The Federal Reserve has lowered short-term interest rates twice in the past week by a total of 1.25 percentage points. (They lowered the federal funds rate, not the prime lending rate, though that falls in lockstep with the former.) Many people are excited because they believe this will lead to lower rates on fixed-term mortgages, meaning the average person may be able to save big bucks by refinancing. One GRS reader wrote yesterday to ask:
The feds cut rates again this afternoon. I would like to know if this means it may be a good time to consider refinancing my primary residence. I’m currently locked at 7.0% for 30 years.
This is a great question, one that I’ve had, too. But my research revealed something surprising. Contrary to popular belief, the federal funds rate does not directly affect mortgage rates. (Not even adjustable rates, from what I can tell.) According to Bankrate:
Mortgage rates have declined dramatically over the past several weeks. But the Federal Reserve’s latest rate cut does not guarantee that rates will keep dropping. In fact, mortgage rates often climb following a cut in the federal funds rate, and actually rose about 50 basis points after the Federal Reserve announced its emergency 75-basis-point cut Jan. 22.
That’s right: the Fed cut rates by 0.75% last week, but mortgages climbed by 0.50%. Mortgage rates are affected by 10-year Treasury Bills. Take a look at this graph from HSH Associates:
That chart may be a little difficult to read. This one from Bankrate is not:
The green line represents the federal funds rate. The blue line represents the U.S. national average on 30-year fixed mortgages. Both lines trend downward, but otherwise seem unrelated. If anything, the mortgage rate appears to be a precursor to the federal funds rate. Again, it seems clear that the federal funds rate does not directly affect mortgage rates.
Then what does? According to an HSH Associates article on the subject, the answer is complex. “Fixed mortgage rates, like other bonds, track US Treasury bonds quite well,” the authors write. However, they’re quick to add, “There is no specific ‘lockstep’ relationship between Treasuries of any term and fixed mortgage rates.”
GRS reader JerichoHill is an actual economist. When I asked for his comments, he noted, “Thirty-year rates are largely affected by the supply and demand of funds available for long-term loans, and by the anticipated inflation rate. If the Fed’s moves lead to expectations of higher inflation, guess what that would do? Raise mortgage rates!”
Now may or may not be a good time to refinance your home. But don’t count on a drop in the federal funds rate to yield a corresponding drop in mortgage interest rates.
This article is about Economics, News Thursday, 31st January 2008 (by J.D. Roth)


RSS Feeds
Facebook
GRS Twitter









January 31st, 2008 at 5:46 am
There is not a direct link between the two, however in both the graphs that you give, if you were to overlay the lines, the interest rate does not change as often, but it is clear to me that there is some level of correlation, I don’t have all my stats books with me to calculate the amount, but just looking at it, when the fed goes up the mortgage goes up, but with a few other factors effecting it outside of that also. Am I the only one that sees that they ARE linked?
January 31st, 2008 at 5:52 am
They are linked but the two are not in lock step that is the point of the article. The problem now is that our currency has been weekend by poor gov’t management of funds. When you have a strong currency these two rates pretty much move together, but the threat of inflation causes banks to raise rates no matter what the fed does.
January 31st, 2008 at 6:10 am
Actually, doesn’t the Fed dropping rates correlate to higher inflation? And if higher inflation correlates to higher mortgage rates…
This is a great post. I didn’t realize that mortgage rates were not based on the Fed rate. There goes my dreams of nabbing a 5% fixed 30, with the way these Fed drops have been going
January 31st, 2008 at 6:20 am
Be aware also there there is no “Prime Rate” in the market place. Prime is a made up rate set at each bank by the bank itself. It was once considered the best rate available to the best customers. Now it is simply a marketing gimic.
There is no place or market you can go to find out what Prime is. You would have to check with each of your banks to find out what their prime is currently. Banks can use that to set a higher prime and offer you below prime to make you feel like you are getting a good deal.
Those comments came direcltly from a former bank president who taught my Entreprenureal Finance course for my MBA.
January 31st, 2008 at 6:22 am
It’s usually the other way around. Mortgage rates start to drop and then we see Fed cuts. It’s just that the Fed makes for bigger news stories than mortgage rates.
January 31st, 2008 at 6:28 am
If you have a 7% mortgage for 30 years, depending on if it is a jumbo or not, it was a great time to refinance even just months ago. Rates were nearing 6.25% for a few days. What you need to do is determine how long you plan to stay in your house, and figure out how long it will take to recover the new “closing” costs of refinancing. Usually, 5 years or less isn’t worth it. 5-10 years for a 1% drop, and I have never figured out the rest.
January 31st, 2008 at 6:30 am
I would counter that they are highly corrolated. Maybe not one for one. The bond market anticipates the rate cuts well in advance, so that they move early, only if there is upside or downside surprises do they have an immediate impact. So these latest cuts were already priced into the bond and mortgage rates. The fed dropping rates DOES NOT correlate to higher inflation. It can mean that currently there is a risk of recession. Eventually it could cause inflation, if left too low for too long. So when there is high inflation you would expect it to move higher to counteract it.
January 31st, 2008 at 7:17 am
A lot of mortgages (especially adjustable) are tied to the LIBOR (London InterBank Offered Rate). Bankrate data here:
http://www.bankrate.com/brm/ratewatch/other-indices.asp and economagic chart here: http://www.economagic.com/em-cgi/charter.exe/libor/day-us12m
January 31st, 2008 at 7:23 am
If you are at 7.0% and have good credit definitely look into refinancing now. Note that if you don’t have very good credit the lenders are going to be very wary… and my title agent said she had seen a lot of refinances that didn’t happen.
I just finished a refinance from 6.75% (22 of 30 years left) to a 5% 15 year. Looking at bankrate you should still be able to get ~5% on a 15 year or ~5.5 on a 30 year fixed. However, beware of the fees! I got a bunch of quotes and the fees varied by thousands. Expect to pay at least another $3000 for closing- that does NOT include the reserves you will need for an escrow account.
Also, try to close with the same title company you should be able to get a discount. It was quite a process… I’ve been thinking that describing the process might make a good guest article of JD is interested.
January 31st, 2008 at 7:39 am
Okay, if a cut in the Federal Funds Rate doesn’t benefit mortgage rates - and may even cause mortgage rates to go up - who or what does it benefit?
January 31st, 2008 at 7:53 am
When it comes to the Prime rate (which many home equities are tied to) it usually goes down when the Fed cuts rates. If you go to http://www.bloomberg.com, you will see it currently is at 6.00%. If any of your loans are set to Prime they should drop by the next statement.
Although, as has been pointed out, Mortgate rate ups and downs are correlated to the Fed cuts and increases, they are more inflation and risk senstitive. As a result, they more closely follow the changes in the 10-year treasury. But as many banks have been tightening their lending standards and have had less money to loan, the rates will probably be higher than anticipated/hoped for.
January 31st, 2008 at 8:18 am
your second graph seems to suggest that if you wait about 1.5 months after a fed rate cut, you can get a lower mortgage rate. maybe this only applies when there are successive downward adjustments to the fed rate, though, as shown in the graph.
January 31st, 2008 at 8:23 am
Great post.
There are other factors at work here which might make historical comparisons imperfect.
The Fed is doing everything it can to encourage banks to lend money (by lowering discount rate, accepting junk collateral, lowering Fed Funds, etc.). But, banks are still reluctant to lend, especially for bigger mortgages that they can’t sell off easily. Now, larger or riskier mortgages have to sit on the balance sheets of the banks…. just like the old days.
January 31st, 2008 at 8:35 am
Mortgage rates and the Fed Funds rate are correlated in some ways. Both change during economic expansion and contraction periods. I noted to JD that the general trend of these rates do move together. However, correlation does not equal causation. Many times A does not cause B, C does,but A and C are related.
However, it is evident from the graphs that many other factors influence mortgage rates aside from the federal funds rate (the rate at which banks make loans to each other).
Mortgage rates more closely will follow whatever t-bill is the closest to their maturity window.
These cuts are supposed to increase monetary liquidity…ie, encourage banks to continue to loan, or keep their current loan portfolio. Credit drying up really puts the brakes to an economy.
January 31st, 2008 at 8:53 am
In reply to W Baker…the banks benefit. BTW, I received my notice that my HSBC rate is dropping to 3.88%. Guess I’ll transfer to my Emigrant account.
January 31st, 2008 at 8:57 am
As JerichoHill points out, mortgage rates are more related to t-bills. The 10-year note is quite commonly an indicator of where mortgage rates will go.
Someone asked about things that are affected by the Fed rate cut. Here are a few:
*variable rate HELOCs
*some ARMs
*credit card interest rates
*cash investment yields
January 31st, 2008 at 9:22 am
I think I saw the link to this on cnn.com, but I found that it was interesting to see how and where the candidates stand on economic issues (the subprime section is particularly interesting):
http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/pf/20080128_issues_a1.asp
January 31st, 2008 at 9:52 am
In Canada, at least, posted mortgage rates are related to 5 year bond rates. The exact spread differs, based on the market’s risk tolerance. But they do normally rise and fall together.
January 31st, 2008 at 10:28 am
There goes my dreams of nabbing a 5% fixed 30, with the way these Fed drops have been going
At least in my area, last week 30 year rates were being offered at 5%, or even slightly less. They’ve gone back up a half percent or so since then.
My husband and I jumped at the chance when it hit 5% and are refinancing. Our current mortgage is 6.25%, our credit is excellent, our LTV is good, and we can pay closing costs out of pocket. The end result should be a principal + interest payment of $200 less per month. If the Good Faith Estimate is even close we’ll recoup our out of pocket expenses in 15 or so months.
Apparently lots of other people jumped, too, because the loan dept at our credit union is absolutely swamped. When we locked the rate it was good for 45 days; a customer service rep told me that they were extending it to 60 days because the loan dept was totally overwhelmed.
I’d say that even now you do way better than 7% on a 30 year note. Obviously personal circumstances vary, but if you’re in your house for the long haul, it’s at least worth investigating.
My favorite calculator for fooling around with principal & interest payments under varying circumstances is at
http://ray.met.fsu.edu/~bret/amortize.html
January 31st, 2008 at 11:10 am
Great and timely post JD. I was just reading something interesting in its correlation to this at Jon Taplin’s blog, http://jtaplin.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/transparency-the-credit-crash/
where he talks about the real difficulty of understanding any of these financial questions because the banks are so shrowded in secrecy. This fits also with the apparent unregulated way the credit card industry functions. It is like they are a law unto themselves.
February 1st, 2008 at 11:41 am
Hi,
Just wanted to say that at least some ARMs are tied to the fed funds rate. We got a “fixed for five years, and then float for 25 years” ARM that is (we knew we’d be moving within 5 years… and then weren’t able to sell our house).
Our ARM is set to the fed funds rate, and resets in July to that rate +2 points - we’re at 4.125% now, and hoping it won’t change when it resets this summer. Keep your fingers crossed for us
February 1st, 2008 at 12:12 pm
Wall Street Journal says if you were thinking about refinancing, then do it now.
http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB120172406024429583.html
Dr J
February 3rd, 2008 at 1:19 pm
[...] Many people are asking the question whether they should refinance after all these interest rate cuts, Get Rich Slowly takes a look in Are Mortgage Rates Tied to the Federal Funds Rate? [...]
February 4th, 2008 at 8:56 pm
[...] Are Mortgage Rates Tied to the Federal Funds Rate? JD tackles a common misconception in hopes of setting the record [...]
February 16th, 2008 at 11:58 pm
As I understand it, mortgage rates have a lot to do with the bond market now since the barrier of separating the banking industry and the investment industry was lifted by the GLB Act in 1999. Rates are now trending upwards because the lenders can’t sell the paper into the bond market, which has increased their exposure. This of course is a result of the “challenges” that are facing the bond insurers as a result of the sub-prime fiasco.
Here are some good links on the subject.
CnnMoney.com-http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/05/news/economy/bond_insurers.ap/index.htm?postversion=2008020513
FinancialWeek.com-http://www.financialweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080123/REG/676016275/-1/FWDAILYALERT01
International Herald Tribune-http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/02/08/business/NA-FIN-MKT-US-Closing-Stocks.php
Consumer Mortgage Reports-http://www.consumermortgagereports.com/mortgage-bond-insurers-downgrades/
Will Blog For Food-http://willblogforfood.typepad.com/will_blog_for_food/2007/11/collateralized-.html
FindLaw.com-http://library.findlaw.com/2000/Jan/1/131290.html
Travis Mitchell
Debt Free Project
April 17th, 2008 at 4:48 pm
[...] If you’re interested, here are some links to a few articles about the relationship between a fed rate cut and mortgage interest rates: http://www.bankrate.com/bosre/news/mortgages/20070920_rate_cut_affect_mortgages_a1.asp http://biz.yahoo.com/cnbc/080122/22783168.html?.v=1&.pf=loans http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/01/31/are-mortgage-rates-tied-to-the-federal-funds-rate/ [...]
October 9th, 2008 at 8:08 am
Curtis says there “is no such thing as a ‘Prime’ rate.” Unfortunately, Curtis - you’re wrong.
You can find it published in the Wall Street Journal or a ton of websites and it’s 3% over the federal funds rate.
October 9th, 2008 at 9:01 am
Jim. Check the Wikipedia entry for Prime Rate (Bank Rate says the same thing). The WSJ “Prime Rate” is the consensus prime rate of at least 75% of the 30 largest banks in the US. The WSJ keeps it at that rate until 75% of the banks decide on a new rate.
While the banks may “generally” be 3% over the Fed Funds Rate, that doesn’t mean they are “Required” to be. They can still choose to set it at whatever they deem necessary. They can be 2.75% or 3.25% if they choose.
There is no oversight body telling them what prime rate should be. The banks decide and the WSJ just reports the consensus. That’s what I meant by there is no such thing as a Prime Rate. No place can tell you, absolutely, what Prime is for YOUR bank except for your bank.
December 19th, 2008 at 9:03 am
Mortgage interest rate = FFR + inflation expectations premium + risk premium.
Therefore, the FFR is one of three determinants of the mortgage interest rate.