If you're new here, you may want to learn what this site is about. I encourage you to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
This is a Guest Post from Kevin at No Debt Plan, a blog about living debt-free. This is part of Kevin’s Dumb Money series.
I was recently thinking about my first real job — doorman at the movie theater. Ah, the days of minimum wage. I thought movies were expensive back then, but nowadays they cost a fortune. Let’s look at some numbers.
Assume a family of four (two adults, two children) goes to the movies on a Saturday night. I researched the ticket prices for a local theater with Fandango simply because I haven’t been to an actual theater in years. I can’t as easily research concessions, but let’s say they spend at least $5 per person. (I’m guessing this would still be fairly low.) Your expenses would be:
- Cost of Adult Ticket: $9.50 x 2 = $19.00
- Cost of Child Ticket: $6.50 x 2 = $13.00
- Concessions: $20
- Total: $52
That’s $52 for, at most, three hours of entertainment. Some may find that reasonable, I think it’s ridiculous, and for more reasons that just the cost. There is simply no convenience to going to the movie theater.
- You are on someone else’s time table. If you get stuck in traffic, you miss out or your plans are pushed back 2-3 hours.
- You have to go somewhere other than your house. You are spending additional money on gas and other car related expenses.
- You don’t get to set the thermostat. It can be too cold. It can be too hot. How do you prepare? Wear layers? Just to go to the movies?
- You can’t pause. Have a coughing fit? (Get up and leave — you’re ruining the expensive experience for everyone else!) Need to go the bathroom? Need to take your child to the bathroom? You may miss out on some of the best scenes.
- You can’t rewind. Really love that line or special effect? You can’t go back and see it again, at least until the DVD comes out.
- Other people can ruin the movie for you. There were countless times when I worked at the theater that we would get complaints about someone on a cell phone, or kids being loud, or any number of other things you could imagine.
Let’s contrast all of the above with renting or owning the DVD yourself. For my $52 spent at the movies, I can pay for almost four months of the Netflix two-DVDs-at-a-time plan. I could probably watch a movie every three days with that plan. But even if I only watched one every two weeks, that’s at least seven movies. (Also, with Netflix you can now get unlimited downloadable movies!)
Plus, when you’re watching a DVD, you’re at home. You can pause, rewind, or watch in your pajamas. You’re on your schedule and in your comfort zone. Want refreshments? For what you spend at the theater, you could buy enough popcorn and soda to have a group of friends over!
I’ll be the first to admit there’s nothing like watching an action thriller on the big screen. The explosions are that much bigger, and it truly is an experience. But staying at home is the more frugal of the two options and, frankly, my personal preference.
And really, can you justify spending $5 for one bag of popcorn?
J.D.’s note: I’m not as anti-theater as Kevin, but since Kris and I began using Netflix several years ago, our theater attendance has dropped sharply. The last film we saw was Juno on Christmas Day. I was shocked that my ticket cost $8.50. On a holiday! My refreshments — child’s popcorn, a pack of Red Vines, and a soda — cost over $10. Since when does it cost $20 to go see a movie? This is why we stick to the second-run movie houses — five bucks for a film and a snack.



February 19th, 2008 at 5:14 am
Some theaters (Kerasotas in my area) have “five buck clubs” which make things a little better. Basically, you sign up for a card (all they want is your e-mail) and they send you a list of “qualifying” movies. Usually these movies are a few weeks old. And for $5, it’s a little more affordable to go see the big, splashy, special effects filled blockbusters (such as Live Free or Die Hard).
Most of the time, that’s what we do, although we also prefer to go early evening in the week- you usually miss out on the big crowds, so you don’t have to worry as much about missing lines, or disturbing people if you have a coughing fit.
February 19th, 2008 at 5:26 am
I cannot, simply cannot, spend money at a movie theater anymore. 10 bucks a ticket, when we have Netflix. Movies tend to lose their opening luster as one ages.
February 19th, 2008 at 5:27 am
Thanks for letting me guest post, JD! My heart jumped quite a bit when I saw it on the front page!
February 19th, 2008 at 5:29 am
Our kids are still small so we have been taking them to the theater once a year. We go to a $2 movie house to see whatever the kid summer blockbuster was supposed to be. The snacks are cheaper at the $2 place as well. You can still easily kill off a 10 dollar bill but you get enough to nearly call it dinner.
Otherwise, our movie viewing consists of DVDs checked out from the library.
The thing I miss most at the theater (besides rewind and pause) is the closed captioning. If I miss a line at the theater, it’s gone forever!
February 19th, 2008 at 5:39 am
Great article. This is why my wife and I buy movies. In fact, I wrote an article on whether it was less expensive to go to the theater, rent, or buy movies. The article is titled Movies: Rent or Buy?
Having crunch the numbers, it was less expensive to buy, especially if you can watch the same movie more than once.
February 19th, 2008 at 5:47 am
We use one of our credit cards which is part of the ThankYou network from Citibank to get free movie passes - the we pay our balance in full every month, and for not that many points (compared to the dollar value of going to the movies) we get two tickes and some concession money. We don’t go to the movies often (probably only every two or three months) but it is a nice treat, and I can’t remember the last time I paid for a movie.
February 19th, 2008 at 5:49 am
I find the price of concessions offensive, and so don’t buy them. Especially for GRS readers, this should be the tip- go for early shows (before 6pm) and don’t buy concessions. Your $52 trip would have become a $25 one.
February 19th, 2008 at 6:01 am
We regularly go to the movies, and we also have Netflix. Tickets at our local theater are only $5.50 (military discount). That $11 trip to the movies is cheap enough that we don’t feel bad about making a date night out of it.
We generally don’t buy snacks or drinks, though we do have a loyalty card to our nearby theater and it nabs us free drink or popcorn coupons and free tickets about every 3rd or 4th trip.
February 19th, 2008 at 6:04 am
Besides loving our Blockbuster subscription, we stopped going to movies for the same reason we don’t like concerts or sporting events: no control over the food. We’re not allowed to bring our own food into the venue, yet there are no options that are vegetarian, heart-conscious, and so on. I got tired of being forced to either eat greasy junk or go hungry.
February 19th, 2008 at 6:09 am
I can’t believe $8.50 is much to go to the cinema. Here in Switzerland, when I go to the cinema with my wife (no children), we pay each $10 (reduced fee) for the train and each(!) $15 for the film. So that’s $50 for the two of us - without pop corn.
February 19th, 2008 at 6:14 am
Kevin raises some outstanding points, but I think he may never have spent a rainy weekend housebound with two kids.
I’m a huge lover of movies checked out of the library. Since my library participates in an inter-library loan service, I can get nearly any film or tv series for free. Most items come within a couple of weeks of request. Patrons have a week to watch, and pay only $1 a day for late returns.
February 19th, 2008 at 6:21 am
Well, we saved up and bought a projector and two screens. Now we can watch inside, by the pool or out on the lawn with the tiki torches! Much more fun, plus we can control all the goodies and things we want to eat, we can rewind and we can invite tons of friends over to share it with.
With that being said, we STILL go the movies a few times a year. I will only go IF we can pay matinee or military discount pricing, and we do bring our own snacks..using the excuse that they don’t serve anything healthy in there, so mom has to provide it!
February 19th, 2008 at 6:29 am
This goes off in a slightly different direction, but it alludes to the same point of us getting ripped off by movie theaters.
Why Commercials Before Movies Is Worse Than Piracy
February 19th, 2008 at 6:34 am
I totally agree. It’s a BIG deal for us to go to the movies (just my husband and I go - our son is too little). I’m really choosy about which movie — I’ll only go to the theater when the movie has effects that I really want to see on the big screen. We saw all of the LOTR series and the Star Wars movies, Transformers, and Spiderman movies in the theater… but we haven’t been in quite awhile.
February 19th, 2008 at 6:36 am
My wife is disabled, so we rarely go to the movies as a family. I sometimes take my 6-year-old, and she likes it a lot. I would take her more often if we could come to some agreement about concessions. If half the time we didn’t get food, I’d take her a good bit more often.
I’m also a fan of buying DVDs. We canceled our cable when our daughter was born because we didn’t have time to watch it. I’ve never done the Netflix thing, but for $50 a month (the cost of the cable we canceled) we can buy as many movies as we want.
We did buy a big screen television, the symbol of non-frugality, but when you realize that 5 years worth of cable is $3000 saved (not to mention movie tickets), the TV doesn’t seem so expensive.
February 19th, 2008 at 6:37 am
We usually sneak our own snacks into the theater. We also often go to the 6 PM show right after dinner, thereby negating the necessity of a snack in the first place.
Anyway, I think the author misses the point of going to the movies. It’s a social experience. It has little to do with the actual movie. You are not paying $52 to see a movie. You are paying $52 for a night out with the family or date and a shared social experience. The movie industry itself seems to miss this point too.
February 19th, 2008 at 6:38 am
$52 divided by 4 people divided by 3 hours!
$4.33 an hour!
Not too bad, but there are much better options. I only go to the theatre for special reasons. U2 3D or an action thriller that you just have to see on the big screen. (at least until I save for a hdtv)
February 19th, 2008 at 6:40 am
You are correct that nothing beats the Movie Theater. I’m glad that Fandango and McDonald’s had the $1 movie deal last year till xmas. I was able to get 4 coupons. Went to the movies twice with GF for $2 plus drink/popcorn came to $9. If it had been normal price it would had been $10.50 for each movie, plus the $1 fandango charge: final cost $30 with food. Way to expensive.
To: SJ
How do you get the free movies through thank you points? Are you using the thank you points for free movies?
February 19th, 2008 at 6:41 am
Solution (if you have young children): The Sunday Children’s Matinee…
If your local theater is like mine, it offers special prices for “kid shows” (ours is $3). Our family of four can see a movie for $12 (we bring our own refreshments). It’s also a fun experience to share that makes for life-long memories…
Not bad for 12 bucks…
For other movie-watching, I agree with J.D. and another comment that NetFlix and the Library make for wonderful alternatives to the theater…
February 19th, 2008 at 6:44 am
Great post!
This is a rant I have on a semi-regular basis.
I just cannot justify the cost of a night out at the movies when in 2-4 months I could just rent (or buy on the rare occasion) the DVD.
I’m much happier watching a film at home, in pjs, in a comfy recliner with a glass of wine and a slice or two of pizza than I ever am in a movie theatre.
I’m starting to feel the same way about television. Paying crazy amounts of money to have cable (even basic cable) when there are only a handful of shows I really want to watch in a year. I’d rather buy the complete season of the 2 or 3 shows I truly can’t miss and watch them commercial free on my own time than pay for cable each month.
February 19th, 2008 at 7:03 am
Funny timing for posting this, given this story I heard about today:
http://uk.movies.yahoo.com/19022008/5/cinema-s-sweet-eating-policy-sucks-0.html
I rarely go to the cinema with my wife now, and it really tends to be just for special occasions (e.g. very highly anticipated film or social meeting with friends we’ve not seen in far too long). Among other things the total cost ends up being around £20 for two, money which we can put to much better use.
However you could make this argument with a lot of things, especially live sport, but despite spiralling ticketing costs that’s probably the last thing I’d give up to save money (behind our dog).
My wife does take advantage of Orange Wednesdays with her best friend on a regular basis though (2-for-1 ticket deal with the Orange phone network in the UK). It’s a cheaper way for them to see films and it also lets the respective other halves avoid chick flicks.
February 19th, 2008 at 7:05 am
As a kid, my entire family (six of us) went every year once a year — an uncle would give us gift certificates for dinner and a movie for the family at Christmas, and once the big family film or Disney movie for that year came out off we’d go. Now I rarely set foot in a theater, unless it’s a movie I really desperately want to see. Sometimes — especially with something like Harry Potter or Lord of the Rings — there’s an added level of audience reaction in the theater that you don’t get at home. When I do go to the theater, that’s what brings me in.
February 19th, 2008 at 7:12 am
Our local library has a totally awesome library of DVD’s. As a matter of fact, they usually get the latest releases on the day of release–only downside…sometimes we’re 110 on the reserve list. However, to save myself $50, and all the other reasons listed, I can wait. And, because their depth is extreme–we live in an university town–there’s hardly a movie we can’t get, even the indies. So, this is an easy-peasie place to save money for us. We do do the big screen option every once in awhile, but then its before 5 pm or Tuesday night special for us. Great post! We’ve got friends who go to 2 movies a weekend and then tell us they have no money to do anything. plu-lease!
February 19th, 2008 at 7:14 am
Plus, when you’re watching a DVD, you’re at home. Which is at least as much a minus as a plus, for me. Sometimes you need to get out of the house. Sometimes you want a shared experience (I love going to a new, eagerly anticipated movie and feeling the energy of the crowd shift as the feature opens). For me, going out to the movies is less a pricy alternative to staying in with a DVD, and more a cheap alternative to live theater. I miss out a little on the thrill of a live performance, but I get much higher production values than I’d find at a play or opera at a similar price point.
There are plenty of other arguments to be made against going to the movies vs. other entertainment options, but I really think comparing “going out” and “staying in” is an apples to oranges comparison. At least for me, they fill two different purposes.
February 19th, 2008 at 7:18 am
My girlfriend and I love to go to the movies, usually about twice a month, more during the summer and fall. I use my employer to get cheap movie tickets and subscribed to the local theatre (Regal) discount card, which nets us a free popcorn or soda every third movie or so.
This brings the cost of an opening night from $19 to $13.
February 19th, 2008 at 7:19 am
I love going to the movies and will never give it up. To save money I
1) go to matinees.
2) sneak my own food and drink into theaters.
3) go to the Alamo Drafthouse in Austin, TX, where instead of charging $5 for stale popcorn they serve restaurant-quality food at restaurant prices (for example, $5 for an appetizer, $9 for a pizza). If you don’t want a meal, you can buy a reasonably-priced draft beer or scoop of ice cream. My fiance and I usually get full meals & movie tickets for $35. Plus, instead of bad commercials before the movie, they show fun clips of old TV shows and movies.
February 19th, 2008 at 7:20 am
I HATE THEATERS. I am so anti theater it isn’t funny. Always some retard that ruins the movie or answers his cell phone.
I instead made the long term enjoyment investment of a 65″ tv and surround sound.
February 19th, 2008 at 7:20 am
You are missing the point. Going to a movie theater vs watching DVD at home is comparing apples to oranges. It’s like comparing watching a concert on TV vs watching concert live.
You are paying for the experience. The experience “watching via the huge screen with surround sound in a movie theater” is different from “watching via the TV screen at home”.
I also subscribe to Netflix but it’s nice once in a while to watch a movie with the family.
February 19th, 2008 at 7:27 am
Thanks for all the feedback. I’ll try to address some questions/comments:
Yes, going to a matinée helps cut some of the cost down.
@Sam: ouch! that’s an expensive trip!
@HollyP: You are exactly right. I don’t know what I would do with a house full of kids. I guess I would still try to avoid the theater. The library is a great resource for borrowing movies, too.
@COD: Hmm, I slightly disagree. If you are looking for a social experience, why would you sit in front of a giant screen and quietly watch a movie? I would go to a coffee shop or anywhere else where you could carry a conversation with someone.
@Tim L: That’s $4.33 per person per hour. Now substitute in the cost of a Netflix subscription — let’s say $17/month, 3 movies, 3 hours each, 4 people. That’s $0.47 per hour.
Thanks for all of the comments!
February 19th, 2008 at 7:29 am
I love going to the movies. I usually attend the early shows and never buy anything to eat or drink.
February 19th, 2008 at 7:29 am
I really think its just a matter of prioritizing, just like other entertainment options.
My husband and I are huge film buffs, and we tend to go to the theater a few times a month (on top of our Netflix and library rentals). We love the social experience of the movie theater - there is really nothing like seeing a great comedy or horror film in a packed house. We also live in a large city where there are limited releases that may never come to DVD. In fact, we’ll even pay to see an older release (like the recent Blade Runner final cut) in the theater just because there’s nothing like experiencing a film on the big screen.
We don’t buy the snacks, we often go to the (cheaper) matinée, and we take advantage of free and sneak previews when we can.
So if we go to a matinée three times a month as a couple ($7 x 2 x 3 = $42) thats still three fun days out for less than we we would pay for cable each month (which we don’t). And about the same as one dinner out. Still seems like a pretty good value to us.
February 19th, 2008 at 7:33 am
You don’t have to buy concessions. There’s nothing wrong with watching a movie without stuffing your face full of bad food. Not drinking 60 ounces of pop also eliminates the need to get up to pee and miss part of the movie.
Also, I’ve found that it’s not very often that other people in the theater ruin a movie. Kids are rarely at the more serious films I see, where one expects a quiet and serious atmosphere. I actually like the social aspect of seeing films. If I’m watching Monsters Inc., I expect lots of laughter and glee.
I love movies, so I don’t mind paying a little extra to see a movie on the big screen with high quality sound. But I never buy concessions and I try to take advantage of second-run movie houses to catch up on movies I haven’t seen. And going on a weeknight or for a matinee is much cheaper.
Also I am often confused by is people who go to the theater and pick a random movie when they get there. Then they complain that the movie was so lame they walked out before it was over. I always check the reviews and solicit opinions from friends before deciding to see a movie.
The bottom line is that even for a guy like me who watches 90% of his movies at home and rented free from the library, there are plenty of ways to enjoy the theatrical experience frugally.
February 19th, 2008 at 7:35 am
Don, your dd is old enough that you can negotiate over how to spend the entertainment fund. If your dd knows she can either go to the movie 1x and eat, or go to the movies 2x she might make a different decision.
In our house, many purchasing decisions are compared to the number of times we could eat at our children’s favorite restaurant. (Knowing that a trip to Disneyworld equals the cost of dining out weekly for more than 3 years was an eye opener for them.)
February 19th, 2008 at 7:44 am
I couldn’t agree with Jen more.
Going to the movies is not generally an alternative to staying in and watching a movie and should not be compared to it. The two serve different purposes and I enjoy both at the right time. They are completely different experiences.
February 19th, 2008 at 7:44 am
We cancelled out cable back in April of 2006 and love it. We rarely go to movies, although there are the odd exceptions.
We do on the other hand, buy movies - but only when they’ve fallen in price to what we deem reasonable (2 for $30 or less) - this is fine by us because we are re-watchers. If we enjoy a movie, we’ll re-watch it a few times.
Heck, we’ve just started our third time going through the TV series Firefly.
February 19th, 2008 at 7:51 am
I have cut back on movies but there are some thing that should be experienced on the big screen. The LOTR triology comes to mind. Sure the DVDs are nice but to see it on the giant screen was incredible. The only movies I go to now are what one would call ‘eye-candy’. Transformers, Cloverfield, Iron Man, anything Pixar, Potters, etc. I am sorry but even on a 60″ screen, it does not compare to the giant screen. (Caveat, even if it may be visually pleasing, I will not see just anything…SpiderMan3, Shrek3 come to mind)
In light of this, I see not need to see comedy films or dramas at the theater as I do not see the need as the point is the more story than brilliant visuals.
As you can see, this does not mean I go to the movies much. 2-3 times a year at most. Since it is such an occasion, I go all out. Giant popcorn. I admit, I sneak in soda and gummy worms but I love the warm theater popcorn. Also, I go to the noon showing to avoid (1) high evening costs and (2) less jerks show up. Unless it is a major release with a midnight showing on Thursday. Then, you know, NO ONE will have a cell phone going off or will talk for fear of reprisal from the guy dressed up like Darth Maul.
February 19th, 2008 at 8:02 am
How about giving up your car for a year and taking the bus or the bike? I don’t drive a car, I live ecologically and can afford the movie theater every once in a while. Plus you get to take you own sweater, if it gets cold! And, it’s actually not mandatory to buy popcorn!
February 19th, 2008 at 8:03 am
Wow, you’ve managed to take a trivial and simple event, something I do once or twice a month, and vastly over-complicate it.
It really isn’t as hard are or as stressful as you’re trying to make it out to be.
Anyone who is anxious over going to see a movie because they may be stuck in traffic or because of the thermostat needs to take a chill pill.
February 19th, 2008 at 8:22 am
@Andrew: I can agree to disagree.
@javert: Exactly. As I said, there are just some movies you -have- to see on the big screen. The comedies you mentioned would not be one of them.
@All: It all depends on your personal situation, too. If you are out of debt and well on your way to retirement, then maybe it isn’t that big of a deal to you. But its the people that are struggling with saving and debt that should avoid the theater the most. In the end, this is just my opinion, but I appreciate all of the feedback.
February 19th, 2008 at 8:23 am
While the theater may be expensive, there is nothing like watching a comedy with a large audience that laughs along as well. I cannot even begin to agree with saying that the benefits of owning the DVD instead of seeing it in the theater are more.
Ridiculous.
February 19th, 2008 at 8:26 am
This past weekend, I took my family and one of the kids’ friends (5 in all, including myself) to see Spiderwick. I had a gift card for the theatre that covered all of our ticket prices, so admission was “free”. From the concession stand I bought the following: a kids pack (popcorn, soft drink, candy), two trays of nachos, one small fries and two regular soft drinks. Total cost: over $40.
At home, I could have paid $3 to rent a movie, made my own popcorn for a buck, spent about another $3 to put together my own nachos, and a buck for 2 L of soft drinks. Total cost: $8-$10. Plus, I wouldn’t have had to put up with bad seating, noisy patrons, sticky floors, and counter lines.
As a result, I’ve resolved that every time I feel the urge to go see a movie, I’m going to take %50 bucks and put it into my home theatre system, either to upgrade my TV or add a component. I’m done with theatres.
February 19th, 2008 at 8:28 am
he is not anti-theater, he is just cheap.
Spending $52 once a year to go to the movies is relevant
February 19th, 2008 at 8:28 am
Okay, it’s MUCH cheaper to rent if you’re married with kids. But if you’re young and single?
I have a 13″ TV because I don’t have space in my bedroom for anything bigger, and I don’t want it to be a hassle whenever I move.
Because I have roommates, I usually watch movies with my headphones on.
This is not the way you want to watch Spider-Man.
I could spend a LOT more for a bigger apartment of my own, a larger TV, a good sound system…
Or I could go to the movies every couple of months.
If I spend $20 on a ticket, popcorn, and soda every time I go to the movies, and I see six movies a year, it would take YEARS to add up to the $500-1000 I could spend on a home theater system, if I even had the space to put it!
February 19th, 2008 at 8:31 am
As someone who also worked in a movie theatre for many years, I cannot fathom paying the outrageous ticket and concession prices that I watched many willing patrons do over the years. In fact, I ran across this right after having written about my movie watching habits
here:
February 19th, 2008 at 8:32 am
Unrelated to my previous comment, but related to the topic: the latest dreadful idea I’m seeing is the limited engagement movie. The Hannah Montana concert film is playing in our area. It’s only playing in one theatre, for a limited run of 3 weeks, and the theatre has upped the price by 4 bucks. There’s absolutely no reason for this aside from artificially creating demand (the shows are sold out well ahead of showtime). It’s not like she’s actually appearing in concert. Movie cinemas stop being an enjoyable social experience when you know you’re not getting your money’s worth from the outing.
February 19th, 2008 at 8:44 am
I totally agree with you that the theatre is relatively expensive, probably even more so with kids.
I just don’t like the fact that you justify your frugalness by acting like it’s a stressful experience.
It’s Aesop’s tale about the fox and the grapes. You’ve made a choice to be frugal about going to movie theatres. It is a luxury that you’re choosing to forgo for other reasons. However, there’s no need to turn your nose up to the whole experience just because you want to avoid spending money.
February 19th, 2008 at 9:12 am
A couple of other people have mentioned them, but I also want to put in a word for the theater discount cards. Near me, Regal and Loews/AMC offer them and you really do get free concessions or tickets every few movies, and it doesn’t cost anything to sign up. I absolutely love going to the movies and it’s an expense I choose to have, but I also love getting the free stuff from time to time.
I don’t know how many cities they’re doing it in, but one of the theaters here in NY is doing an Oscar screening day — all 5 nominated films for $5. It might already be over since the Oscars are Sunday…not sure.
Another thing about seeing movies in the theater is that you can be part of the social experience afterwards, discussing them with friends later, having an opinion on the Academy Awards, etc. I know lots of people don’t care about this stuff, but just wanted to point out sometimes it’s a pain to wait several months to see something — a movie might get ruined by the time you see it, you might find out the twist at the end or hear all the jokes a million times or it becomes overhyped, etc.
But if it’s not what you choose to spend your money on, I would never criticize!
February 19th, 2008 at 9:15 am
I really just like to go to our local movies called the maxi saver…its $1.50 to get in…unfortunately the concessions are normal prices but we usually bring our own snacks and sneak them in. And with that extra money we just go see another movie, with this you can go to the movies all day and spend the same as a regular theatres. In my opinion i get the same effect of going to the movies but with a fraction of the price.
February 19th, 2008 at 9:19 am
I love seeing a movie in a theater but it’s too ridiculous these days. A shame with most theaters by me is they start off great when new but after a couple of years the theaters are run down from use.
My wife recently took our daughter to see Hannah Montana in 3D as a special gift. The tickets were $15 because you pay for the 3-d glasses as well. Of course we didn’t know that before hand and my wife couldn’t tell my daughter who waited all week that the movie was too expensive. So lesson learned: 3-d = more expensive!!
We’ve been using Netflix for about 6 months now and loving it.
February 19th, 2008 at 9:32 am
NoDebtPlan,
You obviously don’t enjoy movie theaters, so it’s natural that you would consider it “dumb money.” Others would consider Netflix to be dumb money. Or bowling for that matter.
So are you just stating that as a personal thing, like that it would be really dumb of *you* in particular since you don’t even enjoy movie theaters (maybe even irrational or insane rather than just dumb… who would pay to do something they don’t enjoy for entertainment), or are you saying that ANYBODY who pays to go to the theater is dumb?
Just curious
February 19th, 2008 at 9:40 am
I would rather spend my $52 on some other form of entertainment. When we watch movies we either check them out from the library or borrow them from friends.
I will admit there are some movies out there that are just better on the big screen, but the older I get the less interested in movies I become.
February 19th, 2008 at 9:40 am
I haven’t been to a movie theater in years. Some theaters around here already charge more than $10 for an adult ticket. Couple that with the inevitable loud kids and cell phone users during the movie, and it’s simply not worth the money.
February 19th, 2008 at 10:03 am
“You have to go somewhere other than your house” is one of the worst reasons *not* to do something ever. In fact, that’s half the reason *to* do a lot of really fun, really life enriching things. Certainly it would have been much more convenient to stay home than for me to spend three weeks in India in January. But I didn’t go to India for the high level of convenience it offered me. Movies aren’t exactly the same thing, but the idea is the same — you don’t go to the movies for convenience, you go for entertainment. Making arguments about movies not being convenient is like making arguments about amusement parks requiring too much walking. So what — rollercoasters are still fun, even if you have to walk to them.
If you want to convince me that staying home is better than going out to the movies, do it based on the fact that staying home is more entertaining, not that it’s more convenient. Doing nothing is almost always more convenient.
February 19th, 2008 at 10:03 am
I spent over 4000 dollars last year on movies. You can see my totals and why at my site.
http://the-reviewer.net/2008/02/19/the-cost-of-the-reviewer-2007/
I am a movie reviewer on my own blog.
February 19th, 2008 at 10:10 am
I am not anti-theater or anything else, but the cost of going to the movies is really ridiculous. My boyfriend is a movie-buff and we tend to go to the movies once a week - which means he is spending around $84 on the movies each month. This can be more if he wants to go to the Arclight Theater down in Hollywood. The above price does not include food from the concession stand (which I don’t get, my boyfriend does – the last time I bought something from there, it was an $8 bottle of water. Never again!) This is a ridiculous price for a little entertainment. We could easily save that money up and buy a home theatre with it! But, on the same token, there are some movies neither of us want to wait to see (like Indiana Jones) or movies that you need to go to see if you want to get the experience of a big screen (like Cloverfield). So, while we have been cutting down our movie-going (we used to go two times a week!), it’s still a major expense that he and I are usually willing to pay.
February 19th, 2008 at 10:15 am
Try living in London, a cinema ticket for an adult is at least (for a normal cinema)… £7, that is about $14!
February 19th, 2008 at 10:29 am
I know exactly how you feel. I took my girlfriend out to a movie with some popcorn and it cost $19.50 total. In my opinion, it should cost about half of that.
February 19th, 2008 at 10:32 am
We still go to the movies every once in a while. As some have said, the big-screen experience can’t be matched in a home setting. However, our visits have become less frequent lately because of the costs. At the local first-run houses, the prices of the matinee tickets are now $8.50/adult. A nasty trick at the concession stand is that they don’t post prices. Everyone is used to buying a combo, with the expectation that you get a reduced price for doing so (which doesn’t make it a good deal, but that’s a different rant). At our local theater, it turns out that there is no price break for buying a combo, but since you don’t know prices until you ask or they ring you up, I doubt most people realize it. It’s disturbing to pay $11 for 2 drinks and a medium popcorn, especially when I figure I can get a case of soda and a big jar of popcorn kernels for that amount, and have cash left over!
February 19th, 2008 at 10:32 am
I love going to the movie theater, but do it very rarely now. Tickets are around 10 dollars in my area. If I go, I only go during matinee and bring my own snacks or don’t have any at all. For the price of movie theather snacks/popcorn I could have dinner somewhere before! Blockbuster online is fabulous as I don’t go to the theater as often!
For those who have the option, I recommend buying movie tickets at Costco. It’s around the matinee price and you can go anytime usually.
But I do crave the social experience every now and then and go to the theater. I once heard that the theaters don’t make money off of the movie ticket, only the concessions. I wonder if this is true? I used to buy movie theater popcorn, but it’s too expensive unless you are in a group and buying the large bucket.
February 19th, 2008 at 10:34 am
The Seattle Public Library = $0.
I can get any movie there (have yet to look one up that they didn’t have).
I reserve it online, and I get an email when it comes in.
I get about 4-5 movies a week this way, and they are all free.
And this includes new movies, not just old.
February 19th, 2008 at 10:51 am
I guess its all a matter of taste. No way would I spend $52 at a movie theatre. Last movie I saw was Talledega Nights. However I go to many a minor league baseball game - $14 a ticket and at least $15 spent on food (for 2) $4 for the parking garage. So for 2 people that’s $47. And I do this about 60 times a year. But to me it’s well worth the cost (considering I get a good 5 hours of entertainment and its ok if the people around you yell and scream). But like I said, it’s a matter of preference.
February 19th, 2008 at 10:55 am
Most of the movies that I really want to see require a 32′ screen and theatre sound. For instance, Blade Runner or The Abyss simply don’t carry the same intensity of experience without it.
And, in fact, most movies just wind up being bad television on a television screen, for me. Of course, I don’t watch many movies now adays.
February 19th, 2008 at 10:59 am
Second-run theaters are DEFINITELY the way to go. There have been times that’s I’ve taken a group of friends, paid for ALL of their tickets myself, and still paid less than one ticket at the regular theater. It’s also generally less crowded, which is a major plus!
February 19th, 2008 at 11:04 am
Check out movies from the Library - it’s free!
February 19th, 2008 at 11:07 am
I agree…though all of that being said, sometimes you go to the theater not for just the movie, but the environment. But I should stress, always bring your own snacks
February 19th, 2008 at 11:15 am
> You are on someone else’s time table
I guess this one is really a matter of taste, I can’t see it as a problem for a movie I really want to watch on the big screen. I’m planning the evening that way.
> You have to go somewhere other than your house. You are spending additional money on gas and other car related expenses.
Well that’s because you have a car and use it to go there. Use the bus and forget the additional expenses.
> You don’t get to set the thermostat. It can be too cold. It can be too hot. How do you prepare? Wear layers? Just to go to the movies?
Never had a problem with that. What kind of theater is it if people managing it don’t care about that ?
> You can’t pause. Have a coughing fit? (Get up and leave — you’re ruining the expensive experience for everyone else!) Need to go the bathroom? Need to take your child to the bathroom? You may miss out on some of the best scenes.
Go to the bathroom just before if needed. And don’t bring children too young for that experience. If they’re not able to handle it yet, they won’t enjoy it anyway.
> You can’t rewind. Really love that line or special effect? You can’t go back and see it again, at least until the DVD comes out.
That’s art. You can’t change the bits of the experience, that’s all. Just like you can’t touch and modify what you see at the museum. You can still rewatch the whole movie. And if the whole movie is not worth a rewatch, that bit you’re interested in is probably not either.
> Other people can ruin the movie for you. There were countless times when I worked at the theater that we would get complaints about someone on a cell phone, or kids being loud, or any number of other things you could imagine.
Go were people are civilized. That is in theaters were eating food, keeping cell phones on, and entering after the beginning is just forbidden.
February 19th, 2008 at 11:27 am
[...] this fine post over at Get Rich Slowly this morning, pointing out how going to the movies is not a great financial [...]
February 19th, 2008 at 11:38 am
The only way I go to the movie theater these days: When they pay me to!
Next Thursday I’m going in as a mystery shopper, they are giving me a $25 gift card to take care of my expenses as well as $5 deposited into my PayPal account next month. I just have to make sure they are doing their job and go to a web site, filling in my information. My wife and I went out to the movies around 7 times last year from doing this.
February 19th, 2008 at 12:00 pm
With dysfunctional families or teenagers/children who just won’t stay put if you try to watch something with them at home: taking them to the theatre to ensure everyone watches it — together and at the same time — seems to be the only option.
February 19th, 2008 at 12:02 pm
We have a drive-in near the house. It’s $7 per adult and under 11 gets in free. And they run double features and they are first run movies. We also bring our own snacks. So $14 for two adults and a toddler and we don’t have to get a sitter. The only downside is that this is only a summer time option.
February 19th, 2008 at 12:02 pm
Blockbuster Online and Netflix are both excellent services. You can potentially see 10 or movies a month for under $20. That said going to the theaters can be worthwhile as long as you go see a good or great movie. I have recently seen “There Will Be Blood” and “No Country For Old Men.” I spent $7 for each matinee ticket and I thought it was money well spent because each film was excellent. I do advocate avoiding the concession stand at all costs. It is criminal what they are charging for their food and drink.
February 19th, 2008 at 1:03 pm
If you live in a college-town or a big city, do a little research and you can find movies screenings for free (not preview screenings — that’s a different subject). I’ve actually found so many in the Boston-area that I set up a public Google calendar. Right now, it’s running 25-30 movies a week (some are repeats) and they are all open to the public. Of course, we have the advantage of having Harvard, MIT, Tufts and BU among many other schools, an independent cinema with monthly Sat. morning classic films, several library systems that show movies and some cultural centers as well. Sometimes the school even feeds everyone (pizza mostly) to get attendance up.
You do end up seeing more documentaries and foreign films (though lots are mainstream movies), but you often get the director or a subject matter expert to talk about the films. I’ve seen some films before they were even released to the theater.
February 19th, 2008 at 1:28 pm
I really enjoy going to the movies, however I go less and less often (only for movies I really want to see on the big screen rather than just another activity for entertainment’s sake.
I’ve learned to wait two weeks after release so I can go to a matinee for $5.
However, the price (and size) of concessions is obscene. I gave up and just started sneaking a snack in after I had the following argument with the concession clerk about their $4.75 “small” soda, which was so big it took two hands to grab the cup:
ME: Don’t you have anything smaller?
CLERK: This is the smallest size we have ma’am.
ME: But it’s huge! I’ll never finish it.
CLERK: We don’t have anything smaller.
ME: I just think you’d do better to have a smaller size option. I don’t want that big a soda. I’m going to end up throwing half of it away.
CLERK: Ma’am, we don’t want you to have to come back for a refill in the middle of the movie.
ME: I don’t want MORE soda, I want LESS soda.
CLERK: Do you want the soda or not ma’am?
*sigh*
February 19th, 2008 at 1:28 pm
I would love to pay $8.50 for a movie! The nearest theaters to me are a minimum of 12. One is $14, but it doesn’t have any commercials and I think fewer trailers. If we drive a little further, we can find movies for $10 and free parking.
Nevertheless, that’s why we rarely go see movies anymore. I think that last movie we saw in a theater was Harry Potter last summer.
February 19th, 2008 at 1:31 pm
I am fortunate to live near one of the New York Times’ 10 Best Drive-In Theaters in the U.S., and have rediscovered the pleasure of it in the past few years. $4 per adult, and a backseat full of candy from home
February 19th, 2008 at 1:31 pm
I go to the movies a few times a year just as a “date night” type of thing to get out of the house. I’m lucky that I now live in a major centre where we can still go to older movie theatres that haven’t been converted to the massive 16 screen abominations where just walking through the door is an affront to the senses. In the ‘burbs where I grew up the only option now is the giant SilverCity concept with fast food outlets right inside, no character at all just a big box we’re-ripping-you-off-and-you’re-gonna-take-it atmosphere. Modern movie theatres are pretty unpleasant places really. When I do go though I try and go to a late show on a non-peak night so that the theatre is as empty as possible, if it’s a show that’s been out a few weeks sometimes we’ve been lucky enough to be the only ones in the theatre and for that I don’t mind paying the $30 or so it costs once you get some popcorn and a drink.
I’ve also discovered a theatre in a mall where there is a restaurant that does a dinner and a movie combo where you can get an entree and a movie ticket for as little as $15.99 (barring movies opening that week). The food isn’t bad and the price is pretty good considering just the dinner alone could easily sell for that.
I’m a bad example though, I don’t really watch a lot of movies at home or the theatre (I rented exactly once last year and ordered one on PPV as well), 98.8% of them (give or take
) are absolute trash. I know a girl who owns literally thousands of DVD’s (approaching 4000 last count) and I could borrow any of them for free yet never have.
February 19th, 2008 at 1:43 pm
Also, you could spend all that, and the movie can suck! There’s not a lot of great stuff coming to the movie theater near me.
Cancelled NetFlix because the movies weren’t appealing to me, and too many times I’d venture to get something that looked interesting, and it was awful.
I know it sounds like I’m a fussy movie watcher, and maybe I am, but on the other hand, maybe you’ll agree that it’s hard to find a good movie.
A good book is easier to find, and if you’re not liking it, you can close it and never open it again. Also leaves more for the imagination, and talk about entertainment at your own pace. Get them at the library, cost =$0.
That said, I do like going to the movies because I do enjoy the feeling of experiencing a cultural phenomenon along with others, on the rare occasions when a movie can be said to be a cultural phenom.
February 19th, 2008 at 1:53 pm
LOL–It’s great to see how many comments this article has generated! Obviously a lot of people have some strong feelings about this–
I used to love going to the movies, but anymore I hate it! The ticket prices are insane, the concession prices are insane, the volume is DEAFENING, and instead of just previews before the movie (which I love) they’re now showing commercials as well.
The idea of paying these clowns good money so they can forcefeed me 10 minutes of commercials louder than a Led Zeppelin concert irritates me to no end. I’ve only attended one movie in the past year, when I used to go at least twice a month years ago.
No thank you–DVDs at home or even On-Demand movies are the way I go now.
February 19th, 2008 at 2:15 pm
I can’t remember the last time I went to a movie theater.
Oh wait, yes I can.
I spent the entire time absolutely livid because a little boy sitting nearby kept asking his mom question after question after question. “Mommy, why did he do that? How come the bullet didn’t hurt him? What’s she going to do now.” (She basically just ignored him, which didn’t help the situation any.)
Several other times, my husband actually had to ask someone to please not talk on their cellphone during the movie!
I’d happily pay those prices occasionally, *if* I could sit and enjoy the movie.
February 19th, 2008 at 2:24 pm
Renting is absolutely cheaper (and theater tickets are frequently overpriced). No doubt about it. Especially if you need a babysitter… can’t believe nobody brought that up yet. That’s another $20-50 right there, not to mention an increase in logistics, unless you’re lucky enough to have family or close friends who will watch the kid(s) for free.
But do I avoid the theater? Absolutely not. I’m judicious in what I choose to watch, and generally only go to the eye/ear-candy films as some others have mentioned, but sometimes I’ll go to a comedy or drama.
Why? The audience. Yeah, sometimes you get a moron who brings a screaming baby or a cell phone, but most of the time the audience adds an energy to the film you can’t get at home. There’s nothing like seeing a film in a crowded theater and hearing the collective gasp when the ghost walks through the wall just behind our hero. Sometimes it’s a subtle energy, sometimes it’s overt, but the audience reaction can be powerful. In a comedy, for example, the audience reaction can help me find the humor in a movie I wouldn’t otherwise find funny (that happened when I saw Ace Ventura).
I also agree with Emily H. when she says a 13″ TV “is not the way you want to watch Spider-Man.” For that matter, a 32″ TV is not the way I want to watch Spider-Man for the first time. Totally…. Totally… different experience.
Not having to avoid the kids watching a movie that would be scary or inappropriate, or worry about the volume being too loud? Priceless (well, almost).
As for mitigating the cost of tickets… so far I’ve used gift certificates I got for my birthday and Christmas (one left! Can’t wait to see “Jumper” this weekend!!), rewards programs, and discounts through work to help me get to the must-see films. I’ve also “made” my parents drive an hour-and-a-half on multiple occasions to provide babysitting.
I used to go (pre-kids) to at least 15 movies a year - one year I went to about 10 in two weeks - but now I’m down to about 5 in a good year.
I’ve missed a few I wanted to see on-screen (e.g., Transformers, Live Free or Die Hard) and the movies suffered on DVD (Transformers especially).
February 19th, 2008 at 2:33 pm
Preach it, sister! It’s as if theater owners are doing all they can to make the theater-going experience unpleasant, and then they wonder why attendance is falling…
The noise thing is terrible. I sometimes carry earplugs with me because of this. The Lord of the Rings films were terrible for this. They hurt my ears.
February 19th, 2008 at 2:38 pm
We have had too many bad experiences with rude people at the theater. The last one we went to was Sweeney Todd and the girls behind us insisted on SINGING the whole movie. My wife kindly asked them to refrain and let us watch the movie without their “additions.” Instead they sang louder and kicked the back of my wife’s seat every 30 seconds. Sadly, this type of behavior has become common and so we have completely sworn off the multiplex.
February 19th, 2008 at 2:39 pm
Some people are complaining about movies that suck. It does hurt to waste money on a bad movie, but there are ways to mitigate this.
The best one I know is to find a movie critic you understand and can “parse” — where you understand what his reviews mean — and then follow the critic religiously.
For me, that critic is Roger Ebert. I don’t always agree with him, but when I read one of his reviews, I can tell if I’ll like a movie or not. Ebert is wowed by special effects. I am not. Gladiator and the LotR trilogy and the new Star Wars movies were all pretty lame, IMHO. Why? Gratuitous effects. I’ve learned to tell when the effects have influenced Ebert’s review.
Also, I happen to like films like Rushmore and Juno. Ebert likes them, too (he called juno the best film of 2007), and I can tell which of the movies he loves I will love too.
So, learn to understand how one critic works, and you can save yourself a lot of wasted money.
February 19th, 2008 at 3:00 pm
I’m not a big movie buff, so I only go to see something in the theater when it’s something I really want to see (for example, if Judd Apatow was involved in the production, I’m there). Others seem to go to the movies for “something to do,” which makes it pretty expensive entertainment.
Also, you can just not eat at the theater. Or sneak in your own candy - it’s not that hard.
February 19th, 2008 at 3:09 pm
The fact that the movies aren’t in my own home is a plus, not a minus! Me, I’ve got to get out of the house sometimes. I work at home, which makes this even more of a priority. In the winter I often have to choose between sitting at home and going out to a movie, dinner, or store - all of which are expensive ways to spend time.
I loved the lists of fun things you can do for free. How about a list of things you can do for free, outside of home? Hikes and picnics are obvious, but what about out-of-the-house activities for the cold dark days of winter?
February 19th, 2008 at 3:29 pm
I don’t buy the “movies are just as good at home” argument. The true cinematic experience cannot be re-created at home (nor at a second run movie house). The money I pay to see movies (98% matinees BTW) is well worth it. Matinees alleviate many problems (prices, crowds, people issues).
But I am a movie guy…(see link).
My biggest complaint - the annoying Regal employees who interrupt your movie twice to walk up and down the aisles with their glowing wands.
February 19th, 2008 at 3:38 pm
WRT buying movies, I can’t justify that, I have a nice catalogue of movies that I bought in high school when I thought $20 was a good price for a movie, and I hardly watch any of them. There are a few exceptions, I watch Office space, or Tommy Boy, or one of those when a certain group of friends come over to play drinking games, but this isn’t about my alcoholic habits. Netflix is the best option for me, it’s $15 a month for three at a time, if I want to watch a movie again, I can rent it again, but I watch way more than one new movie per month.
I also get a little sick when people add the concessions into the equation, because I never have any desire to buy food at the movies. I wouldn’t spend $3.00 on a box of candy no matter where I was. Take that out of the equation, and you might actually find that two tickets to a matinée showing of a movie you really will enjoy isn’t that bad a price to experience it on the big screen. For a special treat, me and my S.O. go into the city (Denver) and watch it on the digital theater on the 16th street mall. You get to walk around down town, see the street performers, go to our favorite spaghetti restaurant, and even stop for some drinks afterwards (not for the matinée, we aren’t alcoholics…) That’s certainly more expensive, but you’ve turned a lazy activity (watching TV at home) into an active one (a full fledged date).
February 19th, 2008 at 3:38 pm
I wonder if there will be any movies to see if everyone stops going to the movie theatre…
Not that I’m not part of the problem –we rent, but not from netflix. It’s a great idea BUT I don’t want to add any monthly fees that I don’t have to. Instead, I keep my money circulating locally, by renting from a local (not blockbuster, a private) service that has reasonable fees, especially for movies that aren’t “new releases.”
February 19th, 2008 at 4:05 pm
I am a manager of one of the theaters here in North Carolina and I am kinda shocked by the “anti-theater” comments. Not because the prices are ridiculous (I agree, they are) but because you shouldn’t be anti-theater, and instead anti-movie companies. When movies are released in theaters usually the first two weeks the theaters see absolutely NO MONEY. Somewhere between 95%-100% of all movie ticket prices go straight to whoever made the movie. That’s how they afford Brad Pitt, Will Smith, etc. And even after two weeks (which is when most of the movie will do its business) theaters usually see no more than 60%-75% per ticket.
And since we must support a staff of 40-70 people, heat and a/c the huge buildings, etc. we must make money somewhere and that is where the concession stand comes in at. I agree 4 bucks is a lot for a small Coke, but its same price at basketball games, wrestling events, etc.
So for people who like the theater and by pass it for DVD, you are ensuring movie companies that you are going to give them your money no matter what and the trend continues.
Before working at a theater, I too, frequented second run theaters like mad, but now looking back on it, it really would have been worth the extra 4 bucks to not sit in dirty theaters that had essentially no ushers and dirty looking concession stands. But hey, I’d probably still go if I didn’t get in for free now.
And just a final comment, my theater adult nightly price is $9.25. For North Carolina that is high, but for the mass influx of people from New York and California is really low. So for every person that complains, we have one person that is thrilled that they are paying $12-14 per ticket.
February 19th, 2008 at 4:59 pm
I agree that going to the movies isn’t necessarily a good financial decision, but I continue to go because you can’t truly replicate the theater experience outside of a movie theater. Some movies are more than worthy of a theater experience (There Will Be Blood, for instance).
The concession stand is what really kills your wallet. It’s a totally unnecessary expense, not to mention the food is generally terrible for your health. I haven’t spent money at concession in years because I eat before or after the movie. You don’t need snacks to enjoy the movie. But if you can’t live without it, sneak in a granola bar or two.
February 19th, 2008 at 7:42 pm
I don’t do netflix or blockbuster. I will watch a movie 2-3x a year and that’s it. I’ll rent movies from Library if necessary. But otherwise I usually want to see it on the big screen. I never buy concessions. I have a box of candy maybe in my purse.
Also if I spend $20 for DH and I 3x year = that’s less than 3 months of netflix. And I see the same movies from the library.
February 19th, 2008 at 8:15 pm
I’ve found that there’s almost nothing so important that we can’t wait until it comes out on DVD to rent/borrow it. That said, we’ve been to see two movies in the past year, the Simpsons Movie in the summer and Enchanted/I Am Legend (we actually split up for that) in the fall. We didn’t buy concessions either time so it was less than $20 for each. And both were experiences with friends…so it wasn’t that bad for a date night. Not something we’d make a habit of, though.
As you say, too many things can go wrong/be annoying.
February 19th, 2008 at 9:22 pm
@BrandonM:
Ahh…but you see, some of us would never GO to baseball/wrestling/someothersport event. WAY too expensive for something we wouldn’t enjoy. Let alone buy a rip-off big gulp there.
All I have to say is at $3-5/ticket I used to go to a lot of movies I didn’t necessarily feel driven to see since it was “cheap”. Now that a ticket is generally $7.50+ for a matinee and $9.50+ for prime time, I really REALLY have to want to see it in the theater.
February 19th, 2008 at 10:19 pm
I pretty much agree with everything said in the post. However, an error was made here:
“(Also, with Netflix you can now get unlimited downloadable movies!)”
The “watch instantly” feature provides unlimited streaming movies for netflix subscribers. In no way can these movies be downloaded as files and played elsewhere. Not a huge error, but a misleading one.
I only go to see movies when I’ve read reviews first and know that I will most likely enjoy it. Going to the movies shouldn’t be thought of as a form of entertainment unless one is pretty sure they’re going to enjoy the movie.
February 20th, 2008 at 10:09 am
Whoa. This really got my hackles up. Though, I love to see movies in theaters, and I don’t own a tv and/or dvd player (I can watch them on my laptop, but that defeats the experience of most movies). I understand it can be expensive to go as a family — but why not go to matinees? Why buy snacks at the theater?? Why not just budget for movie nights? It’s ridiculous to criticize the cost of movie theaters if it’s not something important to someone (yes, I believe there is a difference between liking movies, and liking to watch movies in movie theaters).
Aside from my reactions, yes, I know movies are more expensive than they used to be. Though, I once worked in a movie theater and I noticed that ticket prices were slightly more than the minimum wage. In my state, the minimum wage is something like $8/hr, and evening movie tickets are around $10. So, it seems on par with when ticket prices were $4 and I was making $3.25. It just makes me think of my parents when people say “Oh! I remember when X cost y!” True, and they made less money, and nearly everything was cheaper then, too. Prices don’t freeze and it generally irritates me when people wish they would.
Finally, can you even imagine the difference paying $11.25 (which I did and it was worth every penny) to see the latest Harry Potter movie in 3D at the IMAX theater in comparison to watching it on even a 50″ tv screen? There is no comparison, and I don’t know if the 3D effects will even be available on the dvd.
February 20th, 2008 at 10:58 am
NO NO NO NO NO !
Finally after two years a friend fixed my dvd player and I did watch two films recently on it but is it comparable to sitting in a proper cinema concentrating on a film HELL NO - I’d always choose to see a film in a cinema over dvd every time.
February 20th, 2008 at 11:10 am
Ticket prices are just astounding - in parts of Toronto they can go as high as $15. And the last time I only spent $5 at the concession stand was probably in the 90’s. That $52 he quotes is barely enough to cover my wife and I. Now imagine a dinner and a movie and you’ll contemplate refinancing your mortgage.
I used to go to movies all the time, now its only for the big special effects movies. Indiana Jones will probably be the next one I see.
February 20th, 2008 at 3:57 pm
@Shana:
Re “Prices don’t freeze and it generally irritates me when people wish they would.”
Well — sure the price of everything is going up. That’s not necessarily the point.
The point is the value of a thing needs to be in equilibrium with its price. So, it’s not necessary for us to just accept price increases for their own sake. If prices raise, it’s to be expected that people will demand more value.
Just like with TV, in the movie theatre it can be extremely tough to find a movie worth watching. When they were $3-5 dollars, that didn’t bother me as much (and I was making MUCH less in those days). Now, when the ticket price is bumping $10 (and greater), well — sorry but I have to be a lot more impressed with the offerings than I used to be to justify going to that expense.
February 20th, 2008 at 6:31 pm
Wow, looks like movie theaters are a touch subject here!
So, I waited to do this comment before i find out how much i pay to see a movie. My kids are still too young to sit through a full movie during a late showing. If they go see a movie it will be during the summer when they have the free ones for kids.
As for the misses and myself, for a Friday or Saturday night showing (note: no student discounts are offered on these nights) $10 per ticket… TEN DOLLARS!!! So before we walk up to the concession stand we are already TWENTY bones in the hole. Gotta get some popcorn, two sodas (i like the diet she likes the regular), nachos or candy? You get the idea. Just tack on another $20 for food and your in the ballpark of $40 for 2, yes TWO people to see a movie.
I remember back in the day (about 4 years ago) i used to get in for $5.25 with my student discount. Ah, those were the days.
February 21st, 2008 at 1:30 am
Good article… BUT…
There are a million things that we can all cut back on (or we know are treats) if we are saving money. Going to the cinema, Friday drinks after work, going out to a nice restaurant with a loved one once or twice a month.. we don’t need to do any of these. If we choose to, it’s exactly that - a choice. We could all save alot more money by not going out at all, not eating nice food, renting horrible apartments, not drinking… well, you get my point!
That being said, it was a good article. Keep up the good work!
Mart
February 21st, 2008 at 11:56 am
I’m with m. As much as I love nights home watching or rewatching old movies on dvd, the big screen will always be one of the greatest pleasures. Almost all those excuses for not going are futile, let’s just say it’s expensive, it is. Needless to say, I carefully choose films, I don’t go just for the sake of going. I’m all for supporting the industry, movies at the movies forever
February 21st, 2008 at 1:07 pm
A week ago I would have agreed with every word. But a few days ago, my bro-in-law came to visit and agreed to babysit our two kids, so my husband and I went up to Santa Monica to see “Persepolis.”
We held hands and talked for the 30 minute drive up, cuddled (a bit!) in the theater (not many people there, that’s the advantage of art-house films), and were enthralled by the superb animation, which would not have been done justice on my tiny set at home.
Cost: $20 plus gas (we don’t get snacks), and sure, it wouldn’t do to go every week, but I considered it 100% worthwhile. I forgot how a great movie seen on the big screen with a friend can’t exactly be duplicated at home without buying equipment that would cost way more than $20.
May 6th, 2008 at 8:05 am
[...] simply not go. Over at the Get Rich Slowly blog, Kevin at No Debt Plan recently had a post “Dumb Money: The Movie Theater,” assailing the movie theater experience as largely a waste of money (as opposed to seeing [...]
September 24th, 2008 at 7:51 pm
Just to let you all know, you can bring food into the theater. That way you don’t have to spend a fortune. People tell me it’s not allowed, but I’ve never once been told I couldn’t. Heck, I’ve brought Jack-in-the-Box in before. Plus you have the advantage of being able to buy a wider variety of food, such as health food if you’re into that. Also, for all of you talking about $10 movie tickets. I usually pay $6.50 or so; you should try living somewhere that isn’t a rip off.
September 24th, 2008 at 8:01 pm
Let me get this right, Tony. Because of a $3.50 difference in movie ticket prices, I should try to sell my home in a down market and move to an area with low movie ticket costs.
I’ll get right on it.
September 24th, 2008 at 9:04 pm
I am fortunate enough to still have a dollar thatre in my neighborhood, and I take advantage of it when I’m bored or just need to get out of the house. No one has mentioned yet that you are allowed to see a movie by yourself. Am I the only one who enjoys seeing whatever movie I want, at the time I want, and not having to whisper back and forth to another person during the whole thing going “What did he just say”?