Three Legislative Proposals That Could Have Major Consequences for Your Finances
Published on - December 18th, 2008 (by J.D. Roth) J.D. is on vacation. This guest post comes from DR of The Dough Roller, a money management blog. Previously at GRS, he shared the seven habits of wealth.
Amidst all the financial turmoil on Wall Street and in the credit markets lately, one could easily forget about money-related legislation that is quietly pending in Congress. Ranging from credit card reform to foreclosure assistance to identity theft prevention, these legislative initiatives could have major consequences for your money if passed and signed into law. While these bills won’t be going anywhere during President Bush’s last month in office, President-elect Obama can and likely will breathe new life into these proposals.
This article will describe some of the more significant money-related bills pending in Congress. You will also find links to resources that will allow you to conduct further research and track this legislation as it moves through Congress. In this regard, GovTrack is an invaluable resource for finding and tracking all federal legislation.
Credit card reform
There are several bills pending in Congress that would overhaul the consumer credit card market. Two credit card reform bills were introduced in 2008, one in the House and one in the Senate. The House version, called the Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights Act of 2008, was passed by the House on 23 September 2008. The Senate version, dubbed the Credit Card Reform Act of 2008, was introduced in March 2008 and has been referred to committee. While both bills offer somewhat different consumer protections, they both attempt to address what some view as predatory lending practices within the credit card industry.
In a nutshell, here’s what the House version would accomplish:
- Interest Rate Increases: The bill amends the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit a creditor from using certain adverse information, including information in a consumer report or any change in a consumer’s credit score, as the basis for increasing any annual percentage rate (APR) of interest on the consumer’s outstanding credit card balance. This provision would, for example, eliminate the universal default for credit already outstanding.
- Double-Cycle Billing: The bill prohibits a creditor from imposing interest on credit repaid within the interest-free repayment time period. This restriction would prohibit double cycle billing, which is a method of calculating the daily outstanding balance that often fails to give consumers credit for payments made during the last two billing cycles.
- Reports to Credit Agencies: The bill prohibits a creditor from furnishing information to a consumer reporting agency concerning a newly opened credit card account until the consumer has used or activated the credit card. One advantage here is that if a consumer decided to cancel the card before using it (because, for example, they were unhappy with the credit limit offered), they could do so before the card company had furnished information to the credit reporting agencies.
- Payment Allocation: The bill details mandatory pro rata payment allocations by a creditor. This provision is critical to those with credit card balances subject to different interest rates. For example, balance transfer offers are typically at 0%, but a cardholder may also have made purchases that are subject to high rate interest charges. Currently, credit card companies allocate principal payments to the 0% balance first, and then to the balance subject to interest rate charges. The bill would require credit card companies to allocate payments across both balances.
So would such a law help consumers? Some yes; some no. For example, limiting a credit card company’s ability to raise interest rates would certainly help those that fall on hard times. Today, when a credit card issuer determines that a cardholder is at greater risk of default, it can and often does raise interest rates in response to the increased risk. The pending legislation would make it much harder for a credit card company to do this.
On the downside, it could mean higher credit card interest rates for everybody. Just like a mortgage, a fixed-rate credit card generally will carry a higher interest rate than a variable-rate card, all other things being equal.
Foreclosure Assistance
With foreclosures on the rise, we can expect to see a rash of federal assistance aimed at bolstering real estate prices. Such assistance undoubtedly will include, among other things, keeping people in their homes.
Currently, Congress has passed or is considering a number of foreclosure assistance related bills. The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 was enacted into law on 30 July 2008. Among other things, this law established the Home Ownership Preservation Entity Fund to fund the HOPE (Home Ownership Preservation Entity) for Homeowners Program, which will insure up to $300 billion for 30 year refinanced loans for distressed borrowers between 01 October 2008 and 30 September 2011.
Introduced in February 2008, the Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008 would also address the foreclosure crisis. The big news here is that the bill permits a bankruptcy court to modify a mortgage in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy (individual reorganization). Under the bankruptcy laws enacted in 1978, such a modification is not permitted. Here’s a summary of this provision:
Authorizes a bankruptcy plan for individuals with regular income to: (1) modify an allowed secured claim secured by the debtor’s principal residence if the debtor’s income is insufficient to retain possession of the residence by curing a default and maintaining payments while the case is pending; (2) provide for payment of such claim for a period of up to 30 years; (3) set conditions for the addition of certain fees, costs, or charges to secured debt; and (4) waive any prepayment penalty on a claim secured by a debtor’s principal residence.
As with credit card reform, the Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008 would help some and hurt others. Allowing a bankruptcy judge to modify the terms of a mortgage would save some homeowners from foreclosure, but it likely would increase the cost of mortgages for everybody because it would introduce some level of additional interest-rate risk to both fixed- and variable-rate mortgages.
Identity Theft Prevention Act
As one last example of pending legislation that could impact your finances, the Identity Theft Prevention Act was introduced in the Senate in 2007.
This bill provides three key measures in the fight against identity theft:
- Requires entities that maintain consumers’ confidential information to enforce a written program designed to secure that information.
- Requires these entities to notify consumers and, in certain circumstances reporting agencies, of any security breach that creates a reasonable risk of identity theft.
- Enables consumers to put a security freeze on their credit report. A security freeze prohibits a reporting agency from releasing your report for credit review purposes without your prior express authorization.
With President-Elect Obama’s plan to make the economy the number one issue when he takes office, we can expect a number of legislative actions that will impact our finances. The above three are some of the more significant bills pending in Congress, but as noted above, you can track any legislation you want quite easily with GovTrack.
On a related note, check out Billshrink’s Credit Card Bill of Rights. Photo by Pong.
GRS is committed to helping our readers save and achieve your financial goals.Savings interest rates may be low, but that’s all the more reason to shop for the best rate.Find the highest savings interest rate from Ally Bank, Capital One 360, Everbank, and more.
This article is about Economics, News, Odds and Ends
Disclaimer: This content is not provided or commissioned by American Express. Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of American Express, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by American Express. This site may be compensated through American Express Affiliate Program.
Discover is a paid advertiser of this site. Reasonable efforts are made to maintain accurate information. See the Discover online credit card application for full terms and conditions on offers and rewards.
SEARCH FOR RECENT ARTICLES



Yup. There’s a lot of things happening down in the US.
I’m sure all US people will be hit by taxes or whatnot to help other people. They dug themselves in the hole and now they need other people to dig them out. Luckily I live in Canada so it’s not that bad but best of luck to everyone!
loading....
I agree Trevor. It’s our own faults that we are in this mess, but individual corporations are not taking their fair share of the blame. They are just asking for bailouts. Hopefully some of the new laws coming into effect will prevent stupidity in the future, but I doubt it.
loading....
Some of this stuff is overdue, especially in terms of credit card companies.
loading....
I was writing a post yesterday about an alternative way of looking at debt reduction (Try Taking A Different Approach to Paying Down Debt) when I received a call regarding the vote today on the credit card rules and one thing really irked me regarding the way in which the payments will be applied. Forcing the credit card companies to apply payments to the highest interest-bearing charges first doesn’t necessarily help the consumer at all. Ordering the application of payments from highest rate to lowest does not necessarily benefit the consumer as a larger purchase at a lower rate carries more of an interest burden than a small purchase at a higher interest rate. Perhaps, all credit issuers should allow the consumer to choose which purchases a payment gets applied to to give consumers even more control.
I know that the credit card companies are unlikely to allow consumers to pick and choose how their payments are applied, but the credit issuers will still receive their interest. I guess people will be happy with the fact that the government is at least looking for ways to help people get out from bad situations rather than leaving them stranded.
loading....
Of course, the credit card stuff only applies if you *use* credit cards. And perhaps higher-interest credit cards might not be a bad move if it ultimately helps people decide to cut those things up and not use them in the first place.
loading....
lets see how many proposals actually come through…I wont be holding my breath tho
loading....
Sucks when people take away one’s ability to make one’s own decisions based on one’s own circumstances doesn’t it?
I’m still waiting for someone to explain to me WHY we are still listening to these so-called expert bozos who got us into this mess? Plenty of people saw this melt-down coming–plenty with respectable acronyms after their names. They’ve been screaming for years and were lambasted for trying to start a chicken little episode! Guess what, the sky fell and will fall even more before its over. Expect a 3000 DOW before 2010. How come none of the resident and accepted experts did? So who’s the expert?
I want someone else to get us out of it. Better yet, I want them (congress, corporates et al.) to get OUT OF MY WAY and let me handle my own business.
If I don’t like your terms, I don’t do business with you. I don’t like “other people” telling me to do business within set restrictions, anyway, “for my own good.” They didn’t have my “own good” in mind when they subsidized, restricted, and expanded the various bubbles, protections, and money supply. They didn’t have my or humanities own good in mind when they spent trillions on a false-based and technically illegal war with corrupt insider contractors. They had their own profit and bonus pockets in mind. Now they want more of MY money to keep them afloat. Any company too big to fail is too big to survive.
It has been my experience that anyone who thinks they know better than me, what my own good is, is best gotten away from as fast as possible. Especially if they think it is for my own good enough to force me to play with them at a point of a gun.
(What guns? Try not paying taxes because you can’t afford it. Try selling short to protect your investments right now. Try cashing in your entire savings to get out of socialized banks…if you have more than 10k, they won’t give it to you unless you have a chat with the men in black…and if you don’t comply or satisfy them, the men in blue with guns come and take you away. Try it. See how free you are.)
There is more than these three pieces of legislature that is going to affect us in the coming days. Get used to it.
loading....
I am hoping the foreclosure assistance bill doesn’t pass. I am sick of the government interfering to prop up housing prices that should be falling. Get a clue, housing is way over priced in places like southern Cal and artificially propping up prices only prolongs the damage we are all seeing.
loading....
I agree with John. Continuing to prop up a bubble isn’t going to do anything but prolong the pain.
Foreclosures are going to happen. Banks that survive need to focus on making smarter loans and consumers need to focus on building lives that aren’t so tied to credit. I’m tired of hearing that once the Fed frees up money for banks to loan out we will all be fine.
And what about someone like me who bought an affordable home with a mortgage I can afford despite bumps in the economy and other emergencies? Life isn’t fair and I want to help people when I can but if you renegotiate a $200,000 mortgage for $125,000 because of crashing home values then we all end up suffering.
Best to let people take their losses and get on with things. My house may not be worth a dime more than I initially borrowed but at least I have one and I can make the payment. Guess it wasn’t a great “investment” but it sure comes in handy when the wind blows and it’s 10 below!
loading....
I completely agree with you, Mick. I’m a Californian, and the talk of propping up taxes even more for the sake of paying off pensions of primarily useless workers makes me sick. DW and I are seriously considering leaving the state, and maybe the country.
loading....
I agree with John to a point regarding the issue of not artificially supporting housing prices. I do however have a problem with all of the talk about credit this and credit that. People caused this problem. People are the ones that bid up housing prices to non-sustainable levels. People are the ones who decided to approve loans to risky borrowers in order to boost the company’s portfolio and their own pockets on commissions. People are the ones that signed notes for properties which they knew they could not afford over the long run and especially once rate adjusted on ARMs. Once people start to accept responsibility for their actions and current situations, then maybe they can move forward. As long as fingers keep getting pointed in every which direction nothing will change.
And to anyone who wants to leave the country, I wish them well and hope hope they’re not shocked when they discover that the grass isn’t always greener…
loading....
As it turns out, the HOPE for Homeowners bill has been nearly useless since it went into effect in October.
loading....
The credit card reforms would help out a lot. I especially like the idea of being able to shop around for cards with out it showing up on your credit report.
I hate that I have to actually open an account with a creditor and they send the info to the credit agency just to see what my rate would be.
loading....
I think the allocation of payments will be in favor of the consumer in a couple of different scenarios. 1. Cash advances – many credit cards allow cash advances however they hold a higher APR. 2. Retail credit – with different purchases on different APRs. varying by promotion. Normally credit card companies would pay the one that has the least advantage for them.
Maybe it will help in situations as I mentioned.
Remember reporting to the credit agencies item does not talk about the inquiry that hit your credit bureau to get the credit card only if you choose not to use it once you were approved.
There are always going to be a pro and con
loading....
Until we get rid of the well connected politicians down in Washington, nothing will change, there is too many lobbies, too many favors, too many everything. I’ll be surprised if any of these make it. This is to more to boost their poll numbersthen anything else from the low 10s.
loading....
“Luckily I live in Canada… so it’s not that bad…” ummm you watched the news lately…? Pardon the sarcasm there, but please don’t keep your head in the sand..
My RSP provider London Life just placed a moratorium on withdrawals of funds from 2 of their managed funds.. E.g. I can’t take any money out and put it into another mutual fund or RSP money market account.. They’ve effectively frozen $5 Billion in assets right now.. Yes, $5 B I L L I O N… and, yes, this is in CANADA…
So, my fellow Canadian, it’s not so rosy up in the Great White North afterall..
loading....
I have to say that those all seem like sensible credit card reforms. After all, how many articles and comments have you read on in the space of personal finance blogs about some of these credit card “traps” that you would not have reasonably expected?
I personally think the practice of offering a 0% rate for a large balance transfer and then applying paymennts exclusively to that 0% balance after a customer uses the card was a trap, plain and simple. At least requiring payments to apply pro rata helps mediate that some.
The abusive practice of giving short notice and raising your interest rate on new purchases and old balances was also getting out of hand. This modification makes sense. It gives a card user the tools to use their credit “sensibly” at least in the sense that they can decide if the credit is too expensive when they take it on without needing to guess if the rate will unexpectedly change later.
loading....
While we can debate all day about the merits of these bills, it’s striking to me that we’ll put up with all manner of chicanery from the government when it benefits big business or some conservative front group, but when it benefits people who are down on their luck, we get angry and start ranting about leaving the country. When did we become so myopic? The sad part is that some of us yelling about this probably call ourselves Christians. Well, people who are down on their luck in the U.S. may be better off than people down on their luck in, say, Somalia–but it’s all relative. This isn’t Somalia. So where’s the compassion?
I know, I know, people were irresponsible. But it’s like the weight thing. We’ve all decided as a society that people get fat ONLY because they are irresponsible, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. But the people who eat five Big Macs a day make the news, while the people with thyroid problems are overlooked. So with the foreclosure crisis. The people who took stupid risks and maxed out their credit cards make the news; the people who were given incomplete information or who were lied to or who were given loans by banks who knew they couldn’t repay them, hey, that isn’t news. Not even worthy of consideration.
I would rather have the over 5,000 American troops who have died in Iraq back alive and well and kicking, the thousands upon thousands of Iraqis we’ve blown up and shot to still be alive, and the corporate bigwigs who encouraged the housing bubble to all be behind bars, but I can’t have any of that. I *can*, however, support the idea of helping those people who can be helped. Maybe the current plan isn’t ideal, but anyone with a better idea is welcome to present it, and by “better” I do not mean “let them eat cake” or “let them live in a cardboard box like I’d have to do” when you know darn well you wouldn’t because you’ve got connections who would gladly take you in til you got on your feet again.
Just sayin’.
loading....
@ Tim, #12: I just heard that on NPR also. Here’s that story, which I think goes into a little more detail:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=98409330
loading....
In regards to the idea that:
“While we can debate all day about the merits of these bills, it’s striking to me that we’ll put up with all manner of chicanery from the government when it benefits big business or some conservative front group but when it benefits people who are down on their luck, we get angry and start ranting about leaving the country. When did we become so myopic? The sad part is that some of us yelling about this probably call ourselves Christians. Well, people who are down on their luck in the U.S. may be better off than people down on their luck in, say, Somalia–but it’s all relative. This isn’t Somalia. So where’s the compassion?”
That is my point exactly. Get government out of it. It was regulation and subsidy and inflation that got us into this mess. Generally speaking, people wouldn’t have had occasion to use the Equity ATM and artificially push up prices if cost of living hadn’t been stalled since 1980. (Look up overall middle-class growth compensating for inflation).
We can’t blame all of this on the off-vacation, plasma TV or stainless ‘fridge. It’s not the credit card companies getting the bail-outs. Fan and Fred wouldn’t have lent to people who couldn’t pay because it wouldn’t have been regulation and “special help” that kept them in business (remember fan and fred have never been what you call PRIVATE business).
Walmart wouldn’t have been able to get so big without government breaks, tax abatement, or as low prices without trade agreements–but you wouldn’t have noticed because your main street would still be intact and you may be getting better made objects just as cheaply, only from Cuba rather than China. And your friend Bob would still own his bookstore rather than working at B&N.
People on Government “assistance” CAN’T make their own decisions (I do community outreach; I know these people and the difficulties they face living within and getting OUT OF the system). Who gets assistance is arbitrarily decided and communities cannot help their own because they must only support those that fall within Federal guidelines. What does Washington know of Wichita? Or Detroit, for that matter? Remember, this bail-out isn’t coming from our taxes. OUR taxes only pays the interest. It is just another form of debt…and debt does not fix debt. That’s what we are all squawking about on this site.
How much could we all be doing for our neighbor, if we were so inclined, if half of our income wasn’t supporting the bureaucracy which, in turn, is spending 50% of it on the military-industrial complex rather than those Americans in need anyway?
(And it is as UNCHRISTIAN to MAKE people be inclined against their freewill, as it is to be un-inclined. Do remember the atrocities christians have committed, and are currently committing, in the name of the Lord.)
So the MIC is a production engine? Planes, guns, all that, providing jobs to Americans…to do what? Bomb and destroy elsewhere (Somalia)–and now in our own backyards. Germany operated on that model starting around 1930-32. Worked for them too, for a while. Have you noticed how para-military the police have gotten? Against what? Americans.
People, come on. Ya’ll are smart. Government is NOT the answer, and is more the black horse of the apocalypse than a knight in shining armor.
loading....