Are E-Books Cost Effective? The Pros and Cons of E-Books
Published on - December 7th, 2010 (by J.D. Roth) Yesterday, Google opened its ebookstore for business. The search giant joins Apple and Amazon (and Barnes & Noble) in a fast-growing field. Electronic books will never completely replace paper books, but they’re going to make up a sizable portion — and maybe even the majority — of the market sooner than you think.
Naturally, more and more GRS readers are moving to e-books. In fact, I’ve had a couple of people ask me about them recently. For example, Peggy wrote last week to share her experience:
What do you think of Kindle books? Do you have a Kindle?
Our family members are all avid readers. We live overseas and move every three-four years. Books are a major weight factor for us, so we started downsizing during our last move and kept only those books we enjoy re-reading or which have sentimental value.
This year we bought several Kindles, and I have to say, I really like it for its portability and that we can travel on R&R and have all our reading material in one small ‘container’. But when we retire and settle down, it might lose some of its attraction. I also wonder how it will hold up over time…but I guess it’s too early to tell about that.
I’m a die-hard bibliophile. I love the look, feel, and smell of an old paperback. I used to have several thousand books, though I sold many of them to pay off debt. Still, I have a modest library, and I love it. I cannot imagine a world without books.
Having said that, I did own an Amazon Kindle. I bought one in early 2009, and used it for just over a year. When I bought my iPad, I sold the Kindle to a friend. I switched to the Kindle app instead. (For those who don’t know, you can download the free Kindle app for iPad, smartphone, and computer, which means you can read e-books from just about any web-enabled device.)
Checking my Kindle account, I see that in the past two years, I’ve downloaded 54 books. Twelve of these were free, but the rest cost about $10 each. If I had to guess, I’d say that about half of my book dollars are now spent in the Kindle store.
The pros and cons of e-books
I agree with Peggy’s assessment: It’s great to be able to have many books in a small “container”. It’s awesome, really — like living in the future. To the extent that e-books help me reduce clutter, I love them. But I’m not wholly sold on e-books yet for one very simple reason: cost. Buying e-books usually isn’t cost-effective. Not for me, anyhow.
First, you can only read an e-book on an electronic device. That means you have to own the electronic device, which itself costs money. Admittedly, most folks own an iPod, a smartphone, or a computer, which means they don’t have to pay anything new for an e-book reader. But still, you’re using a device costing hundreds of dollars to read a book. And that device generally isn’t as portable and/or convenient as a paperback.
Second, e-books aren’t cheap. In fact, depending on what you read, they may actually be relatively expensive. Perhaps to protect the paper-book industry, publishers have set what seems like obnoxiously high prices for most e-books.
Here’s my assessment after two years of buying e-books:
- E-books are great for new releases. For new books, the electronic version is almost always the cheapest way to go. At a friend’s house the other day, I noticed he’d paid $29 for the latest John Grisham book. $29!!! That’s insane. That John Grisham book costs $16 at Amazon, and the Kindle version costs $10. In fact, most e-books cost between $10 and $12. When the cost savings is combined with the space savings, e-books are the clear winner for new releases.
- E-books are okay for classics. Anything that’s in the Public Domain (published before 1923) can generally be downloaded to your e-book reader for free. Sometimes the formatting is goofy, and there usually isn’t any supplemental material (like essays and notes), but you do get the books at no cost. (Searching for free Kindle books? Here’s Amazon’s list of free eBook collections, and here’s their best-sellers in the Kindle store, including free books on the right.) Of course, these books can usually be had for cheap (or free) in their dead tree versions, so there’s not a huge savings here.
- E-books suck for most titles published between 1923 and, say, 2008. Books from the past century are still priced between $5 and $10 in electronic editions. This is ridiculous. You can borrow these for free from your public library. Or you can go to a used bookstore, a garage sale, or a thrift store to pick them up for less than they cost in digital format. Plus, tons of popular books aren’t even available electronically. (A real-life, typical example: Cry, the Beloved Country costs $12 on the Kindle. A brand-new paperback copy from Amazon? $9. The mind boggles.)
Finally, this is both a pro and a con: With electronic books, you can download something you want to read right now. Buying a book for the Kindle is an almost instantaneous process. The morning we left for Europe, for example, we were seated on the plane just before takeoff, when I decided I wanted to read Eat, Pray, Love. In the two minutes before we were required to switch off electronic devices, I was able to download the book. It really is that easy. But, as I say, this is both a pro and a con. It might lead some folks to buy too many books on impulse.
End notes
What about the reading experience itself? Some people prefer e-books to regular books. I don’t. I tend to be a synoptic reader — I read several books on a subject at once. And with non-fiction, I’m often a non-linear reader — I jump around from chapter to chapter. Plus, in all books, I like to dog-ear pages and take notes. E-books suck at all of these things. Yes, you can add bookmarks and take notes, but it’s a tedious process.
To summarize:
- The part of me that hates Stuff loves e-books.
- I use the Kindle app on my iPad often (it resides in the taskbar), especially for new releases. In fact, as soon as I finish this post, I’m going to spend a couple of hours reading Jayber Crow on the iPad.
- But I think e-books are expensive.
My advice? Unless you’re an avid reader of new books, I’d avoid the Kindle itself. Stick with the free Kindle app on a device you already own. And be careful choosing which books you purchase. Stay frugal!
Do you read e-books? What do you think? Do you find them convenient? Do you find they save you money? Do they cost more than the printed page? If so, are you willing to pay the price?
Photos by goXunuReviews.
GRS is committed to helping our readers save and achieve your financial goals.Savings interest rates may be low, but that’s all the more reason to shop for the best rate.Find the highest savings interest rate from Ally Bank, Capital One 360, Everbank, and more.
This article is about Books, Choices, Odds and Ends
Disclaimer: This content is not provided or commissioned by American Express. Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of American Express, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by American Express. This site may be compensated through American Express Affiliate Program.
Discover is a paid advertiser of this site. Reasonable efforts are made to maintain accurate information. See the Discover online credit card application for full terms and conditions on offers and rewards.
SEARCH FOR RECENT ARTICLES





Hardback Books are the New Collectors Edition. Print media is dying and a digital distribution revolution is inevitable.
loading....
Thank you, Sylvia (91) for typing out my answer.
I have a enough items on hold at the library on a regular basis that I’m never out of anything, then I return it.
There’s always something new so I have little need or time to read (most) things twice.
Perhaps this is because we must have a comparitvely excellent library system (esp. with the county interlibrary loan) and I drive by one of the branches everyday.
Books they don’t have I either use PBS, second hand, or (last resort) buy new.
loading....
I don’t know why anyone expected e-books to be cost-effective. Didn’t anyone learn from music downloads? Buying an album to download is sometimes MORE expensive than buying the hard copy at a music store. They charge for convenience and image. Just like mp3′s. Both markets are TOTALLY wrong in this but as long as consumers keep supporting it, they’ll keep doing it.
For me, a Kindle doesn’t make sense. I haven’t bought a book in ages. I only borrow books from the library. For my Dad, however, a Kindle makes sense. My dad doesn’t use the library but doesn’t like the space books occupy. He recently went on a decluttering rampage and got rid of all the books in his house except the ones for his profession. I’ve noticed my dad has been reading less because he doesn’t want to buy books because of the hassle of what to do with them when he’s finished and he doesn’t want to borrow them because of his perceived “hassle” of dealing with the library.
If you’re looking for cost-effective reading, e-readers aren’t it. There’s only one solution and that’s the library. But if the library doesn’t suit you for whatever reason, I could understand going for an e-reader. It is definitely preferable to buying up physical books that take up space and sometimes cost more.
loading....
i’ve never felt like i was in the minority so deeply! like several of the commenters, i spend all day on the computer- to be able to hold and read something physical and non-electronic is bliss.
my library is also a 10-minute walk from my apartment, and has a great web system. i’vve checked oodles of books out of the library, and have a hard time figuring out why friends & family spend upwards of $10-20 for a book, digital or paper, when it is available for totally free out of the library.
it comes out of your taxes, guys. it’s essentially a pre-paid netflix for books for everyone. library power.
loading....
I don’t have an e-reader, and not really sure I want one. Mostly because one of my favorite places to read is the bathtub.
I have only dropped a couple paperbacks into the water in my almost 30 years of tub reading, but many do get a little damp/splashed.
And while I doubt that there’s enough juice to kill me if I did drop it into the water, I also don’t want to have to dry it out and then hope it still works.
loading....
At the risk of sounding like a luddite, I’m not interested in a Kindle.
I will forever be a fan of the printed page, the dog earing a favorite book, of passing the books around among friends and family. And as JD said, if I lose a book, I’m not stricken. If I lost a Kindle, it would be a big deal.
I know we can’t stop the march of technology, and I like technology a lot. It allows me to earn a living from home. But I have a dear friend who is a manager at Portland’s beloved Powell’s book store, and the recession has hit them too. It’s important to me to support my fave book stores, and I can often find second hand copies at a very good prices. I get a bargain, someone gets to keep their job. And Powell’s often buys the book back when I’m finished with it!
If I traveled a lot, I suppose a Kindle would be attractive. It’s just not a necessity for me.
loading....
Ebooks are also great when you need an answer fast. People often buy my ebooks because they can’t wait to go to a bookstore, there’s no bookstore nearby, they don’t want to wait for snail mail or their book store will take too long to order in a book.
loading....
I received a kindle 3 as a gift a few months ago. The e-ink is easy on the eyes, but most importantly, it is a solution to my dust and mold allergies that make libraries and used books not work for me.
Sharing is a concern, but I lend the whole kindle! If you read in spurts this works, or have the person who is borrowing lend you a few (for me new) paperbacks at the same time.
Sure, it takes a level of trust, but it can be done.
loading....
Just a quick note, my library carries ebooks, right there with the audiobook downloads you can now get ebooks. Do check and see if you library offers the same service. The books lock up in a few weeks but once you are done with them you are going to delete them anyhow, or at least I am…
loading....
Call me old school too, but I prefer paper books. I’m a huge fan of the Multnomah Co. Library system and can pretty much get anything within a week. I spend so much time on the computer for business and logistical purposes, the last thing I want to to is “curl up” with another electric device.
Yes, I suppose the Kindle is great for travel, but that’s just another thing I have to buy. :-/
loading....
I just bought the new Kindle and received it yesterday (first ereader I have owned). I really like being able to move the cursor over a word and having the definition pop up. One of the reasons I bought a Kindle was to be able to do this with foreign language books in which there are a lot more words unknown to me. I haven’t tried this yet, but I read online before buying that foreign language dictionaries are supported (I think you have to pay around $5 to buy the additional dictionary for the Kindle). This will make reading books in French much easier than switching back and forth between paper book & dictionary, even easier than using Google translate.
loading....
One question I had was how is reading on the Ipad (a general use device) vs. e-reader (specific purpose)?
Can you read on an Ipad for hours w/o headaches etc? My understanding of the e-readers is the electronic ink is a specialized technology that is meant to help with this problem.
loading....
I collect fewer, but higher quality books in hardcover now – things I can imagine re-reading throughout life. I’ve replaced paperbacks completely with my B&N Nook, where I keep pop culture, trash fiction, current events, magazine articles, and anything else I don’t want cluttering my good collection on the real bookshelves. I explain here: http://pistolette.net/2010/07/24/the-death-rebirth-of-books/
loading....
I live in a small apartment, and I never kept books I wasn’t going to re-read–still, my TBR stack took up quite a bit of room, and my books to be donated or sold took up even more. It was a great relief to free up this shelf space permanently.
I much prefer my e-reader to a paper book. Unlike JD, I do dare to take it in the tub. I made a nice case for it, so I can haul it anywhere without fear. My cat loves the fact that I can read one-handed.
My big plus is the instant book-buying. I didn’t think about how great that would be until I had it, now I don’t know if I would want to live without it.
My husband has since inherited my first Kindle, and I now have the latest edition, with even nicer contrast and better font control. He was skeptical at first, but he now reads mostly on his Kindle, including taking it on the bus. We both have the Gutenberg catalog on our Kindles, so we have instant access to tons of stuff, which the husband loves.
Links:
Books on the Knob covers free books for several e-readers:
http://booksontheknob.blogspot.com/
Daily Cheap Reads concentrates on books under $5, but usually cheaper:
http://dailycheapreads.com/
Kindle Nation Daily has Kindle news, and a complete listing of free books:
http://kindlehomepage.blogspot.com/
loading....
I guess I am old fashion, but I like the feel of a book in my hands when I am reading. I can find a hardback book for a cheaper price than the paperback, once it comes out in paperback. Bargain bins rock! I use the library more than anything. For newly released books, I can reserve them there and have never had to wait more than a few weeks to read it.
loading....
I bought the Nook Color for the same reasons as stated in the article. I move at least every 2 years and cost of moving my books not only weighs on my back (moving) but also my wallet (shipping). I also had quite a few subscriptions to magazines and enjoy being able to contain them on one device instead of in several areas of my small home. I travel for work at least a few times a month. I am an avid library user and needed an ereader complies with our system. I am so happy that our state library supports ebooks so the cost of a book is free. For me, the moving, shipping, and ability to borrow my books for free makes my e-reader cost effective. Also the nook has a lend me feature that allows users to share their books.
loading....
I really love my Nook and eBooks are very cost effective for me. Is it me or has anyone else noticed that Google’s prices are better than Amazon’s and B&N’s? For some books that I’ve recently purchased, I could have saved slightly over a dollar (not a lot, but it adds up) on each of them.
loading....
I’ve begun to add e-books to my reading library simply because they take up a lot less space than hardback or paperback books. Reading is as essential to me as breathing and I have stacks of books as well as bookshelves spilling over with books.
That said, for my experience e-books are great for the sheer purpose of reading for information and sometimes entertainment. Yet an e-book gives a different experience than reading a paper or hard back book. I have books that are just pleasant to hold – be it for the glossiness of the paper, the intense colors of the illustrations, perhaps raised lettering on the cover, the size or shape of the books, or even an excellence in the method of binding. I often like to highlight or mark a line or two so I can look at it later – and I like the tactile experience of uncapping the highlighter and rubbing it over the favored line. I even like looking at them on the shelf, or showing a page or two to someone when we are discussing something related to the book.
As for the e-books: the ability to quickly find a book, search for a phrase, or even to carry around many books at once – these are all good.
I don’t see e-books replacing regular books for myself. I see them as a supplement or a convenience, sometimes as an enhancement. That said, I wouldn’t give up my e-books any easier than I’d give up my other books. I’ll take both, thank you.
loading....
Personally, I don’t enjoy e-books. I’ve borrowed my sister’s Kobo reader, and I didn’t like it.
I read mostly fiction, and when I pick up a book, it is to take a break from technology. From my computer screen, or smartphone screen, or television screen. I find that we spend so much time in front of ‘screens’, and I don’t want to take the only thing left, reading, away from my life.
I’m sorry, but if you imagine reading on a Sunday on the couch with a cup of tea, are you reading on an electronic device? NO!
loading....
I got a Kindle for my birthday and I love it! It’s definitely convenient to have so many books in one place. As far as the price, what I did was get a membership with Borders to get books for a discount, and convert the format to fit my Kindle, so it works out in the end. As far as taking notes, I’m very anal about NOT dog earring or highlighting my books (even though they’re mine). So I like that I can’t “mess up” a book on my Kindle
loading....
I don’t know about the environmental argument. I can reduce the books I buy (library), reuse the ones I do (re-sell, pass on to someone else, book exchange), and recycle the ones beyond repair, or let them rot in a compost pile.
But when version Older of an e-Reader is replaced with version Newer, where do the older models end up? In Chinese landfills, masquerading as “electronic recycling.”
Pushing our environmental problem onto other people doesn’t make us environmentally friendly.
loading....
But how does it compare to the library?
loading....
When the Kindle came out, I looked it over & decided I didn’t want it. I’m visually impaired, but currently commute 1.5 hrs each way to work, and the ipod just wasn’t doing it for me. A friend who loves his Kindle bought me one as a gift, and I’ve got to say, I’m converted! I don’t like the cost of ebooks, but I’ve barely begun to tap the free book sources. But for now, it’s keeping me sane!
loading....
I found a HUGE benefit (I captialize because it was insane how handy it was,) was the free global webservice I received on the Kindle while out of the country. My friends had gotten an ipad, but they had to be connected to a password protected wireless network, which was down more than half the time we were staying in Oxford. To check the rules to play snooker, or random tourist information, it was much easier to use our Kindle.
On top of that, I have found it soothing to play text-to-speech (it isn’t quite as horrible as the very early computerized voices) while reading because it focuses the mental and visual aspects of learning.
Since I tend to read classics, I feel that my Kindle will continue to pay me back for years. (I got it used and don’t have the zest for upgrade. I’ll run mine until it stops working.)
loading....
This whole ebooks discussion reminds me of why I’m annoyed at the whole marketplace. When I bought books on cassette, the market moved to compact disks; rebougfht some. I’ve bought and rebought music (i.e.:records, 8 track, cassettes, disc). Now, books that used to be on paper that I bought, I’m now expected to rebuy my favorites on one or more reader platforms.
Sorry, that ain’t going to happen. I’m tired of getting screwed.
loading....
I love my book reader (I got a Sony one. I picked it especially for two reasons: it does NOT have wifi or a touch screen, and it supports SD cards).
The day I bought it, I downloaded thousands of classics. After moving from another country, classics were the first things I left behind, and it was incredibly easy to find both French and English classics, that I downloaded extremely fast. For classics, I say ebooks are the way to go, be it only because they offer me choice. There is no way I could have all these books at home if they were not ebooks.
Now if I feel like reading, I can choose from a huge number of books, and there is always something I feel like reading. I love that.
Because I am a bit OCD, and while e-readers typically have a huge memory, I like sorting my books on SD cards, in categories (by author, or genre, or type, for instance comics or non-fiction or poetry, etc). Then I print labels for these cards and carry them in a SD card pouch (it would take four of them to reach the size of one book, and each can hold up to thousands of books)
For me, it recreates the experience of physically looking through your library and picking a book, which I prefer over scrolling through titles.
Ebooks are also practical for huge books or book series. I have Les Misérables on a single ebook, for instance, which is 2,500 pages long. No way I could carry that along with me. And while you might think you wouldn’t /need/ to carry it along, you might be surprised: I’ve already read it twice since getting it two years ago, and neither time was planned.
I also like reading webcomics on my reader, as I find it more comfortable than on a computer screen, and I can do it offline. You do lose colour on coloured comics, and the screen doesn’t allow for big sized comics easily (there is a zoom but I’d rather not have to use it).
I’ve also heard of people using their readers to read fanfiction or blogs, they download it all in the morning and read it on the bus or during the day.
Another thing I really like my reader for is library books. While they don’t have as big a selection, you get the book instantaneously on your reader, and then it expires. No need to return it or go get it, and in winter here when the weather can reach -40 degrees, it’s appreciated.
Quite honestly, I have never bought anything I read on my reader. Every book I have read on it was free (either public domain or a library book). So for me, the only cost has been the reader itself and the electricity (which, without wifi, is ridiculously low).
So I would say it saved me money. It saved me money on late fees on the library, and on free domain books that would probably have cost a few bucks each (I haven’t read all of them, but I have read a few hundreds by now).
But mostly, it’s more practical. Often the books I read probably didn’t actually save me money because I otherwise wouldn’t have read them. But reading is something I love doing so I’m definitely happy to be able to do it again.
In the end, I recommend it for free material or people who travel a lot.
loading....
I think eBook authors need to take a leap of faith and price their eBooks at an affordable level. Mystery/suspense author J. A. Konrath is enjoying great success by selling Kindle books for $2.99.
loading....
I’m an avid reader, usually consuming at least a novel a week. Like you I LOVE owning actual books. However, we recently quit our jobs to become “Gap Adventurers” with a goal to travel around the entire world over the next 4-5 years on our motorcycles. Hauling around books on the back of a motorcycle was very tedious this summer so I started checking out eReaders.
I just recently got the NookColor – amazing product. An advantage with Nooks is that you can electronically borrow books from your local library (assuming it supports ereaders and most seem to now) for FREE! So that pretty much takes the cost issue out of the equation. Add in the advantage of Google Books and Project Gutenberg and the thousands of book you can download for free you can read and read and read all at no cost!!
I’ve downloaded a couple of new releases but I rarely bought books as new releases anyway so by using the free resources I’m finding tons (downloaded 75 so far in three weeks) all at no cost.
Another plus with the Nook (I think you can do this with Kindle too) is that you can have up to five Nooks on an account. So if I download a book my wife sees it show up on her Nook – no extra cost! No more waiting for each other to finish the latest novel!
You can only imagine how much space I’m saving having my Lonely Planet travel guides on the Nook. AND, check this out, with the Nook Color you can make notes, bookmark, etc., all those key travel highlights and come right back to them. (you can do that with any book by the way, but I’m loving the application for tying together all the travel advice…)
Just another kudos to the Nook Color – you can download full color magazines (I like Natl Geo’s Travel) and newspapers – very slick. Great way to stay current without the hassle of newsprint. I wake up every morning and my Wall Street Journal has already been delivered to my Nook Color!
To Deb@106 – having ebooks is actually safer than paper books. I had a fire a few years ago – lost everything I owned, including a library worth over $50k. With a Nook all those books are also saved on my online account. If my Nook goes belly up I just connect a new one and viola – all the books are back.
Please don’t get me wrong, I’ll never give up paper books – I love the feel, smell, and the reward of the favorites in my library but I have to say that the ereader definitely has a place in my life.
To b@51 – actually you can share books, both with the way I’ve mentioned above and with the Nook they have a cool “lend me” feature that allows you to electronically lend books to others for up to 14 days.
loading....
Great post as I’ve been grappling this with myself. I adore reading physical books, highlighting key points, picking them up at any point and looking back over them.
That said I travel the world as a suitcase entrepreneur and right now with 8 books in my case it’s a big weight I don’t need.
So I’m likely going to get a Kindle or hang on to the iPad I bought to sell here in Buenos Aires and install the Kindle app!
I buy quite a few eBooks – mainly from bloggers I respect and admire and I like the format of having them to hand, to cut and paste ideas from and refer back to.
At the end of the day I’m willing to pay for quality of ideas and for the author’s efforts. Anyone who writes a book deserves that much!
Natalie
loading....
I love reading books with the Kindle app on my iPad (and in iBooks too…I bought two to try it out). However I’ve found that I’m now spending more on books. In the past I never bought more than one or two books a year. Since getting the iPad? I think I have purchased anywhere from five to ten books since April. That being said, they are all books I wanted to read.
I think the biggest disadvantage of e-books in my mind is that you cannot resell them like you can a paper book. If you are not going to read a book again why keep it? So I’ve resolved to only buy e-books that I might actually read again. For the rest, I’ll stick with the library.
loading....
I went on a book diet a couple years ago. I made a pact with myself that I would not buy any new books for myself UNLESS they are something to which I can (and likely will) refer many times after the purchase. Since making that pact, I think I’ve bought three books for myself. Gifts are another story. In the meantime, I really wanted a Kindle for the spacesaving. The book diet was intended to be a wallet fattener as well as a decluttering step. But with a library just a few short miles away, I’ve as yet been unable to justify the cost of an e-reader, to say nothing of the added cost of newly published e-books. For now, I’m sticking with the library and my book diet.
loading....
I just want to say thanks for posting this topic and thanks to everyone who commented. I had truly been on the fence about whether to get a Kindle for the holidays, and after reading every comment and discovering all sorts of things about owning a Kindle that I’d never even thought of, I cannot wait to get it! In fact, I took the advice of one poster (Robin) and signed up for a few cheap-ebook blogs, plus I got the Kindle on PC app and already have some books in it – grand total spent so far $1.99. Santa can’t get here soon enough.
Just for the record, I love dead-tree books. I’ve always loved books, and that won’t ever change. But this comes at a time when we’re trying so hard to declutter, and books everywhere are a huge part of the problem. Plus my husband reads so voraciously that he’s always whining about not having anything to read. This will help immensely with that issue, too. I don’t expect to never own a dead-tree book again, and in fact DH and I are both getting some for Christmas
But I think the combination of “real” books and e-books will just make our reading experiences better than ever.
Anyway, thank you again to everyone who’s participated in this topic!!!
loading....
I actually read more often since I have had my Kindle. I like the instant-gratification factor of it. If I have the desire to read something, I get/buy it and then start reading right away. And I don’t have to pay fines to the library for being late (this always happens to me) or have to purchase more bookshelves for more dusty heavy books that I will never pick up again when I have finished reading. The thing I dislike most about reading novels in book form is that my hand/arm gets tired from holding the thing. The kindle is light, and I can put it in my handbag and travel with it easily.
loading....
I didn’t get through all 131 comments, but so far I’ve not committed to an ereader.
I am like many of the readers here who like to take paperbacks on trips and then give them away or leave them at the book exchange at the vacation place. After all, I probably only paid 25 or 50 cents for them…and I’ll gladly let someone have them for the experience.
I wish there was a way to sell or give away the rights to the ebooks that you buy. Seems like the digital companies will make a lot more money from selling books 5x to 5 different people whereas before, we just passed the book around and let everyone read it in turn.
But I see a huge, huge benefit if they would put college texts as e-books and sell them for even $20. What an advantage. History of Civ books tend to cost over $100 now and buying it (or even just the rights to it) for $20 would be vastly superior to that. These are books that are used just one semester. However, if an absent minded kid loses his e-reader…hmmm
I’ve wondered how the school in FL that was going to assign each high schooler a Kindle is doing. I wondered if any of the Kindles got sold on Ebay for drug money (or Disney World/Busch Gardens money) and then the kid said he lost his…what then? I’m sure they must have thought through those things and planned for them. At the same time, I’m wondering what has happened with them.
But I also like to dogear pages, look back easily, etc. I’ve not used an ereader, so I can’t compare. If the world really goes to all digital, then I’m sure I’ll adjust, but since a good bit of the world isn’t there yet, it will probably take a bit of time. Maybe my eyes will be so decrepit by then, I won’t care.
loading....
I think the one point people overlook is that free books subsidize the cost of any books you purchase AND the cost of the device itself. I read about 100 books a year and get many for free because I enjoy the classics, and also I review indie books so often get coupon codes for those. And I borrow ebooks from the library. So if you add up the money I have spent on both devices themselves and on content I have purchased, and divide it by the number of books I have read since I started reading ebooks, I am at about $6 per book—and this includes factoring in the cost of the devices.
loading....
ebooks are here to stay. the one missing attribute is the ability to attract readers, analogous to how print publishers have retail footprints via big bookstores like barnes & noble. online, that will be SEO and advertising, as well as smart marketing
loading....
I’m coming in late, but I was wondering why some people chose a Nook or Sony?
I’ve been thinking about getting a Kindle, although many of the cons pointed out here hold me back. Sometimes I like have technology more than I like actually using it. But the Kindle seems to be the better product in my limited research, I especially like the 3G function.
I am not a current fiction reader. Most of my reading would be older classics and pub domain stuff off places like Gutenberg. After some of the comments here I wonder if the non-Kindle options would be better?
loading....
I use the Kindle for PC software on my net book. It’s a great way to read a variety of free books when I’m on the road for work.
My preference at home is to have a book. I can write notes, fold pages and resell if I want.
Do people take Kindles to the beach? For that, you still need a book.
loading....
I have not made the leap yet to an ebook reader. I just love an old book way too much. I too like to skip around, or read one page while referencing another and am always marking up the pages. I can see how pleasure reading would be better, but I read more non-fiction and it just does not make sense with the way I read. I don’t consider cost as I love to read and know it is a way to grow personally. If I am heading over budget I head to the library.
loading....
Yes but most people own a pc/laptop, so e-books are more cost effective imo. I like buying from Barnes and Noble because they’re not anti DRM like Amazon.
loading....
For me the breakout is simple. If it is something that I will read once then I would pick it up at the library or might be inclined to buy for an e-reader. Problem with the e-reader is that once I own it then it is mine and I cannot really resell it like I could a regular book which is why I would get it at the library or paperback swap if I could.
If it was the type of book that I would re-read or refer to then I would buy it and whether on a e-reader or paperback would just depend on the book. I like to take notes in the margins of some books like personal finance books – I have an iPad and do not like how the function works so I would opt for a paperback book. Otherwise, if note taking was no key then I would consider it on an e-reader, as the e-reader is likely the more environmentally sustainable of the two but I would have to look into that more before jumping in whole hog on that statement.
loading....
@137 Carrie
I have a Sony 650. The reasons I didn’t buy a Kindle or Nook are:
Kindle – Amazon regularly does extremely sketchy things that are anti-consumer and I am not willing to support their business model.
Nook – The page turns triggered a migraine when I was looking at it in the store.
The reasons I love my Sony:
-Touch screen that does not hold fingerprints
-Extremely light
-Expandable memory
-Long battery life
-Double-tap a word for dictionary look-up
-Reputable brand; I am sure that the device will last
-Library access
-The file formats that it supports work for me (BBeB (LRF/LRX), PDF, EPUB, TXT, RTF, JPEG, BMP, GIF, PNG, MP3, AAC)
loading....
I have a Kindle and have had good and bad experiences with ebooks on it. Most of my bad experiences are due to poor formatting of the source material for an ebook reader. Some examples: poorly-scanned illustrations that are pixelated and difficult to see, especially maps, pictures of tables that should be done in all text are done as a graphic instead with the aforementioned pixelation problems (this is especially bad in a technical manual), and footnotes that are done as a single sentence on an otherwise empty page, rather than as a link.
I still like my Kindle, but a lot of ebook authors are shooting themselves in the foot by making the above mistakes.
loading....