Readers sometimes ask me, “Which personal finance magazine do you recommend?” This isn’t an easy question to answer. None of the Big Three — Money, Smart Money, Kiplinger’s Personal Finance — are exceptional, though each is good in its own way. Which is best for you depends on your financial objectives. Here are my impressions after subscribing to each for the past year.
Money ($10/year)
The most popular personal finance magazine in the U.S. — and the one that tries hardest to be “hip” — is Money. The magazine’s typography and layout drive me nuts, but the articles are varied and well-written. There are too many stock recommendations for my taste, but all of these publications are guilty of this. The July 2007 issue of Money included:
- An article by Jean Chatzky on how to make your charitable contributions more effective.
- Spot-on advice about what to do if you inherit a large sum of money or otherwise come into a fortune.
- A 13-page section on entrepreneurship with two articles: “Getting Rich in America” and “How It’s Done“. I liked both of these pieces — I believe that entrepreneurship is one of the most overlooked aspects of personal finance.
- Profiles of Whole Foods and of “must-have” car options.
Money offers a good variety of articles and has some fine columnists. (Walter Updegrave is one of my favorites.) It’s not without weaknesses, however. This issue features an inane article on how to marry a billionaire — it’s seven pages of nonsense. Most Money articles are easy to find on-line a few weeks following each issue’s publication. This magazine seems to be targeted at those just beginning to take control of their financial lives.
Smart Money ($12/year)
This magazine is not for people struggling with money; it’s for those who have already mastered their personal finances, and who are now looking for ways to maximize their returns. The magazine is published by The Wall Street Journal, and much of the content is not applicable to the average American. This month’s issue, for example, features an earnest article discussing the merits of “entry luxury” vehicles: which is best, the Mercedes C-class or the BMW 3-series?
Other articles in the September issue include a profile of a $300 chef’s knife and a conversation with Antiques Roadshow’s Keno brothers (the twins who gush over six-figure furniture pieces). Two pieces stand out, though:
- An article from Pulitzer-prize winner James B. Stewart on the investment strategies of Ivy League colleges, and how the average person can duplicate them with index funds.
- The cover story about living debt free is interesting, but even it offers advice that’s impractical to most GRS readers: “If you make $1,000 monthly payments [on your credit cards], rather than the $250 minimum, you’ll save more than $3,000 in interest.” Right. If.
Though each issue features stories about high-end personal finance, Smart Money is mostly filled with investment advice. The magazine isn’t bad, but for it to be useful, you should be well on the way to meeting your financial goals.
Kiplinger’s Personal Finance ($12/year)
Kiplinger’s is my favorite of these magazine, but even it has too much mind-numbing stock advice. (I’ve never figured out why these magazines promote stocks instead of index funds.) Fortunately, it also contains lots of information I can use, which in August included:
- An article featuring “savvy ways to tap your retirement savings — great strategies to make your money last a lifetime”.
- A piece on purchasing health insurance if you’re not already covered through your employer.
- A discussion of how debit cards compare to credit cards.
- A list of 30+ ways to use $1,000: buy stocks, boost your career with professional classes, buy driver safety training for your kid, fight poverty with microloans, and, best of all, earn a guaranteed 18% by paying off your high-interest debt.
Unfortunately, this issue also contained an article I loathed: James K. Glassman creates a stock portfolio in hindsight, and then gushes about how great it would have performed. “I’ve come up with a ten-stock portfolio that includes some of the best companies in the world…Over the past year to June 1, every stock has produced a positive return and, as a while, the portfolio has handily beaten [the S&P 500].” Lame. (If you don’t know why this is lame, let me know so that I can write an entry about why this sort of thing is worthless.)
Kiplinger’s is hit-and-miss with me. I’m not a fan of the stock-picking advice at the front half of each issue, but I generally like the articles in the back, the ones that explore real-world finance for average people. Most of the advice here seems to be geared toward those who are well into middle-age.
Recommendations
If you read magazines and can afford to subscribe, any of these is a source of good information. Unlike personal finance blogs, the articles in these publications are written by professionals. The stories are well-researched and published in a magazine that has a vested interest in maintaining credibility. Subscriptions aren’t very expensive — gleaning a single idea over the course of the year will pay for the subscription. Best of all, magazines are portable. (You can’t read a blog in the bathtub or on your business flight to Denver.)
Really, though, if I weren’t running this site, I wouldn’t subscribe to any of them. I’d rather peruse my favorite personal finance websites, including blogs like this one. The web is more personal. Unless you specifically seek an investment blog, you’re not going to be deluged by constant stock news. Blog content seems much more focused on real-world issues.
Where would I get my personal finance information instead of magazines? My favorite professional columnists on the web include:
- Liz Pulliam Weston at MSN Money
- Ben Stein at Yahoo! Finance
- Penelope Trunk at Yahoo! Finance
- Laura Rowley at Yahoo! Finance
- Walter Updegrave at CNN Money
The personal finance blogs I read most often include:
- Consumerism Commentary
- I Will Teach You to Be Rich
- The Simple Dollar
- Five Cent Nickel
- My Money Blog
- Blueprint for Financial Prosperity
There are many other great pfblogs — it’s impossible to list them all.
One final note: Please don’t base your investment strategy on the stock tips you find in personal finance magazines. Your best option is to purchase low-cost stock index funds. If you do set aside a small portion of your portfolio with which to purchase individual stocks (as I do), it’s okay to use magazines for ideas and research, but don’t blindly place your trust in the stocks they profile.
This post was inspired by a question in the Get Rich Slowly discussion forums.
This article is about Books, Tools Thursday, 16th August 2007 (by J.D. Roth)


RSS Feeds
Facebook
GRS Twitter







August 16th, 2007 at 5:20 am
From the article:
Unlike personal finance blogs, the articles in these publications are written by professionals. The stories are well-researched and published in a magazine that has a vested interest in maintaining credibility.
Not sure if I agree with this. Some bloggers are professionals. I mean, I am…I’m not a personal finance professional, as I chose not to, but I could be.
Many blog articles are well-researched and the blogs do have a vested interest in maintaining credibility. I know my does and I research everything I write.
JD, is this really what you met to say? If I am reading you correctly, this would imply your blog stories aren’t well researched and that you don’t have a vested interest in maintaining your credibility. Having been a reader of your blog for a long time, I find your articles the exact opposite…well researched and with a vested interest in maintaining your credibility. I mean this is backed up by just looking at your subscription count.
I think us bloggers have the same requirements…at least those of us who want to be respected, credible, and successful.
As for the magazines, I agree I subscribe but only because I blog otherwise I wouldn’t either.
August 16th, 2007 at 5:47 am
I’ve never figured out why these magazines promote stocks instead of index funds.
The magazines are business, or divisions of businesses. The goal of these businesses is not to make us personal finance geniuses or brilliantly efficient investors, but to turn a profit for themselves.
People are much more likely to buy a magazine if the cover is “The Mega-Cap Portfolio: Buy safe stocks and beat the market” or “How to marry a billioinaire” than if they told the truth.
This is one of the biggest problems with the financial services industry; giving consumers good advice usually goes directly against the self-interest of service providers. Buy index funds and hold them. A small difference in fees adds up to a big difference over time. (Over the long term, a low-cost fund that mediocre is likely to outperform a fund that is great but expensive.) Don’t check on your investments’ performance more often than every 6 months. All of this most important advice, with detailed explanations, could be fit in a single magazine issue. But then how will they get people to buy it next month? And the month after? And the year after? (Imagine the headline, “Keep doing what we told you three months ago”!)
Because of this, I find many finance bloggers more credible than “professionals.” Professionals assume that they are automatically credible, and so they often get away with lower standards of quality or poorly-researched articles.
August 16th, 2007 at 5:51 am
Something I’ve always wondered about money magazines is wether or not there’s a “Kramer Effect”. I just never remember to look at when the magazines hit the stands and compare the stock/fund prices for the month afterward, seeing how they fluctuate.
August 16th, 2007 at 6:05 am
@glblguy
Hm. I think I failed to make my point clearly. I guess what I’m trying to say is that professional personal finance writers, those who write for magazines and newspapers, have a system of check-and-balances built into the system. There’s tremendous quality control before an article sees print, whereas I (and other bloggers) sometimes make mistakes (like this one), and the quality control occurs after the fact.
On the other hand, it’s this direct accountability — and the chance to see how a blogger responds — that is one of the advantages of the web.
You’re right, though: I do research my artciles, and I do spend a lot of time on “craft”, the actual nuts-and-bolts of writing. But there are no formal mechanisms in place to police me other than accountability to my readers.
Despite the time I spend researching articles, I don’t spend hours for each piece on the phone interviewing experts in the field, which is how many magazine and newspaper articles are written. That was the difference I was trying to note, though I did a poor job of doing so!
Thanks for calling me on this!
cmadler wrote: All of this most important advice, with detailed explanations, could be fit in a single magazine issue. But then how will they get people to buy it next month? And the month after? And the year after? (Imagine the headline, “Keep doing what we told you three months ago”!)
Excellent point. I love this: “Keep doing what we told you three months ago!” I feel like I do this (and so do other pfblogs). I guess we can get away with it because we don’t charge for the stuff we write.
I also think that’s one of the most important things I do: narrow in on the advice that works and then keep repeating it so that I remember it, and so that my readers remember it, too.
August 16th, 2007 at 6:23 am
I think one thing a personal finance blog has over a magazine article written by a professional is that if they write something inaccurate they will be called on it immediately and be forced to change the content. A magazine once published - the inaccuracies become part of the public record.
August 16th, 2007 at 6:25 am
I’ve been thinking of subscribing to Money, b/c I got a card to do it for a year for $10. Mostly it’s really ‘lite’ so I can read it in little chunks when I’m not in front of a computer. I got an issue on a flight recently and was entertained in a tepid sort of way and learned a little about evaluating 508 plans.
August 16th, 2007 at 6:41 am
Check with your local library, you may be able to read these magazines, and many others, for free, online. Many libraries subscribe to EBSCOhost databases, and all three of these magazines available (check Business Source Complete), as well as other biggies like Consumer Reports, Time, etc. Plus, since the articles are online, you can search for certain topics from one or more mags. Anyone who lives in Ohio definitely has access to these (go to http://www.oplin.org). Sometimes only HTML versions of the articles are available, but if that bothers you you can always borrow the print copy from your library too.
August 16th, 2007 at 6:47 am
I’m not a big fan of those magazines. You can get much more unbiased information on the web.
However, there is still a huge older generation who still like print.
Carl Zetterlund
August 16th, 2007 at 6:52 am
Actually, Money Magazine is only $9.95 for 13 issues. And also check ebay for new subscriptions, there are usually great deals!
August 16th, 2007 at 6:56 am
Thanks for saving me some time with this post. I like web based articles and blogs better too - I’m more likely to find information related to where I am NOW financially, instead of where I’ll be in 5, 10, or 20 years.
August 16th, 2007 at 7:04 am
Thanks for the love man!
I like having the magazines around just so I can scan through them and I agree with you, don’t make any decisions based solely on any one single source. Do your homework or you deserve what you get.
August 16th, 2007 at 7:05 am
As a globally-diversified index-fund investor, I find the Economist to be the best personal finance magazine because it helps keep me on course and focused on the big picture. Even if it’s been a lousy week for the markets, there are usually a few positive stories where I can say, “hey, I own a tiny fraction of that company!”.
August 16th, 2007 at 7:08 am
@J.D. - No problem, and thanks for doing what you do, and thanks for clarifying. Understand exactly what you mean now, and I agree.
That’s is just one of the many things I like about blogging. I write great content (ok, a little prideful shameless promotion here), then my readers add their valuable comments making it even better.
That’s the community you get with a blog you don’t get with print.
August 16th, 2007 at 7:13 am
I subscribed to Kiplingers because they had a sepcial magazine at the time (I didn’t know, I thought it was a regular magazine) That dealt with your money. It was all kinds of awesome personal finance advice. Well imagine my surprise when the normal magazine arrived - its too much into investing. The last 5 pages are normally all they have to devote to personal finance. Very disappointing, who wants to read about “the best stocks” in EVERY issue?
August 16th, 2007 at 7:14 am
The cover story about living debt free is interesting, but even it offers advice that’s impractical to most GRS readers: “If you make $1,000 monthly payments [on your credit cards], rather than the $250 minimum, you’ll save more than $3,000 in interest.” Right. If.
I’m really surprised by your tone. It seems out of character for someone who’s giving financial advice. The fact that most people *don’t* make those kinds of payments doesn’t mean that they *shouldn’t*, or *can’t*. If you’re going to be dismissive of the idea of making large credit card payments, why not be dismissive of budgeting or saving in general? Most people don’t do those things, either.
Lots of professionals (both young and old) are carrying around significant credit card debt. Lots of those professionals could, if they established a proper budget, pay $1000 per month on their credit cards. I daresay that quite a few of *your readers* could be making $1000 payments on their credit cards. I’d further say that many of them probably *are*.
August 16th, 2007 at 7:20 am
Everything I learned on how to get myself out of debt and start accumluating wealth I learned online for free. The next step is to understand investing, etc. I assume I can learn that online for free as well. I wouldn’t necessary pay for a subscription magazine unless it was a specific niche like Black Enterprise, etc. And even then, I could go online and read the articles later for free.
I prefer blogs because not only are some of them very well written and informative, the comments from the readers helps to round out the information, encourage discussion, and help people get/give more specific information. So that’s where the gold is to me. Blogs encourage interaction. I’ve found it invaluable.
August 16th, 2007 at 7:46 am
@J.D.
“I’ve never figured out why these magazines promote stocks instead of index funds.”
Well…
“By day we write about “Six Funds to Buy NOW!”… By night, we invest in sensible index funds. Unfortunately, pro-index fund stories don’t sell magazines.”
-Anonymous Fortune Magazine Writer, Fortune, April 26, 1999
August 16th, 2007 at 7:56 am
One thing I dislike about PF magazines is that the articles are often about things you can do if you already have a lot of money. Well, I don’t. Admittedly, articles about index funds and high-yield savings accounts probably won’t be all that exciting.
August 16th, 2007 at 8:01 am
Most magazines usually aren’t worth, mainly because people don’t read them. I know that is the case for us, whenever we have had subscriptions. At most we usually just leaf through them and then they clutter up some area of the house until we get motivated enough to recycle them. I have seen this play out in many homes. Just my two cents.
August 16th, 2007 at 8:02 am
Money actually heavily touts index funds. They go on and on about what fees due to long term returns. There are one or two “money makeovers” every issue, and every last person ends up with advice to put their money in a diversified portfolio of index funds.
Given that perspective, what baffles me is the regular stock-picking column (”Buy Waffle House, Pfizer, and PepsiCo NOW!”). It is completely at adds with the financial philosophy of the rest of the magazine.
August 16th, 2007 at 8:06 am
One final note: Please don’t base your investment strategy on the stock tips you find in personal finance magazines. Your best option is to purchase low-cost stock index funds. If you do set aside a small portion of your portfolio with which to purchase individual stocks (as I do), it’s okay to use magazines for ideas and research, but don’t blindly place your trust in the stocks they profile.
Couldn’t agree more. As others have said, it does help some magazines. Nonetheless, when it comes to most savvy investment writers, most folks should follow a “do what I do, not do what I say” philosophy. Fortune was promoting bank stocks in the issue I just finished. Ugly, considering how much of a recovery these stocks need to break-even to their “buy” prices.
August 16th, 2007 at 8:36 am
@Jeff,
“Money actually heavily touts index funds. They go on and on about what fees due to long term returns. There are one or two “money makeovers” every and every last person ends up with advice to put their money in a diversified
portfolio of index funds.”
Money talks out of both sides of its mouth. Check its list of 70 Best Funds You Can Own. Or its 2006 Fund Rankings. What are they pushing? Index funds? I don’t think so.
August 16th, 2007 at 8:40 am
Why subscribe? My library offers them for free. I can get back issues and take them home and read them at my leisure too for nothing.
You will find they are scalping material from web logs more and more. All the stuff about how to reduce your expenses I believe is being scalped off web logs.
August 16th, 2007 at 9:18 am
I subscribe to two of the three magazines, Money and Smart Money. I like them both. I don’t read things that knock my socks off every month but every once in a while you get a really good article or find out about a new financial product.
August 16th, 2007 at 9:19 am
I mean this in the most professional way, but Penelope Trunk? She’s not quite as bad as Kiyosaki, but I have read many of her articles on Yahoo Finance and have found very little useful info. I find sites like yours and other personal finance blogs to be ten times more useful and pertinent for my personal situation.
August 16th, 2007 at 9:40 am
My favorites about money and money behavior in general (since I’m not all that interested in investing, unless it’s socially responsible investing) are the NYTimes Business section, especially Sunday, and Business Week. I’m more of a humanities/social science person than a number cruncher, yet I always find lots of interesting things to read. I always enjoy MP Dunleavy’s biweekly SAturday column in the NYTimes about financial behavior.
Business Week profiles products, companies, trends, and does an excellent job of covering the green business revolution, which is so far ahead of our government’s reaction to the Kyoto Treaty and global warming.
August 16th, 2007 at 9:45 am
I try not to read ANY magazines. They are all full of advertisements. The more ads I see, the more I tend to purchase things I don’t really need.
No magazines, no TV watching, and ad blockers on my browser mean I see almost no ads. I like it that way, and it helps me financially.
August 16th, 2007 at 10:09 am
Although I don’t have any time to read it and my father keeps renewing my subscription against my wishes, Business Week is a pretty well-rounded publication. It covers micro- and macro-economic issues, as well as personal finance and international issues.
August 16th, 2007 at 10:26 am
@Shaz
“Everything I learned on how to get myself out of debt and start accumluating wealth I learned online for free.”
I’d add “and in the library” to that, but fantastic post.
August 16th, 2007 at 10:28 am
I agree with Michael. I find Penelope Trunk’s advice scary.
August 16th, 2007 at 1:24 pm
I check out Money (along with lots of other mags) from my local library. Yeah, I get it a month late, but the information doesn’t expire! More important, I save a pretty penny;o)
August 16th, 2007 at 7:58 pm
I have to say that I derive a guilty pleasure from both Money Magazine and Bottom Line/Personal. I have no interest in any of the other finance magazines out there.
Oh, and thanks for the link!
August 16th, 2007 at 8:53 pm
Airline miles for magazines…then they are free. It’s the only way I get magazines anymore, I refuse to pay cash for them!
August 16th, 2007 at 9:19 pm
Penelope Trunk is terrible. I’m surprised you list her as a favorite…Can you elaborate as to why?
August 17th, 2007 at 4:42 am
Lots of libraries will let you check out their earlier copies of magazines, just not the current edition. Another idea would be to read the current ed. at the library and then photocopy in invaluable information which you can’t get online. That would only pay off if you did less than the mag’s subscription price per year, but you might.
-MM
August 17th, 2007 at 5:01 am
[...] can’t answer this question from personal experience. However, as I was writing about personal finance magazines yesterday, I stumbled upon a recent Kiplinger’s article about finding health care coverage [...]
August 17th, 2007 at 9:46 am
I like Money, but I only buy it when I’m taking an airplane trip, because too much of the content is available online very soon after publication. I don’t like Smart Money and I buy Kiplinger about a third of the time that I take airplane trips.
I definitely agree with you that magazines are superior to personal finance bloggers, since most columnists are being backed by someone who is concerned with credibility and also most columnists are actually credentialed (which 99% of personal finance bloggers are NOT). Liz Weston is awesome, though, Walter Updegrave is pretty good, and while I read a LOT of personal finance blogs, the only ones I take a lot of stock in are Kay Bell’s and Art Dinkin’s. As people like Suze Orman, Robert Kiyosaki, and Trent Hamm show, popular doesn’t necessarily mean good/accurate/credible.
August 17th, 2007 at 12:07 pm
Kiplingers has gone downhill in the last couple of years … or I am getting better at financial decisions. They frequently profile some “great” mutual fund; at the end of the article you find out the load is 2.35% or there’s a $20,000 minimum to invest. Every time they profile a couple, family, or individual for a financial makeover, said persons are making at least $85,000 or more - usually triple digits! I haven’t seen them yet profile someone in the $25,000 - $60,000 range … you know, average Americans.
You can read any of these magazines in the public library for free. Some basic advice that works for anyone:
Invest in yourself with education in your field;
Don’t smoke, drink moderately or not at all, and exercise, even walk, on a regular basis … this “investment” pays off all of your life;
Use public transportation if you can;
Go without a car if you can (I did it for a year before leaving a large city);
Try to save at least 15% or 20% of each paycheck;
Invest in no-load index mutual funds with an expense ratio under .5% BEFORE getting into individual stocks;
Get into a house as soon as soon as you can (and pay 20% down if at all possible to avoid PMI);
Bank 75% or more of each of each pay raise (that adds up over a career)
If you have older relative of modest income/career who has done well for themselves financially, you might want to pick their brain.
OK, I’ll shut up ……
August 18th, 2007 at 5:56 am
I subscribe to Money and I feel really lost when I read it to be honest. I won’t renew my subscription when it comes time. I’m 22, my boyfriend is 25, household income of $120k, we both save 10% of our incomes towards retirement and 5% towards “whatever” (initially it was a car, now perhaps a house?). I feel like we are doing great especially for our ages when most people are still paying off school debt, but the advice in Money Magazine is for people who start saving at around age 30! I want to read a magazine which has tips for people like me who are young and upwardly mobile, not people who are coasting downhill towards retirement. I still have 30 or 40 years to go!
August 18th, 2007 at 6:35 am
[...] Rich Slowly analyzes personal finance magazines to determine if they’re worth the cost. I subscribed to Money for a year, but most of the [...]
August 20th, 2007 at 4:57 am
Thanks for the mention. I think all these magazine have a big chunk of entertainment. I often read them all at once so they all blur together, I haven’t really thought about which ones were better than another one.
August 21st, 2007 at 8:00 pm
[...] subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!Time for me to eat a little crow. Last week I wrote a tepid review of personal finance magazines, concluding that they’re worth the subscription cost, but that they’re hit-or-miss with [...]