Reader Story: I Got a 20% Pay Cut — and Loved It!
Published on - September 12th, 2010 (by J.D. Roth) This guest post from Tim Stobbs is part of the “reader stories” feature at Get Rich Slowly. Some stories contain general advice; others are examples of how a GRS reader achieved financial success — or failure. These stories feature folks from all levels of financial maturity and with all sorts of incomes. Tim Stobbs is the writer behind the blog, Canadian Dream: Free at 45. He lives in Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada and despite his recent pay cut, he hopes to reitre by his 45th birthday.
I left my boss’s office with a huge smile on my face. I had asked for a 20% pay cut, and was thrilled that he had agreed to it. Had I lost my mind? No, not yet. Did I have the worst performance review on the planet? No, that wasn’t it. So what happened? That’s a long story, but it goes something like this.
Like many middle-class people, I had a decent job, a wife, two young kids and, of course, a mortgage. There was just one small problem: I didn’t find my work all that meaningful. It paid well, it had good benefits, and I wasn’t bored by it — most of the time. Yet, I was never fully engaged at work. It all seemed like rather pointless paper shuffling.
I was looking for something more meaningful to with my life. I was open to all possibilities, so on a whim one day I looked at who was running in our civil election for city council and the school boards. I noticed that no one was running for the Public School Board for my subdivision. Out of curiosity, I looked up the requirements to enter the election, and then called the previous trustee who told me that he wasn’t running again.
So, just days before the nominations closed, I went around to get my signatures and paid my deposit. When talking with the election office staff a couple of days later, I had it confirmed: No one else ran against me. I was acclaimed and just got elected to my Public School Board for a three-year term. The kicker was this: I didn’t realize they also paid you for the job. Beyond a new title and a lot of responsibility, I also found out that I earned just over $23,000 per year in salary.
I really didn’t need the extra salary since I was already living below my means, so my wife and I decided to pay down the mortgage faster. With the school board pay and most of our regular savings, we managed to pay off just over $25,000 of the principal in six months. If we keep up this pace, we could be mortgage-free by the end of my term on the school board!
So, yes, I was rolling in extra cash, and I was enjoying my school board work, as it was directly meaningful to my own children’s lives. To a lot of people I had it all, except I had a major problem: I had no time. Working a full-time day job, a part-time job as a trustee, helping to raise two young boys, and keeping up with the household chores left me falling asleep from exhaustion most nights. I felt like Bilbo Baggins I was “stretched out and thin”. After six months of this, I realized something had to give — I couldn’t work this hard for the next three years.
My initial response was to look at my calendar and drop things that I didn’t need to be doing. Then I looked at where I was spending my time in a week. I got merciless with my time as I turned down meetings and avoided extra projects like the plague. In the end, it still wasn’t enough; I rarely got to do anything for myself, and still fell into bed exhausted more often than not.
So I looked at my more extreme options:
- I could quit the school board (but I didn’t want to give up that meaningful work).
- I could work part-time instead of full time at my day job.
I assumed that dropping to part time at the day job was a long shot, but it was worth a try. I made a meeting with my boss and explained my situation and how I wanted to drop down to 80% time (or a four-day work week). “I want the time more than the money,” I said. It took a few more meetings and some discussion on how to move the workload around in the department, but in the end my boss agreed.
I started my first four-day workweek in July. I had every Friday off all summer long — and as far as my calendar goes into the future. My first morning off, I woke with a pounding heart as I looked at the clock. I assumed I was late for work until I remembered I didn’t have to work on Friday anymore. I rolled over and slept in for another half an hour.
The cost of this choice isn’t cheap: I’m losing 20% of my day job’s salary. Yet, my-take home pay is actually higher than I would have expected. Why? Taxes. By dropping my income, I’m also no longer paying as high a tax rate on that income. My overall take-home pay only dropped around half of the total salary reduction. Yes, this means I have to keep my mortgage for a little longer, but I’m okay with that choice because I have the time now to do more of what I love, like writing and spending time with my family.
In the end, this was the right choice for me and my family. It does come at a cost, but it’s not nearly as high as some people would assume. Besides, money is just paper and metal coins or numbers in an account. Having a balanced life again is worth every dime of income that I gave up.
GRS is committed to helping our readers save and achieve your financial goals.Savings interest rates may be low, but that’s all the more reason to shop for the best rate.Find the highest savings interest rate from Ally Bank, Capital One 360, Everbank, and more.
This article is about Career, Choices, Reader Stories
Disclaimer: This content is not provided or commissioned by American Express. Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of American Express, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by American Express. This site may be compensated through American Express Affiliate Program.
Discover is a paid advertiser of this site. Reasonable efforts are made to maintain accurate information. See the Discover online credit card application for full terms and conditions on offers and rewards.
SEARCH FOR RECENT ARTICLES



I whole-heartedly support and applaud Tim’s decision.
I’m also interested in the gender politics of cutting back on work to spend more time with family.
I am intrigued by the responses to this post in comparison to the responses to a female reader story in which the writer made a career change and cut back her hours to spend more time with her family. She got much more criticism for her decision. Many of the commenters couldn’t understand why she would give up a high-paying job she hated.
Why the difference?
loading....
It’s great that you manage your money well enough that you can afford to give up some pay in exchange for time with your family. The cynical side of me, however, wonders how the rest of your workload was divided. Do the people who took on the extra work get extra pay for it? If your company is anything like mine, the work was probably just added to the full-timers’ responsibilities. It’s a great deal for the company because the same amount of work gets done, but they save 20% of your salary.
loading....
Ugh!!!! I LOVED this story!!!! First, as a former teacher and now stay at home mama, I am so in love with the idea of someone CARING enough about something to actually go out and DO SOMETHING about it. Thanks for posting this story, JD. Definitely inspired me to rethink how I spend my time-isn’t that what life is all about anyways?
loading....
I have to agree with the other poster who mentioned that it’s not so much a pay cut as a time cut. My company had to cut us all back by 25 percent to get through the tough times without laying anyone off last year. That meant we all worked 40 hours a week, but got paid 25 percent less. That’s what I would consider a pay cut. We were ok with doing it if it meant we all kept our jobs, and we’re back to full pay now, so it worked out.
I’d much rather they cut our hours, as the extra time would have been nice, but I didn’t have anything quite so useful to do with it as the author. Good job, and a very interesting way to handle the situation. I liked the article, but did think the title a bit misleading.
loading....
I took a 30% pay cut, voluntarily, by leaving a job that made me miserable. Just got to the point where the extra money – which I was spending, anyway – was not worth the pain.
Much happier working in a more peaceful environment for less money. Of course, after subsequent layoff I’m now in a NEW new job and almost back up to my previous level of compensation.
Nice story. It’s good to remind people that public servants often go into public life because they want to make a difference.
loading....
@ Bill,
Good plan, perhaps when I’m closer to retirement I’ll have to try and drop down to a three day week as well. *grin*
@The Other Brian,
Actually we just brought on a new person to the department recently and were planning on shifting around the work load anyway. So my dropping hours didn’t dump work on anyone who had a full plate. It just craved off sections that someone else could manage instead of me. In reality my timing was nearly perfect from that point of view. My co-workers were actually fine with my reduction in hours since they got some more interesting work out the deal.
Thanks for the stories from everyone else. It’s good to hear about who others are trying out reduced hours. It really was a great choice for me.
Tim
loading....
I just started working 80% a month ago and I’m loving it! I realised that I had no time to do the things I wanted to do, and no reason really not to take the time instead since we have no kids, no mortgage, plenty of savings etc. So now I have time to get stuff done at home, sort out the garden etc which leaves more fun-time at the weekends. My SO has fewer chores in return for working FT. We are starting major house renovations in a few months so I think it will help having a day when I am around for meetings and so on.
So far we enjoyed all the 3-day weekends at the beach in August but I think that real-life will kick in shortly and I will be back to chores!
loading....
Kudos to you, Tim, and thanks for sharing your story!
I was laid off over 2 months ago, with no prospects. Our income was slashed by 60% when that happened, not to mention that going on my husband’s health insurance is not nearly as good as mine. Financially, we’re in fairly decent shape going into this, but it’s still stressful. The strain on our marriage is soon going to be too much, I fear.
Is there anyone out there who’s a single parent AND has been successful in cutting back on work time? I’d like to hear that story. Our marriage isn’t going to survive this, but financially, it doesn’t make sense to separate. We’re not prepared for that.
loading....
Interesting story with a nice twist. I am glad it worked out for the writer.
I did not realize that school board positions paid, especially that much. Sounds like the writer found a win-win situation for him and his company.
loading....
I think this is a wonderful article. If my employer would let me cut to 32 hours a week and keep my medical, I would do it in a heart beat. I only have my mortgage left as far as debt goes and live well below my means. Perhaps one day, one day….one day!
loading....
Tim, good for you for being brave enough to make changes to your life so that it is balanced and meaningful. Great insight! And thanks for serving on your school board, that’s a big job. Kudos!
I too work 32 hours a week, and have for years. I am so much happier because of it, and I telecommute to boot. The adjustment to a smaller paycheck was somewhat neutralized by reduced work related costs due to telecommuting (less gas, no lunches out, no special clothing, no baby showers, etc). And as a result, I am much happier in my work and my production actually went up 15%.
I know it isn’t at all possible for everyone, but I wish more people could have the opportunity to job share or work 32 hr weeks. Only 60% of the Dutch work full time, and they are some of the happiest people in the world. I think they’re definitely on to something because it can be life changing.
loading....