Burn After Reading: The $22 Movie Print
Thursday, 25th September 2008 (by J.D.)This article is about Choices, Frugality, Odds and Ends, Real-Life
I’m going to sound like a crotchety old man for a minute here — but it’s my blog and I can write what I want. Movies are too damn expensive.
One of the luxuries of working from home is that when a friend calls me at 2 o’clock to go see a movie, I can do it. So when Paul called yesterday to ask if I wanted to see Burn After Reading, I said, “Sure.”
Not so long ago, Kris and I were avid movie-goers. Once or twice a month, we’d catch a new film. As we’ve flexed our frugality muscles, however, we’ve fallen out of the habit. Mostly we stay at home and watch movies from Netflix. When we do go out, we make a point of hitting the cheap theaters. It hurts less to pay $4 to see Indiana Jones than to pay $9.50.
But when Paul and I looked for a venue yesterday, none of the cheap places were showing Burn After Reading. The closest theater playing the film was part of the Regal chain, which I generally avoid on principle. Yesterday was a good reminder of why that’s the case.
Here’s a quick run-down of my expenses at the Regal-owned “Hilltop 9″:
- One movie ticket (matinee) = $7.50
- One “medium” diet soda (44 ounces, or about 1.25 liters) = $5.00
- One order nachos = $6.25 (and I only ate about half!)
- One box Raisinets = $3.50
I paid a total of $22.25 to watch a 96 minute movie (plus about 20 minutes of loud in-your-face pre-film advertising). Wow. Not very frugal. ($14.75 for refreshments! In retrospect, I’m amazed at myself.)
Now obviously I chose to pay $22. Nobody forced me to spend this much — I’m not denying that. But you can bet I won’t be doing this again for a long, long time. I’ll stick to the second-run movie houses and the bargain theaters, of which there are many in Portland. Some of my favorites include:
- McMenamins Theaters ($3 films with pizza and beer!)
- Cinemagic (Four or five bucks for a movie, and cheap snacks)
- Moreland Theatre (less than $10 for a movie and snacks)
- Laurelhurst Theater (all films $3)
- Family Cinemas ($5 matinees and reasonable refreshment prices — plus they have Red Vines!)
It would be fine to spend $22 to see a movie if that’s what I valued. But it isn’t. I’d rather save my money to splurge on other things. $22 would buy a nice meal. It would pay for five lunches at the local taco stand. $22 is about the price of a new comics compilation. $22 would buy one-tenth of one percent of a new Mini Cooper. I value a trip to the movies at about ten bucks, not $22.
When I told Kris about my movie-going experience, she too was shocked. “That’s insane!” she said. “That’s more than an entire month of Netflix. In fact, you could watch the entire month of Netflix and buy a bag of popcorn and buy two liters of diet soda.”
Indeed.
(Bonus ten-second movie review: Burn After Reading is goofy fun, but it lacks punch, and the ending is weak. It’s no Fargo or No Country for Old Men, and it’s certainly no The Big Lebowski.)

RSS Feeds
Facebook
Twitter

September 25th, 2008 at 1:24 pm
We buy tickets from costco (good if you are already a member) it comes out to $8 each instead of $9.50 then we don’t buy snacks, we eat at home. we only watch blockbuster type movies, everything else is watched at home.
September 25th, 2008 at 1:25 pm
I dont go to movies that often (maybe one a year) but when I do go I bring my own snacks. Unethical perhaps a great money saver you know it.
September 25th, 2008 at 1:26 pm
It sounds like you’re suggesting that the only options were to either not see the movie or spend $22 on it. Why not buy the $7.50 ticket and then go out to get some real food before or after it?
I know you talk about trying to minimize the effect advertisements have on you. The only reason people want to eat nachos and candy at a movie is because that’s what the advertising tells you to do. Most people don’t eat Raisinets when they’re watching a movie from Netflix at home.
September 25th, 2008 at 1:31 pm
I hardly ever buy snacks at the theatre. And I have a great movie mini-chain here in San Jose, California, the Camera Cinemas. They play both blockbusters and arthouse flicks, and they sell a discount card: 10 admissions for $60, so I only pay $6 per movie. The only restriction on the card is that you can’t go Saturdays after 6pm, and I never do that anyway. It’s perfect for me.
September 25th, 2008 at 1:32 pm
I remember my first shocking experience at the movie theater. I wasn’t going frugal then.
A buddy and I went to see “I Am Legend.” They had a popcorn and soda “special.” Two medium sodas and a medium popcorn.
$16. $16!
I almost crapped my pants. That’s over $5 each!
Needless to say, I was disenchanted with the theater experience like you are now.
http://www.goingcarless.com
September 25th, 2008 at 1:36 pm
You didn’t see a $22 movie. You had a $7.50 movie experience and bought $14.75 worth of junk food to go along with it. That’s just foolish on your part.
I highly doubt when you sit down to watch a film at home you’re having a giant soda, nachos, and Rasinets. So why did you feel the need to purchase these items when you went to the movie theater?? You bought the snacks because you wanted them. You can’t blame advertising for this. It’s power disappears the instant you consciously recognize what it is designed to do.
I go to the movies all the time and I never get snacks unless I get a free coupon for them as I enter (which Regal Crown Club members get as rewards). I see all the same ads for them and smell all the same smells, and I simply choose not to purchase them because they are unhealthy and overpriced.
September 25th, 2008 at 1:41 pm
$7.50 for a movie isn’t that terrible, around here it’s more like $10 for a matinee and $13 for a night showing at Silver City. The real question is, why did you buy so much crap?
September 25th, 2008 at 1:52 pm
I always sneak a bottle of water in my purse, and buy popcorn only. Is this frugal…or cheap?
Since I’m paying to see the movie, and paying for popcorn, I consider it frugal. Also, I buy movie tickets at Costco or from a local theater which does 10 tickets for $60 total (excludes Saturday night showings.) If you live in the San Jose area, Camera Cinemas does the 10/$60 deal. It’s a credit card type of thing, and you can buy 2 tickets per movie with it.
-Erica
September 25th, 2008 at 1:52 pm
Don’t forget St. Johns Cinema (not the McMenamins one)! First-run movies for $6, with a $4 matinee. Pizza & beer, too! It’s like the good second-run theaters, with new movies. The owners are super-nice too.
http://www.stjohnscinema.com/
September 25th, 2008 at 1:54 pm
Ummm…..The movie was only $7.50…right? Which seems reasonable. A matinee and some M&Ms tucked in your pocket sounds like a great deal. You know how you’re not supposed to go to the grocery store when you’re hungry? Maybe you shouldn’t go to the movies when you’re hungry :}
clw
September 25th, 2008 at 1:56 pm
You could have made it a 7,50 movie if you had simply snuck in a can of coke and chocoalate bar, but you have to buy popcorn, nothing beats movie popcorn!
September 25th, 2008 at 1:57 pm
Um, the only reason it cost you $22 was because you spent money on all the ridiculous priced snacks. If you had eaten beforehand you probably wouldn’t have bought the snacks and there wouldn’t be a reason to justify buying them. It doesn’t make any sense to buy snacks at the movie theatre…whether or not you are on a budget….they’re unhealthy AND expensive. You could either bring your own (yes, I know it’s not allowed, but I do it rarely) or not eat at all. I’m sure you can go for 2.5 hours without eating something.
September 25th, 2008 at 1:58 pm
I totally agree with Aleks above.
I’m just jealous that you can see a movie for $7.50, matinees are $9.50 here and evenings are $12-14.
As for the amount you spent on food, I’m afraid you’ll get no sympathy from me- I hate the smell of faux-cheese nachos in theatres and dread that someone next to me will be munching their way through a pile!
September 25th, 2008 at 2:01 pm
You left off the Avalon Theatre. The popcorn is cheap, the movies cost $2.50, and the theatres are seldom crowded. Yes, the floor is a tad sticky, but if the movie turns out to be boring, you can always hit the nickel arcades across the hall!
September 25th, 2008 at 2:05 pm
You are all absolutely correct! I could have saved $14.75 if I hadn’t bought so much crap to eat. I realize that. But you’re missing my main point.
The movie itself was $7.50 for a matinee, which to me still seems outrageous. And then the snacks were an extra $14.75. It used to be that going to see a matinee and getting some snacks might not have been frugal, but it was still reasonably priced entertainment. It’s not anymore.
I’m being a grouchy old man, grousing about the high cost of living. Even if I’d paid just the $7.50 for the movie, I couldn’t have come in under my $10 acceptable line if I wanted a treat. None of the snacks cost less than $2.50. Not even the water!
September 25th, 2008 at 2:06 pm
I hear ya. I personally haven’t been to a movie theater in almost 3 years. On the other hand, my wife absolutely loves going to the movies. We’ve sort of come to an agreement that if she really wants to see a new movie, she might as well just ask one of her friends to go see it with, and I’ll wait until it comes out on netflix.
Couple the high cost of going to the movies with the fact that our nearest theater is nearly 45 minutes away, and even if the movie was relatively cheap, the cost of gas to drive there, and the thought of sitting in the car for a total of an hour and a half to catch a 2 hour movie really kills the appeal of it all.
That’s why I have a big HDTV and surround sound, so I don’t have to pay through the nose or drive somewhere. But my wife likes the “experience” of going to the movies. Oh well.
September 25th, 2008 at 2:07 pm
I agree with you on the ridiculous prices, but we still love watching movies on the big screen. The Entertainment Book has offers for the AMC theaters which brings down the admission prices a few dollars. There are some coupons out there for AMC as well to get a free small popcorn with purchase of a coke product. Still not all that cheap. We sneak in candy and drinks from time to time. We get older movies from the library, and have a one-movie account with Netflix as well. Guess we’ll make do since we are such movie buffs.
September 25th, 2008 at 2:08 pm
Do you have any drive-ins near you? It’s too bad they’re a dying breed, but I found them to be a great, relatively inexpensive movie-going experience.
It costs the standard price of a movie ticket to get in. Bring Windex and a few paper towels to clean off your windshield before the show begins. Tune your car radio to the FM broadcast of the movie’s sound track.
Once the show begins, you begin feasting on whatever delicious food and beverage you brought with you. My personal favorite was always pizza and beer, but I’m a simple man.
Special bonus: no morons talking behind you, no morons texting on their bright cell phones in front of you, and no ugly looks from the other patrons when you thunderously pass gas.
September 25th, 2008 at 2:12 pm
I only pay full price to see action films that would look best on the big screen. Otherwise its Netflix for me. I also will sneak in my own candy. But drinks and popcorn are hard to sneak in. I try to eat before I go that way I’m not tempted.
But for me movies just aren’t worth it. I usually can’t sit still for 2 hours anyway, so going to the movies is something I don’t often do.
September 25th, 2008 at 2:12 pm
I don’t read this site for the complaining about the cost of things. I read it for all the great advice.
Please go see another movie and plan ahead this time. Sneak in food, find a discount (student of life), wait until it shows up at the cheap theater, ride your bike to the theater, whatever.
I want to read the movie thread with you bragging how much you saved over your last experience.
Thanks, Ian
September 25th, 2008 at 2:12 pm
Oooof! $$! I love the pub theaters… have you checked out the Bagdad? One of the most gorgeous theaters in town, and in the upper balcony they have lots of nice, cushy love seats. The Laurelhurst is just a couple of blocks from me so I tend to go there a lot.
Just imagine, for $22 at one of those theaters you can get a movie ticket, a pitcher of beer, 2 slices of pizza and a donut!
September 25th, 2008 at 2:13 pm
“I paid a total of $22.25 to watch a 96 minute movie ”
What’s the big deal? You cannot splurge everynow and then. According to the previews, I knew the movie was a downer.
I have 6 figures in investments, but I still find little luxuries like going to the movies, which will not hurt my cash flow
I think you are more upset that the movie wasn’t good than spending the $22
September 25th, 2008 at 2:15 pm
working in the industry I hate to say this, but some films are meant to be torrented. I was so excited for Burn After Reading, but then I saw how bad the marketing peeps whored it out (completely twisting negative reviews into positive ones) that I gave up. Read this isht - http://www.gelfmagazine.com/archives/the_coens_emotionfree_uneven_thriller.php.
September 25th, 2008 at 2:16 pm
If you go to the movies in my area, it’s about $10. $10 a month is not unreasonable for that type of entertainment, especially compared to what a big entertainment system + cable would cost (I don’t have the need for most of that stuff, just want to see a movie every once in a while).
You’re right, though, the food is way overpriced. Don’t buy it. The “treat” is the movie itself.
I don’t think we’re missing the point. I think we’re disagreeing with you. $10 to see a movie is not outrageous. All the additional junk is priced outrageously, so the logical conclusion is to not buy it!
September 25th, 2008 at 2:27 pm
I love Ian’s comment at #20: “I don’t read this site for the complaining about the cost of things. I read it for all the great advice.”
Ouch. Good point.
But can’t I wear my grumpy old man hat just the once?
September 25th, 2008 at 2:29 pm
I haven’t been to the cinema in years. Sticky floors (ugh), screaming children, whispering people, etc. I’d rather stay at home, curl up on the sofa, and watch a film from Lovefilm (like Netflix). I can dress down, have a mug of coffee and stroke the dog (who will probably be on the sofa next to me) at the same time. it’s a much better experience.
And it’s a damn sight cheaper.
September 25th, 2008 at 2:34 pm
Wow, that is a lot.
To get movies to see on my blog I usually go to AMC Theaters on weekends. If you go before Noon you only pay $5 at older AMC’s and $6 for newer AMC’s. It’s not expensive and it is for any movie that is playing before noon.
September 25th, 2008 at 2:34 pm
Solomon is right — 90% of the objection is due to the crap environment. A few landmark theaters are ok, but obviously you have to do your due diligence in exploring theaters.
September 25th, 2008 at 2:40 pm
You can’t even get into a theater where I live for your ten dollar limit, JD. It’s twelve bucks just to walk in the door. Consequently, I only go once or twice a year. I stick almost entirely to Netflix — and half the time I find that a film that looked interesting when it first came out no longer interests me by the time it gets to the top of my queue.
September 25th, 2008 at 2:48 pm
Those of you for whom it costs $10 or $12 to get into the theater: is that the matinee price? Holy cats, either way.
At what point do movies become too expensive? What must it be like to take a family to a movie? When I was a boy, one of our favorite things was for the family to go see a movie together. If Mom, Dad, and the three boys were to go to a film today, it’d cost nearly $40 just for admission!
I don’t really mean to complain. I love going to the movies as much as the next person. I’m just spoiled by the cheap theaters. As I mentioned, Portland has some great ones. For the price of my $7.50 matinee ticket for Burn After Reading, I was able to see the last Indiana Jones film and buy some Red Vines and a bottled water.
Portland also has a great chain of pub theaters. You can buy beer and pizza and watch a second-run film. This is very inexpensive, as the long lines testify. I’ve seen some great movies at The Baghdad: The Matrix, Children of Men, etc. But it’s even more fun to watch bad movies like The Scorpion King this way.
September 25th, 2008 at 2:48 pm
I agree, movies are ridiculously overpriced. I love my Blockbuster online account, but still see some new releases in the theater. My costco sells discounted tickets to some chain theaters (basically matinee price anytime), or there’s also the drive-in which is a fun experience in itself. The only time I buy food from the theater is if I’m with a bunch of people and we get the big bucket of popcorn and share so it’s 1-2 dollars each. Or else I bring my own snacks from home. Frankly, I don’t see anything unethical in that. there have been times I’ve been actually carrying a bag of food or a drink and no one has ever said anything to me. If the items were reasonably priced, I’d buy them there, but it’s not.
p.s. Theaters in my area are at least 10.50 this is the non-matinee price. Matinees range from 8.50-9.50 I’d say. I don’t know how families go to the movies at all, especially since kids usually want food when they are there.
September 25th, 2008 at 2:49 pm
JD, just curious on your take on the outrageous cost for concerts these days.
September 25th, 2008 at 2:53 pm
$7.50 for matinee is outrageous. lol
But that is why I sneak in Gummy Bears to eat.
September 25th, 2008 at 2:59 pm
The Academy! Haven’t you been to the Academy? And how did I not notice that you’re in Portland?
September 25th, 2008 at 2:59 pm
When was the last time I was active in the comments like this? It’s a sign that I’m Caught Up, that I have posts written for the next few days.
@Susan
It has been a l-o-n-g time since I went to a big concert. I’ve been to some smaller concerts, though. Also, I tend to go to concerts only for bands I really love.
Believe it or not, at this very moment I’m researching ticket prices for The Decemberists show in Portland on 11/29. I’m having trouble finding the actual ticket prices, though.
Aha. They’re $27.50. Well, that’s pretty darn steep, too. But it’s The Decemberists. I’ve seen them live three or four times already, and I know that I’ll get $27.50 worth of enjoyment from the show.
I guess maybe that’s the real issue here (as a couple of commenters already noted) — getting value for your dollar. I can pay $27.50 for a two hour concert and think I got a bargain. Or I can pay $22.25 for a mediocre movie and some junk food and feel ripped off. The key is to make smart choices, right?
September 25th, 2008 at 2:59 pm
My wife and I try to only go out to watch movies once in a while, and tend to wind up going on weekend evenings. Prices are getting pretty high for first-runs, but I’m not overly concerned–watch the credits at the end of most movies, and then remember that everybody on that 10-minute list needs to get a cut of your $7-10 ticket, not just the theater and the studio heads. From what I hear, theaters don’t make much on ticket sales, which is why snack prices are going so high. They need to earn money too, so I’m not averse to paying $5-6 for one large popcorn which feeds us both, though I limit my snack purchases to just that–anything more we want I buy cheap at Walgreens and sneak in via my wife’s purse (big enough for a couple boxes of candy and two canned drinks).
And of course, we only go out and do this once in a while. We saw four movies this summer, and I think that’s going to be all for the year.
September 25th, 2008 at 3:05 pm
Ha! You beat me to it — if I’m going to pay $20+ to sit still and be quiet, there had better be a live performance going on — theatre, concert, hockey . . .
A couple of theaters near us just came out with discount cards, where $30 buys 5 movies and 2 medium popcorns, so I invested in 3 of them, because sometimes we just want to get out of the house and see a movie on the big screen without the kids.
September 25th, 2008 at 3:08 pm
The last two big concerts we went to were really discouraging–during the first, two women behind us chatted loudly right in our ears the entire time, catching up on their lives, I guess–why they spent money on the concert when they had no interest in the music, I don’t know.
During the 2nd the people in front of us stood up, swaying drunkenly (people started drinking in the parking lot before the concert even started) and singing loudly and off-key. I doubt they even remembered what concert they went to the next day.
Not worth it!
September 25th, 2008 at 3:13 pm
I see your point in principle and as a fellow Portlander, I feel lucky to have such good cheaper movie theater options available. For the same reasons you mentioned, my husband and I generally avoid places like Regal, just because we would rather wait and see the movie much cheaper at home, without the loud person behind us talking, etc. We purchased a large LCD TV and surround sound stereo nine months ago and have only seen two movies at the theater since then. Outragous movie theater prices was one of the considerations for that purchase.
However, you spent 66% of your expense on food that was not necessary or healthy. We recently saw Dark Knight in IMAX because we thought the experience was worth it, but we chose to enjoy a meal outside of the movie theater before the movie. That movie theater food is a rip-off no matter what!
September 25th, 2008 at 3:13 pm
JD
Take it easy…you splurge once in a while !
LOL @ JoBmore…Gummy Bears !
Netflix is the way to go. Also, I don’t see anybody talking about DOLLAR THEATRES ! I have heard of some cities where 6 months old movies are shown for $2 ! That’s a great deal, but sadly there are no such theatres where I live
September 25th, 2008 at 3:22 pm
Why did you go last night when you can go tonight for the price of 3 cans of food?
http://www.oregonfoodbank.org/news/newsroom/Canstheatrelist.html
I’m going to see Igor!
September 25th, 2008 at 3:26 pm
@Mary Sue
D’oh! Neither Paul nor I knew about that.
But now that you’ve brought it up, maybe I can take Kris on a cheap date tonight.
“Honey, why do you have six cans of creamed corn with you?”
September 25th, 2008 at 3:30 pm
@ Mary Sue, Igor is on the list of movies that don’t qualify for cans.
September 25th, 2008 at 3:31 pm
McMenamin’s has Red Vines too! (at least The Mission Theater does)
September 25th, 2008 at 3:38 pm
I’ve made a rule for myself that I won’t see a movie if I think it will be just as good on the small-screen. So far only Harry Potter and the new Batman series have made the cut. All the others are definitely not worth the $10, and I’m not a fan of matinees unless it’s a crappy day.
I agree that movie prices have definitely skyrocketed…but spending twice the cost of the movie on snacks is just a silly move on your part.
September 25th, 2008 at 3:44 pm
i dont see why NetFlix is so highly supported. It’s a repeat payment, so unless you are watching 7 films a month, you may as well rent individually. And if you’re watching 7 films a month, that’s 15 hours you could be spending making that time work for your savings or bank account.
September 25th, 2008 at 3:51 pm
A reminder that you did not see a $22 movie. You saw a $7.50 movie. That’s 1/3 of what you spent. It’s a great movie and well worth it, IMHO. The rest of that stuff? Not so much.
September 25th, 2008 at 3:54 pm
I think I share J.D.’s grumpy feeling about this. I feel the same way every time I buy overpriced food in a restricted environment - airports (where you can no longer carry many food/drink items through security), amusement parks (where they often check your bag, and you don’t want to have to carry stuff around, anyway), movie theaters, sporting events, etc. Sometimes I want to enjoy a snack with a movie or eat a meal at a ball game, but my options are:
1. Break the rules by sneaking stuff in,
2. Feel like I’ve just been hit by some sort of scam artist by paying way overinflated prices, or
3. Be hungry.
None of those options is appealing. Yes, I know that I can eat before I go, and I only want the popcorn because it smells so good, yadda yadda yadda, but the lack of a better option makes me feel worse about the overall experience.
September 25th, 2008 at 4:02 pm
Everyone will have their opinion on this, but I actually enjoy posts like this one. I like hearing about the highs and lows, the joys and frustrations, triumphs and mistakes, of your whole financial experience. We all have them.
September 25th, 2008 at 4:09 pm
I am ok with the price of movies, but the concessions are really crazy. $5 for a small drink. $6 for a small popcorn. wow. nuts. I can even eat beforehand, and I’ll end up getting popcorn and eating the whole thing. Too bad you can’t sneak in popcorn!
September 25th, 2008 at 4:10 pm
Nachos have to be the stupidest idea for a theater snack ever. They should find and shoot the guy who thought that up.
Seriously, I can’t think of a louder, more annoying food to eat in a quiet movie.
September 25th, 2008 at 4:15 pm
I guess it has been a while since I have been to a first-run movie. Seven and a half bucks for a matinee does seem outrageous.
Last weekend I went to Baghdad to see “Moulin Rouge”. It cost five bucks(before the pizza and beer) and had a little show before the movie. It included a little burlesque, a can-can contest, and a costume contest. I was amazed how many people showed up in costume. It was a very entertaining evening and didn’t come close to $22. I guess, like anything else, it pays to shop around for the best entertainment value.
September 25th, 2008 at 4:17 pm
Thanks, J. I’m glad somebody enjoyed the rant.
You know, I got to thinking. What’s really going on here is my perspective has changed. What I did yesterday was just go to the movies in the same way that I’ve been going to the movies for years. Yes, it’s much more expensive than it used to be, but the Old J.D. wouldn’t have noticed or cared. He just would have paid his money (and possibly put it on credit).
The New J.D. is aware of how much things cost, and aware of how much “life energy” (to borrow from Your Money or Your Life) goes into each thing he chooses to do. The New J.D. is always making comparisons: this movie experience costs as much as dinner at Pok-Pok.
When I think about it, that’s what’s really going on here.
September 25th, 2008 at 4:19 pm
Tickets in Australia at Greater Union cost $16.50 (standard adult - normal session) and that’s just for the movie… no popcorn, drinks or inclusions… sounds like we are getting ripped off over here!
September 25th, 2008 at 4:22 pm
Yes, a trip to the movies is extortionate! We are a family of five, so you can imagine how much that can cost. Consequently it is a major treat for us and we only do it once or twice a year. It’s much cheaper for us all to go and see a local High School football game and just as much fun!! If we really can’t live without seeing the movie, we wait and rent it through Netflix.
September 25th, 2008 at 4:42 pm
You can’t bring your own food and drinks to the movies? Since when?
Erm, last movie I saw in a theater was…lemme see, “Star Trek: Wrath of Khan”, I think. (First run). It was excellent!
I will add that if you live in a University town you can go to the movies at the Student Union, or the plays they give.
September 25th, 2008 at 4:43 pm
I am from India and while growing up used to frequent cinemas which were huge single screen cinemas. Tickets were inexpensive and the cinematic experience was worth it. The growth of multiplexes and the high prices in multiplexes has eroded the value for money. After coming to the US, we sometimes go for the matinees ($7.50) for select movies based on their box office performance.
However, we found IMAX to be a phenomenal cinematic experience (of course, depends on the movie too). Although tickets are around a dollar more than the regular prices in first run multiplexes, we find the cinematic experience in IMAX worth every cent.
My view is that it boils down to the value for money of the cinematic experience.
Has anyone tried RedBox? For 1$ per night, I can’t imagine a much better deal if one has a good digital tv or home theater. Redbox has most of the new movies. Of course you need to ensure that you watch the movie the night you rent it.
September 25th, 2008 at 4:43 pm
First, wanted to mention that I like these types of posts as well.
As for movies, I compromise the same way KC and Chloe do: Go to the theater for theater-quality movies, watch the rest at home. I happily paid $16 per ticket to see Dark Knight in IMAX, but I wouldn’t pay half that to see, I don’t know, Pineapple Express in the theater. It all evens out.
I also sneak in food and have my entire life. My parents would NEVER pay the concession stand prices and instead we’d buy candy on the way to the theater. The big chain drugstores sell movie-theater candy for about a buck a box.
Finally, I think there are child prices and student prices that make it a little less expensive to take a family… but still probably pretty pricey. Baseball tickets are starting to get that way, too.
September 25th, 2008 at 4:55 pm
Okay, IMAXians, what makes that worth the cost? I’ve never been. I don’t even know what it means other than ginormous screen. (And I might even have *that* wrong.)
September 25th, 2008 at 5:00 pm
Beer at the movies in the U.S!? I always thought it wasn’t allowed.
I enjoyed going to the movies in Japan and being able to have a beer, I could never understand why they didn’t have theatres that served Stateside.
Glad to hear they actually exist
September 25th, 2008 at 5:13 pm
One “medium” diet soda (44 ounces, or about 1.25 liters)
Oh my! If I drank that, i’d miss half the movie running to the toilet all the time. That is MEDIUM?
Sean.
September 25th, 2008 at 5:16 pm
Dang. Now you’ve made me all nostalgic about McMenamins. Beer, movies, and old historic buildings are the best!
I thought it was cool that you could buy beer from a vending machine in the middle of the street in Japan. It might have to do with their harsh criminal system though.
September 25th, 2008 at 5:25 pm
I went to the theater 10 times this summer and probably spent a total of $77. I haven’t bought a snack at the theater in at least a decade. I always bring my own.
Nothing beats a good cinema experience. In my experience, 2nd run theaters have crummy sound and video.
September 25th, 2008 at 5:31 pm
Now y’all have me curious. Of those who are reading down this far in the comments, how many bring your own snacks to the movies? Always? Sometimes? Never? How many don’t have a problem with other people doing this? How many do have a problem with other people doing this?
September 25th, 2008 at 5:50 pm
Hubby and I worked in “The Industry.” We even met at an industry screening. Of course movies were what brought us together and it’s been hard setting aside that strange and unique shared experience with strangers in the dark. But as the children were born, we certainly couldn’t afford to take the whole family anymore, and movies became special dates for the two of us.
As prices have risen, we have cut back dramatically. There are still films we see in the theatre, but the majority of films we get from Netflix.
Regal Cinemas has recently changed their matinee showing times to end at 3PM. That means for the greatest part, there is one matinee showing a day.
As for snacks, we try hard to buy something at the theatre, even if it is only something to share. It might be poor personal economic policy, but we support our local theatre (especially the Mom and Pop operations.) Concessions are where the theatre make their income. Those outrageous ticket prices line the pockets of the film companies, NOT the theatres. I don’t have a problem with others bringing their own snacks, but please get educated about where that money goes (giving your teens a safe place to work, hiring someone to work the projector and someone to scrape gum off the floor and scrub the toilets) before deciding to not purchase concessions.
Some theatre companies offer discounted tickets to their own hired “Mystery Shoppers.” You purchase a block of tickets for half price, then after your film, fill out a short online form telling about the service you received. These arrangements are usually in a special boxed section on the theatre company’s home page.
Ah, I miss McMenamins. What a great date night.
September 25th, 2008 at 6:04 pm
Amen, JD! On vacation last week, my husband took our three older ones to an Imax movie, and without ANY snacks, the bill was $46. It so did not used to be that expensive. And next year, we will not be doing that.
To answer your question, we don’t bring our own snacks. It seems deceptive and dishonest to me. And I know I’d never get caught if I did it, but God sees and knows, and I’d rather go snackless(or buy expensive snacks) than do something that would be dishonoring to Him.
I remember my dad bringing dried apples to a movie once, though! LOL
September 25th, 2008 at 6:40 pm
I’m reading this far down! I NEVER eat during movies, period. I think it has to do with how I was raised. When my parents took us to the movies, we just bypassed the concession area without a second thought. It was something other people did but not us. I was never conditioned to associate movies with eating, and I still don’t.
Reminds me of when my grandmother used to take my cousins and I to the “doll museum” down the street. There were all kinds - antiques, new ones, some in cases, stacked high. It wasn’t until years later that I realized it was actually a store - not a “museum” at all. But we were content just to ooh and ahh because she framed it in a way that made us think nothing was for sale.
September 25th, 2008 at 6:41 pm
IMAX is great for movies like The Dark Knight and 300, both of which I saw in that format. One, the screen is huge and encompasses your vision. Two, the sound system tends to rock your socks off… a bit more so than standard movies. However, IMAX is best for documentaries where the expanded field of view is most effective.
As for sneaking candy into the theatres, I do it from time to time, but only when I’m seeing a big movie such as The Dark Knight. Otherwise I go without and tend to be happier and healthier for it.
September 25th, 2008 at 7:38 pm
We have found an especially frugal alternative to Netflix–the public library.
You can put movies into a queue online and get them from the interlibrary loan, so they have 20-30 libraries to choose from. Check it out–there are many more titles than you might think, even new releases. The best part–it’s FREE! And you can check them out for 2 weeks, while having as many others in your queue as you want. My husband loves “beating the system”!!
I will admit going to the theater is great fun, but a luxury we don’t often partake in. We did see U23D at a really nice theater this summer though–worth the money!
As for your question, yes we smuggle in a couple water bottles, but usually buy a small bag of popcorn to share. We wouldn’t have more than that at home either (don’t buy much pop–told ya we’re cheap!)
September 25th, 2008 at 7:42 pm
I still don’t get the point of all of your whining given how much you chose to spend on junk food. I’m 33 years old, and I have NEVER bought food in a movie theater. This is both to save my budget and out of principle — the stuff is an obvious trap and is grossly overpriced. I wouldn’t get any pleasure from buying it or eating it knowing the insane price and the profit margins.
You made two bad choices — buying all of that food was bad for your budget and a disaster for the health/weight loss plan you are supposed to be following.
$7.50 is about my threshold for a movie, and I don’t mind paying that much to support a great movie. It actually costs a lot to make and advertise many films these days. In contrast, it costs the theaters next to nothing to make popcorn and nachos and then sell them to impulsing movie-goers.
September 25th, 2008 at 7:46 pm
J.D., the issue about the snacks you had has been beaten to death, but…aren’t you supposed to be on an exercise and fitness regimen?
I very rarely go to first-run movies, and never eat during a movie at all. If I can attend an opera or a concert or a play without stuffing my face, I can sure survive a movie without doing so.
And besides–here’s my inner grump emerging–I truly hate it when people (around me) eat and drink at a movie. All of the chewing and slurping grosses me out and is distracting, and I can’t stand the smell of buttered popcorn. BLECH!!
September 25th, 2008 at 7:48 pm
My definition of a movie theater has always been “a concession stand that happens to be showing a movie”.
I don’t go to the theater because two tickets is the price of the DVD and I can watch the DVD more than once.
There are two psychological “tricks” about movies. 1) You need to watch on a bigger screen. 2) You need to see it right away. Believing both makes you a good little consumer but getting over both makes it much easier to shrug off the theater all together.
September 25th, 2008 at 7:55 pm
Yup, my wife and I just went to see “The Dark Night” yesterday. All said and done it was about $45.00. It was a really good movie, and I wanted to see it in the theater, but now I know why I don’t go to the movies much. The only thing that made it worth it was that I was able to get my wife out of the house. She’s been cooped up because we just had our second child 2 weeks ago.
September 25th, 2008 at 8:09 pm
Hi JD! I kind of see your point. A few weeks ago my friend invited me to see The Dark Knight at the IMAX theatre with some friends of hers. I had already seen it and told her I was trying not to spend money. She kept bugging me and told me it was only $12. I didn’t want to flake on her so I agreed to go. When we got there it was really $17! I couldn’t back out since her friend had already purchased the ticket. I also ended up buying a pretzel that cost $4.50. To top it off, I felt really uncomfortable because I didn’t know any of her friends. They all basically talked amongst each other and ignored me. In total I paid 21.50 for a crappy uncomfortable night out.
September 25th, 2008 at 8:16 pm
A movie here in LA costs $12.75 (and a matinee is $9), so feel lucky you’re paying so little.
I always sneak food in (if I bring food, which is seldom. My folks would never pay for movie snacks so I never got in the habit). I don’t care what the rules are; I just bring my big purse with a box of Hot Tamales (my preferred movie food). For what you paid for your snacks, you could go to Costco and buy, like, 5lb. of Hot Tamales
Sodas just make you want the movie to END so you can pee, so they’re a crummy investment.
I like how you said you’ve changed your perspective over the years — I think the best part of the experience is the awareness that you value your money and don’t want to waste it on frivolous junk. If everyone in America thought like that, maybe movies would be better quality. *shrug*
September 25th, 2008 at 8:23 pm
That stinks, and it’s why I never buy snacks at a regular movie theater. I do go to the movies regularly, however. I’m so frugal with the rest of my life that I really don’t mind spending the cake once a month or so. I like the big screen.
For those times that I want to eat during the movie, I like to go to Chunky’s, which is a local theater around here. I think admission’s like $6 or something, and then you order food from a menu and they bring it to your table and you eat while you watch. (Or beforehand if you got there early enough.) It’s standard Friendly’s/all-American type cuisine. Nothing special. They also serve beer and wine and some mixed drinks.
Did I mention that you sit in reclining Cadillac seats? Yes, literally, reclining Caddy seats back when they were big and comfy. There are quite a number of middle-aged and elderly men and women who go at all times of the day and night. It seems to transcend the typical teenybopper megaplex concept.
It’s my favorite way to go to the movies.
http://www.chunkys.com/
Pity you don’t have them where you are. It’s cheaper to do that than go for dinner and a movie separately.
September 25th, 2008 at 8:37 pm
Yes, Get Fit Slowly readers, I did have snacks. However (and get ready for some rationalization!), they consisted of 440 calories of Raisinets, 2 ounces of chips, some fake cheese stuff, and diet soda. The rest of my day included plenty of exercise and healthy meals.
September 25th, 2008 at 8:47 pm
You should have waited a day - all of the Regal Cinemas in the Portland area had an event today (the 25th) in conjunction with the Oregon Food Bank called “Cans Film Festival”. If you bring in 3 cans of food you get a movie AND a small popcorn for free. The 4 newest movies are excluded, but Burn After Reading was not. Hey, you still have an hour or two to get to a Regal Cinema near you…
I just realized someone else above posted this same information… didn’t catch it on the first scan through the comments! Sorry for the repeat.
September 25th, 2008 at 8:48 pm
Snacks at movie theaters are way overpriced. I avoid them. It’s like buying water at the airport. With the airport security in the US these days I cannot bring water in any more. I have a good mind to sneak in an *empty* bottle next time I fly and fill it with water from the water coolers inside.
I’ve never brought my own snacks to the movies because I’m usually not hungry. :p Drinking water during the show forces me to use the bathroom mid-movie and causes me to miss part of the movie. What’s the point? Unless they are showing Lord of the Rings Director’s Uncut Extended DVD Edition or something long like that, might as well wait until after the movie to eat and drink.
September 25th, 2008 at 8:48 pm
Dumb Money: The Movie Theater
You saw it here first… back in March
September 25th, 2008 at 8:59 pm
I know the guy that runs the three theaters in our little foothills area. They make no money off the films. Income is produced by the popcorn and candy etc… Just the way it is.
I don’t do a lot of movies.. Only when there is something that I really want to see, otherwise, it’s a rental later. But, nothing beats a good movie on the big screen with theater popcorn.. Gotta do it once in a while…
Anyway.. Who says you need a 44 oz drink … Or comics? How frugal is that?
jegan
September 25th, 2008 at 9:12 pm
Kris: “You are such a rationalizer. You can never rationalize 440 calories of Raisinets and nachos. Never.”
I would like to point out to those unfamiliar with my current fitness woes (and successes), that this is what I’m going through right now. And it’s exactly the same as what I went through with money before I finally got it under control. You don’t see me rationalizing my $22 expenditure here. I know exactly what it is and what it means. But my food consumption? Well, I still make excuses…
September 25th, 2008 at 9:25 pm
Wow, 80 comments already for a current day post. We must be some movie watchers or something
J.D., of course you’re allowed to wear your crotchety old man hat once in a while, but pick something where you don’t break every GRS rule in the book!
I quit going to the public movie theaters a very long time ago. The experience is just ruined now. The wall-rattling commercials/promos, the idiot behind you who saw the movie yesterday and just has to provide running commentary to his companion, the jerk in front of you who is so important to the world that he absolutely must take this very important cell phone call (and who seems a little peeved now that his precious phone is in little pieces under the seats). I won’t put up with it anymore.
My wife loves movies. So I built her a nice home theater; huge HDTV, surround sound etc. Sure, there’s several hundred $22.25 theater visits in there. That’s one of the things we could choose to do once we learned to control our money situation.
See how I spun that back to GRS? Pretty cool eh?
September 25th, 2008 at 9:38 pm
I live in a community with three places to go to movies in our county, all are independent and I will always purchase something from the snack bar when I go because that is the way the staff gets paid and the owners make money- also they purchase their snacks from a local family owned distributor and when the place gets messy a local company comes in and cleans the seats- since all of these local businesses support the community through a variety of activities including free kids movies on Saturdays during December, almost free kid movies on Mondays during summer, and sponsoring almost every kid who comes down the street I figure the least I can do is buy a bratwurst.
That said… I seldom go see anything except what’s playing at the drive-in where (a)it’s $10.00 a carload on Saturday and Sunday nights (b)ice chests are encouraged (c) if you happen to bring an adult beverage, and don’t get stupid, no one cares.
Also, the most expensive ticket at the regular theater is $6.50
September 25th, 2008 at 9:44 pm
I am with the military and have been living overseas since 2002. One of the true joys of raising a family in this environment has been the base movie theater. We go to the movies about once a week and they are a great value. No commerical advertising (except some base information)and everyone is expected to stand for the national annthem before the movie.
Tickets are $4.00 for adults and $2.00 for under 12. A popcorn and soda is anwhere from $3.00 to $6.00 depending on size.
The sound system will never be THX certified and it isn’t uncommon to have an occassional focus problem with the projector but who cares?
Twenty years ago we would get new releases a few months after they came out. Now we get them a few weeks late but on occasion at the same time.
I really am going to miss this when we go back to the states.
September 25th, 2008 at 10:04 pm
Also, everyone might be able to stop referring to “sneaking” in food. The last time I went to a movie (which is the fanciest, biggest theater complex in Georgetown in Washington, DC — maybe an AMC, but I forget), I just happened to ask someone if outside food was allowed in the theater. I was told YES. I never even expected that. They have an official policy that any outside food and drink can be brought into the theater. So, no more sneaking and no more justifying insanely high snack food prices! Double-check with the theaters in your town.
September 25th, 2008 at 11:08 pm
Hm, I may be cheap–not frugal but so be it.
I sneak into a second movie- thus dividing the cost of a ticket (8$) to 4$/movie
I bring my own snacks 2$
I download any movie I feel isn’t worth 4$ (Cloverfield…)
September 25th, 2008 at 11:37 pm
odd - i thought it was obvious to everyone that concession stand items are ALWAYS overpriced.
September 26th, 2008 at 12:43 am
Just seconding Tim Tate’s comment above about St. Johns Theater. It’s a bit out of the way for most people but I’m pretty sure it’s the only 1st run “brew & view” in town. It’s the only place I see new movies. I love living in Portland!
September 26th, 2008 at 1:54 am
we don’t pay to go to the movies for the same reason- way too expensive. However, my husband and I have just seen 2 first run films this month for free by attending previews- there’s a website here in the UK that you can sign up with and if you have the codes, you can get free tickets (the previews are usually on weekday evenings, so we go straight after work.) As for refreshments, we brought in our own snacks for the first film and for the second split a popcorn/drink deal that cost £3. Not bad for a night out!
September 26th, 2008 at 2:19 am
D’oh. Eat at home, don’t buy snacks and price will be no more than 7.50.
Sorry, DUMB money is not the one spent on movies.
DUMB is buying the newest gadget or car or whatever just because it’s new.
September 26th, 2008 at 3:22 am
Here in Ireland we have a deal where you pay 19.99 (thats euro - approx $30) and you can see as many movies as you like. Its called an unlimited card, it has a minimum of 1 year subscription but when you consider that its usually about 10 euro to see one movie, you only need to go twice a month to break even. I would easily see a movie a week, I live just 1km from the cinema, and this card is great value to me. When I went last night they had a special, where unlimited cardholders could get 25% discount on popcorn and soda - a nice added bonus!!
September 26th, 2008 at 3:27 am
I don’t go to movies anymore. Cineplexes are disgusting breeding grounds for disease. I did go to see “Vicky Christina Barcelona,” however. But that was at an art house theater, that’s much cleaner than run of the mill movie theaters.
Anywhoo… If you are the type who still likes to go out to see mass released movies, why not go to a dollar show. There are two cheap theaters in my area that show second run films (second run now being the day after they’re bumped from the first run theaters). Most of the time a ticket is slightly more than a dollar, but they both have a weekly true “dollar day.” These theaters are also really easy to sneak food into, as they are both in malls. When I used to go to those places, I’d typically sneak in enough Taco Bell, candy and pop (soda to some of you) to kill a man.
I’ve always operated on the principle that if I haven’t seen it yet, it’s new to me.
My new, slightly related thing, is that I go to see matinée performances of plays by myself. That way, I can afford to sit dead center in the first three rows of the orchestra seats. Were I to go at night and take my girlfriend, who really isn’t into live theatre, I’d be forced to buy two inferior seats and end up spending more money in spite of it.
September 26th, 2008 at 3:36 am
I guess I am one of the few who don’t think it’s expensive to go to the movies. Granted I only get there a few times a year but for $10 or less I usually feel I get my money’s worth (plus it’s cheaper than going out to dinner or drinks). Also there are plenty of *options* for doing movies on the cheap (low cost theaters, special promotions, etc.). I usually don’t buy food there but the few times I do I certainly don’t beat myself up for it (it’s a choice).
I guess that’s why I’m confused by the post. Most of the cost was a choice. If you didn’t want to spend so much why did you choose to do so? You are obviously a more mindful spender than most. The rising costs that really make me upset are the ones I HAVE to spend (gas, oil - yes yes I can conserve but many of us don’t have the option to eliminate). The rising costs that are optional are just that - optional.
Also if you haven’t been to an IMAX 3-D go now. It’s amazing…
September 26th, 2008 at 4:44 am
Oooh imax. We gladly pay £12.50 ($25ish) to watch films at the imax instead of normal cinemas (the local 12 screen multiplex lies 50m from home).
The screen is so much bigger than it beggars belief and so when you see the robots in transformers it is jaw-dropping because they are near life size and then proceed to fight (we saw it in the regular cinema first and then decided it was worth trying the imax - good call we still drool at the experience).
More than the screen though, I find the sound is better. Most screens pump us the volume and particularly the bass which comes from smaller screens. IMAX has huge bass speakers and I don’t know why but they are much more powerful (there must be a physics explanation).
We will only watch new action films in the imax (comic book adaptations especially) which also works as a good budget device (wait and save for it) and have a proper dinner too in central London.
For us it is worth every penny (cent).
Plus, you can sometimes see full length films in 3d (parts of them anyway although we have only ever seen this in Bangkok’s amazing imax theatre in the Siam Paragon - Return of Superman for those interested).
September 26th, 2008 at 4:52 am
Plus here, regular cinema tickets are £6.50 ($13ish).
September 26th, 2008 at 5:00 am
I hardly ever go to the movies unless it’s one of my kid’s birthday things or something like that, which while they have fun is no pleasure trip sitting in the front row with 9 kids. But that’s maybe every other year…
I don’t think it’s a big deal at all to go to the movies if that’s what you want to do for pleasure. I think that’s the bigger question really. Not how much you spent, but whether it was worth it to you, and you enjoyed spending time with your friend in that way. Was it worth the bottom line you paid? If yes, then your money was not wasted at all.
We were in DC not long ago and at the Smithsonian (free admission all the time btw) and we paid for an IMAX. Yikes…17 bucks is right and I just don’t find them very plesant to be crammed in with a bunch of people, sitting watching about great things when you can be out experiencing them for yourself on some level.
I have brought food in one time, some chocolate covered popcorn someone sent me for Christmas and it was so superb, I couldn’t eat any other popcorn until it gone! But yes, especially if it’s a mom and pop thing…I always buy something to support local folks.
We used to have a drive-in here, it was 5 dollars a person for two shows (new releases), the food was great and it was fun to go and see your friends and the kids could play between shows, but it closed to make way for new houses…not exactly progress imo….
September 26th, 2008 at 5:39 am
Look at all of the snacks you bought. At large movie theater prices, that’s enough food for 4 people. Why’d you buy so much, fatty?
September 26th, 2008 at 5:58 am
This is simple, just don’t order the soda and nachos and candy. Either don’t eat it at all, like I do or just buy your candy before hand and put it in your pocket. They don’t pat you down for contraband snacks at the movies the last time I checked. Had you done that your movie would cost about 9 bucks.
September 26th, 2008 at 6:12 am
What a rip off!!! The amusement parks are the same way 5.00 for a hot dog or a soda. I don’t run my business that way, I know that I am in business to make money (and so are they) but making money and ripping off someone are two different things. So I choose not to participate in those “rip offs”.
http://downwithdebt.today.com/