In last Wednesday’s link round-up, I pointed to an article over at Gen-Y Wealth in which RJ has listed 20 financial milestones you should reach in your twenties. “I like this list,” I wrote, “and I’d actually love to see similar lists for different age ranges. People could use it as a sort of road map to where they ought to be.”
What sorts of milestones were on the list? Things like:
- Pay off your student loans.
- Build an emergency fund.
- Learn to negotiate.
- Set a target retirement date.
- Learn to give.
Like me, a lot of GRS readers found RJ’s list of financial milestones useful. Often, there’s no real way to know if you’re doing things “right”. How much should you be saving for retirement? How much should you have in your savings account? How soon should you buy a home? Get married? Have children?
Obviously, there’s no single right answer to any of these questions. Everyone is different. We all have different strengths and weaknesses, and we all have different goals. Because of that, no single list of milestones is going to be applicable to everyone.
Still, it’s helpful to have some sort of road map. A road map lets you gauge your progress, and can help you know when you’ve lost your way. In fact, I think a lot of folks — including me — would love to be able to compare their financial progress to some sort of standard checklist like the one RJ provided.
One way to do this, I suppose, would be to sort through the economic data collected by agencies like the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Census Bureau. (Every three years, the Fed conducts its survey of consumer finances, which is a gold-mine of info about how Americans spend money.) But this only works if you’re resourceful and like digging through data. Besides, you’d have to construct your own benchmarks from the numbers you found.
One useful benchmark
I may have encountered other lists of milestones in the past, but I can’t remember them. The one benchmark that’s stuck with me — and it’s not really a milestone like the kinds RJ describes — comes from The Millionaire Next Door by Thomas Stanley and William Danko [my review].
The authors suggest a simple way to gauge where you should be on your financial journey:
Multiply your age times your realized pretax annual household income from all sources except inheritances. Divide by ten. This, less any inherited wealth, is what your net worth should be.
Some of that sounds like jargon, but it’s actually fairly easy to understand. Here’s my attempt at a translation:
- Calculate your annual pre-tax household income.
- Divide your age by ten.
- Multiply these two numbers together.
Ignoring inheritance, your expected household net worth is the product of this calculation. So, if you and your spouse are about 35 years old and you make $80,000 a year, your calculation would look like this:
If you’re 35 years old and your household income is $80,000 per year, your expected net worth is $280,000.
Prodigious accumulators of wealth
Based on this equation, Stanley and Danko classify folks into three categories:
- A prodigious accumulator of wealth (or PAW) has more than twice the expected net worth for her age. In the above example, her net worth would be over $560,000 instead of $280,000.
- An under accumulator of wealth (or UAW) has less than half the expected net worth for his age. In our example, his net worth would be $140,000 or less.
- And an average accumulator of wealth (or AAW) falls somewhere in the middle.
The interesting thing about this formula is that it adjusts based on life circumstances. Somebody working minimum wage at a coffee shop can still be a prodigious accumulator of wealth if he manages to set aside a large portion of his paycheck. And a highly-paid doctor can still be an under accumulator of wealth if she spends every penny she earns.
When I first read The Millionaire Next Door, I dismissed this formula as silly. “It leaves so much out!” I thought. Part of the problem was that I was an under accumulator of wealth. (I was 35 years old and earned about $50,000 a year. My net worth ought to have been $175,000. It was much, much less.) I didn’t want to like any rule of thumb that basically told me, “You suck at saving!” — even if it was true.
In time, though, I’ve grown to like this benchmark. I think about it often, and I now believe it’s a useful barometer for gauging financial health. I wish I could find more useful benchmarks like this one.
Benchmarks vs. Milestones
As I say, Stanley and Danko’s forumla isn’t really a milestone. It’s not an event like buying a house or paying off student loans or starting a Roth IRA. Instead, it’s more of a benchmark, a standard you can judge your progress by.
I’d love to find more financial benchmarks like this, and more milestones like those that RJ listed last week. (I’m not really looking for financial rules of thumb, which I consider a different beast entirely.) In fact, I’ve started a text document to collect these milestones and benchmarks. So far, though, the document contains only a link to RJ’s blog post and the quote from The Millionaire Next Door.
Do you have a favorite financial benchmark or milestone? How do you use it? How has it helped you? (Or do you find these sorts of things useless?)
GRS is committed to helping our readers save and achieve your financial goals.Savings interest rates may be low, but that’s all the more reason to shop for the best rate.Find the highest savings interest rate from Ally Bank, Capital One 360, Everbank, and more.
This article is about Books, Money Hacks
Disclaimer: This content is not provided or commissioned by American Express. Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of American Express, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by American Express. This site may be compensated through American Express Affiliate Program.
Discover is a paid advertiser of this site. Reasonable efforts are made to maintain accurate information. See the Discover online credit card application for full terms and conditions on offers and rewards.
SEARCH FOR RECENT ARTICLES




@ VB – if the only way for a 23 year-old to meet the formula’s definition of AVERAGE is for them to have their education generously financed by mom and dad, then live on less than half of their salary regardless of their area’s cost of living, and then take their life savings and gamble it on a stock quadrupling over a two-year period, I would say the formula abjectly fails and also runs counter to everything this site represents (i.e. getting rich *slowly*)
loading....
By the way, thanks for the article. It was very interesting and a nice refresher for TMND, which I read awhile ago and thoroughly enjoyed. What is even more interesting is the response of the GRS readers, who have overwhelmingly “assailed” a well-researched theory simply because they either do not understand it or are in denial over the results they are faced with.
To begin with, the equation is a “rule of thumb.” It gets you in the ballpark of where you are in relation to others of your age cohort would be expected to be in terms of wealth accumulation. Everyone has had and will continue to have issues in their lives which differ from someone else. Those issues WILL affect how much wealth you have accumulated and how much wealth you will be able to accumulate relative to someone else of your age cohort. A kid coming out of college with $100 K in debt is probably not going to accumulate wealth like his buddy of the same age who went to school on a full scholarship and emerged with essentially zero debt. That’s not the fault of the equation. And it doesn’t matter, because the equation shows a statistical measure of what an age cohort of a particular income is expected to have accumulated, not an absolute measure. Those who have had large student loans, got divorced and paid half of their income or savings to his or her spouse, who lost money in the stock market or real estate values: doesn’t matter to what the statistical measure is.
Many or even most of us will never be in the PAW group, either because of the lifestyle choices we have made, be it educational and employment choices, or because of the bad breaks in life which blind-sided us and set us back. Either way, the GSR readers who are set in their belief that the equation is flawed, need to take a breath, read the book, gain some understanding of what the equation is meant to demonstrate, and take ownership of their situation. The equation doesn’t make you an UAW, nor does it suggest that you are doomed to remain an UAW. In fact, it’s not meant to suggest how well you will be able to retire based on what you have accumulated. It’s simply a tool to demonstrate your level of wealth compared to others of your age and income cohort: do you do better or worse than your same aged/same waged buddy in the cubicle next to you…without excuses/reasons of what has or has not happened in your life.
loading....
As others before have pointed out, this formula fails to account for changes in employment status, cost of living, economic upturns and downturns, plunging or skyrocketing real estate values and more. Ergo, two years ago we would have been prodigious savers whereas today we’re under-accumulators, mostly b/c our home lost about $200K in value since 2008.
loading....
This doesn’t work at all. It displays the middle-aged fine, but distorts the expectations of young and old workers.
Obviously, a 23-year-old making $45k is unlikely to have more than $100k in assets.
This discrepancy is fair enough for a rule-of-thumb, but it becomes dangerous at the other end of the spectrum. If you are 60 and making X, this formula suggests you should be worth 6X. What is an income-reliable return? 7-8% (if lucky)? In the best case, this person would have 48% of his/her income (6X*.08), a level that is certainly not enough.
loading....
@Walter 102 – Thanks for nicely encapsulating my thought after reading the previous 101 posts. As you reasoned, there are way too many variables in a person’s life to perfectly apply the benchmark. But that’s what it is – a benchmark. I too read the book several years ago and thoroughly enjoyed it.
What bothers me is how many of the responses reviled the formula giving every reason conceivable as to why it doesn’t or can’t work for this or that age, but then offered nothing as an alternative (a few did).
It’s clear that the best calculations should realistically consider expected expenses at retirement and the necessary amount of wealth it will take to cover those expenses each year. You can adust the benchmark 4% withdrawl rate higher or lower to suit your expectations.
How many here roundly condemned the MND’s formula without having read the book? To condemn something out of context is small-minded and disturbing. I’ve read way too many comments reflecting a lot of self-justification and rationalization.
I expected more from the readers.
loading....
It’s really hard to have a benchmark that both a)is simple to figure out and b)takes into account a lot of different circumstances. I know I’m an above-average saver, but at 30, I’m coming in 50K below where I should be. I agree with the commenter who pointed out this should be exponential–then the younger folks wouldn’t get penalized as much!
loading....
I would LOVE to see a list for someone in their 30s. I spent my entire 20s in graduate school earning a PhD, and I’m about to turn 30 next month, so several things on the list for 20-somethings were unattainable for me (such as paying off my student loans – though I did pay off about $20,000/$50,000 of them so far).
loading....
Thoroughly enjoyed the post & the comments. I agree with Walter & Curtis…. the life of each person is different, will have different problems & different solutions. The benchmarks like this only help us, motivate us.
loading....
Good stuff to think about…
I like the road map. That means I have 8 more years to… finish my 60k of student loan repayment…and get 3-6 months in the bank. I think I know parts of negotiating, and I have a target date of 60 years old, although I haven’t done much with it for retirement.. and I try and give whenever I have the financial opportunity, and it makes me feel good.
Except with the formula my net worth should be basically what I owe in student loans, and therefore, I appear to be worth.. nothing.. I do like to think I’m worth something though
loading....
I’m seconding the comment LifeAndMyFinances made: while I can see that down the road an equation like that might be useful, it’s simply unrealistic for a lot of us.
I’m in my early 20′s. I recently got a job making pretty good money. This equation puts that number at almost $130K. I haven’t even made that much money in my lifetime…probably not even half that. Down the road this may be useful, but I don’t think it’s reasonable to look at without looking at all the other circumstances – how long you’ve held your job, how much money you’ve made in your life, etc. If anybody can tell me how I can double the amount of money I make (gross, not net) let me know.
loading....
Our problem with this is that my husband is 18 years older than I am, so do we use his age, my age, or an average?
As far as the benchmarks … if I knew anything about personal finance before I was 28, I’d be in MUCH better shape than I am now… But hey, learning in my 30s is better than learning in my 40s!
loading....
I’ve had a gripe with TMND’s formula for some time, so I started thinking about a better one that doesn’t shaft younger people:
net worth =(((age-year you started earning money)^1.15)*how much you make)/10
In plainer English:
your net worth should equal the number of years you’ve been working to the 1.15 (yeah, that’s an exponent) multiplied by how much you make, all divided by ten.
In spreadsheet talk (MS Excel or OO Calc):
b10=you current age
c10=the age you started working
d10=your current income
=(((B10-C10)^1.15)*D10)/10
This is actually an old/rudimentary version of the formula, I can’t seem to find a nowhere one, but hopefully this will be better for you guys. But tell me what you think.
loading....
I think it’s a good benchmark. From the time you make a good salary it takes a while to hit a solid net worth number. It really is a product of time, savings rate and having a steady income.
In my early 30′s I was an AAW but now am a PAW. I just read the book. The beauty of the book is it reminded me to stay humble, stay low cost and avoid lifestyle creep. I had been saving so much that my thoughts were to get a nice house by the water in CA- after reading the book I think that will avoid getting sucked in by lifestyle creep!
-Mike
loading....
I think the fact that a lot of folks are having a hard time shows that this is an accurate benchmark to be a wealthy American. This benchmark isn’t about realistic or the average person or family. This is because the average person or family makes tons of excuses and is quite frankly broke. Average is not real desireable.
I’ll break all the sterotypes. I am 27 ( not a dink as I have a 2.5 year old son and my wife is a stay at home mom). I stsrted inbesting money into my retirement accounts early on in ny working career and I also got into real estate. Since college my income went from $28,000 a year to roughly $75,000 this year. I am about 50% higher on the net worth side than where I should be. These benchmarks are motivational. It shows something that doesn’t seem possible but obviously is. Once we realize it is we need to analyze how we could achieve it. If we are raised with this line of thinking we make better decisions in our 20s when financially it makes the most difference. If your student loans are killing you you prolly should not have taken that many out. If your mortgage debt is high, you should really have nothing higher than a 15 year note so it pays off sooner and frees you to grow.
The alternative metric I have found is take the gross income from your employment since starting working. Then add it up. Yiur net worth should be 25% -50% of that earlier in your career. As you get closer to retirement you should have a net worth about equal to your lifetime employment earnings. At retirement you should shoot for 200% of your lifetime employment earnings. This is a very agressive benchmark and that is why I like it so much. It stresses the importance of putting money in investments and building assets.
loading....