Comments on: Book Review: 50 Prosperity Classics

By: paul

paul — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:41:25 +0000

Great style of book. For a thief. This is theft. He reads the books, steals all their ideas and tells them to lazy cheap people who should go and buy the hard work of the original authors.
Thou shalt not steal.

By: kick_push

kick_push — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:24:54 +0000

i read 50 prosperity classics.. didn’t really like it that much.. hard to squeeze in useful financial info all in one book

50 success classics was much better IMO..

By: B Smith @ Wealth and Wisdom

B Smith @ Wealth and Wisdom — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:34:24 +0000

JD-Thanks for the great review. You’ve just identified the next book I’m going to read!

@Writer’s Coin-You could find the info online but that misses the point. You can get an overview of each book. This allows you to:
1) Gain much of the knowledge with a minimal time investment.
2) Determine if the book has information that would be worth further study.

Researching this yourself would take hours. Personally my time is too valuable. I would rather spend more time with my family or on growing my business.

By: Chad @ Sentient Money

Chad @ Sentient Money — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:17:59 +0000

That’s a great way to save time and identify books to read in depth.

By: Shanel Yang

Shanel Yang — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:59:40 +0000

A perfect example of how sometimes less really is more!

By: Frugal Dad

Frugal Dad — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:35:14 +0000

The titles listed on the “Prosperity” books include a couple of my all-time favorites. Thanks for the heads up on this series! I had not heard of these before, but it looks like an excellent set of consolidated resource.

By: Alex Shalman

Alex Shalman — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:22:11 +0000

I REALLY like this book style. If I didn’t have 75 books on my reading list right now I would totally buy one right now. Actually, maybe I can knock off about 50 off that list by just getting one of Bowdown’s! =)

By: Writer's Coin

Writer's Coin — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:47:36 +0000

Interesting formula he’s come up with. Smart dude. But can’t I glean the same “essentials” from the web? It seems to me like I could.