You might have noticed that the U.S. stock markets took a tumble today. In fact, the drop was the largest in five years. What does this stock market correction mean to the average investor? What does it mean for the fellow who’s just plugging a few hundred dollars a month into his IRA?
In the grand scheme of things, it doesn’t mean much. The slow, sure path to investment success is to “buy and hold” your stocks. When you apply this strategy with discipline, then market fluctuations — even large swings such as happened today — are irrelevant. You’re in it for the long haul. It doesn’t matter what happens in the short term.
On the other hand, there’s always some market timing involved with investments. Here’s an example: I had planned to stick a few hundred dollars into my Sharebuilder IRA next Tuesday. Because of the way Sharebuilder works, this trade would only cost me $4. However, now it’s tempting to make an unscheduled investment tomorrow. Market orders cost more with my plan ($15.95), but it’s possible that this $11.95 difference could be made up shortly. (Ad: Buy Stocks for $4 at ShareBuilder.)
By way of example, UPS — the stock in which I intend to invest — is currently trading at $70.11. Let’s say I put $500 into it, purchasing 7.07 shares of stock. UPS would need to be trading at $71.80 per share next Tuesday for this to be the correct move. The question becomes: how likely is this to happen?
What do the experts say? In “Today’s selloff: Buy, sell, or hold?” at CNNMoney, experts offer differing opinions. One says, “You have to look at days like this as an opportunity.” He says to buy. “Nothing has changed fundamentally.”
But another expert says, “Stocks are not as expensive as they were at the peak of the bubble in 2000, but they are not cheap. …I’d be pretty cautious here.”
A third professional investor says, “Any pullback will be more of a buying opportunity than an indication of more to come on the downside.”
“Survive a market drop — and make it work for you”, another CNNMoney article, also recommends that investors stay the course. In fact, the article suggests that its better not to pay attention to financial news at all!
In the late 1980s, Paul Andreassen, a psychologist then at Harvard University, conducted a series of laboratory experiments to determine how investors respond to financial news. He found that people who pay close attention to news updates actually earn lower returns than people who seldom follow the news. When you think about this a little more, it actually makes good sense. News coverage tends to make market movements seem even bigger than they are — and to make them seem likely to persist just when they are most likely to reverse.
What it boils down to is this: nobody knows what today’s sharp drop means. Nobody ever knows what’s going to happen with the stock market. I believe the best bet for the average investor is to just sit back, relax, and remember that investing in the stock market is a long-term proposition.
(Note: As I write this, markets in Australia and Asia are continuing to decline, which probably means another drop in the U.S. markets tomorrow. I’ll wait to buy UPS on Tuesday.)
This article is about Investing Tuesday, 27th February 2007 (by J.D. Roth)


RSS Feeds
Facebook
GRS Twitter








February 27th, 2007 at 8:54 pm
Hope this is not the start of a larger bear market. Many of the markets are still strong.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:27 pm
We should have some volatility in the morning, but I will be picking up 25% of my target stocks tomorrow: eBay (EBAY), Cisco (CSCO), and Goldman Sachs (GS).
I suggest going back in at a lower price point below your first. The volatility may give you another buying opportunity. Buy on dips. I think this is a god-send buying opportunity to pick up some quality stocks.
Dow Down 400 points: Why You Shouldn’t Care
February 28th, 2007 at 1:14 am
It feel, what, all of 3%? That’s not a tumble; that’s not even much of a decline; in the big picture, it’s a blip. The sky is *not* falling.
What does it mean to me? Well, mostly it means that Thursday’s 401(k) contribution will buy me a few more units. Nice. Cue the Buffet hamburger analogy.
(It also means my 401(k) is worth a little less than it was the day before. But what’s a day and a few percent worth worrying about given a 35-year horizon?)
On the other hand, there’s always some market timing involved with investments.
Well, yes; but the statistics show that most attempts to time the market fail. Better to pick a plan and stay the course.
The question becomes: how likely is this to happen?
The real question is: how likely are you to guess right?
February 28th, 2007 at 2:36 am
looks like market will be on sale for the next few days. I may be an optimistic (or just plain stupid) but yes, that includes emerging market funds too.
in fact that may be over soon as futures indicate. I sure hope not, because I’m waiting for funds to clear to pick up some discount.
February 28th, 2007 at 3:38 am
You quoted three “experts” from CNNMoney as saying:
This is like the blind men feeling different parts of the elephant. I suggest that all three “experts” are probably right.
1. Nothing has changed fundamentally. This is true. Of the stocks which fell yesterday, how many announced earnings, new products, sale of divisions, mergers, acquisitions, etc?
2. Stocks are not as expensive as they were at the peak of the bubble in 2000, but they are not cheap. The fact that stocks continue to be highly valued by historical standards has been widely commented on.
3. A pullback is a buying opportunity rather than an indication of more to come. It is commonly accepted that in the long term, stock prices will rise faster than inflation. Given that stocks are cheaper today than they were yesterday, if you accept that stocks will rise in the long term then this is a buying opportunity.
Interesting note: Of yesterday’s top price losers by percentage, four of the top five are Chinese, and the fifth is South African. Even when you look at market capitalization (which weights any results heavily toward the large US companies in the DJIA), two were Chinese and one was Brazilian (?).
February 28th, 2007 at 4:36 am
The stock market being up one day and down the next, that’s just nonsense. It’s the long term that counts. Read Warren Buffet. He’s not infallable but he does come close. He predicted the rising cost of energy and the weakness of the dollar.
What you want to look at, when buying a stock or a mutual fund, is how it did the last five years or more. Also do research. Read up on company, if it’s a retailer, go take a walk in the stores. Walking through Walmart vs Target, you can see which one is the better buy. You’ll see the same thing reflected in the graphs and preformance of the stock. For a mutual fund, see what it holds.
What is nice is a stable rising trend in value. What is not nice, is if the stock had a sudden upsurge or drop over a period of time. Means something funky with management.
Also, the news of what goes around in the world and at home does affect your earnings. My mutual funds are heavy on international and energy, especially Exxon/Mobile. If something is happening in Venezuala, or Nigeria, or the Persian Gulf, and if the weather is colder then normal, or everyone decided to drive one weekend, I make money. If the dollar is having a bad day, I make money.
It’s not hard to make money if you just do the research. Lots of research.
February 28th, 2007 at 5:26 am
I actually did this with JNJ awhile back. They had released some bad news about one of their products being stalled in FDA approval and their stock price dropped by a lot. You could tell that it was an overreaction and that it was now selling at a big discount. I had an order into Sharebuilder for the next week and then thought that buying immediately was a better choice. I finally decided to buy half immediately, paying 15.95 commision and the other half at the regular Tuesday buy, paying 4.00 commision.
By the next Tuesday, JNJ was down another $1. Totally not worth trying to time the market, in my estimation. I realize now that it wasn’t worth putting an extra 15.95 in to try to time this.
Considering how irrational the short term market is, how can you predict it? I think you made a good choice on this one. Even if you’re a little off this time, over the long term, this decision will probably make you money.
February 28th, 2007 at 6:20 am
“What it boils down to is this: nobody knows what today’s sharp drop means. Nobody ever knows what’s going to happen with the stock market. I believe the best bet for the average investor is to just sit back, relax, and remember that investing in the stock market is a long-term proposition.”
Thanks for the reminder!
February 28th, 2007 at 6:25 am
J.D.-
This is a great illustration of why transaction costs are so important.
By using a market order, you’re paying $2.23 over the actual stock price — or more than 3%. The normal transaction fee of $4 is much better, but still almost 1% on $500.
Every percent counts, especially in an era of expected mid-single-digit returns for most asset classes. For this reason, I generally suggest stock trades only for larger amounts ($9.95 or $15.95 is a much smaller percentage if you trade only when you have saved up $5000). For periodic investing, I recommend using ultra-low-expense, no-load mutual funds (especially index funds). Avoiding transaction fees will avoid a significant drag on performance, and you have the added benefit of diversification.
February 28th, 2007 at 6:26 am
This is like the blind men feeling different parts of the elephant.
EXACTLY!
February 28th, 2007 at 6:30 am
Oops — almost forgot my original point:
By choosing the $15.95 now rather than the $4 next week, you’re paying an extra $1.70 per share.
That’s essentially an option premium. You are betting that the stock will be over $71.80 by Tuesday.
The options market can give you guidance on this. You can buy a March 70 call for $1.50, which means the market doesn’t expect the stock to be over $71.50 by mid-March, much less $71.80 by next Tuesday.
So the numbers would argue strongly against paying the extra transaction fee.
February 28th, 2007 at 7:12 am
J.D.,
It’s refreshing to hear some common sense after having to watch yesterdays obscene display of the most embarrasing aspects of human and crowd behavior at its worst -hysterical, irrational and overreactive.
Fortunately, this is the exact recipe that allows level headed traders to profit massively from mass stupidity. I imagine there will be some unreal buying opportunities in a few days.
Time to make a shopping list…
Cheers,
Ralph
http://www.successfulonlinetrading.com/
February 28th, 2007 at 8:00 am
There’s plenty of research out there on why market timing (for long term investors) is a bad idea. A number of studies point out that if an investor sat out the 10 best trading days over a 10 year span he missed out on an average annual return of nearly 5%. This implies it’s better to invest and stay invested.
It also implies that if the volatility of a particular stock (UPS, in this case) is such that you’re willing to sit it out and attempt to second-guess the market, maybe there’s too much risk associated with this particular stock for your taste. If you think about it, there is a direct correlation to your risk preference.
On the other hand, if you’re a short term trader and don’t subscribe to the Efficient Markets Theory… nevermind.
February 28th, 2007 at 9:34 am
#9 makes a good point: you can’t control the market, but you can control your costs. $12 on “a few hundred dollars” is quite a heavy upfront load; the sort of load that most investors balk at on mutual funds.
And J.D., hadn’t you arrived at a realization that index funds were the way to go for you? Is there a bit of a head-vs-heart struggle here — the sensible-but-safe index fund vs the go-on-let’s-have-a-punt lure of individual stocks?
February 28th, 2007 at 9:42 am
“Of yesterday’s top price losers by percentage, four of the top five are Chinese, and the fifth is South African.”
That is because this entire sell off was sparked by a move towards more regulation in China. There has been concern for a while about the ‘too quick and easy’ growth in China backed by sub-prime loans and the way that capital is being thrown around.
The Chinese government made it harder for people to get at this capital, meaning that growth should slow a bit. But that is better than explosive unsustainable growth resulting in a crash. This isn’t exactly a surprise, but the financial markets are so mind-blowingly short sighted that it rattled the world. Financial analysts never ask for rate hikes, because that hurts the market right now when their bonuses are on the line, regardless of the future ramifications that easy money can have on an economy.
The simple fact is that not much has changed in the world since this news broke. China is still a power house, but their growth will be sensibly controlled. Before this regulation speculation and manipulation was able to run wild and unchecked through their markets (think Enron style corruption, but on the investment side). People should be thanking them. All of the financial markets and analysts just got too excited, as per the norm.
Sorry for the long post, but I did a lot of reading on this (3.5% in a day isn’t something that ebb and flow) and wanted to add my 2 cents
February 28th, 2007 at 10:21 am
yes, and apparently the Chinese congress meeting next week is the big event the market is waiting for, we don’t expect anything decisive from the markets until then..
in the meantime, some very good stocks will likely get cheaper or remain on sale
February 28th, 2007 at 10:27 am
And J.D., hadn’t you arrived at a realization that index funds were the way to go for you? Is there a bit of a head-vs-heart struggle here — the sensible-but-safe index fund vs the go-on-let’s-have-a-punt lure of individual stocks?
This is absolutely what is going on, especially after big declines. This is a case of hearing all of the advice, and intellectually knowing what I ought to do, but being wrapped up in the emotional “I can do better” thinking. That’s a way to “get poor slowly” or to “maintain the status quo”, eh?
February 28th, 2007 at 12:59 pm
Why aren’t any of you guys using Zecco.com for free trades?? For people who are willing to do anything to save a buck, I just don’t get it! It’s not like your money will disappear if Zecco goes under or anything! Do some research!
I happened to have $500 in my cash account yesterday at Zecco (earning interest), so I threw it all in there on one of my index ETFs that took a big hit. Totally free.
You guys are boggling my mind with this refusal to accept free trades!
February 28th, 2007 at 2:18 pm
To be honest, Michelle: I don’t trust Zecco yet. They’re brand new and unknown; I don’t know if their business model is sustainable.
They’re free now, yes. But what happens if, in a year’s time, they introduce an account maintenance fee? Or high fees for selling or transferring stocks?
All power to them, but for now I’ll wait and see. Sometimes it’s better to *not* be an early adopter.
“(earning interest)”
(At 1%.)
March 1st, 2007 at 12:28 am
J.D., I agree with the vast majority of your article. My only question is why you are not taking your argument to its logical conclusion: i.e. timing the market is pretty close to impossible, but picking stocks that on average out-perform their respective market peers is also pretty close to impossible.
There is a large and well established body of research that demonstrates that when you take trading costs and other fees into consideration, index fund investing will generate higher returns than stock picking for a majority of investors.
March 3rd, 2007 at 7:15 am
[...] little they could do about it anyway. Others took comfort in the tried-and-true philosophy of slow, sure, long-term investing, not necessarily enjoying the drop but looking forward perhaps to picking up cheaper [...]
January 25th, 2008 at 6:19 am
[...] What the stock market decline means for you [...]
May 25th, 2008 at 11:41 pm
All great comments! Sharebuilder does offer 6 free trades per month if purchasing the $12/month account.
Definitely invest “long-term”, but that is a relative statement. I prefer to invest until a stock at least doubles. That might be 10 years, or only 2 months. Sell off half, and you’re home free. Use the money to invest in another stock.
Invest at least $320 in one stock so that a $16 real-time trade only represents 5% of expense. Once stock is up 10%, commissions are covered. (5% on buying end, 5% on selling end).
ETF’s make LESS money than well-researched common stock. ETF’s are like “middle men”. Just pull up 5 year graphs and see for yourself. More stable growth, but slower. Stocks with high volatility have ability for great increase. Just DON’T SELL until increase is achieved. Risky, but profitable. Offset risk with investment in ETF’s or more stable stocks.