRA. I started looking at the big three, but like the other comments, it seems most of the index funds require a minimum that is higher than $4,000.00. Will continue with the research. Thanks again!
March 22nd, 2007 at 8:40 am
[...] you’d like represented and what percentages they should represent in your mix. Then settle on some good fund families with experienced managers and purchase shares in their funds. Take note of the management style, [...]
June 7th, 2007 at 6:21 am
[...] Big Three In his guest post “An Introduction to Mutual Funds”, Vintek recommended starting at one of the Big Three: Fidelity, Vanguard, or T. Rowe Price. I call [...]
September 5th, 2008 at 5:52 am
Unfortunately in Canada, most people won’t have access to the products offered by these companies. Unfortunately this means that Canadians have to do way more research when looking to buy a mutual fund.
Fortuneately there’s a websiet called Globefund.ca, which I wrote a tutorial/review for it over at BTGNow.net, you can find it here: http://www.btgnow.net/2008/08/globefundca-part-1-my-portfolio/
Anyone interested in purchasing a Candadian mutual fund should become well aquainted with Globefund.
http://www.btgnow.net
December 17th, 2008 at 7:14 pm
Truly a fantastic post for newbies! I will be sharing this link.
January 8th, 2010 at 7:11 am
I am very concerned about some of the fees I see in no load fund families.