<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which is Better: a Roth IRA or a Traditional IRA?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/</link>
	<description>Common sense advice on money saving tips, how to get out of debt, high interest savings accounts, cd rates, money market accounts, mortgage rates, money management and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:17:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tha</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-351391</link>
		<dc:creator>tha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-351391</guid>
		<description>Why do so many articles never talk about the time value of money and how the money in 30 years will be worth less than the money today. My question is if it is better to pay the taxes later on this devalued money. Why pay taxes up front with a stronger dollar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do so many articles never talk about the time value of money and how the money in 30 years will be worth less than the money today. My question is if it is better to pay the taxes later on this devalued money. Why pay taxes up front with a stronger dollar?</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-351391" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-187561</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-187561</guid>
		<description>Everyone here is confusing marginal rates with their overall tax rates.

For the vast majority of people in normal circumstances, a standard IRA/401k is the right choice.  Exceptions are people with temporarily low income such as students, people working only part of the year and such and the very wealthy who will have higher taxable pensions on retirement.

The reason is simple.  It makes no difference standard or roth if the taxe rates are the same on the money you put in and the money you take out.  This is just the associative rule of multiplication.   However, you make your tax deductible contribution off of the highest tax bracket.  You take money out at a range of tax brackets.  Even if you end up in the 35 % bracket on retirement, that only means your last bit of income is taxed at that rate; most of it is at 10, 15 or whatever brackets exist at that time.

Another wrinkle, if you plan to retire to a state with no income tax, you don&#039;t have to pay state income tax on your standard contribution and it comes out state tax free, while you pay state taxes for no reason on your roth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone here is confusing marginal rates with their overall tax rates.</p>
<p>For the vast majority of people in normal circumstances, a standard IRA/401k is the right choice.  Exceptions are people with temporarily low income such as students, people working only part of the year and such and the very wealthy who will have higher taxable pensions on retirement.</p>
<p>The reason is simple.  It makes no difference standard or roth if the taxe rates are the same on the money you put in and the money you take out.  This is just the associative rule of multiplication.   However, you make your tax deductible contribution off of the highest tax bracket.  You take money out at a range of tax brackets.  Even if you end up in the 35 % bracket on retirement, that only means your last bit of income is taxed at that rate; most of it is at 10, 15 or whatever brackets exist at that time.</p>
<p>Another wrinkle, if you plan to retire to a state with no income tax, you don&#8217;t have to pay state income tax on your standard contribution and it comes out state tax free, while you pay state taxes for no reason on your roth.</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-187561" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-173764</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-173764</guid>
		<description>I have a question I can&#039;t solve.  My wife and I both max out our ROTH IRA&#039;s.  I also have a Simple Plan at work.  We can&#039;t afford to max that out, but my wife has a bank account that is solely hers (from her parents inheritence).  I also have a brokerage account that is solely mine (from my grandfather)  If she were to contribute $6500 to our household so we could max out the Simple IRA, would she get $6500 (as a percentage) of my brokerage or $3250 (as a percentage)  This math is wracking my brain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question I can&#8217;t solve.  My wife and I both max out our ROTH IRA&#8217;s.  I also have a Simple Plan at work.  We can&#8217;t afford to max that out, but my wife has a bank account that is solely hers (from her parents inheritence).  I also have a brokerage account that is solely mine (from my grandfather)  If she were to contribute $6500 to our household so we could max out the Simple IRA, would she get $6500 (as a percentage) of my brokerage or $3250 (as a percentage)  This math is wracking my brain</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-173764" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Irwin eFinPLAN</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-168001</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Irwin eFinPLAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-168001</guid>
		<description>No you can&#039;t max contribute to both in one cal year, got to pick one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No you can&#8217;t max contribute to both in one cal year, got to pick one.</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-168001" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allen</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-167811</link>
		<dc:creator>allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-167811</guid>
		<description>@mike: closest to an answer i could find in 3 minutes.

http://www.mydollarplan.com/2009-roth-401k-and-roth-ira-limits/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mike: closest to an answer i could find in 3 minutes.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mydollarplan.com/2009-roth-401k-and-roth-ira-limits/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mydollarplan.com/2009-roth-401k-and-roth-ira-limits/</a></p>
<div id="placeholer-like-167811" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-167795</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-167795</guid>
		<description>I am over 50 years old.  I have a Roth IRA and a traditional IRA.  Can I contribute $6,000 to EACH IRA in a calendar year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am over 50 years old.  I have a Roth IRA and a traditional IRA.  Can I contribute $6,000 to EACH IRA in a calendar year?</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-167795" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-151771</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-151771</guid>
		<description>One isn&#039;t necessarily better than the other, they are suited for different scenarios. Understanding the rules of a Traditional IRA can help: http://www.life123.com/article_FullStory/Understanding-Traditional-IRA-Rules_1205353975576.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One isn&#8217;t necessarily better than the other, they are suited for different scenarios. Understanding the rules of a Traditional IRA can help: <a href="http://www.life123.com/article_FullStory/Understanding-Traditional-IRA-Rules_1205353975576.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.life123.com/article_FullStory/Understanding-Traditional-IRA-Rules_1205353975576.html</a></p>
<div id="placeholer-like-151771" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zest egg</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-133767</link>
		<dc:creator>zest egg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 09:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-133767</guid>
		<description>I agree that the Roth is usually better. I wrote some advice on using IRAs for people who are just starting to think about retirement and don&#039;t have a 401K at:

http://www.zestegg.com/No401K.aspx

The article is called &quot;but I don&#039;t have a 401K, what about me?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the Roth is usually better. I wrote some advice on using IRAs for people who are just starting to think about retirement and don&#8217;t have a 401K at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zestegg.com/No401K.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.zestegg.com/No401K.aspx</a></p>
<p>The article is called &#8220;but I don&#8217;t have a 401K, what about me?&#8221;</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-133767" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-124001</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 20:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-124001</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;The magic of compounding works in your favor with the traditional IRA.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

It does with the Roth as well. 

Whether you put $3750 in a Roth and pay $1250 in taxes or the whole $5000 in a traditional IRA should be a wash if your maximum tax bracket is 25% when you deposit and when you withdraw. Remember you will pay taxes on the earnings in the traditional IRA. You won&#039;t pay any taxes on the earnings in the Roth.

Or to make it clearer, if the $3750 in the Roth account doubles in value you will have $7500. The same rate of return on the $5000 in the traditional IRA will give you $10,000, but you will have to pay 25% tax on it. So the net is still $7500. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;The magic of compounding works in your favor with the traditional IRA.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>It does with the Roth as well. </p>
<p>Whether you put $3750 in a Roth and pay $1250 in taxes or the whole $5000 in a traditional IRA should be a wash if your maximum tax bracket is 25% when you deposit and when you withdraw. Remember you will pay taxes on the earnings in the traditional IRA. You won&#8217;t pay any taxes on the earnings in the Roth.</p>
<p>Or to make it clearer, if the $3750 in the Roth account doubles in value you will have $7500. The same rate of return on the $5000 in the traditional IRA will give you $10,000, but you will have to pay 25% tax on it. So the net is still $7500.</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-124001" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123999</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 20:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123999</guid>
		<description>There are two things mentioned here that I think are most important:

1) It is always better to go with the Roth IRA if you are contributing the maximum. This is because $5000 in a Roth will bring a better return than $5000 in a traditional IRA and the tax savings ($1250 for the 25% tax bracket) in a taxable account. 

The exception is if the deduction changes your eligibility for other tax savings. For instance the tax credit lower income taxpayers get for retirement savings.

Something people have not mentioned is that retirement savings are usually protected in bankruptcy. So while the money in the Roth IRA is protected, the tax savings from a traditional IRA deposited in a taxable savings account is not.


2) You can withdraw the money you put into a Roth account. So you should never put any money into a taxable savings account that you don&#039;t intend to spend within a year until you have maxed out your Roth contribution.  A Roth IRA is a perfect place to start building that emergency fund everyone says you should have. If you don&#039;t use it, you have a great start on retirement savings.  If you need it, you haven&#039;t lost anything by having it in the Roth instead of a regular savings account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two things mentioned here that I think are most important:</p>
<p>1) It is always better to go with the Roth IRA if you are contributing the maximum. This is because $5000 in a Roth will bring a better return than $5000 in a traditional IRA and the tax savings ($1250 for the 25% tax bracket) in a taxable account. </p>
<p>The exception is if the deduction changes your eligibility for other tax savings. For instance the tax credit lower income taxpayers get for retirement savings.</p>
<p>Something people have not mentioned is that retirement savings are usually protected in bankruptcy. So while the money in the Roth IRA is protected, the tax savings from a traditional IRA deposited in a taxable savings account is not.</p>
<p>2) You can withdraw the money you put into a Roth account. So you should never put any money into a taxable savings account that you don&#8217;t intend to spend within a year until you have maxed out your Roth contribution.  A Roth IRA is a perfect place to start building that emergency fund everyone says you should have. If you don&#8217;t use it, you have a great start on retirement savings.  If you need it, you haven&#8217;t lost anything by having it in the Roth instead of a regular savings account.</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-123999" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLP&#8217;s Roundup&#8212;AllFinancialMatters</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123852</link>
		<dc:creator>JLP&#8217;s Roundup&#8212;AllFinancialMatters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123852</guid>
		<description>[...] JD takes another look at the Roth IRA vs. the Traditional IRA. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background:#dfdcd7">
<p>[...] JD takes another look at the Roth IRA vs. the Traditional IRA. [...]</p>
</div>
<div id="placeholer-like-123852" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rainer Werner</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123674</link>
		<dc:creator>Rainer Werner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123674</guid>
		<description>One advantage I have heard for retirement accounts funded with pre-tax dollars is that the extra money you can contribute to a traditional IRA (because you don&#039;t have to pay taxes, the same amount of income will get you a larger contribution) earns interest for all those years you leave it in there.  The magic of compounding works in your favor with the traditional IRA.

Obviously, this assumes that you won&#039;t be maxing out your Roth.  

Can anyone comment on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One advantage I have heard for retirement accounts funded with pre-tax dollars is that the extra money you can contribute to a traditional IRA (because you don&#8217;t have to pay taxes, the same amount of income will get you a larger contribution) earns interest for all those years you leave it in there.  The magic of compounding works in your favor with the traditional IRA.</p>
<p>Obviously, this assumes that you won&#8217;t be maxing out your Roth.  </p>
<p>Can anyone comment on this?</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-123674" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123418</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123418</guid>
		<description>Is it possible to convert Roth contributions to Traditional for a given year? I maxed out my Roth this year, but after doing my taxes realize that I owe a large sum of money to the IRS. I am now looking at the possibility of switching my 2007 contributions to a Traditional (if possible) to get that $4000 deduction. 

Thanks for the help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to convert Roth contributions to Traditional for a given year? I maxed out my Roth this year, but after doing my taxes realize that I owe a large sum of money to the IRS. I am now looking at the possibility of switching my 2007 contributions to a Traditional (if possible) to get that $4000 deduction. </p>
<p>Thanks for the help!</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-123418" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123328</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 06:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123328</guid>
		<description>JD, what did you mean by &quot;Roth IRAs have income limits; traditional IRAs do not&quot;?

Traditional IRA has income limits as far as tax-deductibility is concerned. So if I do not get the tax benefits now and neither in the future, why do I need to go the IRA route. can I not just stick my money on my own in an asset class without the restrictions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JD, what did you mean by &#8220;Roth IRAs have income limits; traditional IRAs do not&#8221;?</p>
<p>Traditional IRA has income limits as far as tax-deductibility is concerned. So if I do not get the tax benefits now and neither in the future, why do I need to go the IRA route. can I not just stick my money on my own in an asset class without the restrictions?</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-123328" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harmony</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123290</link>
		<dc:creator>Harmony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123290</guid>
		<description>Question, If I am not eligible for the Roth IRA and am using after tax dollars to invest and expect my taxes to stay the same after retirement would I be better off investing in a regular account over a traditional IRA that will get taxed again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question, If I am not eligible for the Roth IRA and am using after tax dollars to invest and expect my taxes to stay the same after retirement would I be better off investing in a regular account over a traditional IRA that will get taxed again?</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-123290" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allen</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123289</link>
		<dc:creator>allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123289</guid>
		<description>@fontraid:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traditional_IRA#Advantages

Sorry, i was partially wrong. You do get a portion of the money refunded... and if you make little enough money. 

to quote the article for those with too little time: 
&quot;then a $1,000 benefit ($1,000 reduced tax liability) will be realized for the year. Because qualified distributions are taxed as ordinary income (the taxpayer&#039;s highest rate), the long-term benefits of the traditional IRA are only comparable to those of a Roth IRA (whose qualified distributions are tax free) if the current year tax benefit ($1,000 above) is reinvested.&quot;

from the Wiki article on Tax Brackets in the USA:

for 2007:
25%: from $31,851 to $77,100

So, as long as you make under 77K, then you get a portion of the money refunded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@fontraid:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traditional_IRA#Advantages" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traditional_IRA#Advantages</a></p>
<p>Sorry, i was partially wrong. You do get a portion of the money refunded&#8230; and if you make little enough money. </p>
<p>to quote the article for those with too little time:<br />
&#8220;then a $1,000 benefit ($1,000 reduced tax liability) will be realized for the year. Because qualified distributions are taxed as ordinary income (the taxpayer&#8217;s highest rate), the long-term benefits of the traditional IRA are only comparable to those of a Roth IRA (whose qualified distributions are tax free) if the current year tax benefit ($1,000 above) is reinvested.&#8221;</p>
<p>from the Wiki article on Tax Brackets in the USA:</p>
<p>for 2007:<br />
25%: from $31,851 to $77,100</p>
<p>So, as long as you make under 77K, then you get a portion of the money refunded.</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-123289" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fontraid</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123286</link>
		<dc:creator>fontraid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123286</guid>
		<description>@allen[#32]:
I was under the impression that a traditional IRA is tax-deductible. That is, even though you contribute with money from your paycheck after taxes are taken out, when you file your tax forms, you list your contributions to the traditional IRA and get that tax &quot;refunded&quot; to you. Am I wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@allen[#32]:<br />
I was under the impression that a traditional IRA is tax-deductible. That is, even though you contribute with money from your paycheck after taxes are taken out, when you file your tax forms, you list your contributions to the traditional IRA and get that tax &#8220;refunded&#8221; to you. Am I wrong?</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-123286" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miranda</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123284</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123284</guid>
		<description>Loving my Roth IRA. I agree that now is a good time to put more in. The number of shares I&#039;m buying of companies that are likely to recover is much higher than it would be if we weren&#039;t going through a correction.

Many people are forgetting about the Roth 401(k). It&#039;s relatively new, and looks to combine the best aspects of the 401(k) and those we associate with the Roth IRA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loving my Roth IRA. I agree that now is a good time to put more in. The number of shares I&#8217;m buying of companies that are likely to recover is much higher than it would be if we weren&#8217;t going through a correction.</p>
<p>Many people are forgetting about the Roth 401(k). It&#8217;s relatively new, and looks to combine the best aspects of the 401(k) and those we associate with the Roth IRA.</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-123284" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allen</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123278</link>
		<dc:creator>allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123278</guid>
		<description>@Cely:

I would advise against that, becuase with a traditional IRA, you pay taxes NOW, and then AGAIN when you withdraw. @least with a 401(k), you are getting it with pre-tax dollars. 

If it will help you feel any better: Think of it as a blessing that you are so well paid that you can&#039;t contribute to a ROTH. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Cely:</p>
<p>I would advise against that, becuase with a traditional IRA, you pay taxes NOW, and then AGAIN when you withdraw. @least with a 401(k), you are getting it with pre-tax dollars. </p>
<p>If it will help you feel any better: Think of it as a blessing that you are so well paid that you can&#8217;t contribute to a ROTH. <img src='http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<div id="placeholer-like-123278" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cely</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123271</link>
		<dc:creator>Cely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123271</guid>
		<description>I max out my 401(k), but my employer does not contribute anything (argh!). My income makes me ineligible to contribute to a Roth. Now I wonder if I should stop the 401(k) and open my own Traditional IRA instead? I honestly never thought about that until reading this post. But I&#039;m not crazy about the investment options in our 401(k) -- not many index funds -- and if I had my own IRA I could go with someone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I max out my 401(k), but my employer does not contribute anything (argh!). My income makes me ineligible to contribute to a Roth. Now I wonder if I should stop the 401(k) and open my own Traditional IRA instead? I honestly never thought about that until reading this post. But I&#8217;m not crazy about the investment options in our 401(k) &#8212; not many index funds &#8212; and if I had my own IRA I could go with someone else.</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-123271" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123269</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123269</guid>
		<description>If your employment fluctuates often and you have the flexibility, the best approach can be traditional while working a full year and converting to a Roth when unemployed for much of it, guaranteeing a lower tax rate, but it does mean coming up with additional amounts for taxes during periods of low income.  Since you are probably employed more than unemployed, you would only be able to do this with a portion of your savings, 1 year in 5 would suggest 20% traditional 80% Roth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your employment fluctuates often and you have the flexibility, the best approach can be traditional while working a full year and converting to a Roth when unemployed for much of it, guaranteeing a lower tax rate, but it does mean coming up with additional amounts for taxes during periods of low income.  Since you are probably employed more than unemployed, you would only be able to do this with a portion of your savings, 1 year in 5 would suggest 20% traditional 80% Roth.</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-123269" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben @ Trees Full of Money</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123256</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben @ Trees Full of Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123256</guid>
		<description>Imagine if congress passes the &quot;fair tax bill&quot; which essentially is a consumpton tax on certain goods and services that we purchaseover a predetermined &quot;poverty&quot; level.  With a ROTH you have already paid taxes on the money, then you must pay taxes again if you decide to purchase something with that money in retirement.  

That said, the &quot;Fair Tax&quot; is unlikely to pass, and if it did, there would certainly be a provision for &quot;Roth&quot; retirement accounts whether they be 401k&#039;s r IRAs.

Personally I invest up the match in my 401k&#039;s, then max out roths for both the wife and I, and then if we still want to save some more will put more in our 401ks.

Ben @ Trees Full of Money</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine if congress passes the &#8220;fair tax bill&#8221; which essentially is a consumpton tax on certain goods and services that we purchaseover a predetermined &#8220;poverty&#8221; level.  With a ROTH you have already paid taxes on the money, then you must pay taxes again if you decide to purchase something with that money in retirement.  </p>
<p>That said, the &#8220;Fair Tax&#8221; is unlikely to pass, and if it did, there would certainly be a provision for &#8220;Roth&#8221; retirement accounts whether they be 401k&#8217;s r IRAs.</p>
<p>Personally I invest up the match in my 401k&#8217;s, then max out roths for both the wife and I, and then if we still want to save some more will put more in our 401ks.</p>
<p>Ben @ Trees Full of Money</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-123256" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123251</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123251</guid>
		<description>@grimsaburger: There is nothing fundamentally wrong with being risk-averse, but if you are risk-averse you need to select safe investments, such as deposit accounts, government securities, and short- and medium-term bonds. This will give you less risk, but you have to accept lower return--in some cases, a return that doesn&#039;t even keep up with inflation. That is the trade-off.

What you do NOT want to do no matter how risk-averse you are is wind up in a situation where you try to time the stock market. This is what Daniel says when he talks about the buy high, sell low mentality. If you are going to invest in stocks, you need to go all in and be able to stomach the ups and downs. If you can&#039;t do this, stick to bonds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@grimsaburger: There is nothing fundamentally wrong with being risk-averse, but if you are risk-averse you need to select safe investments, such as deposit accounts, government securities, and short- and medium-term bonds. This will give you less risk, but you have to accept lower return&#8211;in some cases, a return that doesn&#8217;t even keep up with inflation. That is the trade-off.</p>
<p>What you do NOT want to do no matter how risk-averse you are is wind up in a situation where you try to time the stock market. This is what Daniel says when he talks about the buy high, sell low mentality. If you are going to invest in stocks, you need to go all in and be able to stomach the ups and downs. If you can&#8217;t do this, stick to bonds.</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-123251" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grimsaburger</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123248</link>
		<dc:creator>grimsaburger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123248</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m no kind of investor because I have no Roth yet....
I&#039;m not an alarmist at heart, and I don&#039;t have much if any anxiety about recession since I have a steady income and a firm grip on my personal finances.  I just tend to think of investing as a separate endeavor that yanks me out of the real-world economy of small business that I inhabit, and shoves me into the finance part of the economy that does all the roller-coaster-ing.  I believe this makes me one of those pesky &quot;risk-averse&quot; individuals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no kind of investor because I have no Roth yet&#8230;.<br />
I&#8217;m not an alarmist at heart, and I don&#8217;t have much if any anxiety about recession since I have a steady income and a firm grip on my personal finances.  I just tend to think of investing as a separate endeavor that yanks me out of the real-world economy of small business that I inhabit, and shoves me into the finance part of the economy that does all the roller-coaster-ing.  I believe this makes me one of those pesky &#8220;risk-averse&#8221; individuals.</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-123248" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123247</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123247</guid>
		<description>@The Weakonomist: yeah - it&#039;s important to remember that most of America is employed by small business.  Most companies aren&#039;t the GEs, Microsofts, and Apples of the world - most of them are like where I work, a 20-man employee-owned firm.

@grimsaburger: when stock prices go down, it&#039;s time to snatch &#039;em up - they are on sale!  If you are in it for the long term, the stock market is where it&#039;s at.  If you are in it for the short term, you should avoid the stock market.  It sounds like you might have the typical &quot;buy high sell low&quot; mentality - it&#039;s important to break free of that line of thinking in order to be a successful investor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@The Weakonomist: yeah &#8211; it&#8217;s important to remember that most of America is employed by small business.  Most companies aren&#8217;t the GEs, Microsofts, and Apples of the world &#8211; most of them are like where I work, a 20-man employee-owned firm.</p>
<p>@grimsaburger: when stock prices go down, it&#8217;s time to snatch &#8216;em up &#8211; they are on sale!  If you are in it for the long term, the stock market is where it&#8217;s at.  If you are in it for the short term, you should avoid the stock market.  It sounds like you might have the typical &#8220;buy high sell low&#8221; mentality &#8211; it&#8217;s important to break free of that line of thinking in order to be a successful investor.</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-123247" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grimsaburger</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123246</link>
		<dc:creator>grimsaburger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123246</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it possible, at least in theory, that stocks across the board could dwindle to the point that using a different broker wouldn&#039;t make a bit of difference?  And in that case, it would be a better idea to let money sit in an FDIC-insured savings account at a measly 2%?

Surely this is getting way deep into hypothetical territory, for which I apologize...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it possible, at least in theory, that stocks across the board could dwindle to the point that using a different broker wouldn&#8217;t make a bit of difference?  And in that case, it would be a better idea to let money sit in an FDIC-insured savings account at a measly 2%?</p>
<p>Surely this is getting way deep into hypothetical territory, for which I apologize&#8230;</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-123246" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Weakonomist</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123245</link>
		<dc:creator>The Weakonomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123245</guid>
		<description>The economy is held together by small business.  Its just the only true metrics avaliable come from publicly(sp?) traded companies.  

My local economy is supported by commercial banking, tobacco farming, and biotechnology.  But for every employee of a big company (myself included), there is a teacher, a farmer, a small business owner, and a small business employee.  The conservative nature of my city allows us to thrive when the market is down.

If you have your finances in order, a recession is your time to thrive. The biggest returns in the market will happen as the market recovers from recession.

Now is the best time to buy a house, a car, start investing, etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The economy is held together by small business.  Its just the only true metrics avaliable come from publicly(sp?) traded companies.  </p>
<p>My local economy is supported by commercial banking, tobacco farming, and biotechnology.  But for every employee of a big company (myself included), there is a teacher, a farmer, a small business owner, and a small business employee.  The conservative nature of my city allows us to thrive when the market is down.</p>
<p>If you have your finances in order, a recession is your time to thrive. The biggest returns in the market will happen as the market recovers from recession.</p>
<p>Now is the best time to buy a house, a car, start investing, etc&#8230;</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-123245" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123244</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123244</guid>
		<description>@grimsaburger: I&#039;m not so sure.  Investment firms are simply a conduit one uses to buy an investment (such as a stock).  If Fidelity were to go under, I could just use a different broker.  Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@grimsaburger: I&#8217;m not so sure.  Investment firms are simply a conduit one uses to buy an investment (such as a stock).  If Fidelity were to go under, I could just use a different broker.  Am I missing something?</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-123244" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grimsaburger</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123243</link>
		<dc:creator>grimsaburger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123243</guid>
		<description>I dunno, I suppose I think of the big banks and investment firms as the scaffolding that hold the economy together, and when they start to wobble, I just wonder if there comes a point when investing becomes a good way to lose rather than grow your money.

Now, by the way, is the point at which I become acutely aware of how little I get about macroeconomics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, I suppose I think of the big banks and investment firms as the scaffolding that hold the economy together, and when they start to wobble, I just wonder if there comes a point when investing becomes a good way to lose rather than grow your money.</p>
<p>Now, by the way, is the point at which I become acutely aware of how little I get about macroeconomics.</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-123243" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/comment-page-1/#comment-123240</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2008/03/18/which-is-better-a-roth-ira-or-a-traditional-ira/#comment-123240</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know how the income limit for a Roth IRA has increased over the years?  I&#039;m &quot;close&quot; to the limit now, and I&#039;m not expecting huge leaps in my income.  I&#039;m wondering if the income limit would increase similarly to my salary, or if I&#039;d be better off with a traditional IRA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know how the income limit for a Roth IRA has increased over the years?  I&#8217;m &#8220;close&#8221; to the limit now, and I&#8217;m not expecting huge leaps in my income.  I&#8217;m wondering if the income limit would increase similarly to my salary, or if I&#8217;d be better off with a traditional IRA.</p>
<div id="placeholer-like-123240" class="likediv"><p>loading....</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
