Comments on: Get Rich Slowly Advertising Policy http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2007/03/31/get-rich-slowly-advertising-policy/ Common sense advice on money saving tips, how to get out of debt, high interest savings accounts, cd rates, money market accounts, mortgage rates, money management and more. Sun, 19 May 2013 15:54:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Kit http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2007/03/31/get-rich-slowly-advertising-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-92343 Kit Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:16:02 +0000 http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2007/03/31/get-rich-slowly-advertising-policy/#comment-92343 The Google Ads bother me because they run so counter to what you are promoting on this site. I understand that Google is targeting the words "get rich" in your content, but since they do offer get-rich-quick schemes (on every single archive page I have seen), why don't you get rid of them and stick with advertisers who you can pick and choose? The Google Ads bother me because they run so counter to what you are promoting on this site. I understand that Google is targeting the words “get rich” in your content, but since they do offer get-rich-quick schemes (on every single archive page I have seen), why don’t you get rid of them and stick with advertisers who you can pick and choose?

loading....

]]> By: Wesley http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2007/03/31/get-rich-slowly-advertising-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-82695 Wesley Sun, 01 Apr 2007 21:32:11 +0000 http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2007/03/31/get-rich-slowly-advertising-policy/#comment-82695 I'm definitely onboard. Heck, if it's a mainstay (like Mint), I'll likely visit the sponsor's site and check it out. As long as the ads don't interfere with the content (and they don't currently), I see them as almost necessary on a site as popular as this. Heck, I'd begin to wonder about a financial site that didn't make the best of the situation...It just doesn't make sense not to have them! I’m definitely onboard. Heck, if it’s a mainstay (like Mint), I’ll likely visit the sponsor’s site and check it out.

As long as the ads don’t interfere with the content (and they don’t currently), I see them as almost necessary on a site as popular as this. Heck, I’d begin to wonder about a financial site that didn’t make the best of the situation…It just doesn’t make sense not to have them!

loading....

]]> By: cwall http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2007/03/31/get-rich-slowly-advertising-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-82686 cwall Sun, 01 Apr 2007 16:09:40 +0000 http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2007/03/31/get-rich-slowly-advertising-policy/#comment-82686 I fully support your advertising policy, its unobtrusive and will help support this excellent initiative. The only thing that I hope for, is that the ads be static (no flash movies inside of the ads please) as I find them very distracting. thank you for continuing to provide excellent financial resources and discussions. I fully support your advertising policy, its unobtrusive and will help support this excellent initiative. The only thing that I hope for, is that the ads be static (no flash movies inside of the ads please) as I find them very distracting.

thank you for continuing to provide excellent financial resources and discussions.

loading....

]]> By: db http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2007/03/31/get-rich-slowly-advertising-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-82662 db Sun, 01 Apr 2007 05:12:03 +0000 http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2007/03/31/get-rich-slowly-advertising-policy/#comment-82662 No clue JD -- I figure your advertisng policy is just fine -- do whatever you need to do with it. It doesn't bother me. db No clue JD — I figure your advertisng policy is just fine — do whatever you need to do with it. It doesn’t bother me.

db

loading....

]]> By: Allie http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2007/03/31/get-rich-slowly-advertising-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-82658 Allie Sun, 01 Apr 2007 03:42:28 +0000 http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2007/03/31/get-rich-slowly-advertising-policy/#comment-82658 What advertising? I love Firefox. What advertising?

I love Firefox.

loading....

]]> By: John K http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2007/03/31/get-rich-slowly-advertising-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-82656 John K Sun, 01 Apr 2007 03:06:18 +0000 http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2007/03/31/get-rich-slowly-advertising-policy/#comment-82656 Advertising is the mainstream and makes many things that were previously impossible, possible. This might include sites such as this, that provide good consumer advise and a place for consumer comments as well. All of these things come with a price tag and someone has to pay the price: From the website charges and/or server costs, internet connection, the annual costs of a website address, internet domain and IP address, all the way down to the time it takes to maintain a site and promote a website (Yes, Jenny, it does cost money to promote your website so that more people see it when they search for something....Santa Claus doesn't do that for you) With that being said, for those who don't like the advertizing, remember this: You might not be able to see the page that you are looking at now if there isn't a charge you are paying or some type of advertising to pay for it! Thanks for giving us this site, advertising and all!!!! Advertising is the mainstream and makes many things that were previously impossible, possible. This might include sites such as this, that provide good consumer advise and a place for consumer comments as well.

All of these things come with a price tag and someone has to pay the price: From the website charges and/or server costs, internet connection, the annual costs of a website address, internet domain and IP address, all the way down to the time it takes to maintain a site and promote a website (Yes, Jenny, it does cost money to promote your website so that more people see it when they search for something….Santa Claus doesn’t do that for you)

With that being said, for those who don’t like the advertizing, remember this: You might not be able to see the page that you are looking at now if there isn’t a charge you are paying or some type of advertising to pay for it!

Thanks for giving us this site, advertising and all!!!!

loading....

]]> By: Mira http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2007/03/31/get-rich-slowly-advertising-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-82654 Mira Sun, 01 Apr 2007 02:39:13 +0000 http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2007/03/31/get-rich-slowly-advertising-policy/#comment-82654 I've been reading this site for several months now. I think the best part of it is your format: you write your column and others post comments. I like that there are barely any advertisements. I have navigated to websites recommended by you or others in their post. I prefer it to stay this way because I'm getting recommendations from you and others based on your experience rather than a company trying to push their site. I’ve been reading this site for several months now. I think the best part of it is your format: you write your column and others post comments. I like that there are barely any advertisements. I have navigated to websites recommended by you or others in their post. I prefer it to stay this way because I’m getting recommendations from you and others based on your experience rather than a company trying to push their site.

loading....

]]> By: J.D. http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2007/03/31/get-rich-slowly-advertising-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-82652 J.D. Sat, 31 Mar 2007 23:45:12 +0000 http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2007/03/31/get-rich-slowly-advertising-policy/#comment-82652 Those of you who are rating this "one star", are you doing so because: 1. You're opposed to the advertising, 2. You're opposed to me cluttering the main body of the blog with admistrative stuff like this, or 3. Some other unrelated reason. I had sort of expected this would just pass without stars of any sort. Now I'm puzzled. Those of you who are rating this “one star”, are you doing so because:

1. You’re opposed to the advertising,
2. You’re opposed to me cluttering the main body of the blog with admistrative stuff like this, or
3. Some other unrelated reason.

I had sort of expected this would just pass without stars of any sort. Now I’m puzzled.

loading....

]]>