Give Your Wealth Away: An Argument For a Secular Tithe
Published on - December 13th, 2009 (by J.D. Roth) This is a guest post from Sierra Black, a long-time GRS reader and the author of ChildWild, a blog where she writes about frugality, sustainable living, and getting her kids to eat kale. Previously at Get Rich Slowly, Black told us about sweating the big stuff and the pitfalls of buying in bulk.
My mother’s family is Catholic. They’re working class people from Buffalo: nurses, drugstore clerks, steel mill workers. Even though they never had a lot of dollars, they always gave 10% of what they had to the church. Like taxes, that 10% was just something they paid out before spending a dime on themselves.
As an adult I became the first college graduate in my family and adopted the position most of my educated, liberal peers seemed to hold toward charity: give a little, when you can, and feel guilty about not doing it most of the year.
For most of my 20s, I was living beyond my means. With every dollar being spent before it was earned, giving even a few dollars felt like a huge pinch in my messy budget. I was haphazard and frankly not very generous with my giving.
Overall, liberals tend to give less to charity than conservatives. Religious people like the ones I grew up with give more than my secular humanist friends. The working poor are, as a class, the most generous group in America, reliably giving away 4.5% of their income. The middle class are the least generous, giving just 2.5% on average.
In addition to making me and my friends look bad in the conservative press, statistics like that are, as George Will put it, “hostile witnesses” to the idea that “bleeding-heart liberals” actually care more about the poor and disadvantaged than our conservative counterparts.
According to the American Enterprise Institute, the single biggest predictor of a person’s charitable giving is religion. People who go to church every week give more money, more consistently.
I think it’s time to make secular tithing a middle-class trend. Those of us who don’t go to church every Sunday may not have the easy, deeply ingrained tradition of giving my great-grandmother had when she put her little envelope in the offering plate each week. That’s no excuse for not giving our share. It’s not right for the affluent and secure to let responsibility for maintaining the social safety net rest on the backs of those most likely to need it.
Last year, when I got serious about straightening out my spending habits, I wanted to make charitable giving, like saving, a key part of my financial future.
I adopted something akin to the “balanced money formula”. Instead of allocating 30% to wants, though, I drew up my formula like this: 50% for needs, 10% for charity, 20% for savings and 20% for wants.
My money is not balanced. I’m working hard to repay a pile of credit card debt and continuing to fine tune a frugal lifestyle. My needs and debts suck up most of our income. Because all the “extra” money goes into savings and debt repayment, I’m still living as if we were on the edge financially. Giving hurts. I do it anyway. Every week.
I’m not tithing yet, but I am moving towards it. Here’s how:
- As our income increases, I spend the new money in a “balanced” way. A year ago, my husband and I were living on one salary — his. As I’ve added income to our household with my freelance work, I’ve allocated 10% of those dollars toward charitable giving, 20% to savings, 20% wants and 50% to needs.
- As our debts decrease, I’m beginning to split our debt snowball. Snowballing debts is great. I’ve seen some people argue for splitting the money that’s freed up when a debt is paid off between paying down the next debt and adding to an emergency fund. I’m doing this with giving too. This month, I pay off a credit card that had a $35/month payment. I’ll put $3.50 into my charity fund, $7 into savings and the rest toward the next debt I’m attacking. I do this with frugal changes too: split the saved money between charity, savings and debt reduction.
- I make the giving automatic. Remembering to do stuff is not my strong suit. To stay consistent with my giving, I’ve signed up for recurring automatic withdrawals from my bank account. There are organizations, like Just Give, that will help you coordinate automated or one time gifts to many different organizations.
- I’m teaching my kids to give. My kids use jars to split their allowance into categories for giving, saving and spending. They’re too young to tell yet what lasting impact that might have, but I’m hoping it will get them into the habit of giving some of their money away every time they get paid. A habit it took me 30 years to grow into.
- Giving small counts big. Charities can use their membership rolls and total numbers of donors to solicit large grants from individuals and foundations, and to earn matching grants. Because of this, the difference between giving $10 to a charity and giving them nothing is a lot bigger than the difference between $10 and $20. I make a lot of small donations to different organizations I like, to spread out my impact.
There are many good organizations doing vital work in the world that depend on charitable gifts to run their operations. These range from the Red Cross to the World Food Program to local groups.
The end of the year is often a time charities need dollars most. To encourage holiday season giving, many have created fun holiday gift programs. My favorite is Heifer International’s famous gift catalog, which lets you “give” a cow or a beehive or another livestock animal to a family in the developing world. In reality, of course, what you give them is the money to run their organization, which then distributes livestock to needy families at a local level. It’s fun to read their catalog though, and Heifer has one of the lowest overhead ratios of all the large charities.
In closing, a note: Expressing concern about what a charity is going to do with your money is a terrible excuse for not giving. Very few charities are outright frauds, and even the inefficient ones will put more of your dollars toward a good cause than your bank will. If you want to be sure you’re getting the most bang for your charitable buck, though, you can investigate organizations at a charity watchdog site before giving.
Note: Get Rich Slowly does not take a stand on religious or political issues. Respectful discussion of these topics is fine; please keep the comments up to their usual high-quality standards.
GRS is committed to helping our readers save and achieve your financial goals.Savings interest rates may be low, but that’s all the more reason to shop for the best rate.Find the highest savings interest rate from Ally Bank, Capital One 360, Everbank, and more.
This article is about Giving
Disclaimer: This content is not provided or commissioned by American Express. Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of American Express, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by American Express. This site may be compensated through American Express Affiliate Program.
Discover is a paid advertiser of this site. Reasonable efforts are made to maintain accurate information. See the Discover online credit card application for full terms and conditions on offers and rewards.
SEARCH FOR RECENT ARTICLES




Okay, I’m going to take offense at the commenter that suggested that being raised a Christian and is now a liberal is contradictory. Liberals can be Christians too. Many Christians would tell you Jesus was the biggest liberal of all depending on which church you attend. It’s just like the statement “Conservatives are only Republican”. There is no black and white label that can define a whole group of people.
loading....
It doesn’t matter which organization you donate to, as long as you do your research and believe in the organization. Some people mentioned that the non-profits can be poorly run, thus wasting your donation. How is that different from investing your money in a company that is poorly run or hosts lavish parties (think Tyco)?
@K.Goodman – we have the same family pairing! I’m a social liberal and my boyfriend is a moderate republican. The difference is that he won’t donate a cent, but he will be glad to volunteer his time at different places.
loading....
This is an excellent post today. My family gives 10% of our gross income as tithe to our church. We also give above and beyond to the church for other special items. I am lucky to be involved in a church that also goes out and donates time and money to secular causes such as food banks, children’s centers, etc. We have been greatly blessed, and it is our calling to give to those in need. I encourage those of you who currently go to church to tithe. God will bless you greatly for it, and meet all your financial needs.
loading....
i agree ppl should use charity watchdogs to decide who to donate too. i don’t necessariyl agree with the whole conservatives “give more”. they give more to churches and christian organizations that feed the poor in exchange for poor ppl converting to their religion. there’s generally an ulterior motive (prosleytying) behind these types of charities. even charitynavigator.org gives them low rankings as the money is used inefficiently, most of it going to admin costs rather than helping people. use charity navigator and pick a charity that ranks 4 stars!
loading....
I think 94 hit the nail on the head. Many (middle class) people plan many parts of their financial picture, but do not have a plan for giving. That’s me. In the past, my giving has been very haphazard, $40 here and there for multiple agencies which is probably spent sending me additional mailings asking for more money. So, I think every person, or in our case every family needs to figure out what their values are, and to support that. The kids love animals? Help the local non-kill shelter, or sponsor a spaying. Into environmentalism? As far as making it automatic, my job allows me to designate organizations and deduct my contribution from each paycheck. It is a small amount now, but want to including giving in my financial plan so it is doable.
loading....
This article talks a lot about how to give but it seems to assume that giving is most always a good thing. Why? Why should I “give my wealth away” to someone who hasn’t earned it? Why is the morality of altruism assumed to be the correct moral stance?
loading....
The point of this post was lost to political divisiveness and moral sentiments.
loading....
I guess I should also state I agree with poster 101 that questions why being christian and liberal are somehow contradictory. I can think of many examples in the people I know that that’s not the case. If anything I think it’s a little suspect when a person has to profess/advertise their faith when doing acts of caring or charity. On the opposite, side, I bet you could do an analysis that “liberals” often choose less lucrative careers that are involved in helping people (peace corps, social workers, teachers, etc) than “conservatives”. But I guess what you devote your life to isn’t considered charity.
loading....
I don’t understand why so many people have gotten so worked up over this post. Facts are facts. If you don’t like the facts, then do something to make them different in the future – i.e. donate more if you are a liberal non-religious person.
loading....
Why I give:
I was born white in North America, to a loving family committed to my well being. I am healthy and reasonably intelligent. My family provided for my education and continues to provide me with a safety net should the worst happen.
I earned none of these things, yet I benefit from them daily. It is important to me to share those unearned benefits with those who lack my considerable advantages.
Why you should give:
Human beings are social animals, reliant upon one another. If you have some unearned advantage over your fellow being, and if you’re reading this you do, then it is only decent to share some portion of that to your mutual benefit. There IS a way that works for you; it is up to you to find it.
It’s a work in progress.
Thanks JD and Sierra, this is an excellent topic and an excellent discussion.
loading....
@E
Your parents were obligated to provide for you. If they hadn’t they’d be acting immorally because they chose to have you (lets just assume that anyway for the sake of argument).
Why is it your obligation to share what your parents gave you, by way of earning it themselves, to those who have not earned it? If you want to, well that is your prerogative, but not your obligation.
As soon as someone else’s need becomes a moral claim on an another individual’s life (read: means of survival, the product of their work, their wealth). Then that second individual no longer owns their life. They must surrender it to anyone comes a long shedding a tear and begging on the grounds they didn’t get a “fair” hand.
Need is not moral justification. To say so leads you down the historically dark path of the morality of self-sacrifice.
“If men have grasped some faint glimmer of respect for individual rights in their private dealings with one another, that glimmer vanishes when they turn to public issues – and what leaps into the political arena is a caveman who can’t conceive of any reason why the tribe cannot bash in the skull of any individual if it so desires.” — Ayn Rand from “The Virtue of Selfishness”.
loading....
Of course… in the end we will all die. At least that seems to be the current trend.
I’m 22 just out of college and trying to start my own business. I give to my local church as well as Christian missions agencies. I also drop cash into donation boxes at nature preserves and other places I enjoy because of someone else’s diligent work in preservation, in hopes that others can continue to enjoy them.
It’s still giving. It’s still money I don’t have to spend on me stuff. The argument that just because someone gives according to their political or religious views it shouldn’t be considered giving is blind. Turn it around on yourself and your own giving. Is giving to the Sierra Club somehow more noble than giving to a YMCA?
Our giving should line up with what we value and believe is important. Of course those who disagree with you with donate to different causes and groups. You donate to different groups than them too.
Now – those who say you’re willing to pay more in taxes to support charitable causes do you give the extra amount you’re willing to pay in taxes? Does your pocket book back up your words? It’s one thing to say you think everybody (especially the “rich”) should pay to help feed the world and quite another to back up your supposed valuation of that through the dedication of your own money, or life to that purpose. “Giving” through taxes could better be defined as forcing your world-view and oh so charitable spirit onto those around you. Really forcing it on them, like they go to jail if they don’t kind of forcing.
For those talking about leaving politics and religion out of financial discussion… That works when the discussion is about the practicality of how to save money, invest money or make money… but when it comes to the why it doesn’t work. Politics and Religion are at the very heart of the WHY of money whether you believe your purpose in life is to “die with the most toys”, “preserve the earth”, or “save souls”.
In the now politics has everything to do with whether you believe that abstinence education or free abortions is a charitable cause. Politics also has a lot to do with whether you believe a church run hospital or a government run hospital is a more effective and less corrupt provider of medical services to those who can’t afford them.
But, on a grander scale… I have a hunch that someday everyone of us is going to die, and the very first question you might want to ask does life really matter? …if so (cause most people sound like they think ‘it’ does) does it matter how much money you had, is what you did with it more important? A discussion of religion is a good place to start in answering that question.
loading....
@ Russ, it’s not an obligation. There is no “have to” and need doesn’t enter into it. I said it’s only decent. And I’m not talking about lazy jerks with sob stories. I’m talking about people who could use a hand up, which I can provide. I’m talking about the innocent – animals for example, which have not asked for their lot in life. I’m talking about the Earth, which we all need to survive.
Ayn Rand died a bitter and lonely woman. Hers is not a philosophy I would choose to emulate. Is there really no one and nothing that is worth it to you to give a tiny bit of yourself?
loading....
“If men have grasped some faint glimmer of respect for individual rights in their private dealings with one another, that glimmer vanishes when they turn to public issues – and what leaps into the political arena is a caveman who can’t conceive of any reason why the tribe cannot bash in the skull of any individual if it so desires.” — Ayn Rand from “The Virtue of Selfishness”.
huh?
Maybe I’m dense, but I thought that’s what governments and laws are supposed do, say it’s NOT ok to bash people’s heads in. Or am I suppose to correlate someone asking you to contribute to a charity to bashing your head in?
loading....
This is an interesting topic. My boyfriend and I (both atheist, extremely educated liberals) have made the decision only to support charities that benefit animals (whether benefitting individual animals through adoption, like Humane Society, or to organizations that support legislation on animal welfare, like the Animal Legal Defense Fund). We just feel that since animals are utterly at our mercy both individually (food and companion animals) and as species (wild animals whose habitat we are destroying without their knowledge or permission), they are more deserving of our help than people are.
That being said, we would support an even more aggressive progressive tax system whereby a lot of the causes that benefit people would be taken care of by the government rather than by charitable organizations. I’d also love to see a tax system whereby the amount you were taxed was determined by the code, but what percentage of your taxes went to what was determined by you. Probably not in super-specific terms, but having a checksheet on the tax form with broad categories like defense spending, offense spending (which I regard as two different things), the national debt, healthcare, green energy, etc. would really let Congress know where our priorities actually lie.
I did appreciate the point being made by the commenter who said that those who support a more aggressive tax system should be donating the difference between the current tax system and the system that they think is ideal and donating it to charity. At the moment, though, my boyfriend and I have a total of $200K in student loan debt and $45K in credit card debt so that just isn’t feasible. About 50% of our income goes to debt repayment.
loading....
Why I Give: Because I appreciate a warm bed and a solid meal. Because I see homeless people all the time, and never give them money, because I have become suspicious of what they’ll do with it. Because I hate feeling suspicious about people who may genuinely be in need.
What I Give: I’ve tracked my spending for 2 1/2 years, and I really only give a little bit. I’ve pushed myself to give a bit more each year. This year I vowed to give 1% of my take-home. Do the math: it’s not much.
Where I Give: I give as my values dictate, mostly locally: to my local NPR station and to a local food bank.
I have never missed the money, which clearly indicates I could give a bit more! Next year I’m going for a whopping 2%.
loading....
On the subject of secular giving: One year I decided to budget $1000 for random donations. Every time someone asked me for money for a worthy cause, I gave them $100. It was a blast! Such a small amount makes a huge difference to a kid participating in a jog-a-thon to benefit another needy student, for example. At the end of the year, I gave the balance to my favorite cause. It was fun waiting for the next need to arise, because I knew I was prepared for it and could help in a meaningful way.
Look, ma! No politics!
loading....
@E
My question then is: Why is it the decent thing to do? If I chose not to give am I being indecent? Am I being immoral?
As to your question “Is there really no one and nothing that is worth it to you to give a tiny bit of yourself?” I guess you’d have to clarify what you mean by “give”. But there are plenty in my life whom I love dearly and to whom I’d sacrifice a great deal for. My reason for doing so would not be sacrifice in and of itself. Sacrifice of a lesser virtue for a greater one is not really sacrifice at all.
The article touches on giving out of guilt, and talks about giving without providing any rationale for doing so (other than guilt). Which begs the question – why are you guilty in the first place? Guilt is a response to a set of moral values. I’d simply ask that everyone would think long and hard about what their moral values are and why they hold them.
Rand’s philosophy of objectivism does not depend on her ability to be happy. Judge it on it’s merits, not on what may or may not be true about Ms. Rand herself.
loading....
As I say over and over again, this is one of many cases in which giving TIME is virtually ignored as a charitable measure. A great number of non-profit groups are desperate for volunteers.
loading....
Some have mentioned taxes as an alternative to giving. The problem I have with this is one of extra cost and inefficiency.
I buy a blanket for $10 and give it to Good Will. They now have a blanket.
$10 in taxes to buy a blanket is reduced because you are introducing more hands simply to pass the money along.
It seems so simple but many just want other people to take care of problems when it is not the best way to attack a problem.
I will not join in the fracas between religion and nons as it gets everyone in a tizzy nor between conservatives and liberals because both of those groups tend to be hypocrites and I would not want to be classified as either one.
loading....
@Rita in 109: the point people are making is that these are NOT facts. Don’t mindlessly swallow whatever you hear from some vague group with hidden agendas.
loading....
About the “religious people give more” research: religious people give more because they give it to their church, but the vast majority of a church’s funds are spent to the benefit of the membership, not as charity to non-members. So I’m not sure it’s fair to paint secular people as more selfish because they spend money on therapists, restaurants, or secular community-gathering places (parks? theaters? coffee shops? country clubs? bars?), while religious people spend money on their pastor and their church building and community.
I give to my religious organization, so I’m not knocking doing that, I just know that most of the funds I’m giving are really for me (for services and music I enjoy, a beautiful place to have gatherings with friends, free classes, free counseling, etc.), and that only a small percentage is used for charity programs for outsiders.
loading....
Marie,
Several studies show the same general type of data. Just because the data cited in this article is partisan, doesn’t mean the data is incorrect.
loading....
Here is a little test done by ABC:
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=2682730
Interesting New York Times article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/opinion/21kristof.html
loading....
@ Diane, #117 – LOVE IT! What a great idea, and a fun way to do it. I’m stealing that for next year.
@ Russ, I’m afraid I can’t explain why it’s decent to take care of your fellow human beings as and when you can. Nor can I tell you whether you are being indecent or immoral; only you know that. I can tell you there’s no guilt involved, and no sacrifice either as I can easily afford what I currently give (time and money). If my family needed something from me I would absolutely provide it. Since they don’t, I provide instead for causes I value.
loading....
@E:
Morality is not grey, either I am being immoral or I’m not. Granted that it’s not a fair question to ask without specifics. Could you clarify though, are you saying that I can decide for myself what is moral and immoral? Or are you saying that altruistic morality is the correct moral stance, and that I’m being ridiculous for rejecting it?
Also, how do you determine how much giving/taking care is enough. What basis do you use to make these decisions? (I’m not asking in jest, I’m seriously curious.)
loading....
@ Russ, morality is extremely gray. There are very few things, if any, that everyone on earth would agree are moral or immoral. Giving is personal. If you’re using your logic and philosophy to defend not giving, when you know giving is the right thing to do, you are being immoral. But if you think it is immoral to give aid, that it is better to die than to succeed by strength other than one’s own, then not giving is completely appropriate.
I give because I think it’s right. I try to balance it with everything else I do with my money and time, and I’m sure I could be doing more and better. I try to pick the right people to contribute to, the ones who are going to provide the most value for my dollar. Maybe I found them, maybe I didn’t.
Sorry, there is no right answer.
Funny, it’s like everything else JD talks about on this site: the perfect is the enemy of the good, and it’s better to do some small thing than nothing at all.
loading....
Well played, E.
loading....
@ Rita, I have to laugh a little at ABC’s test. Salvation Army openly opposes homosexuality and they think they can measure generosity in San Francisco? Not very scientific.
Love the NYT article though.
loading....
I found this post extremely offensive on many levels.
I am not religious, I did not grow up in the south, I am a liberal. Most of the people I know and have known over the years are the same.
My experience has been quite the opposite of what this author states as the “truth”. I now live in the south and am surrounded by conservative religious folks… who are shocked at the amount of money and time I give to charities. The only thing they all seem to agree about giving money to is churches. Other charitable organizations? Forget it.
Why on earth did this blog have to introduce politics into what could have been a very interesting and pleasant subject? I’m really disappointed that this financial blog was used as a platform to push political views.
Please stay on topic and get rid of the politics. If I want to read about politics, there are much better (and more informed about facts) sites to go to.
loading....
Nice post, I like the variety this site offers.
loading....
@E
I’m not sure I understand your reasoning. You say:
“if you’re using your logic and philosophy to defend not giving, when you know giving is the right thing to do, you are being immoral.”
What other basis do we have to determine what is moral and what isn’t? Are you saying that your morality is based on your feelings? How am I supposed to know it is the right thing?
Further, just because their are many different viewpoints on what is and isn’t moral, it doesn’t follow that morality is grey. That just means that some people are right and some wrong. We’re debating who falls where. To say that morality is grey is to say that in a very specific circumstance one action can be both right and wrong at the same time. I’m not sure that is what you meant?
loading....
To Russ: “To say that morality is grey is to say that in a very specific circumstance one action can be both right and wrong at the same time.”
Exactly. For example, that is the subjective reality I live in. Depending on a view point and system of values, the same action can be viewed as right and wrong at the same time. Ethics and morality have changed over time and culture, and will continue to change.
It’s like math, the most logical and objective construct ever, correct? Parallel lines do not cross – but if you are on a sphere, they do. The same axiom is both right and wrong depending on which geometry you are using – and both spherical and conventional plane geometries are applicable to our everyday world.
loading....
2 arguements: (1) liberals may give fewer total dollars to charity than conservatives, but they give a higher percentage of their total income–so that’s MORE. (2) giving money to a church is NOT charity: it supports the organization, the minister, the political lobbying of that church, NOT NEEDY PEOPLE–so that does NOT count as charitible giving to me. (IT SHOULD NOT BE TAX DEDUCTIBLE, JUST AS MONEY TO PACS AND LOBBYING ORGANIZATIONS AND POLITICAL ORGANIZATIONS IS NOT TAX DEDUCTIBLE.)
loading....
While I totally support this conversation regarding charity and tithing, I have to say that I’m a bit disappointed in a few points in this article. First, there are no citations for where the author got her data. Second, she equates liberalism with secularism and conservatives with church-going. Third, she infers that most church-goers & conservatives live in the South and are culturally more inclined to give. As a faith-based liberal living in the South, none of these facts are a given – at least in my experience. Perhaps statistically they are born out, but I’m disappointed that there are no citations to follow up on.
Specifically regarding the idea of charity – given that I’m still working my way out of debt, I have chosen not to give financially but I have made it a priority to give in physical ways. I consider it a “time tithe” in a sense – I try to give x amount of hours per month to working in charitable ways. I also have found a local charity that takes used items and provides them for free to those in need (not reselling like Good Will). In this case, I appreciate that my old clothing or housewares go for free to those who can use them.
loading....
@IngaG: To say that morality is subjective is to do away with morality altogether. To disagree on what is right and wrong is not the same as saying that 2 opposing viewpoints are both correct. In the latter case everything is permissible.
loading....
@IngaG: In order for that axiom to be both true and false you have to change your basic premise. If you’re looking for a counter example you’ll have to come up with something that is both true and false under the same premise.
… Anyway this is a 2 cigar conversation and I think we’re hitting the limits of the level of conversation that is possible on a message board. I think you get my point and where I would go with it.
loading....
@Russ:
I understand what you mean about assessing under the same premise.
To me, the practical solution has been to follow the value system aka premise I believe in – while recognizing that there are other belief systems and consequently to others, some of the things I believe to be right, could be very wrong. Attitudes to sex are a vivid example of such differences.
I always thought that this approach is what moral relativity or subjectivity is about. I guess we have different definitions. But the conversation is indeed reaching its limit as we probably both understand its current direction and points.
loading....
@IngaG:
I just can’t help but share one last thought. We’re getting to the point where you can begin to talk about where the moral basis comes from. Are you suggesting that all belief systems are equally valid? You say your morals will differ from those coming from a different premise. I agree. Now, this allows us to think about which belief system (premise) is valid and which ones aren’t. This is extremely difficult to do and I don’t take it lightly.
For the sake of example if someone’s morals are religious in nature they presumably come from a set of truth statements about history that are either true or false. If they are true, then they should be able to derive a morality from it that is also true. If the premise is false, well then it’s a house of cards that comes tumbling down rather quickly.
The beliefs have to be rooted in something. If they aren’t, as I can only guess is the case for “Mr. E” (see comment #132), then we really don’t have much to talk about. Feelings, whims, and random desires cannot be used as a moral basis simply because their direct result is a system where any and everything is permissible, which is the antithesis of morality.
loading....
Thanks for your thoughts, Sierra. I believe practicing GENEROSITY as a priority with our money is one of the untold “money secrets” when it comes to the full financial picture of one’s life. I also liked your practice with your children. I’m with you 100% when it comes to providing kids with multiple piggy banks (one for saving, one for spending, one for giving and one for investing) to demonstrate the FOUR USES OF MONEY. We must help our kids get into the simple habit of allocating and managing their money, otherwise, they may get into the habit of regarding their allowance as only money they can SPEND and CONSUME – not a realistic view of money. If we can help train our children early, then as adults, they will have a much greater chance for financial success. I am a financial representative with Northwestern Mutual and for years I have provided my clients and their children with the PENNY THE PIG bank – this four-slot piggy bank: http://www.thesimpledollar.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/mspig.gif, is a great gift to help kids develop smart money habits early on in life. Thanks again for your insight!
loading....
It’s amazing how people views differ on what is “giving” and what is not.
loading....
I set aside a small percentage of my income for charity – i was setting aside 10% this summer, but right now it’s a paltry 2% because I decided I needed to focus on saving up money to pay off my college expenses for the next couple of years. The more money I save up now, the less I’ll have to pay in interest later, and the more I’ll actually be able to donate in the long run. I’m also giving my time to a number of organizations, which is something I have slightly more of.
loading....
Nice post.
I am currently in a financial tiz but am considering my charity quota for next year. I have given to street beggars and tin-shakers but not formally to a charity the way some people do. I also shop at charity thrift stores and have bought the odd fund-raising pen or so.
Some major charities have adopted political positions I dislike or find untenable. I may be able to disregard their views if I find an item of clothing at their thrift store occasionally, but I will not donate officially.
I have already chosen one good cause I would like to give to regularly, and will select another four or five to which I can donate small amounts from ten to thirty dollars. If I’m relaly doing well, who knows ?:).
Good causes arise all the time, so I’ll have plenty to choose from! Many people forget that there are so mnay small charities/causes/issues they can donate to – you don’t need to automatically slot in the major charity players.
Hunt around, it’s amazing how many valuable charities and foundations there are.
loading....
Enjoyed the article thanks – got me thinking:-)
Definitely think that giving is important on so many levels least of which, IMHO, has to do with helping other people.
Our desire for possessions is what is causing many of the problems we see in the world today and by making a concerted effort to give some of our disposable income away can reduce this while helping those who are in basic need.
I would however like to suggest that just giving to a charity or letting a payment go off an account is not the most effective way to do either of the above.
As a thought: what if everyone helped just one other person in need until they were self-sustaining and then helped that person to do the same for someone else….?
loading....
@Beth (#134):
“Liberals may give fewer total dollars to charity than conservatives, but they give a higher percentage of their total income–so that’s MORE.”
Huh?!? Are you suggesting that liberals have lower incomes than conservatives? Surely that’s not what you meant to say. I’m going to assume you simply expressed yourself poorly, and you didn’t really mean to say something that silly.
loading....