Every time I write about Stuff, readers point me to The Story of Stuff, a 20-minute video about where Stuff comes from and where it goes. Until today, however, I’d never taken time to watch it. According to the web site:
From its extraction through sale, use and disposal, all the stuff in our lives affects communities at home and abroad, yet most of this is hidden from view. The Story of Stuff is a 20-minute, fast-paced, fact-filled look at the underside of our production and consumption patterns.
The Story of Stuff is an interesting short film, particularly in its last half. Writer and narrator Annie Leonard explains that the “golden arrow of consumption” is the heart of the modern economic system, a system that’s really only existed since the 1950s.
After World War II, planned obsolescence was incorporated into the production of consumer goods. Whereas quality and long life had once been a selling point, now things were intentionally designed with shorter lifespans. Obviously, this increased the rate of consumption.
Even more powerful, however, is the notion of perceived obsolescence. Perceived obsolescence is most obvious with regards to fashion. I suspect most Get Rich Slowly readers try to divorce their purchase decisions from the clutch of fashion because they understand just how insidious it can be. Who wants to be seen wearing clothing from 1993?
But perceived obsolescence goes beyond just fashion. How many of you geeks still have your first iPod? Why did you move to a new one? Was anything wrong with the old one? Or were you, on some unconscious level, unwilling to be seen carrying around that brick anymore? (I’m guilty of having upgraded my iPod because my old one seemed out-of-date, so don’t think I’m condemning anyone.)
What is the cost of all this? Leonard says that 99% of the stuff we harvest, mine, process, transport, and consume is trash within six months. Only 1% of the materials used to produce consumer goods (including the goods themselves) are still used six months after the date of sale.
Here’s the best part of The Story of Stuff chapter five, “Consumption”:
This excerpt is brilliant. I’ve watched it four or five times this afternoon, and could watch it again right now. Thanks to the dozens of Get Rich Slowly readers who have been recommending this video for the past year. I should have watched it sooner.
Addendum #1: Jessica noted that the film’s web site includes an annotated script to back up Leonard’s arguments.
Addendum #2: Every once in a while you folks really disagree with me. This is one of those times. Lots of negative responses in the comments. (Which I don’t consider a bad thing, by the way, as long as discourse remains civil and on topic.)
SEARCH FOR RECENT ARTICLES




Richie – I was focused on content over form.
loading....
I’m reading some of the negative comments and I think many of those folks doth protest too much…
Whether or not the presentation is annoying is irrelevant. One need only to take a trip to a big box store and open their eyes. One need only to go to a landfill and open their eyes.
Not to be preachy, but c’mon, we live in a country and culture of hyper-consumerism and to think that doesn’t have a physical effect on the planet is not only naive but destructive.
loading....
loading....
I just think that a lot of people have this happy vision of the “good ole days” when people lived on farms, never left their home towns, and didn’t own a lot of stuff. What we are forgetting is that this was back-breaking labor, and to be honest, pretty boring. “Stuff” has helped millions to enjoy enough of their time to actually travel the globe and focus on more fulfilling work than producing food to survive.
Just because some individuals are in a cycle of debt doesn’t mean consumerism is automatically a curse on society. I think we need to look at the lifestyle of those who are unhappy and inundated with “stuff” to find out where they went wrong. I am pretty happy that I can work 8 hours a day and come home and enjoy a concert, baseball game, skydiving, etc.
loading....
@ Kevin and Joel “It’s the government’s job to watch out for us, to take care of us. That’s their JOB!”
“WHY it is that seemingly intelligent people think it is the Governments “JOB” to watch out for us???
If everyone were to listen to this nut bag we should just quit our jobs and go on welfare so the government can take care of us since it is the Governments “JOB”!!!!
Please, give me a break!”
Um, Kevin and Joel, what exactly do you think IS the governments’ job if not to take care of their countries people?
To look after the people is exactly why, and the only reason why governments exist. To protect the people from other countries via the military. To protect people from criminals via laws and the justice system.
The Government takes taxes us. We the people pay them, they are employed by US to help us.
Somehow you equate looking after to going on welfare. While this is one way the Government looks after the people it is just one small (as regards overall spending) way it does.
The point of the video was that the government should be doing what’s best for us, it’s employers. Not treating us like a baby but looking after us and doing what’s best for the country, that’s what we employ it for.
loading....
No harm in making sure your presentation is not visually off-putting mary. I know I didn’t have the patience to read it all!
loading....
I might add: I don’t believe the government’s job is to take care of us.
The government’s job is to protect the freedom and God given rights of each person.
The Individual’s job is to take care of himself and those around him!
If we could learn from history, we’d all realize the government will not take care of us. They will use us for their own purposes!
But time will get that message across eventually.
loading....
Looking at all the comments back an forth I’m stunned. Wow, JD you picked a good topic to get our conversations going!
If she meant to get the excessive consumption point across she made a couple mistakes. First, she let her political leanings get in the way. Second, she was far too loose with improper facts and half truths. It got in the way of the message which is a shame.
I’m a die hard capitalist. I believe in the free market and free choice. I also believe that gives me the right to be frugal!
Too many people don’t understand the strength and security that comes from financial responsibility. Blogs like GRS do a great job educating, and help raise people to a new level. JD does a great job presenting great ideas that are backed up by facts. This allows his message to be well received and trusted.
The Story of Stuff could take a few lessons from GRS…
loading....
I might believe that 99% of production is gone in 6 months – if you include food, gas, and other consumables. Ironically, for me personally it’s due to not buying a bunch of “stuff.” 95% or so of the money I’ve spent so far this calendar year has been on food, gas, rent, taxes, travel, etc – things that don’t exist any more except maybe as memories in my head and atoms in my body.
loading....
Josiah said: “I might add: I don’t believe the government’s job is to take care of us.
The government’s job is to protect the freedom and God given rights of each person.”
Aren’t those two statements synonymous? The latter is a bit more qualified, but still…
loading....
I live in a South American country, in a poor town. People here move to the city not because they cannot exist as they have for generations, but because they don’t want to exist as they have for generations. They want stuff too. Survival farming is no fun. so they move to the city and work in the factories because they want to. They are as greedy as any American. We cannot blame the US for everything.
I did enjoy the show, and I heartily agree about the stuff issue.
loading....
Maybe I missed the part where the movie says that we should go back to “backbreaking labor” (#104) and “survival farming” (#111). It’s funny how much people add to the message of that short film.
It doesn’t condemn buying things you need and that make your life easier. It doesn’t condemn taking vacations and going to concerts. It’s about the cheap IKEA furniture you buy and throw away after a year because you move. It’s about the cheap clothes you buy and only wear once. The gadget you throw away just because the battery won’t hold its charge any longer and its design doesn’t allow replacing the battery.
loading....
In the second part of the movie, which I saw on Youtube, she talked about poor third world country folks having to move to cities because all their land had been destroyed by US mining and exploitation of natural resources. I am not saying that it does not exists, but I am saying that the third world, where I live is changing, and largely due to the same reasons that the US changed.
loading....
yp Says:
June 10th, 2008 at 7:04 pm
@ Kevin and Joel “It’s the government’s job to watch out for us, to take care of us. That’s their JOB!”
“WHY it is that seemingly intelligent people think it is the Governments “JOB” to watch out for us???
If everyone were to listen to this nut bag we should just quit our jobs and go on welfare so the government can take care of us since it is the Governments “JOB”!!!!
Please, give me a break!”
Um, Kevin and Joel, what exactly do you think IS the governments’ job if not to take care of their countries people?
To look after the people is exactly why, and the only reason why governments exist. To protect the people from other countries via the military. To protect people from criminals via laws and the justice system.
The Government takes taxes us. We the people pay them, they are employed by US to help us.
Somehow you equate looking after to going on welfare. While this is one way the Government looks after the people it is just one small (as regards overall spending) way it does.
The point of the video was that the government should be doing what’s best for us, it’s employers. Not treating us like a baby but looking after us and doing what’s best for the country, that’s what we employ it for.
********************************************
Apparently you and I saw a different point to the video. She sure seemed bothered by the fact that the free market (corporations) have become bigger than the goverment. I consider that a good thing, I think the goverment should be smaller. In fact if I’m their employer, I’d like to fire most of them for being incompetent and inefficient.
Let me get past the intro and get to extraction. It appears we have slashed and burned the entire planet in the cute little cartoon. “Extraction is a fancy word for exploitation of the enviornment, which is a fancy word for trashing the planet” I guess in the world according to Annie we can’t use anything without “trashing the planet”
I get the point, I just can’t stand the delivery.
As for the goverment I will refer to the preamble to the constitution. “…establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty…”
It says “promote” the general Welfare, not provide the Welfare checks. I also don’t see where it says to make sure nobody utilizes any of the earth’s resources.
loading....
I agree with Ms. Leonard 100%. That’s why I want to ban solar power immediately.
Every single second the sun consumes 600 million tons of fuel. Only a tiny portion of the power produced by that fuel reaches the earth. Only a tiny portion of THAT is converted into electricity. But we must count all matter that went into the production of that electricity! So for 1 amp-hour of electricity we get 2.24694351 × 10^22 electrons, which have a mass of 20.4682665 micrograms. If we generously allow 0% electron loss over a 6 month period, our yield is 3.76040028 × 10^-18 percent. Truly, truly a shocking travesty that must be stopped at once.
I’m only disappointed that Ms. Leonard uses the disgustingly optimistic figure of 1%.
loading....
Jon, your argument is completely silly.
1. The “fuel” the sun consumes is not extracted from the earth
2. We can’t do anything about it
Sure, we should keep researching a clean and efficient energy source. But at the same time it makes sense to reduce our energy consumption, because chances are we’re never going to have safe cold fusion or whatever.
loading....
First,who can argue with the primary message that we are a fat, over-consuming society that needs to wake up to our excesses? For instance, today, yes today, I spent 45 minutes researching all the ways I NEED a new cell phone. Does mine still work and do all that it promised when I bought it two years ago? Of course…but oh… have you seen the Blackberry Pearl in red? Thanks for the wake-up call (pun intended). Maybe I can be the first American to keep my cell phone after the two-year period when I am due a free one with an new contract. I am already proud to drive a 8-year old car…and I am working on getting out of debt including mortgage in 8 years. I LOVE YOUR BLOG…READ IT DAILY….PLEASE KEEP THE ENCOURAGEMENT COMING. By the way….don’t need a Kendel….have re-discovered the public library. So cool how those books fit in my purse…don’t require batteries…
loading....
Lars, I’m glad you realized the argument is silly. Now apply the same critical thinking to Leonard’s argument.
1. Mining waste is also not extracted from the earth. It would definitely be wasteful to launch it into space. It’s just moved around a bit. It’s like saying that when you excavate a basement for a house, all of the dirt you move should count as being “used up” in the production of the house.
2. Not being able to do anything about it makes no difference. For instance, uranium decomposes all by itself whether it’s in a nuclear plant or in the ground, so should that not count?
3. Even if we could do something about it, would you limit natural processes just so that they don’t use up resources?
People who make anti-consumption arguments based on waste of source materials (and not waste of final products) should understand that the only time there’s no waste is in a dead, static universe.
loading....
I would like the video better if she didn’t talk to me like I was 2 years old.
loading....
I love your Macy’s ads to get more stuff for DAD!!!
loading....
Don’t have time to read through 120 comments right now to see if I am repeating something, but to me, stuff represents jobs. If I stop consuming stuff, people will start losing jobs. I am not saying I would overspend. I think the focus should be on natural resource conservation and recycling, not the lower consumption of stuff. I think the person who made the video is making the wrong point. Who cares how much stuff is used to make stuff and gets discarded. Let’s figure out how to resue the trashed stuff better, not stop consuming stuff.
loading....
Almost everyone I know who had an old iPod and got a new one got a new one because the old ones didn’t have enough memory, or the old one just stopped working. They’re pretty solid devices, but far from perfect.
loading....
No matter what your point of view in the end, you must admit that this is very thought provoking either way.
I couldnt help but think how much this reminded me of the The Lorax by Dr. Seuss. Which still to this day even as an adult is one my favorite books. If you’ve never read or seen the move here it is…
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6650219631867189375
Dr. Seuss was a brilliant man. He really understood that in order to get the message across you must convey it in a manner that even a child could understand. And likewise in order to receive the message you must think in an unbiased manner like a child.
Although I dont consider myself to be very religious one powerful thing the bible brings up over and over again is the concept of becoming like a child in order to receive god. A very powerful message…
“Truly I say to you, unless you are converted and become like children, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 18:3).
“Whoever then humbles himself as this child, he is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 18:4).
loading....
I have scrolled through all the posts here, and noticed a wide variety of opinions. Whether you come from the school of consumerism or the opposite, all of us are on the treadmill just by default. Some of us are going slower, while others are running full speed. Ms. Leonard’s assessment with regards to our behavior is insightful and does lead me to question, what more can I do to change my default character?
This also brought to my attention the lack of solutions presented and debated, with the exception of Mary (who appears to be implementing her own solutions). I, like Mary, do not own a TV and have not owned one in 20 years. I am sure this has saved me thousands of dollars in wasted “stuff”.
The interesting aspect is my profession, I am a fashion designer and perceived obsolescence is the heart and soul of this industry. In addition to being a designer, I have been a vintage clothing collector and dealer for 25+ years. From my years of observation, a sense of the fashion industry emerged. Fashion was not king, Style was. Looks were broken down into decades, and clothing was made to last for that decade. This lasted up until the 90′s when looks no longer could be categorized into a decade, rather it was turned into a look for the season, and dramatically changed from one season to the next. This continues to this day. Incidentally, this all coincides with the push to a global market, fast fashion, and the obvious drop in quality.
So this brings me to the issue of quality. For example, 9 years ago my husband purchased a pair of $800 Hermes shoes ( I know many will say this is ridiculous) in beautiful handcrafted black leather for work. He takes great care of these shoes and wears them 4-5 days a week. Before these shoes, he was purchasing $175 Kenneth Cole (made in china) shoes that would fall apart in 12 months even with his attentive care. Due to his “wildly extravagant” purchase, my husband has managed to save over $700 and he’ll probably have the shoes for another 10 years, which brings his savings to over $1500. This just proves where the real value lies, and it is not in cheap quantity driven products. Classic well made clothing never loses its value, it is just recycled and labelled vintage. I am so sorry to ramble on, but one quick point- don’t just buy because the brand is “luxury”, this is no guarantee that the product is quality. Since the 90′s, many luxury brands are just brands with no thought to artisanal skills, craftsmanship, stewardship, and quality. It’s just pumped, glossy, pretty stuff riding on a revised (originally, they really did mean it) company motto.
loading....
I liked the overall message, and I liked her presentation, although it was oversimplified. I find it ironic, though, that she is selling DVDs of her video, disposable, wasteful, toxic plastic DVDs that will probably only be watched a few times at most before they end up in the garbage. What’s up with that?
loading....
Technocracy addresses all of the concerns mentioned in the video and more. If you find yourself agreeing with the msg the video is trying to convey then I will highly recommend that you Investigate Technocracy.org
loading....
I saw the video and although like many commented, there are holes here and there, a large part is true.
Stuff like printers, computers, even car parts are manufactured for planned obsolence.
And I was just thinking of getting a digital camera when our old film camera still works fine, but ….. convenience
loading....
Jon,
If the sun if so inefficient, why has it been powering producers, the foundation of Earth’s life systems, for millions of years? Photosynthesis has been going strong for a longgg time and it probably will continue. Also, we can use that sun if we really wanted, considering the amount of solar energy that hits the Earth everyday has the potential to power every home, car, or building on the planet 13,000 times over. And the anti-consumption people aren’t saying waste none, they’re saying waste less.
loading....
Just how do so many of you determine her “political leanings”? Does her concern for the environmental impact of our consumption point to her leaning to the left? Or does her concern about reckless spending and apparent desire for greater prudence and conservation of our global resources point to her being a right leaning conservative?
Or rather, is it that she questions a comment made by our current president that means she must therefore be in “the other camp”? When did it happen that questioning or criticizing an elected representative was an automatic revelation of a person’s political leanings? Is it simply unthinkable that a conservative Republican can share her concerns?
loading....
Wow, there are so many opinions one here it is amazing! I have to write a critique on this movie for my Environmental Science class. The first time i watched the movie i felt like a three year old the way she spoke to those watching the movie. Although her facts may seem weary and the lack of knowledge she has in some areas of the movie, i believe the best part of the movie was “The Golden Arrow”. IT is true, it is our money we can spend it the way we want, you dont have to buy crap from Walmart. buy it elsewhere. She does in the end have a good point, the underlying message that we need to watch how we spend our money. BUy what you need and use it wisely.
Thanks for everyone that has responded to the movie because all your opinions have really helped with my critique for class!
loading....