If you're new here, you may want to learn what this site is about. I encourage you to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
Maybe it’s because I grew up poor in rural Oregon. Maybe it’s because I love adventure fiction (you know: “man against nature”). Maybe it’s because I have a lot of my father in me. For whatever reason, I’ve always been fascinated by people who go “off the grid“.
In the GRS forums, Benbr pointed to No Impact Man, a blog run by Colin Bevan, who describes himself thus:
A guilty Liberal [who] finally snaps, swears off plastic, goes organic, becomes a bicycle nut, turns off his power, composts his poop and, while living in New York City, generally turns into a tree-hugging lunatic who tries to save the polar bears and the rest of the planet from environmental catastrophe while dragging his baby daughter and Prada-wearing, Four Seasons-loving wife along for the ride.
In many ways, this is another “man against nature” story: a family attempts to go off the grid in the middle of the most on-the-grid city on Earth! Though their motives are different, their methods are similar to people like the Amish, who practice extreme frugality for other reasons. (See also.)
Here are No Impact’s adapted “sustainable consumption” rules as I envisage them:
- Don’t buy new products (including, worst of all, books).
- Borrow, rent or buy used (except underwear and socks).
- Buy only sustainably produced underwear and socks (or anything else that ends up excepted).
- Cancel magazine subscriptions and read online (the trees! the trash!).
- No movies or other forms of mass entertainment.
- Find replacements for everything that is still throwaway or comes in throwaway packaging in our house: cosmetics and skin care products, soap, shampoo, cleaning products, paper towel, menstrual pads, disposable pens, disposable razors, toilet paper.
- Did anyone notice that toilet paper was at the end of that long list?
On the positive side, to replace these things, we can:
- Have fun with Craig’s List, Freecycle and other second hand sources.
- Read all we want online.
- Putter around antiques stores and flea markets.
- Go to more live entertainment.
- Socialize more.
- Have people over more.
Does it all sound awful? Well, we’ll see. That’s the point, isn’t it? To test that assumption and see what actually happens to our lives.
No Impact Man chronicles Colin’s adventures as his family adjusts to this new lifestyle. What will life be like without electricity? (And how will he post to his blog?) What about life without a car? And, most importantly to readers of Get Rich Slowly, how does this crusade affect the family finances? Apparently, they’re saving a ton of money.
How much money are we saving? Here’s a hint: I rarely carry cash anymore unless I’m on a jaunt to the farmer’s market. I forget to put my money clip in my pocket and it sits on a shelf for days on end.
At first glance, to look at our food bill, you’d think we weren’t saving a penny. After all, we spend $30 a week for a pound and a half of artisanal, unpasteurized cheese made from the milk of happy cows who are grass fed and treated well. The eggs aren’t cheap either: $7 a dozen from pasture-raised hens. The lecture from the farmer on how chickens are carnivores who would rather scavenge for worms than eat bagged corn comes free.
[...]
Veggies and fruit, locally grown and milled flour, and milk from cows I personally met and petted at Ronnybrook Farm make up the bulk of the rest of our expenses…
Add to our savings: no airplanes, no hotels, no car rentals, no gas, no subways, no taxis, no shopping for anything new, no designer clothes, no gadgets, no movies, no cable bill. On Isabella’s birthday, we went to a second-hand kids store called Jane’s Exchange, told Isabella she could have anything she wanted, and watched as she chose a pair of gold beaded slippers—total price $1. That means that our weekly living expenses, excluding our mortgage and a couple of bills, are about $120 a week for the three of us.
[...]
[W]hen the project began, we were without a dime in savings and, though not in credit card debt (I’ve been there, done that), we were both way too comfortable being in overdraft. Now, the money idles provocatively in our bank accounts. We’re living on one salary and stashing the other.
No Impact Man will interest those who have been wishing Get Rich Slowly would address environmental issues more often. But you don’t have to agree with Colin’s politics to learn from his experience. There is a lot of information here:
- What you need to know introduces the project.
- Stopping the junk mail tree killers gives four steps to stem the flood of junk mail.
- Eating local vs. organic explores one of my pet dilemmas. (Like the author, I almost always prefer local.)
[No Impact Man, via Benbr in the Get Rich Slowly forums]

.jpg)

May 3rd, 2007 at 7:09 am
He had me until “No movies or other forms of mass entertainment”. Why is Internet okay but movies aren’t?
May 3rd, 2007 at 7:55 am
It’s an interesting experiment although there’s no such thing as “no impact” so really they’re just reducing their impact to extremely minimal levels. Heck, even lichens have an impact on their environment. You can’t live without having an impact! That aside, my own efforts to reduce packaging (one of No Impact Man’s quests) has turned up a couple of good solutions that coincidentally turn out to be practical for air travel now that liquids and gels are restricted:
Shampoo: Lush (not widely available in the US but there are some stores, including one in Washington, DC) makes shampoo bars: it looks like a round bar of soap and they give you a reusable metal container for it. Lasts months and there’s no package to throw out. Plus you can take it in your carry-on luggage (I rarely check bags and carry everything on with me).
Deodorant: Health food stores sell a crystal “rock” deodorant that works amazingly well and a three-inch rock will last you an entire year. Sometimes comes with no packaging, and again this is something you can take on a plane.
May 3rd, 2007 at 7:59 am
I think he stopped the internet, too. I’ll bet he goes to the local library.
May 3rd, 2007 at 8:34 am
This is silly. This may make him happy but I seriously doubt this will create a fulfilling life for threaders of this blog.
Saving is great but sacrificing your happiness and well-being for it is just outright ridiculous.
There has to be a limit. The trick is to find yours.
May 3rd, 2007 at 9:12 am
[...] Save Money, Save the Earth from Get Rich Slowly. An introduction to the adventures of “No Impact Man”, someone who is trying to live in NYC while having zero impact on the environment, and some of the lessons others can learn from him. Here’s a direct link to No Impact Man’s Blog for those who want to skip straight to it. [...]
May 3rd, 2007 at 9:20 am
This is an extreme example of what most, if not all, of us need to do for the betterment (or simply survival) of the world in which we live. Recently, the University of Surrey, UK completed a multi-million dollar research fellowship on sustainable consumption and the motivating factors for individuals to participate in such behavior. Far from resolving the issue, the fellowship concluded that individual behaviors are deeply embedded in social and institutional contexts, and that we find ourselves locked in to unsustainable behaviors in spite of our own best intentions. The study calls for government and political interventions. However, it is obvious that a good first step toward sustainable consumption is to disconnect from media. This consumption machine drives our desires to unsustainable levels. We are suprisingly weak at being able to resist these messages, both overt and subliminal. Without disconnecting from the mouthpiece of consumerism, we are unlikely to effectively modify our behaviors to eventually improve the environment.
Incidentally, practicing sustainable consumption does indeed correlate to better financial health. I too can vouch for the ability to amass wealth at a much faster clip than would be possible trying to keep up with the Jones.
May 3rd, 2007 at 9:43 am
This just seems nutty to me.
May 3rd, 2007 at 11:21 am
closer, it can’t both be making him happy and causing him to sacrifics his happiness.
Presumably you replace toilet paper with just water and don’t have something reusable?
May 3rd, 2007 at 11:23 am
Maybe it’s just me, but I’d find it difficult to live with someone who eats lots of eggs and cheese, yet doesn’t use toilet paper
Great article though, thanks for pointing out this guy’s site. I enjoy reading about extreme frugality in all its various forms.
May 3rd, 2007 at 11:45 am
This is like Green Acres gone horribly, horribly wrong.
And without the TV watching pig.
May 3rd, 2007 at 11:53 am
I love it! Post more stuff like this. This guy has the right idea. His aim isn’t to save money- that’s just a pleasant side-effect. He’s trying to live a life that most closely reflects his principles. I admire that immensely.
May 3rd, 2007 at 3:44 pm
I’ve been watching/reading NIM pretty much since the beginning - it’s not a nutty as it seems and the project is for a defined period of time so the ‘extreme’ aspects of it aren’t necessarily life long.
I just wanted to comment that I love that two of my current favorite blogs are crossing in cyberspace! Makes me feel connected to a community of people that seem to care about the same stuff.
May 3rd, 2007 at 3:48 pm
Interesting idea, however, it’s infeasible for most people considering the way US towns are laid out. It’s miles to my local grocery store, much less a farmers market and I don’t have the time luxury to ride my bike all the way there (nor the motivation when it’s rainy out).
I’ll stick to using CFL’s and spending less in general on unneeded goods for now…
May 3rd, 2007 at 5:01 pm
How funny you should post about this when I discovered this blog yesterday!
I think it’s a really interesting. I particularly the idea of making no ‘net’ impact. By making a positive contribution (like volunteering to clean up a beach) one can offset some of the unavoidable things that leave an ecological imprint.
May 3rd, 2007 at 8:01 pm
I’m amused by how horrified people seem to be by the idea of no toilet paper. Large portions of the world exist happily without toilet paper. In fact, traveling in India, I was hard pressed to give an answer to someone concerned about the obvious lack of public health knowledge in a place where smearing stuff around with paper was thought to be an acceptable alternative to washing with water like normal people do - I mean, when you put it like that, what we do really is rather weird…!
May 3rd, 2007 at 8:46 pm
Are you referring to a bidet? Does the guy have running water to run a bidet?
May 4th, 2007 at 7:05 am
I like the way the Colin Bevan works hard not being strident, or judgmental or even a purist. He’s doing an experiment (and working on a book, which is another kind of financial investment!).
@brad: My wife and I just started using the bar shampoo from Lush. It’s great stuf. I was surprised.
@Chris: It’s really interesting that the Bevans are doing this in NYC, and the extent to which living in a city makes some aspects of reducing your footprint much easier. It’s pretty counter-intuitive, I think that’s one of the most interesting parts of the project. Doing all of the same steps in rural Alaska would be a very different experience!
@Dickey45: I spent a semester in India sans toilet paper. There’s a faucet next to every toilet (in the country and the slums you bring a bucket of water with you). Basically you wash your butt every time, then you wash your hands. It is much cleaner than TP. That said I went back to the TP habit pretty easy when I got back to the USA.
May 4th, 2007 at 7:36 am
My great-grandmother lived in a shack a few miles beyond World’s End on the Eastern Shore of Maryland, and they kept corn cobs in the outhouse for this purpose. Heck, they’re biodegradable!
Cities are in fact the place to be if you want to reduce your environmental footprint, unless you have enough land in the country that you can grow all your own food and don’t need to drive anywhere. I’ve been informally tracking my household greenhouse gas emissions for about 10 years, and they dropped by nearly 50 percent when I moved from the country to the city, mainly because I drive half as much as I used to but also because I use less energy in general. The per-unit energy embedded in products and food tends to be less in cities as well because of efficiencies in shipping. Much as I miss living out in the sticks, I am having a much lower overall impact on the environment by living in the city.
May 4th, 2007 at 9:49 pm
There’s plenty ways to save green by going green. I just posted on my website, 10 environmentally conscious tips from Home Depot designed to save you money.
http://www.livecheapsavebig.com/
Great wesbite by the way, lots of great info!
May 5th, 2007 at 5:54 pm
Let’s be honest - used Prada is often nicer than anything they’ve made recently. Hardly a sacrife….
May 6th, 2007 at 5:18 am
Thanks for mentioning my post in this post. To be honest, I cannot really see myself taking such measures.
May 9th, 2007 at 8:25 am
very belatedly: you don’t actually need a bidet; most of the places I’ve traveled people just use eg an old can or some sort of plastic cup on a string to scoop water out of a bucket or sink. To be honest, I still have trouble not splashing water all over, but there are clearly plenty of eg 8 year old kids who don’t seem to have any difficulty at all, so I assume I could master it with a bit more practice!
May 10th, 2007 at 6:59 pm
Honorable idea taken a bit far, in my opinion.
September 10th, 2007 at 9:57 am
[...] Impact Man — In May I mentioned this blog that profiles the story of a family attempting to go “off-the-grid” in the middle of [...]