Do What Works for You
Published on - November 9th, 2009 (Modified on - December 29th, 2009) (by J.D. Roth) This article is the seventh of a fourteen-part series that explores the core tenets of Get Rich Slowly.
I struggled with debt for over a decade. I made several attempts to tackle the trouble, but nothing seemed to work. Compulsive spending was part of the problem — I bought anything I wanted, even if I couldn’t afford it — but there was another factor, too.
Everything I’d read gave the same advice for debt reduction: Start by paying off your highest-interest rate debt. I understood the logic behind this, but I couldn’t make it work.
The trouble was that my highest-interest rate debt was also my debt with the biggest balance (a fully-maxed $12,000 credit card at 19.8% interest). I’d plug away at this for several months at a time, but then give up because it felt like I was never getting anywhere.
Then I read about the debt snowball approach in Dave Ramsey’s The Total Money Makeover. It blew my mind. Here was somebody saying that it was okay (good even) to do something different, to start by paying low balances first. I tried it, and 39 months later I had eliminated over $35,000 in consumer debt.
In the process, I learned a valuable lesson. In order to succeed with money, sometimes you have to ignore the conventional wisdom. Sometimes you simply have to do what works for you.
The perils of dogmatism
There’s too much dogmatism in our culture. People are convinced that their way is the right way to do things. I don’t begrudge those who are certain they’re right. When something works for you, you have a tendency to believe it’s the right choice for everyone else, so you preach it with passionate zeal. I understand that.
The problem, of course, is that we’re all different. Your religion and your politics and your financial tips work for you, but won’t necessarily mesh with my situation and experiences. And mine won’t fit with yours. There are few one-size-fits-all solutions in personal finance — or anywhere else.
For example:
- As I hinted earlier, there’s no right way to pay off debt. Yes, you’ll save a little if you tackle the high-interest stuff first, but you may have better chances of success by starting with low balances instead.
- There’s no right way to invest. I like index funds, but you might prefer individual stocks.
- There’s no right way to tackle your mortgage. Some experts recommend paying it off quickly; others recommend stretching it out as long as possible to take advantage of the low interest. The best choice is the one that best matches your goals for the future.
- There’s no right way to be frugal. Some folks are unwilling to sacrifice organic groceries, and others are unwilling to take the bus. That’s fine. Find ways to practice thrift that fit your lifestyle.
- Joint or separate finances? There’s no right answer. Just because you can’t conceive that a couple can have a strong relationship with separate finances doesn’t mean that it’s impossible. Millions of people do it with no problems.
- There’s no right way to budget. Some people use a loose framework to guide their spending. Others need detailed line items. The best budget is one that you’ll actually use.
- There’s no single best savings account or checking account or credit card. There are plenty of great choices. Don’t listen to anyone who says you’re wrong for choosing a good option that works the way you do. (I don’t feel bad about using ING Direct, even if they don’t offer the highest rates.)
When you get trapped by the belief that there’s just one right way to do something, you set yourself up for failure: If this “right” method doesn’t work for you, you have no other options. You have to keep using it, even if you keep failing.
But if you allow yourself to consider other options, you give yourself multiple paths to success. Yes, you could use the “right” method — or you could take a different path to reach the same goal.
Doing what works
I’m not saying that it’s okay to do anything you feel. It’s not okay to keep on spending just because dealing with your debt is difficult or uncomfortable. But it is okay to try something new when what you’re doing doesn’t work. And it’s okay to ignore the naysayers who complain that you’re “not doing it right”. Your want to find what works for you, not for somebody else.
Don’t listen to anyone who tells you there’s just one right way to do something. Each person is different. What works for one person may not work for another. Be willing to experiment until you find methods that are suited to your life.
Make informed choices, understand the consequences, and focus on your goals.
This is the seventh of a fourteen-part series that explores my financial philosophy. These are the core tenets of Get Rich Slowly. Other parts include:
- Tenet #1: Money is more about mind than it is about math
- Tenet #2: The road to wealth is paved with goals
- Tenet #3: To build wealth, you must spend less than you earn
- Tenet #4: Pay yourself first
- Tenet #5: Small amounts matter
- Tenet #6: Large amounts matter, too
- Tenet #7: Do what works for you
- Tenet #8: Slow and steady wins the race
- Tenet #9: The perfect is the enemy of the good
- Tenet #10: Failure is okay
- Tenet #11: Financial balance lets you enjoy tomorrow and today
- Tenet #12: Nobody cares more about your money than you do
- Tenet #13: Action beats inaction
- Tenet #14: It’s more important to be happy than to be rich
Look for a new installment in this series every Monday through the end of the year.
This article is about Basics, Choices, Psychology
SEARCH FOR RECENT ARTICLES




@Rob #47
“Thanks for the helpful feedback, Kent. You are absolutely right re the point made in the words quoted above. But this thread is not the place for us to define our terms and then proceed to a discussion on the merits or lack thereof of Buy-and-Hold Investing.
If you would be willing to engage in some e-mail discussion of these questions with me, I would be thrilled. Or you could put up some comments at my blog and we could engage that way. Or we could have a back-and-forth discussions at your blog. Anything that works for you works for me.
My goal is just to get this conversation started. I think that J.D. could help a lot because his blog is so widely read. But I certainly don’t mean to suggest that he is the sole cause of the hold-up in getting this conversation going. He is one guy writing one blog. I would like to see all personal finance blogs exploring these questions in some depth.”
Rob, build a better mousetrap and the world will beat a path to your door. Your PE10 strategy is just another mousetrap, not necessarily a better one. There are any number of buy-hold-rebalance investment strategies which will prove good enough for individuals to attain their financial goals. One would have done just fine in the past by investing in Vanguard’s Wellington or Wellesley Income Funds. Or in the Coffeehouse Portfolio. The point of the article is that there are many approaches that will work for any given individual. Your Lucky 7 strategy might work as well, but it is but one strategy among many. Perhaps you could allow an open discussion of that strategy at your own blog if it holds the most interest for you.
You say your goal is to get the conversation started. You are quite correct in pointing out that this thread is not the place for a discussion of your Lucky 7 approach versus buy-and-hold. Neither is it an appropriate place for you to recruit visitors to your own blog. If you can’t get a conversation started at your own blog regarding your investment beliefs, it seems rather unbecoming of you to proselytize at this and other blogs in your quest to “see all personal finance blogs exploring these questions [i.e. your beliefs] in some depth.”
loading....
If you can’t get a conversation started at your own blog regarding your investment beliefs, it seems rather unbecoming of you to proselytize at this and other blogs in your quest
It is perfectly appropriate to bring up the point at this blog that dogmatism hurts us in the investing area as well as in all other areas, Carlyle.
In all other areas, personal finance blogs discuss a wide range of options. When it comes to investing, the vast majority push Buy-and-Hold relentlessly and have continued to do so even after it caused the greatest loss of middle-class wealth in the history of the United States. The Stock-Selling Industry has invested hundreds of millions into promoting this strategy and there are many investors who are not even aware of the grave flaws (flaws revealed in the academic research 28 years ago). We have a lot of work to do just in pointing out the flaws of the conventional advice to the extent needed so that people can come to a clear understanding of the ABCs of stock investing.
Buy-and-Hold has one huge advantage over more realistic strategies — it’s appeal to the Get Rich Quick impulse within all of us. The problem is that it always causes an economic crisis in the long run. I think we all need to work together to overcome the problem we have created for ourselves by the dogmatic take that many of us have adopted re this question.
The materials made available at my site were developed with the help of hundreds of my fellow community members in the Retire Early and Indexing discussion-board communities. The discussion of realistic strategies has been banned in those communities at the insistence of Passive Investing dogmatics. I think that the many community members who expressed a desire to be able to hear about the realities should be permitted to do so anywhere on the internet they care to engage in such discussions. The fact that a good number of Passive Investing dogmatics objects to this idea reveals their intense defensiveness.
How would you suggest that we work together to spread the word about the dangers of Buy-and-Hold if we do not talk about them at blogs like this? I think it would be fair to say that The Stock-Selling Industry is not going to direct any of its considerable resources to the task of helping us out. All of our retirements are at stake, Carlyle. This is a serious matter.
Rob
loading....
“How would you suggest that we work together to spread the word about the dangers of Buy-and-Hold if we do not talk about them at blogs like this?”
I think it’s fair to say your strongly held beliefs about the dangers of Buy-and-Hold are simply your own opinions. Other opinions you strongly hold are;
1)”the vast majority push Buy-and-Hold relentlessly and have continued to do so even after it caused the greatest loss of middle-class wealth in the history of the United States.”
2)”The Stock-Selling Industry has invested hundreds of millions into promoting this strategy….”
3)”…there are many investors who are not even aware of the grave flaws (flaws revealed in the academic research 28 years ago).”
3)”Buy-and-Hold has one huge advantage over more realistic strategies — it’s appeal to the Get Rich Quick impulse within all of us.”
4)”The problem is that it always causes an economic crisis in the long run.”
5)”The materials made available at my site were developed with the help of hundreds of my fellow community members in the Retire Early and Indexing discussion-board communities.”
6)”The discussion of realistic strategies has been banned in those communities at the insistence of Passive Investing dogmatics.”
A conversation about your strongly held beliefs/opinions is more appropriate for your own blog than imposing your views upon the blogs of others. None your strongly held opinions listed above have much basis in reality. Therefore they contribute little to ones understanding of the ABC’s of stock investing. Since you desire to have the discussion center around your beliefs and only your beliefs, a more appropriate forum would be your own blog.
However, as E says in #22, “you believe that everyone should do things your way and all other ways lead to failure.” So I don’t care to waste any more of my time with you. Good day.
loading....
Since you desire to have the discussion center around your beliefs and only your beliefs, a more appropriate forum would be your own blog.
This part is not so, Carlyle.
It is of course critical that I state my own views honestly. It is equally critical that all others participating in the discussions state their views honestly. It is by listening in on the interaction of different viewpoints (which are the products of different sets of life circumstances and different personality types) that we all learn together.
The primary cause of our economic crisis (in my view!) is that a number of us for a time became intolerant of strong criticisms of Buy-and-Hold and thereby shut off the learning process that in many other areas of life endeavor has helped us achieve great things as a nation of people. We need to follow the procedures that have helped us learn about so many other subjects in our efforts to begin learning anew how stock investing works in the real world, in my view.
We don’t know as much as we once thought we knew. Our state of understanding of what works in investing is primitive. Letting that in will be the first step on a wonderful journey to the discovery of hundreds of exciting insights. Or so Rob Bennett believes, in any event.
Rob
loading....
“We don’t know as much as we once thought we knew.”
We? I think it’s fair to say your use of the editorial we is a bit presumptuous.
“Our state of understanding of what works in investing is primitive.”
Our? I think it’s fair to say this is another permutation of the editorial we. And still rather presumptuous.
loading....
Carlyle (55)–I don’t know how many of Rob’s posts and comments you might have read, and while you might not agree with what he writes, he’s studied the subject more deeply than most and is a real resource. I wouldn’t be too quick to dismiss what he says, even if you don’t agree with him.
Sometimes the opinions we find most disturbing are the ones we need to explore the deepest.
loading....