This post is from GRS staff writer April Dykman.
Most of us, at one time or another, have seen a photo of a celebrity with an “it” bag, even if just in tabloids at the supermarket check-out. Most of the time they are over-sized totes, logo prominently displayed, on the arm of an actress or pop star. (Sometimes I wonder if the tinier celebrities could, in fact, fit inside their own handbag.)
And as ridiculous as it might seem, you can bet that if a pop star is carrying a bag, the masses are sure to want it, too.
The problem is the price sticker. Most people can’t afford a $2,000 bag. Besides, usually the Hollywood elite, who can afford these bags, receive them as gifts (think product placement).
Riches for rent
I’m a bit late to this party, but I recently learned that one can rent designer bags, sunglasses, and jewelry. Yep, companies like Avelle, Bling Yourself, and Wear Today, Gone Tomorrow will rent merchandise by the likes of Chanel, Hermès, Louis Vuitton, Prada, Chloé, Herve Leger, and more. For a monthly fee, you can carry the “it” bag.
One site, for example, will rent a vintage Birkin bag for $600 per week. The cost to buy a vintage Birkin is about $17,000 (I’ll give you a moment to stop choking…mmkay, better now?). A Coach bag that retails for $350 can be rented for about $30 a week, or $20 per week if you keep it for a month. And so on. You also have the option to buy anything you rent and can’t bear to return, and there’s insurance available if you’re worried about a cosmo spilling on your rented Gucci.
The arguments for renting
According to the companies, renting allows people to enjoy items they can’t afford to buy. Also, if someone decides they need a change, they can send the item back and choose something else.
Some members say that the monthly membership is actually less than what they spend on bags and jewelry in a given year, and that they wind up with less Stuff, since the items go back into circulation for others to borrow.
Fair enough.
My arguments against
Full disclosure? I think it’s nuts. Let’s take that Coach bag, for example. It costs $350 retail, or it can be rented for $20 per week. In about 4-1/2 months, the amount spent renting the bag could be saved to purchase it.
No, it can’t be returned on a whim. No, it can’t be exchanged at will. But it is more cost-effective to purchase one or two quality handbags and own them indefinitely. If you continued to rent bags at $20 per week, in one year the total amount of fees would come to $1,040.
More disclosure? I don’t necessarily have a problem with $350 handbags. If that sounds like an insane amount of money to pay and/or you couldn’t care less about fashion, that’s good news for your pocketbook. Do what works for you and spend your money on what matters to you. If, however, you do love a little fashion in your life and you believe in quality over quantity, forget bag rentals and abide by these guidelines:
- Choose a handbag in line with your discretionary income. There are nice things at most price levels.
- Wait for a sale. Salespeople are always happy to put you on their mailing list, which will alert you to store sales and special events.
- Check out online discount retailers like Bluefly.
- For in-store deals, try T.J. Maxx, if there’s one nearby. I am always surprised by the quality brands they carry—at a fraction of the cost in the boutique stores. Be sure to check out your item carefully for marks and scratches, since the merchandise isn’t handled with kid gloves.
- Pay for it in cash (or put it on a credit card that you pay in full at the end of each month).
- Purchase something classic. If it’s trendy, you probably won’t love it by next season.
- Baby the heck out of it. Get it professionally cleaned if you aren’t sure how to do it yourself.
- Store it carefully. Fill the bag with tissue to hold the shape, and place it in a plastic bag when not in use.
I wasn’t able to find much about company profits, but since these rental companies continue to grow and add new products for rent (clothing, jewelry, golf clubs), I assume they’re doing well. But it’s not for me.
If I’m being dismissive and overly critical, feel free to comment and tell me so! Have you ever rented a luxury item through a monthly membership fee? If not, would you try out a service like this?
This article is about Clothing, Consumerism, Shopping Tuesday, 22nd December 2009 (by April Dykman)


RSS Feeds
Facebook
GRS Twitter




December 22nd, 2009 at 5:35 am
All in all, I think a lot of those rental places provide accessories for the special occasion. I can imagine a lot of situations where I would want a special bag or piece of jewelry (say, a unique invitation to a gala); there are also women professionals who attend high-glitz events on a regular basis and don’t want to wear the exact same ensemble to each. It’s certainly less expensive variety than buying new dresses each time.
The point is, that Coach bag won’t be rented for several months - the point of there being a weekly price is that the average person will rent it for a week or two. I imagine that if someone falls in love with an object they rent, they’ll purchase their own, anyway.
December 22nd, 2009 at 5:49 am
I’ve heard of the rent a handbag service but never tried it. I think it’s a great idea but I’m too cheap to spend money on something like that!
December 22nd, 2009 at 5:55 am
Obviously, I agree that if you can’t afford it you shouldn’t buy it. But it’s a fantastic idea! Think about it: these are fashion items and fashions go in and out of style. Rather than save for 4 months and buy a bag that’s already out of style, you’ve spent a fraction of that to “enjoy the ride.”
Is it vain? Sure. Is it financially sound? Maybe, maybe not. But it’s definitely a smarter alternative than plunking down thousands of dollars on a bag that will have a relatively short shelf like (for the price) and will wind up deep in a closet at some point.
Not for me, but this is a brilliant business and a valued service for many people.
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:09 am
To me it is a good idea if you go to one or two special events a year and need something out of the ordinary and extra special.
My bags usually come from a department store and one of my favorites comes from JCP that I bought about 5+ years ago. Always get compliments on it, looks in great shape after all this time (I use it regularly), and it cost about $30.00 (the price of a one week rental).
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:12 am
Even though I’m a guy, I’m strongly against this idea. I have quite a few friends - male and female - who wear designer clothing and accessories (in fact, they wear *solely* designer). The argument is that this isn’t just about looking good - it’s about knowing that what you wear is also exclusive because it’s outside the price range of the majority.
The second these things become publicly accessible through rental schemes is the moment the brand itself becomes devalued. Quite frankly, as someone who periodically shops designer, I’d be happy to see fashion houses stipulate a legal provision of sorts banning the use of these products for rental.
Bottom line is, although they look great, the real value of these accessories is in their exclusivity, in making heads turn as you walk down the street. The second that exlcusivity is lost, so is the value of the brand (and don’t get me started on Birkins-for-rent - I strongly feel it’s something that should be reserved only for those who can afford it).
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:20 am
My bags end up looking like they went through a meat grinder, so I can’t imagine renting a bag and having them happy with how it looks when I return it.
I’m so hard on my stuff, I ended up buying a canvas tote from Land’s End and using it in place of a purse. They’re virtually indestructible, and I’ve still managed to beat the crap out of it.
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:28 am
If this were something I cared about, I think this would be a good way to go. For some reason, the latest hand bag is a priority for people, and for them, getting the trendiest new look is cheaper by renting. For me, I have a decent black Goodwill purse that serves me well.
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:31 am
I think it makes more sense to rent the bag than buy a new bag every other month. I think it also makes sense to rent for special occassions. We normally attend 3-4 black tie charity events per year and while Mr. Sam can wear either his tuxedo or his black suit to all I have to be careful about which dress to wear since some of the same people go to all these events. I normally buy one new dress a year for my favorivite event and then recycle gowns from prior years for the other events. It would be great if I could rent a gown or two.
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:34 am
I haven’t heard of renting luxury accessories before, but think it’s a good idea for those who are into that kind of thing, and want to try out an expensive (to them) item before making the commitment to buy, or who just want it for a special occasion. I do agree that renting the same item for months on end is silly though - better to buy it in that case - you could always sell it later on if you get tired of it, as designer bags often hold their value pretty well.
I don’t think I’d use such a service - I like quality, but don’t care about fashion or designer labels, and can’t imagine liking a bag enough to spend hundreds on it, no matter how wealthy I become (plus they’re mostly made of leather, which I don’t use). Still, each to their own!
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:36 am
I’m not much into fashion and I scoff at the price of women’s accessories sometimes but I think that this can fill a niche and even save some people money. When I see these, I think of the stereotype that buys a $400-$1000 bag and uses it once or twice then decides that it’s out of fashion or just doesn’t feel like using it anymore. Instead of having a closet full of bags that aren’t used, I see this being a cheaper and neater option. I don’t really know if that stereotype exists or if my mind is warped by movies like Clueless, but if women like that are out there, this is for them.
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:45 am
I’ve not rented items, however, I just found a “unique boutique” in my hometown that takes in fancy dresses and rents them out, a portion of the proceeds go to the owner, the rest to the shop owner. I intend to bring my years and years accumulation of fancy dresses to her as soon as I dig them out of storage! Now I can make a little money on items that would otherwise take up space.
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:46 am
I imagine this is a good bet for something like a wedding where the item is for one time use… rent a wedding dress, cake, accessories, etc.
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:51 am
This sounds a lot like a high-end rent-to-own TV or couch service except the rent is a bit more reasonable, and you never own the item. If high fashion is your “thing”, then I could see this as a reasonable way to live it up for one or two major events per year. However, if you are going to rent a handbag for 6 months, you’d be better off buying your own.
I’m curious what the policies are regarding damage charges? If my wife carried a bag for more than a few days, I’m sure it would end up with some minor scuffs. I’d bet the agreements for these rentals have you paying out the nose for any signs that the item was actually used.
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:55 am
The quality of merchandise has gone down dramatically at TJ Maxx and Marshalls, at least for men it has. Women seem to have good luck at those stores, but their men’s stuff has really taken a nose dive over the past 2-3 years.
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:56 am
The funny thing is that many celebs receive these status items for free–don’t they?
The other thing is that many uber-status bags (like Hermes) sell for almost as much as new on the secondary market. So if I HAD to HAVE it, I wouldn’t rent. I would buy and use for a while and then re-sell.
Something like Coach wouldn’t be worth renting since they are fairly affordable to begin with.
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:59 am
I’ve always envied how men can rent a tuxedo for an occasion, but women have to buy dresses and most accessories! I have a number of “once a year” clothes that I have to store — more stuff!
I don’t have a lifestyle where people care what I carry on my arm. Folks here are more likely to gush over a cat-themed purse than a Jimmy Choo! I have a really nice consignment store near my house, so I can buy myself a name-brand purse at a price I can stand, if I want to.
However, if I were to work my way into a more glamorous situation, I would rather rent a new purse every month or a dress twice a year than buy a bag or dress I won’t use again.
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:01 am
I think it’s genius. Like Sam (#5) we have to attend a number of black-tie events per year, and the crowd is usually the same. By renting, I can get a way nicer dress than I would for the same amount of money spent buying one, I don’t have to clean it/baby it etc. and (the big plus for me) I don’t have to store it.
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:03 am
While I’ve never done handbag rentals, I think Wear Today, Gone Tomorrow’s clothing rental’s are a wonderfully frugal and green alternative for special occasion outfits.
Once or twice a year my husband and I attend a very dressy event. By renting a cocktail dress for a week a couple times a year, I get to wear a gorgeous designer dress, always get compliments, and spend less than $100 on the rental and dry cleaning. Also, I don’t have to worry about being able to fit into my cocktail dress if I gain or lose weight. I just order a different size.
Of course, if my lifestyle was different and I needed a cocktail dress on a more regular basis I would probably re-evaluate my choices.
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:08 am
Great idea! I never thought of renting luxury items (except cars). Definitely a wonderful option.
Also, getting good at buying things on the cheap is a another idea. Just because the bag sells for $350 retail doesn’t mean it costs $350 everywhere. Ebay, online stores, outlets, other countries (like Mexico) could have the item for much less. I bet there are ways of purchasing it for less than 50% of the “retail” prices.
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:09 am
Rent a handbag? Not for me I tend to carry one handbag all the time. I like small purses you cannot weigh down with 5,000lbs of junk. I carry a small brush, lipstick, wallet cell phone, Keys, tissue, one safety pin and one band-aid. Evenings out I carry a vintage beaded purse I pick up for $20 at a resale shop. I get more complements on it than any more expensive bag I have ever owned.
Now Pearls are great accessories, but then I am biased. I wear them everyday.
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:17 am
April, it looks like we’re in the minority here, but I would have to agree with you. The “rental” fees seem insanely expensive, and for that amount of money you could save up to buy a designer bag in a few months to a year. A good bag (not trendy) will look good for years to come. There’s really no need to get a new one every month, or every year, or even every few years. I have a few quality bags that I rotate over the year. I’m not super-high-fashion or anything, but it always looks well put-together.
The exception would be renting dresses and accessories for black-tie events - I can definitely see those services coming in handy.
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:22 am
Personally, I think it is crazy to spend more than one can afford on any luxury item. If you can’t afford a new house, then your old one will serve just fine for now. If you have millions to spend, then do as you wish. It just goes back to don’t spend more than your income. After all, 1 - 2 does not equal -1, it equals -1 with interest…
I personally don’t see why ANY middle income family would need something to carry around their lipstick in that cost > $300. But if you insist that this is something you must have, go for it. I just believe that I would invest that $300 or more in something more worthwhile…
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:23 am
I would consider going through something like Rent the Runway, definitely.
They rent formal gowns and fill a HUGE market gap, contiguous with tux rentals. Whereas I feel all men should definitely own a tuxedo, dresses are not as flexible, and something five or ten years old isn’t going to necessarily hold up.
If I’m going to a wedding or formal event where I absolutely HAVE TO be glamorous, I’d much rather spend $50 than a couple hundred dollars for a dress I’m never going to wear again. If I am ever convinced to have a formal wedding ceremony with bridesmaids, that’s how their dresses will likely be handled (and honestly, our current wedding plan is elope!elope!elope!).
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:28 am
April
Just one correction in the piece…you should never store leather bags into plastic ones. Plastic doesn’t breathe, and if there was any moisture it can ruin the bag. You should store leather purses (stuffed with tissue) into cloth bags. As for everything else in your article, well said!
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:28 am
The only reason this would be worth it is if you were renting something you would not be able to use again, such as a ballgown for an event, or maybe you wanted to “try out” a new style without committing. I bought a $200 grown (on sale) for a gala, plus $50 of alterations, but if I could have rented a gown for $100 and not have to deal with it later, that would have been ideal. Unfortunately, I’m plus-sized and these places don’t cater to us.
As for bags - which everyone is talking about - it’s not a great example because bags *are* something you would use all the time thus renting it for a long period of time is silly. However, if I wanted, for one special occasion to carrying around a $17,000 bag, at least I know I have that option. Though these rental places should be used only for things you wouldn’t normally purchase and want around forever. It’s both a waste of money ($100s sometimes) and space when you live in a very tiny Manhattan apartment!
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:28 am
Like others, I can see renting a designer handbag as a man might rent a tuxedo, to attend a black-tie event once or twice a year. I’d also happily rent a designer cocktail dress. I’m getting married next year, and if a family member wasn’t making my dress, I might have considered renting a wedding dress. (Had I purchased one, I would have immediately either sold it or donated it to a charity for sale after the wedding. So I would have essentially rented it anyway.)
I can’t really see renting a bag as a daily use item though. I suppose it’s a better option than buying a new designer handbag every season — maybe as a first step towards cutting costs for someone who really can’t afford their bag spending, but really wants to keep up the appearance of having new ones frequently.
But I’m not a handbag person. Not my luxury item of choice. If I had lots of money for luxury items, I’d buy computer gadgets (smartphones, ebook readers, laptops) and fine jewelry. Fine jewelry doesn’t go out of fashion frequently, so no need to rent that. Maybe I should consider the question: if I could rent a gadget that got updated every 6 months, would I? If the price was slightly less than buying every 6 months?
The point is moot because I don’t buy every time a gadget gets updated, though. Because I have limited fun money, I have to save up and decide which gadget is really worth owning and will last for years, because it’ll be years before I can afford to buy a new one.
Maybe if I had enough fun money that I did buy each new gadget, renting would be a better choice. But if I had that much fun money I’d probably still be choosy about my gadget purchases, and spend more money on other fun things.
So no, I probably wouldn’t rent a luxury item as anything but a single-use thing.
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:31 am
While it isn’t for me, I think the most compelling argument for a luxury rental service is that you don’t accumulate a lot of stuff that you are going to be sick of in six months and that you can rotate frequently if that’s important to you. It’s not a financial win to buy a $300 bag if you want to rotate between 10 $300 bags.
One thing I think you missed in your buying tips - keep your eyes peeled for a deal on a barely used one! There are some very nice high-end consignment shops and online sites devoted to selling very good condition used luxury items at a fraction of the price.
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:31 am
Instead of thinking about this growing practice from the consumer side, why not turn it around and think about what gaps exist in the market that could be rented as a side business for the more entrepreneurial readers out there. I see some comments from folks who have found stores that will split rental fees for them donating their dresses, but I’m sure there are some other items out there that people have which can be rented out.
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:42 am
I don’t know what to think about this. I’m like the anti-luxury guy, not out of some moral high ground, but because I just don’t care about jewelry, fashion, or any of that other stuff. But what if I did care? Would I buy or would I rent? I don’t know. I like the “no stuff” aspect of renting, but April’s right: If you’re going to rent long-term (or pay a membership fee), why not buy? But I can see how this would be useful for special occasions. For me, I’ll stick to my cheap Costco clothes for now, thanks.
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:58 am
I am not into high fashion, so this kind of thing wouldn’t appeal to me, but for the Fashionistas who need to have the latest trend, this idea work out to be cheaper than buying. The problem with trends is that one day something is in and the next week it isn’t. Keeping up with the latest trends means being able to switch out last month’s bag for this month’s. Renting allows the Fashionista to do this spending way less money than if she had to buy it all.
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:01 am
i can’t see myself ever wanting to rent clothing or fashion accessories…. a ferrari.. hell yeah. it is well outside what my price range will ever be, but i would love to drive one… even if just for a few days.
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:06 am
Hmmmmmm. Curmudgeon alert.
If you’re the type of person who loves high-end bags . . . ?
I thought this was the Get Rich Slowly site, not the fritter your money on fripperies site. For me, Getting Rich Slowly is about changing your mindset about what’s necessary and important, which reduces your list of financial needs. Even when my family hits our big financial milestones, even if we have a nest egg big enough to retire permanently on, I want to continue living relatively simply. (living simply means that we can hit that milestone quicker, too) I’ve seen friends who were used to living the high life lose it, and it’s not pretty.
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:14 am
H&M has great knockoff purses for $20. I got a Hermes Birkin lookalike and a lady in the elevator asked me if it was Italian leather. It has lasted a long time, good construction and quality. $20.
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:21 am
Good thing I don’t follow the lifestyles of the “rich & famous”. If you don’t pay attention to them, you generally don’t know what they have, let alone covet what they have.
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:24 am
I was very confused by this article. I thought I was on the wrong website at first. I read it thinking it would somehow wrap around to living a frugal life, saving, or one of the reasons I come here every day, but no. I didn’t find this piece helpful and as a woman was more than a little irked that the female staff writer chose to address high priced luxury fashion items. I’ve spent my life working to dismantle these ridiculous Madison Avenue-implanted desires for arbitrary status items. I seem to be in the minority but I do not think this article is in keeping with the general point and tone of GRS.
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:24 am
I’m not a fan of this for handbags in particular (because I don’t think most of the ones with logos all over them would really “go” at a fancy event) but like others have said I think renting an evening dress would make sense.
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:28 am
Personally this seems like a total waste of money to me. I have a couple of handbags I like. Two cost $100 and I do really love them, which is a good thing because I don’t think I’d do that again. The others are perfectly adorable & from TJ Maxx or similar.
That said… I’m not a fashion person. I know it’s huge for some people. I guess do what works for you. But it doesn’t work for me.
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:29 am
I’m with in terms of it’s generally being silly. The one good reason I’ve heard is to give you the chance to try out a couple crazy expensive bags to make sure you really like UT before you invest in one.
Did you know there is a guys version? http://www.stealthetime.com
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:37 am
$5 at a flea market gets you a perfectly usable handbag. I bought mine probably 2-3 years ago. I have a total of two. One for every day use, one for special occasions like weddings. They’re both black. They both match everything. And they’re both small, because I don’t need to carry around a lot of stuff that I’ll probably never use.
Anyone who’s chasing that celebrity lifestyle just doesn’t get it. I watch celebrities for the entertainment value they provide while they are WORKING. As for the rest of their time, I don’t care how it’s spent, where they live, or what they buy.
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:38 am
I haven’t seen it mentioned yet, so I’ll just throw out one word of caution: Beware of counterfeits! Counterfeiting designer clothing and accessories has become epidemic. If you find a brand-new or barely-used designer item for a price that seems too-good-to-be-true, there’s an excellent chance it’s a cheap knockoff.
If you’re going to buy an expensive luxury item, do your homework and learn what to look for so you don’t get ripped off and pay $100 for a $20 purse that really, really looks like a $300 purse.
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:42 am
I find renting to be helpful for special occasions, such as a wedding or function. Why pay for jewelry or a tux that you’ll only use once? An ongoing rental, however, doesn’t make much financial sense.
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:47 am
I rented my wedding dress
But then I really fell in love with it and my husband bought it for me as a wedding present.
However if we’d stuck to the rental plan, the price would have been 1/3 the cost of buying and they did minor alterations and I wouldn’t have had to clean it and store it.
Now, of course, it’s in a box under a bed in my mother-in-law’s house (we live in a tiny place in Boston).
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:51 am
I agree with the people who say it is a great idea.
This is like the one case where car leasing is a good idea. IF you are the type of person who MUST have a new luxury car every 2 years, then leasing will work for you. If you’re the type of person who MUST have a different luxury handbag at every event, then this is a great deal.
Most of us think driving a new Mercedes for only two years or not getting full use out of a handbag is ridiculous… but this service is not for us. Most of us would probably be ok with a non-name brand bag so long as it looked nice (or a reasonably priced Coach bag).
I also think dress rentals are a great idea for anyone. Not that I’ve been to a black tie event in at least a decade. If I did go it would be nice to not have to shop for a formal that I would never use again.
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:52 am
At #35:
I respect your views, but I don’t think that the desire for status items is somehow artifical or Madison Avenue-implanted.
If you look at economics, you will discover that there’s a whole category of products the quantity demanded of which DECREASES as the price decreases; in other words, the cheaper a product gets, the less people want it. Products that fall into these category are luxury items, the attraction of which lies in exclusivity and status.
Having lived here in Switzerland for the past seven years and having witnessed these lifestyles first-hand (we’re talking $3,600 Chanel Coco Cabas bags for ladies - quite gorgeous, by the way - or $200,000+ sports cars for men), I can tell you that a lot of these people aren’t chasing celebrities as such; they’re chasing a certain lifestyle of exclusivity and luxury. And, for what it’s worth, there’s nothing wrong with that, so they as they can afford it.
My point is, I don’t think it’s fair to regard these desires for status items as somehow artificial or induced. I think it’s quite normal that when people have that much money, they choose to spend it on items that emphasize their status!
Cheers,
George
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:52 am
I understand this post. Designer isn’t necessarily evil — it’s what people do to achieve it or how they flaunt it that’s evil.
I appreciate a good designer bag because I feel the first items noticed on a body are glasses, shoes and purses. I’d like to be noticed as someone who takes care of their presentation and has earned their luxuries, not someone who wants to flaunt them. I also see designer as antiques because that is what they become. I dress discount in practically everything else. It all balances itself out and I probably spend less in clothing than most.
I completely get that designer is expensive and not for everyone. Useful but expensive garage tools — or fancy yet necessary cooking equipment — isn’t for me. But I get quality. Once you understand quality, it’s hard to defend something cheap, like a perfectly good $25 pleather purse.
To each their own, I guess. April makes a timely point with this.
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:55 am
I have to agree about watching for counterfeits. While some people may not care about copyright infringement, the darker side of counterfeit designer products is that they use child labor. Do you need a fake bag so badly that you don’t mind that a kid got smacked around for not sewing it quickly enough?
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:55 am
I agree with Willow… I come to GRS to read about financial/lifestyle sanity. I was surprised at this blog article. It does not seem to fit into the tone of the blog.
It’s a PURSE. To hold your lipstick, Kleenex and cash. I’m not suggesting switching to a brown paper bag, I question the need of a $350-$2000 purse (an item that WILL get beat up over time– not an investment).
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:58 am
#32 Ami, I would counter that this site is more about making sound financial choices so you can get to a point where you are able to align your finances with your life goals and achieve financial independence. Although many here prefer a more minimalist approach to material goods, that doesn’t mean that those who don’t are to be looked down upon for having a less informed lifestyle.
If a person like J.D. gets to the point in his financial journey that he can spend money on travel or a mini or another hobby, that’s great and we should all be applauding. If another person’s passion is fashion, their new purse shouldn’t be viewed any differently, as long as they are continuing to maintain a healthy financial life. This article just explores a potentially more cost-efficient approach to a “hobby” that many people share.
Its all about balance and priorities.
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:12 am
To the naysayers I would ask whether or not you rent a hotel room on vacation rather than buying a vacation home? A few will choose to buy, because they use the same vacation spot year end and year out. But, for most people, renting makes sense because it allows for variety and doesn’t tie you down to a large investment.
To those who say designer clothes can never be frugal, I would ask if you EVER go on vacation. Vacations aren’t frugal, but they are fun. Some people (myself included) don’t take them because my money is better used elsewhere. But would a post about saving money on vacations evoke the same response?
I think renting an item you are only going to use one time is much more frugal than buying it and letting it sit in your closet.
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:13 am
I’m with Jacque. I think this post works for this site. Besides, there are people who might scoff at spending $400 on a designer purse, but think nothing of dropping as much (if not more) on a good entertainment system. It’s all about taste and personal preferences - while you might not want a designer purse, maybe you want a great sound system, or maybe you want to take your partner out for a fantastic meal. This is post is basically saying “If you want a designer purse or dress, here’s a way you can get one for less.”
I’m also with the poster above - I am not a fashionista by any means, and I’m fine with my purse that I found at TJ Maxx several years ago (but should be replaced, because it looks like it’s been through a war). I can see renting a Coach purse for a week, just to see what the hubub is all about. Then, if it’s something I really like, I’ll buy one.
(I did this, in a way, with my in-laws’ Wii. We borrowed it one night because we thougth about buying one. While it was fun to play, we realized we got bored with it after a few hours, so decided against buying one. Even if we had rented it, I would have considered it money well spent!)
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:18 am
I think this service is great for those of you that have a status to maintain professionally, or must accompany a significant other, etc.
My concern is that 90% of the people that use this kind of service can’t afford it. From a business perspective I think it is a GREAT idea. It’s one of those “why didn’t I think of it first?” type ideas. But from a personal perspective it is people who want a bag for a single event, or people who can afford what they want and choose this service for variety who are making a prudent decision.
But as I said, most people using this service I would bet are poseurs. They want so desperately to appear affluent. They want it because it is exclusive. If you want something just because you want it, that’s fine if you have the resources to waste. But most people don’t.
Therefore live and let live, but I am going to reserve the right to pass moral judgment on most of the people using this service. However I disagree that this is an inappropriate subject at GRS. There are a number of high income people here with an image to maintain that may not have heard of this service who could save a bit of money with it. I think it reaches out to a slightly different audience, and I think April’s obvious dubiousness keeps it in context.
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:18 am
I don’t rent… I buy. I own three Coach bags — One large-ish, one small and a clutch. My current daily bag is a rather large BCBG Max Azria bag, partly because it will hold EVERYTHING and because I got sick of carrying a blatantly obvious Coach bag. (If I buy another, it’d be leather, but I think I have enough Coach… Next time I buy from Coach it’s going to be a pair of sneakers.)
Let’s see, the larger Coach cost me $300, and I used it for a whole year. It desperately needs to be cleaned though, I’ll probably take it to a dry cleaners for that. (I’m hopeless when it comes to cleaning things like this.) The smaller one was my first, cost $145 and used it for almost a year, until I decided to get the bigger bag. The clutch was $20, brand new on an awesome deal. Don’t use it often, but $20? Couldn’t pass it up for when I do use it. (Mostly race days when I carry minimal stuff.) The tote I have now was $100 from gilt, didn’t plan on using it for so long but I got it to eventually hold my dSLR equipment for when I go places. (Nobody said I couldn’t do that in style, right?)
I have to say, a four figure bag makes me a bit light-headed. I do want a Chanel or a Chloe, though, just not now. I’d rather put my money into designer shoes.
Right now, I do a lot of my designer shopping through gilt… Getting nice discounts on the quality stuff. I got a beautiful cocktail dress that fits like a glove for $130, 100% silk. Trolling for a cashmere cardigan and wrap lately, but it’s not in the budget yet. Still enjoy window shopping!
Also, I don’t see that saying, “If you like designer things, what are you doing on this site?” makes ANY sense. There is NOTHING that says getting rich (whatever that means to you, as it’s entirely subjective) means cutting out what makes you HAPPY. I have always paid cash for my designer duds, albeit on the lower end of the spectrum. (I have a weakness for BCBG Max Azria, though. Clothes fit PERFECT every time.) It’s about sacrificing. Some people fritter more money on fake purses than I have on my real ones — I have a friend who spends more on handbags in a year than I have on my most expensive real one… And mine’s held up awesome and will keep kicking for years to come. So one person spends $500 on a TON of clothes and another spends the same $500 to get only a few pieces… Who’s to say one is better than the other?
If getting rich means giving up nicer clothes (to me, nicer means I need fewer pieces overall) and my cars, I never want to be rich. I’ll settle for well-off, but I do not want to drain every bit of happiness to do so. And no, that doesn’t make me a horrible awful stupid materialistic person. It simply makes me human. (Why I like reading JD’s blog — he still bought a Mini Cooper, and he still “fritters money away” on comics — not everything is completely cut out, showing there IS balance in there.)
._. Yikes, I had a lot to say there….. Oops.
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:23 am
I can understand this process- we have a store here that rents expensive dresses and I certainly see how that could be a good choice if you have something important to attend- for certain people- not me. On the other hand,I see much of the luxury market(not at the Hermes level-more of the Coach level) as appealing to those who can’t really afford it but buy it anyway. I just saw a co-worker who is having serious financial problems(she is constantly dealing with them on her cell phone where everyone can hear) come back from buying some name brand coat- because it was on sale(but she has at least 5 coats already)
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:25 am
Buying because of peer pressure. Buying not for quality, but prestige. Spending far over budget. Leasing instead of owning. As far as I am concerned, all of these items go against everything that GRS stands for.
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:26 am
Foxie made me think of the reason each of us wants to be *rich*. A friend of mine has a goal of being rich so she can afford great vacations and designer handbags. And her penchant for these things is why she never will be. And I think that’s the objection one might have to this post. “How to be a little less wasteful” is how it might come across. How many people contend that they NEED the handbag? And how many actually do?
With that being said I am 6′0″ tall. I haven’t been able to shop retail for clothes in years, so I’m completely unplugged (I recognized “Coach”, but that’s about it). I have to mail order everything but jewelry. And I’m an engineer. Five $20 bags are equivalent to one $100 bag. I evaluate the workmanship and stylishness of a bag, plug it into the algorithm in my head, and decide.
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:26 am
For classic bags, it doesn’t make any sense to rent them since they don’t go out of style. The Hermes Kelly has been around for decades, for example. And for people who thing the whole handbag thing is silly, well, different strokes and all. I’m not into electronic gadgets, cars, shoes, large homes, collections, lots of travel, or even clothes much (I don’t enjoy shopping), but I do love my Kelly bag, which I bought used and paid cash. It’s ten years old and still looks fantastic, and it’s the only bag I own. Yes, I only have one purse. By the way, a gently-used Birkin doesn’t cost as much as the article says it does. $17,000 is closer to the price of a new one.
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:28 am
This sounds to me like it’s pretty similar to guys renting tuxes for a wedding or prom… in which case it makes complete sense. For a classical musician for example it makes more sense to own your own tux, for most other people it doesn’t.
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:32 am
Oh, it’s the concept of renting a ridiculously expensive item that makes sense to me, not the concept of a $12,000 handbag. So maybe it doesn’t make complete sense…
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:33 am
I’m not big on leasing anything. I don’t lease a car, I don’t lease a home, so I’m not going to lease stuff. I have two good bags I use all the time: a Burberry and a Gucci (don’t understand the obsession with Birkin or LV). I’ve gotten my money’s worth out of both bags over the last seven years.
BTW, Jane Birkin, whom the bag was named after, claims her tendinitis is caused by years of carrying the hefty Birkin bag and no longer uses one.
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:37 am
Des said this:
“To those who say designer clothes can never be frugal, I would ask if you EVER go on vacation. Vacations aren’t frugal, but they are fun. Some people (myself included) don’t take them because my money is better used elsewhere. But would a post about saving money on vacations evoke the same response?”
I agree with this.
If April had instead posted a story about how to rent gaming systems (PS2 and 3, Wii, etc.), would that have received the same response? Or what if she had written a story about “how to save money on a nice night out”? Probably not.
I actually think this rental program is a smart idea. As others have mentioned, it’s no different from guys having to rent a tux for a wedding or prom. So…why not rent out a prom dress, or an elegant cocktail dress, or even a wedding dress?
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:42 am
I would add one more guideline: wedge it into your overstuffed closet when it goes out of style. It won’t be long.
Pretty disgusting to spend that kind of time and money on egocentric accesories when so many people and animals are in need.
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:45 am
A place down the street from me rents out Rims to people (for their car)
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:45 am
I do not think the tuxedo analogy fits well.
An average man will rent a tuxedo a handful of times in his life. This story is about women who are in a near permanent state of leasing purses.
A tuxedo is the “socially expected” dress for certain events. I cannot think of any event in which those large, ugly purses are required. In fact, for formal events I am pretty sure large purses are highly discouraged.
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:46 am
At #58: Well, isn’t it their money and therefore their right to decide how to spend it? I just don’t think it’s fair to lash out at people or judge them simply because they choose to spend money in a way that’s different from how you’d like them to spend it (it’s their money, after all).
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:48 am
At #59:
Adam, you’re partially correct, except that the focus then transfers on the brand on the small purse (you’d be surprised how good people are at recognizing the brand behind the item).
Moreover, depending on the social function, comments would be made about it being a non-expensive brand item, in much the same way that comments would be made about a man showing up not wearing a tuxedo suit. You’re talking about women whispering to each other “What in God’s name is SHE wearing?”
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:53 am
A friend of mine has spoken well of a similar service for dresses called Rent The Runway, as Christine in comment #23 has already mentioned.
http://www.renttherunway.com/
(I have no interest in RTR, either personal or financial - I’ve just heard good things about them.)
I also like the idea of the Steal The Time website mentioned in comment #38, even if I don’t need it either.
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:56 am
@61:
And now we are back into the realm of buying because of peer pressure, prestige, etc. All the things that go against GRS.
I know it may be easier said than done for people with fragile egos, but they just need to “get over it”.
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:57 am
@62 Question: would you consider wearing a tuxedo suit to a suitably formal event a result of peer pressure? And would you recommend that men do not do so and “get over it” instead?
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:01 am
@63:
We are arguing different things at this point. I recognize the need to not show up in cut off jean shorts to a formal event, just as I recognize the need to have a certain type of dress and purse for those events. What I do not recognize is the requirement to have a several hundred or thousand dollar purse, simply because you don’t want women to gossip about you behind your back.
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:03 am
I would like to add, that if the women were renting purses in the same manner as men rent tuxes, for rarely-occurring events, then I could see some sense in it. This article is not about those women, however. It is about women who are in a permanent state of leasing purses to wear “around town”.
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:03 am
A couple of thoughts: 1) I bet that most of the time people don’t remember what you wore yesterday to work, and certainly don’t remember what you wore to the last gala event that they also attended! I continue to get compliments on clothing I bought many years ago — and so I’m very careful about what I buy and what I discard! Sometimes an item goes out of rotation for awhile, but works great with a new item so gets pulled out of the maybe closet.
2) Cost-per-use. When I first bought a Coach bag, the saleslady convinced me that it would last as long as two or three less expensive bags, and thus I’d be spending the same amount overall. She was right. But, when Coach stopped making styles I liked, and my doctor explained I had a sore shoulder because even empty the bag was too heavy, I switched to less expensive bags. There’s still a cost-per-use analysis to be done, but it does make it easier to discard something that really does wear out.
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:05 am
Adam, for some people their image is very important to their earning potential. It isn’t ego, but simply good sense to wear the uniform of the event. As George said, it isn’t necessarily to impress people, but to fit in. Should one turn down an invitation to an important client’s party because one thinks the trappings are too expensive?
Where I work my boss invites people out to dinner and beers at a bar. For other people it’s lunch at Spago (I think that’s the ridiculously expensive place I hear about in movies), and for yet others it’s black tie parties.
You can be prudent with your money and still have those kinds of obligations.
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:09 am
“Adam, for some people their image is very important to their earning potential. It isn’t ego, but simply good sense to wear the uniform of the event.”
As a previous poster mentioned, it makes sense for a man going to the prom to rent a tux while a man who plays in an orchestra would buy one. If image is part of one’s career, such as in sales, then it is an obvious investment.
Again, I do not think that this article is talking about this class of people. It is talking about people who saw the celebrity of the day wearing a certain purse and “just had to have it”.
P.S. On a side note, why do the post numbers keep jumping around? It’s like posts are getting inserted after the fact.
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:11 am
Oops. Sorry, I just threw people’s numbered replies out of whack by approving a bunch of comments. I hate it when that happens, but there’s no way around it.
Also, I’m writing a quick follow-up to this post for this afternoon. This discussion regarding “is this an appropriate topic at GRS” is great! I actually have an answer.
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:11 am
“I bet that most of the time people don’t remember what you wore yesterday to work, and certainly don’t remember what you wore to the last gala event that they also attended!”
I think that for me, the need to rent a dress would ultimately depend on if I am photographed in said dress at these functions. I bought a beautiful LBD from Ralph Lauren about 6 years ago. I’ve worn it to countless weddings - but the thing is, these were all for different circles of friends and family members. So, I wore the dress to cousin Sally’s wedding, a college classmate’s wedding, a coworker’s wedding, and a high school buddy’s wedding - and no one knew that I a) had the dress for years, and b) I was wearing it for the umpteenth time.
Now, if I were going to weddings within the same circles (Cousin Sally’s wedding this month, then Cousin Fred’s wedding next month, both with nearly identical guest lists), then I’d probably buy a new dress, or at least add some flashy accessory to make it look different (or get new shoes or something). I would feel goofy wearing the same dress in all of the family photos at every wedding, but that’s just me.
Some of those galas, though, can be catty. It depends if that matters to you - if you don’t care about people whispering “didn’t she wear that last year?” then you wear the same dress every year. If it matters to you - and especially if you are photographed at said gala - I can see buying or renting a dress.
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:11 am
@ #69
Actually, Adam, that was precisely the point I was going to make.
Just as you’re expected to wear a tuxedo to certain type of events, so are you expected to wear a designer purse or a unique fashionable dress to others.
In much the same way that people would be shocked by someone showing up to a formal event in cut-off jeans (as you put it), so would they be shocked at someone not wearing designer at a particular social venue.
In other words, it’s all about the expectations that you need to conform to in the environment you operate in. Just like you don’t consider wearing tuxedos rather than cut-off jeans a form of peer pressure (or, at least, not the kind of peer pressure you’d take issue with), so is wearing designer regarded as a perfectly rational expectation at certain social events.
Real-life example: a friend of mine works at a private bank here in Geneva. When he first attended the job interview, he greatly impressed the HR and his prospective boss. However, he was told right when he was leaving that, if he were selected to work with the bank, he’d be expected to wear a designer suit to work, especially when interacting with clients.
My point, then, is that it all depends what kind of environment you find yourself in - and if you find yourself in a situation where wearing designer is expected, I don’t think it’s fair or justified to brand people who choose to do so as wasteful or egocentric. It’s the same expectation as not wearing cut-off jeans to a formal event, only taken to another level.
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:13 am
I can understand renting a dress if you go to many black-tie funtions in a year (there seems to be a stigma for women to wear the same dress more than once) but I don’t really understand renting the accessories. I’ve bought “brand-name” accessories from consignment shops, outlet stores, discount websites, etc. and the cost to buy is almost always cheaper than the cost to rent for a month.
Speaking of the stigma of wearing the same dress… I’m all about accessories. I mix and match mine all the time. I can wear the same black dress to every event I go to for the year (granted, I only have about four formal events in a year) and just dress it up with a different stole, jacket, necklace, brooch, etc. In that case, if you’re fishing for compliments, people will comment on your accessories.
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:15 am
When I was first married, I saw no need for matching furniture. I thought people with matching furniture were vain and materialistic. Why pay even sale price for new furniture when thrift store items work just as well. Just cover them with a blanket and get over it.
But, as I got older, I found that I began to want nicer things. I can appreciate the quality of some kinds of furniture. I can tell a Walmart brand shirt from a Banana Republic shirt, when I wasn’t able to before. I can taste the difference between a $3/lb steak and a $7/lb steak.
The fact is that some brands produce a higher quality than others. If you are used to thrift store furniture, you might not be able to appreciate the quality of a $21,000 dining room set (I know I wouldn’t be able to), but you might be able to appreciate a $400 modern-looking Ikea dining room set. If you are accustomed to listening to your music on laptop speakers, you might not be able to appreciate a $1,000 stereo system, but you might enjoy an upgrade to a $300 system. Does that make sense?
I’m not saying people with more expensive tastes are better (far from it, I’m the one who just recently upgraded to Ikea-style furniture, and $3 steak from hamburger). I am only saying that just because you can’t appreciate the difference in quality between a $100 department store dress and a $2,000 designer dress does not mean that the people who can appreciate it are stupid.
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:18 am
@JD - Looking forward to the follow-up post. I’ll save the bulk of my argument for that thread, but in a nutshell, I absolutely think these types of discussions are appropriate for GRS. This site is about getting rich. It’s right there in the title! And one of the perks of BEING rich is having nice things.
The word “frugal” doesn’t appear anywhere in this site’s title. While frugality is an important part of getting rich, there’s still the whole other half of the argument - what life is like once you BECOME rich. I’m not clipping coupons and driving a 10-year old beater just so that I can keep on doing it when I retire. I fully intend to upgrade my lifestyle once I’ve “made it.”
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:21 am
Although I’m frugal in nearly all other parts of my life, this is actually something I indulge in. It’s budgeted for and paid for in cash. I always purchase at rock bottom prices.
Something that maybe isn’t considered when making a purchase like this is that often times if you buy it at the lowest price and take care of the item, designer handbags (and other accessories) hold a value and can be sold to very close to what you obtained it for. I have purchased and sold many bags this way. I’ve enjoyed many and been able to find out exactly what works for me.
My income is small and I continually save half of that for my future retirement, but I’ve been able to enjoy some really nice bags as a result of smart shopping and selling!
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:23 am
I’m completely clueless when it comes to fashion, so this is definitely something I would never do.
However, I can see where people who are really into fashion and the latest “it” bag would rent as opposed to purchasing. If one is really on top of the fashion scene, the bag they rent can be exchanged for the latest model. Purchasing a bag would mean committing to one style for at least a year.
It does seem like a silly, frivolous way to spend money, but I’m sure people think my Starbucks addiction is just as frivolous!
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:33 am
Kevin (#79) brings up a good point. I also think that readers are at various stages in their quest to get - and stay - rich. So, if a reader has paid off all of their debts and has some good investments, why not splurge a bit here and there and get a nice handbag. That’s something I’d like to enjoy when I’ve paid off my debt - I’d like to occasionally splurge on something (within reason, of course!).
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:34 am
@Meg
Your story about dressing for a wedding reminds me of my sister. She was really mad at her MIL for wearing the same outfit to her wedding as her husband’s brother a year before. She said it made it look like they were married on the same day. There was more to the attitude, but it shows how much it means to some people.
@Des
I know exactly what you mean about upgrading. Depending on how much you are making and for how long your furniture can make it look like you are more cheap than frugal. Everyone talks about how awful peer pressure is, but it has a good effect often by setting and maintaining standards. I’m embarrassed if my house is dirty because of what others will think about it, not because I need it neat to work there.
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:57 am
The bad: that there is peer pressure for people to live above their means, and that people renting high price status items only invites more comparisons and fuel to the fire (i.e. middle class woman sees a woman working at McDee’s with a status bag, thinks well if they can afford it then why can’t I?).
The good: for people who need to get dressed up for a special event, can rent the item, therefore looking good, save money, and keep stuff out of the landfill.
Personally I don’t care a whit about bags, but if I was invited to something Oscar style level It would be great to rent some extravagent piece of jewelry like an emerald choker or something. Heck, that’s pretty much what Cinderella did, isn’t it?
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:11 am
@ Kim (#61) - Why do you assume people who buy pricey items won’t help others? I just donated $1000 to my local United Way. Or am I supposed to donate everything I own and live in poverty to make people like you feel better?
My boyfriend’s father buys a new Jaguar every year. Does that make him a bad person? Even if he donates $5 to $10 million to charity every year?
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:11 am
While there are plenty of opinions flying around here, there is one statement that ALL of us can agree is foolish: #12 Ben’s suggestion of renting a wedding cake!
(Thanks for the lol, Ben. Your humor was well received!)
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:29 am
Okay, I’ve dashed off a quick follow-up. It’ll go live at 1pm Pacific/4pm Eastern.
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:32 am
@ Ann (#85)
Well said! Exactly the same thought went through my mind when I saw a luxury Mercedes parked on the street once, and a friend of mine immediately commented how disgusting she felt it was that people would buy such an expensive cars when so many others are living in poverty.
My answer - you earn it, you spend it.
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:33 am
I realize this is a finance blog, but April seems to have completely missed the point of these sites. Many people spend far too much money on designer goods and don’t save up for them. They want variety, not two good handbags. Instead of spending hundreds or thousands of dollars to have the variety to go with their clothes, they rent different items to satisfy the look they want that month. It’s a much wiser way of dealing with changing desires for people who in the past would have just spent way more than they could afford!
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:35 am
Actually, J.D., I thought April might have written this at your suggestion; if I recall, you tweeted about it a couple weeks ago thinking it might make a post if you had more time?
(The rental wedding cake was a good laugh, I hope intentional! And sometimes it’s smarter to buy wedding stuff than rent if you do it well; I bought beautiful clearance napkins at April Cornell for 1$ each for my wedding, which was cheaper than renting stiff white ones. I also bought 89 cent wine glasses in bulk rather than renting them. I am still using those!)
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:43 am
Personally, I don’t find this article relatable at all since this is way out of my lifestyle choices and spending bracket. I guess if you are in the kind of social circles that require that type of accessory, renting would be a good idea instead of buying since you might not get much use out of the item. However, it sounds like there is a membership fee.
I also feel that caring about what labels your “friends” are wearing is extremely superficial. If that is what people of “status” care about, I’d rather stay put right where I’m at. It’s also ironic that people wearing such items are attending “charity events.” I’m not against having nice things, but perhaps the money spent on ridiculously priced clothing items could be better spent elsewhere.
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:58 am
You are not your job. You are not your bank account. You are not the car you drive. You are not the clothes you wear. You are not the designer handbag you carry.
December 22nd, 2009 at 12:05 pm
@92
You’re right, you’re all of that combined!
December 22nd, 2009 at 12:06 pm
Slowth gets mega-bonus points for the Fight Club reference. I love that book/film.
December 22nd, 2009 at 12:10 pm
Actually, you CAN rent a wedding cake! Some couples opt to rent an elaborate-looking cake made of cardboard. After they cut the cake (the top tier is usually cake), it is brought back in the kitchen, and the caterers cut and serve a much cheaper sheet cake (i.e., one you can get at your grocery store) to the guests.
December 22nd, 2009 at 12:11 pm
I love GRS for the very fact that we were uniquely made with different tastes and preferences. I love designer stuff and have been wanting to buy a particular Burberry purse and sunglasses for quite some time now. My only challenge is that the Canadian retail prices are not fair. So, I am planning to take a bus ride to Seattle after Christmas where I will shop for other designer stuff and also get my Burberry(-ies).
I hate the idea of renting a purse that I will use over and over again. Why not save and buy it and use it over and over again? But that is just me and my approach to getting rich (not necessarily slowly) may be different from my neighbour’s.
This article was great because, like one of the respondents implied, we would probably not be getting these kind of responses if April had written about renting Wii (or comic books). I think the idea about renting vs. buying vacation homes was right on target! Anyway, I am happy that there is such diversity here. Just keep in mind that we are all individuals, let’s enjoy each other’s company here and remember that even “getting rich slowly” has different meanings/definitions to different people.
Personally, I have decided to blend designer into my lifestyle as I build wealth or get rich. I love it when I see ladies carrying cool purses or guys in designer suits, regardless of whether they rented them or bought them (how do I know what’s going on in their lives?). From interaction with my boss who is a self-made multimillionaire with little regard for fanciness (wears nice suits because he is a lawyer anyway), one can be rich and wear no fancy/designer stuff especially if they are naturally not wired to desire such stuff; rich and wear designer; poor/average and wear expensive stuff (whether rented - bought on credit); poor/average and wear no fancy stuff. It’s all a matter of choice and probably due to the uniqueness of individuals i.e personalities etc. It’s funny but in my office the person who has the “most visibly expensive” items (clothing, purses, shoes, accessories etc) is the company president’s assistant yet there is a lady who owns a yacht, has a house paid off, always vacations exotically and carries the most used purse I have ever laid my eyes on. Now, believe me, I was born and raised in Africa and although I have widely travelled internationally I definitely know what an extremely used purse looks like!!!! Not only is this lady (and her husband) wealthy (rich) but she also just inherited more wealth from her father who was a wealthy banker. However, she has carried the same purse to work for the three years I’ve known her. That is her lifestyle choice. She could probably afford to rent or buy others but chooses not to. That’s her choice.
As for me, I love the glitz, the bling and I love it expensive BUT I know I can only afford one item in a long time. I also hate renting stuff or shopping in thrift stores. However, my choices allow me to take care of other life matters. That’s why I am saying we are all here for the same purpose of learning more about how to get rich somehow (slowly, quickly…..whatever) and while we hang out on this site, let’s appreciate each other’s uniqueness and not be so fast to judge. We personal finance enthusiasts (people hanging out on such sites)sometimes have a habit of portraying ourselves as better than others.
May we all get rich (somehow)
Merry Christmas
December 22nd, 2009 at 12:16 pm
@Victoria (post #96): very very very well said! This bears repeating: “while we hang out on this site, let’s appreciate each other’s uniqueness and not be so fast to judge. We personal finance enthusiasts (people hanging out on such sites)sometimes have a habit of portraying ourselves as better than others.”
December 22nd, 2009 at 12:19 pm
A few years ago I wouldn’t have understood this at all. Moving to DC and working my way up the gov’t chain, though, I’ve had a few chances to go to inaugural balls, international galas, etc. I rent a tux, and my wife makes do with the same little black dress she’s always had. If I could rent her a smashing dress and handbag for the night, she’d love it - and the whole thing would be a grand adventure. There are plenty of people in the same boat, judging from the comments.
I think a common-sense but occasionally-indulgent cohort reads GRS and can take away some good ideas from this article. The ’serial handbag renters’ that some commentors seems to be concerned about aren’t really the audience - if they’ve spent any time on the site then they are getting inundated with “STOP BEING FOOLISH!” type messages.
December 22nd, 2009 at 12:19 pm
I can understand spending more money on nice things. I bought a messenger bag for something like $120 a few years ago, it wasn’t a cheap bag. I still have it though, it’s about 4 years old and still looks almost brand new. It was made by hand in the USA out of high-quality materials. I felt like I got something for my money.
That’s not why you buy a $300 handbag though — because it’s well-made and will last forever (imagine showing up somewhere with a 10-year-old, cost $1000 in 1999 handbag). You buy it because it’s in vogue and you can show it off to your friends will will then be envious of your fashionability. If this is something your friends care about, maybe that’s important to you (but then, I’m glad I don’t have your friends).
I even thought this way myself once, for a short while. I went out and bought $150 jeans and European shoes. I quickly realized that nobody cared. No one interacted with me differently. No one thought more highly of me. I don’t even think anyone even complimented my nice pants. That was a lesson I learned in a season, and then I went back to buying jeans at the gap. I’m not immune to wanting others to admire me, I just realize that that they’re not going to do it because of my clothes — at least not the people who’s admiration I’d want.
I’ve spent plenty of money on things I don’t need. I own four surfboards and three bicycles. I don’t own them simply to be seen with them, though.
December 22nd, 2009 at 12:22 pm
Tyler, some of us have nice bags because we like them. I carry my 10-year old bag with pride, and since it has no logos, very few people know that it’s even a designer handbag. My friends aren’t really into fashion (neither am I, for that matter). No one even notices my bag because it’s so plain (I call it “classic,” which is the polar opposite of an “it bag”) but so what? *I* enjoy it, and that’s all that matters. I don’t know why it’s so hard for people to understand that some people simply like to have a little luxury in their lives without trotting out the tired “you’re trying to impress people” myth.