This is a guest post from Carl Hendley of The Motley Fool. He’s substituting for Robert Brokamp, the adviser for The Motley Fool’s Rule Your Retirement service. Brokamp generally contributes one new article to Get Rich Slowly every two weeks, but he’s had the audacity to take a vacation over the holidays, so Hendley is filling in.
$132,683 — That’s how much I’m paying for cable. Now, I do have HBO, Showtime, and 386 other channels of digital bliss, but $132,683!? Please. Is this a billing error? Not exactly.
I recently came across Jon Hanson’s Foolish book Good Debt, Bad Debt. In it, he notes:
If you are forty years of age, every $100 a month you continuously burn costs you over $132,000 at age sixty-five. Said differently, invest $100 a month for twenty-five years (ages forty to sixty-five for example) in a mutual fund or other investment at only 10% and you will have $132,683…Is it worth $132,683 for cable TV with all the premium channels?
Now for the record, I really like The Walking Dead, Boardwalk Empire, and (I can’t believe I am gonna cop to this) The Real Housewives of Orange County, New York, or any other municipality that celebrates elective surgery and afternoon cocktail parties. But do I like them $132,683 worth? I think not.
Paradebt
My monthly Comcast bill is just one example of what Hanson labels “paradebt”. This is debt that’s outside of the traditional “borrow now and pay back later” variety such as a Visa bill, car payment, or student loan. Hanson writes, “paradebt or ‘almost debt’ is the cumulative effect of all your nonessential monthly spending.” Sure, these are services you can cancel, and yes, these paradebts don’t come with an interest rate, but they do come at a cost. Debt is debt.
But what about the Housewives? And my health?
I’m not saying I plan to do away with all of the items that make up my paradebt. I pay $33 a month to go to the gym. Yes, this is paradebt, and yes, I could get the same benefits with a pair of Nikes and a chin-up bar. Nevertheless, I want to stay healthy and maybe live a few years longer. (Plus I’m single and drive a 1995 Civic with 170,000 miles and a broken door — I need all the help I can get.) So, I choose to allocate my money towards the folks at Fitness First.
The key is that I’m consciously deploying that capital. I know that my $33 a month membership will cost me around $40,000 at retirement if I can achieve a 10% return on my investments. That’s okay. I’m willing to spend $40,000 to feel better and maybe live longer. Watching housewives go shopping for $130,000? That’s a different matter entirely.
Under the knife
Now, I’m no doctor but I am reasonably certain that the Real Housewives are no strangers to the scalpel. (For those of you unfamiliar with the show, this isn’t a reference to their abilities as physicians.) And while I’ll let others judge the results of their time under the knife, I will note that we could learn something from their efforts in trimming the fat.
With the New Year just a few days away, I’m in the process of setting my financial goals for 2011. Just like the Housewives, I too plan to make some cuts. This need not be major surgery. I’m just looking to better deploy a few dollars here and there. Since I don’t owe anything on my credit cards and my car is paid off (it’s a 1995 Honda Civic with a busted door, remember), I’m tackling my paradebt, starting with that $130,000 Comcast bill. Not only is $130K a lot of money to me, it turns out I can get it without doing anything other than calling my cable company.
Even if Jon Hanson is wrong and I don’t make 10% on my money, it’s still a great proposition. If I only make a 5% return on my cable savings, I’d still net $60,000 at retirement. Not as much as $132,000, to be sure, but that’s still enough to make me give up a few dozen channels of Law & Order reruns.
Next on the list is my AT&T bill. Yes, unlimited text messages are great, but methinks I could do with fewer LOLs in my life.
Finally, I plan to look at all of those subscriptions that automatically renew every year. The stack of Economists, New York Times, and New Yorkers that show up at my door every week may make me feel smarter (even as they go largely unread), but the costs add up.
And the trade off? I figure that switching out cable for Netflix, dropping unlimited text messages, and doing my reading online will free up about $100 a month — or as Jon Hanson would put it, $132,683 for my retirement.
What say you? How might you trim your own paradebt in 2011? More importantly, any suggestions for coping with my upcoming TV withdrawal?
GRS is committed to helping our readers save and achieve your financial goals.Savings interest rates may be low, but that’s all the more reason to shop for the best rate.Find the highest savings interest rate from Ally Bank, Capital One 360, Everbank, and more.
This article is about Budgeting, Choices, Frugality
Disclaimer: This content is not provided or commissioned by American Express. Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of American Express, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by American Express. This site may be compensated through American Express Affiliate Program.
Discover is a paid advertiser of this site. Reasonable efforts are made to maintain accurate information. See the Discover online credit card application for full terms and conditions on offers and rewards.
SEARCH FOR RECENT ARTICLES




Find me a guaranteed rate of return of 10% over 20 years and I’ll show you a pig that can fly.
loading....
Jimmy@14 – I’m so with you! Hulu, prepaid phones, getting back to reality. Not being an Apple drone – so many have fallen into the trap that all of these techno things are “necessities”.
I have to admit, when I first dropped my blackberry I kept looking for the “blinking light.” My wife and I would often be out somewhere and want to lookup a restaurant or topic and would say to each other – “google that” (meaning get out the bberry and look it up). You know what, after two weeks w/o the bberry we were so over it. These devices take up so much time and feed us so much useless trivia. We have found a new appreciation for patience, not being “instantly on” everywhere means we can actually wait to look something up – and guess what, half the time we find we didn’t really care about the info after 15 minutes anyway, it was just a time filler.
Stop the madness! And save lots of money too!! ; )
Ron@15 – if you’re not getting at least 10% every year you’re probably investing in mutual/index funds or having someone else manage your money. I consider 10% a very low return. As part of my year end financial planning I just looked at my returns for the last two years, I hit 80% over the last two years – not bad, my best ever!
I’m consistently running at least 15% usually over 20% each year. I had one year where I only hit 10%. Do your research, pick excellent companies, sell within strict criteria, don’t get emotionally attached – some beginning pointers… And yes, we have been able to retire very young to head off to our “Gap Adventure” of riding our motorcycles around the world over the next several years! We hate the word “retired” so we are officially “Gap Adventurers”
loading....
I think it’s good to look at recurring expenses (not just monthly ones, but all recurring expenses) regularly to be sure the value you obtain from them is at least equal to the money you exchange. Otherwise, what’s the point?
I pay $80 per month during the winter for oil painting lessons, and it’s well worth the price. But even at free, I wouldn’t want cable TV. It’d still be Netflix all the way for me, even though there is a monthly charge for it. Why? Because it’s worth it to me to NOT have hundreds of channels of crap to filter through.
And like others have said, it depends what else you have going on in your life too, and what you might otherwise do with the money.
loading....
My wife and I dropped cable at the beginning of the year. We were paying about $128/mo for cable + internet. Now we just pay $45 for internet + $9 for Netflix streaming. There are also tons of other video streaming sites, Hulu being another. Netflix is nice because we can stream to our PS3 without any trouble.
But the $74/mo we save adds up to $888/yr that could be put to better use, we did enough small things like that to free up five times that amount!
loading....
Let’s go ahead and take this a step further…
I pay my electric bill each and every month, must be paradebt. Let’s cut that out, then, in retirement, I could have enough money to run thousands of light bulbs and appliances.
I pay my water bill each month also. Must be paradebt. Why drink water now when I could drink an unbelieveable amount of water in retirement? Maybe fill my entire house with water…
After reading this article, the expense I might consider doing away with is my internet bill – god forbid I have to continue to read articles about cutting out every possible thing from my life now so I can be sitting on $50MM bucks at retirement.
If I 80 years old and retired, and I’ve been a cheap ass all my life…why would I even need a huge retirement account?
loading....
I agree with netflix. we have it for 4 months now and we love it. It’s really worth it. only $9 a month.
loading....
Thanks in part to this website my wife and I decided to seriously evaluate our reoccurring monthly expenses.
We canceled Direct TV and replaced with Netflix and free services online. Direct TV was $780 annually whereas Netflix costs us $108 per year. Savings $672 annually.
We also took our cell phones and converted them to a prepaid option. ATT was costing us $900 annually. We changed some of our cell phone usage habits as well. Prepaid cell phones cost us $100 last year for a savings of $800 annually. (Couldn’t be prouder of my frugal wife)
We also switched our home phone from the local carrier to a VoIP service. Qwest was costing us $480 annually. Our VoIP service is $102 annually for a savings of $387 annually.
We have made other changes as well which have overall lead to $200 of found funds per month.
I am a numbers guy it’s hard not to imagine those funds in a retirement account. Given we strongly buy into paying ourselves first (and do so monthly) we have the option to invest these funds or buy experiences. Personally, I find it easier to sell frugality when the rediscovered funds buy meaningful experiences.
loading....
I have a couple of issues with this post.
Compounded interest is great, and anyone who is working a regular job and does not have some kind of retirement plan going is making a poor choice that will come back to bite them in their later years. If you are choosing cable over a 401k or an IRA, I recommend you reexamine your priorities.
That being said, the minor issue I have with this post is that at first glance it almost seems to imply that you are throwing away $132,000 age 65 dollars every month.
The major problem I have with it is that these are not ‘real dollars’ we are talking about. There will always be inflation and future dollars will always be worth less than current dollars, so $132k is not a valid comparison.
For the record, I started contributing $10k a year to my 401k from age 29 to 49 when I retired 4 years ago. I have well over $600k as a result, much of it from the stock market boom in the 90s and skilled (e.g. lucky) investing during the last three years.
But to predict someone else will be that lucky over the next 25 years is pure speculation. I used to believe all that ‘history of the stock market’ crap until I read “The Black Swan.”
loading....
$20 a month less by cancelling one of our netflix accounts (we each had one), $300 a month by eating more at home, $1000 by moving in together (although the money saved wasn’t the reason for this of course
2011 is shaping up to be a good year for our finances…
loading....
I realize that articles like this are supposed to make us think about what we can live without, but I lived for many years without the creature comforts and new cars that my contemporaries had, and now, at the age of 55, I’m tired of denying myself things that make my life a little more enjoyable. I don’t watch a lot of TV as I still work 10 hours a day, but it’s worth $135 a month to me to have cable and internet. I also pay $12 for netflix and since we got our subscription, we’ve stopped going to the movies. My husband and I work in sales and we can make far more for retirement in the next ten years than we can by giving up everything that gives us pleasure outside of our working hours (like the trip to the Dominican Republic we’re leaving on Saturday!)
loading....
We got an antenna and we have netflix. That was enough of a fix for us.
This article a nice way of looking at it for people who are out of debt. But for those of us living paycheck to paycheck (in a sense) cutting cable really could save more than $132,000 if that all goes on a credit card with a 20% interest rate every month!
Also, just think of the money you’ll save on junk after you quit watching so many tv ads. A reason why I don’t like hulu, etc.
loading....
@55 wanzman
“I pay my water bill each month also. Must be paradebt. Why drink water now when I could drink an unbelieveable amount of water in retirement? Maybe fill my entire house with water…”
LOL.
Of all the people talking about how much they’ve saved/cut expenses, has anyone actually put this amount into retirement savings? It’s not an accusation – I too “save” with coupons or cutting services and then do not invest the savings – but I;m wondering since this is what the article’s about.
loading....
Tyler, #49, said: “I’m tired of these ridiculously over-the-top numbers like this. Someone else did a similar one a while back where they claimed an iPhone actually costs you a quarter million dollars or something. They’re pretty much preposterous sensationalism.
I would *love* to see even a single anecdote where someone contributed $100/month to a savings account for 25 years and had a $132,000 balance at the end.”
I think this too misses the concept. You don’t necessarily take that direct savings of $100 and put it directly into some vehicle every month like clockwork. However, if you consider that every $100 you save is another $100 you have available to invest, then every time you find a good investment you have $100 x [however many months since the last one] more to invest than you would if you hadn’t cut out some recurring expense.
loading....
Love your guys comments that are making a bit of fun at this post.
JD – I 100% agree with you that conscious spending is important, and that if you’re in your eyeballs in toxic debt, you need to cut recurring expenses to the bone.
HOWEVER – that is NOT what this article is about. It’s about the smug self congratulatory feeling this guy gets from depriving himself of shows he likes by inflating his 25 year down the road payoff.
This kind of smug PF “latte factor” crapola assumes we need to be coaxed into eating our spinach so that like popeye we will get big and strong in a flash, when really, the benefits after tax and inflation and what have you will be much much less.
If this article was about examining your spending to make sure you’re getting the most enjoyment per dollar spent, then YES I would really like it. It’s a great concept. Instead it’s about a stupid concept like “paradebt” and the value of investing what you don’t spend on things you really enjoy so that you can deprive yourself now and then later swim in a pool of your stashed cash like Scrooge McDuck when you’re 70.
Do you get the difference? Please let me know.
loading....
I don’t think its just about “how much can you give up.” I think a big part is just changing habits. For some people, watching cable is just a habit. Netflix and Hulu could be just as good (or better, I hate commercials), but it requires a change of habit, which is always painful for a short time.
The same thing is true of getting a prepaid phone, or learning to cook at home, or cloth diapering, or carpooling, etc. Once the new habit is established, it isn’t painful anymore. Its the transition that is difficult.
loading....
The TV thing won’t be too hard, after a while. When I first moved away from home (the parents had a flat screen, HD programming, and HBO) I was pretty upset that I wouldn’t have a TV at college, but with the exception of HBO, almost any show you care to watch is either on the station’s website or Hulu. And TV boxed sets, movies, and even HBO shows can be found at the library a year or two after airing. Plus, you’ll probably find, as I did, that you were watching a lot of those shows just because they were convenient. My list got pared back to six shows (still a lot, I know), and I got some free time to devote to my schoolwork (okay, hanging out with my new floor mates) in the process.
In terms of phone, it really depends on what you need. I have unlimited minutes, no texting , no data, due to a promotion that made it cheaper than the limited minute plan I had been eying. But if I had it to do over again (and I will, in about a year and a half), I’d have gotten a prepaid plan because I don’t make that many phone calls.
For subscriptions, again it depends. I love the Economist. I don’t get it delivered, because it’s expensive, but my dad saves his and when I come home at Christmas I tear through a whole pile of them. NYT is free online, though I understand the tactile pleasure some people get from reading newspapers; it’s the same reason I’m hesitant to switch to Ebooks. But you can also find it at your local coffee shop in the morning, if you’re truly intent on cutting back.
loading....
I confess we’ve got a lifestyle at this point that includes cable, a landline, and cell phones. For various reasons, we’ll be keeping all of them for the forseeable future, although I suspect our landline is on its last legs.
One thing that should be mentioned though is you may be able to keep everything you’ve got and still get the price knocked down. For instance, we kept our exact phone/internet/cable service – which includes 2 DVR’s – but they knocked $60 a month off the bill. It helps that we’ve got the option for Verizon or Comcast in our neighborhood so I just called and asked if they could match their competitor’s introductory offer. And they did.
loading....
I suggest hulu and the library (you might be able to read your magazines there, too!).
loading....
the F.R.E.E. substitute for most of this stuff is the library. Yes, folks, that place your parents took you when you were little. I’m older probably than most of the readers so when I was a teen, I LIVED there as I liked to read. However, these days, I can download an ebook on my ereader (free), get music (free), get DVDs of your favorite TV shows and movies (free), read magazines (free), conduct research on any number of subjects including saving money, all for f.r.e.e. Like most people, I rediscovered this wondrous place when I was cutting expenses, and now I wouldn’t go back for the world, even if I could afford it. Brings me right back, however, there’s no cute guy in a Karmann Ghia waiting to pick me up for a ride…sigh.
loading....
I am very very close to ditching cable and just getting HDMI cables and hooking up the Internets, or buying a Roku box with Hulu+
Also, I wish my gym costs closer to $30 like most people here seem to pay. I pay $60 a month, but only because of a corporate discount. Normally it would be more like $90.
loading....
I guess I’m confused by the whole concept of paradebt. Does it mean monthly bills that aren’t debt payment and have no end point? By that definition, then yes, my electric bill and water bills are also paradebt. Does it mean discretionary spending that comes as a monthly bill? Then yes, it’s only my cable bill and Netflix. Overall, I really don’t understand based on the original article what paradebt is supposed to be, although I suspect it’s decretionary spending that comes as a monthly bill.
I find the concept useful as a way to quantify discretionary spending, particularly if you’re having a hard time with overspending and need to cut back, but it’s only an illuminating concept, not something that’s practical to implement. Similar to the idea of “If I make $10 an hour, I have to work 3 hours to cover this DVD I want to buy.” It’s a helpful idea for controlling spending, but I’m not actually going to go home on Friday at 2pm instead of 5pm just because I put the DVD back on the shelf. So if someone finds this way of looking at monthly bills a helpful tool and it encourages them to cut expenses and save more, good for them. But I don’t think it’s meant to be taken literaly as a plan to implement.
loading....
@49 Tyler K.
I think you would enjoy reading Money Reasons’ dividend stock lunch money experiment:
http://www.moneyreasons.com/2010/12/dividend-stocks-free-lunch-experiment-6/
He decided to experiment with turning his latte factor into an income producer.
You’re right, putting that all together would make a great reader story. (MR, you should totally do it.)
loading....
paradebt sounds to me quite a bit like the concept of “opportunity costs” which is a price of NOT doing something, or a price of the time wasted http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opportunity_cost
i’ve been tv-less pretty much all my life, and the only thing i truly miss are hockey and football games (but I just use them as a reason to spend the money i save on not having tv on going out to a bar to watch the games). Netflix is great.
Another place that’s surprising for video entertainment is craigslist. You can barter dvd’s with people
loading....
Wow, that really puts things into perspective. I enjoy watching movies and all, but I’ve actually cut out a lot of useless tv watching. Sometimes you just find yourself watching tv even when there’s nothing worth watching…there are so many better ways to spend your time.
loading....
Reoccurring payments are akin to debt in that you are compelled to service it on a monthly basis and can adversely impact your ability to get traction in terms of fiscal goals.
I was involved in a long distance relationship – a mobile phone was of paramount importance. As the relationship blossomed, we opted to marry and reside in the same locale. We could care less about a mobile phone because we so infrequently used it. Eventually, we mutually decided to cancel our mobile phone contract and with it the burdensome $150-$175 monthly bill. We now have prepaid and its working just fine and saving us goo gobs of $$. That’s the application of that para-debt concept.
Cable is something we continue to pay for because we enjoy it. Regardless, every once in a while I will call to take off the “bell and whistles” to save money and take advantage of service promotions that don’t affect how many channels we get at all. Once I got lucky, and got 50% of our cable bill for six months. Fabulous stuff!
For me, the point is to just be mindful, discriminating, and astute when it comes reoccurring expenses.
loading....
Instead of relying on investment projections (8% or 10% annually), look at it this way:
Every recurring expense you cut is less income you need in the future. If you’re spending $100/month on cable, you need about $30,000* saved assuming the standard 4% safe withdrawal rate. For some folks, that could be an extra 2 or 3 years of working and saving. Ask yourself if that is a good trade off – a few hours of TV per week vs. a few years working. I’m not suggesting cutting everything, but it’s a worthy exercise.
*Calculation $100 x 12 = 1,200. $1,200/0.04 = $30,000.
loading....
This is a great exercise, and, though we probably won’t get a 10% ROI, one can say that there are areas we can “sacrifice” to help us increase net worth. Take for example, a $2.00 coffee at Sturbucks–that’s $730 a year that we could be saving by simply making our own coffee at home; minus $284.25. ($120 coffee machine plus .45 cents per cup of coffee). That equates to $13,372 in 30 years. But, we like the simplicity and the ability to mingle. The same could be said about watching a game at the local pub when we could possibly watch it at the gym while exercising. Thus we save on the drinks and increase our health while watching a football game “free.” Speaking of the gym: I pondered on the idea of investing the $80 a month membership. I counter that I’m investing in my health — granted, I go to the gym at least three times a week.
loading....
Sergei – Agreed, “paradebt” just sounds like a renaming of “opportunity cost”. Every expense comes at an opportunity cost.
loading....
This $132K figure is actually quite incorrect. Merely adding together the face value of the currency used to pay your cable is the wrong way to add up money over a long period.
By this reckoning, the $6 I spend on milk per week will cost me $31,843 over the same 25 year period. Should I not eat cereal?
The correct way to do the calculation is using TODAY’s dollars.
This is a blog about money, so I would kindly recommend learning about the time value of money.
loading....
Seriously? Another article about “cutting your cable to riches”?
IMHO, it is time that JD turned the corner with his readers and feature fewer debt/eat-dog-food-to-wealth strategies and start focusing on investing strategies for all of that money liberated from the cable company.
Most PF advice stops at “invest xx%”. Does anyone really believe investing is as simple as sending xx% of your hard earned money to the wall street folks? Maybe some non-salesman financial advisors would like to guest post? Or, as Tyler K alluded, find the millionaire next door who wants to go over how she turned $100/mo into $132K without simply getting lucky in the dot-com boom.
loading....
When you are 65 years old that $132k might be enough to pay for a months worth of cable TV given the rate of inflation for cable.
loading....
sigh
Folks, the hyperbole in the comments on this post depresses me. This post is not about cutting cable. That’s just an example! Nobody is suggesting that you cut cable or eat dog food or anything else. If you think that’s what this post is about, you’re missing the point.
Yes, wealthy people really are concerned about frugality. Every wealthy person I know (those who actually have money, and don’t just flash it around) is frugal. No joke. They pinch their pennies. Why do they do this? So they can invest for later in life.
I feel like GRS features plenty of articles about investing, but really, my investing philosophy just isn’t sexy. How many times can I say, “Make regular investments in index funds. Don’t touch the money.” ??? I’m always looking for new ways to write about this, and will continue to do so in the future…
loading....
Honestly, I don’t understand how people think the author is “smug” or “depriving” himself. I didn’t think the article was condescending or haughty in any way. And in terms of deprivation, with the exception of premium channels and sports, almost anything you watch on a TV can be found online, legally, for free. If you like HBO, you can check the boxed sets out of the library. If you like on-demand movies, try using the streaming function on Netflix or check some DVDs out from the library. If, like me, baseball is your obsession of choice, there’s an online streaming service for the games that’s around $100 a *year* (for over 2400 games).
If watching football or basketball every day, or HBO and Showtime shows the day of, is of significant value to you and brings you happiness, then this isn’t the solution for you. But it would work just fine for a lot of people. Maybe you won’t find somewhere to invest the money at that rate of return, but you can invest at a lower return or use the space in your budget for something else that would make you happier while keeping your savings rate the same–the occasional designer coffee, if it really does make you happier than a plain cup at home, or saving it up toward an extra vacation or a home improvement project. It’s not about depriving yourself totally; it’s about cutting back on the things you care less about so you can have more, either now or in the future, for the things you care more about.
loading....
I think the author makes a valid and important point (even if the math is rubbish).
Based on the examples given, I interpreted “paradebt” to mean any cost that’s essentially on autopilot — you’re paying X dollars a month for something that you may or may not actually be using. If you’re not using it (or if its value to you is less than its cost), that’s bad. To borrow a term from the energy hounds, maybe this recurring delta between cost and value could be called “vampire cost”?
Now seems like an excellent time to review the monthly bills, and if you find something that’s no longer worth it to you, make it a New Year’s resolution to cancel it or switch to a cheaper alternative.
loading....
Graboid is good for watching movies/shows it’s not free but it’s a bargain compared to cable. It does have a free trial so you can see if you like it. Also most shows I like are on the internet (shows website)and if there not then I guess I don’t need to see it that bad. I buy HBO series DVDs used off Amazon for cheap we are currently watching Six Feet Deep series. It’s kinda fun to watch several episodes at once. I have to have some kind of tv so I have the limited channels (local channels mostly)
loading....
Nicole @16: I have a small quibble with your assessment. I don’t know any billionaires personally, but I can imagine an awful lot of them still do invest the majority of their wealth in long term assets. They might well opt for the 60K at the end of 20 years.
That said, I agree they may be perfectly willing to trade those 60K future dollars for 20 years worth of Desperate Housewives (or 30 Rock).
loading....
Justifying his decision to cut cable by inflating the reward outrageously to $132k is smug, in my opinion. It treats the readers like they are little kids, and we need the promise of big Popeye muscles in order to eat our spinach now. In reality, the benefits are much smaller. The poster clearly enjoys his shows, but wants to show us that he really would rather have this imaginary completely false $132k in the future rather than have his cable now.
This kind of personal finance is Latte Factor, give up a regular tiny expense and you’ll be swimming in cash when you’re retired. David Bach made a killing on it. I think it’s stupid and am TIRED of countless posts about it. JD’s blog is usually better than it.
Dressing it up under the label of “Paradebt” and a catchy “my 132k cable bill” doesn’t change that it’s just the same tired message of the Latte Factor.
loading....
The day I stop watching TV is the day someone bashes my head in. You don’t need to spend 100 dollars on a cable bill. Try a LIBRARY (or netflix) if you want some TV on DVDs. A lot of the great TV on air, some of which you mentioned like Mad Men, The Wire, etc is just as good as any classic film or anything someone would consider “worthy”. The elitist post and comments really need to stop now.
loading....
So what’s the takeaway here? We should all live in a spartan shack in the Montana wilderness so that we can have an extra hundred G’s when we’re almost dead?
First of all, my cable bill is $60, not 100. Secondly, I earn 6%, not 10%. Thirdly, I spend several hours per month watching TV, so $60 seems like a pretty reasonable expense for the entertainment value I get from it.
loading....
@Tyler #49 – Yes! Thank you! We hear the theory all the time, but never see any real stories. Is there anyone who gave up cable in the 80′s and is now a millionaire?
loading....
I think it’s pretty silly to do without pleasures in life now for money in retirement (when it will presumably be spent on pleasures.) Yeah, make sure you’re saving enough to be comfortable and safe in retirement, but otherwise, don’t put off life to save for someday! For one thing, someday may not come! And, even if it does, I’d rather have watched shows I liked and had good meals all my life, and have a couple thousand less a year to spend in retirement. You only get one life, 80 some odd years. Why on earth would you want to spend 40 years doing without to have a little more in your last 20, when you could spread things out and enjoy yourself the whole time?
loading....
This is a great post even if I do not fully buy into the $132 grand number… it would still be something significant. I have never thought about it this way and it is a good eye opener!
As a side note, would love to know what mutual fund they are investing in that gets them 10% year over year for 25+ years!
loading....
JD@82 – I’m with you, I think many folks are missing the real point. Perhaps a detailed post by you on the concept of opportunity costs of money is in order.
As one poster said, it’s about the opportunity cost of every purchase we make. It doesn’t matter whether it’s cable, cell phones, splurging on your favorite hobby or buying steak over hamburger. It’s about realizing that every choice we make, whether for necessities or “wants,” there is a future cost to that money that is being spent. Sure, spending $3/day on cable doesn’t sound like much, but if you realize that that same money invested over time can add up to six figures you may, key word is MAY, just make a different decision. For some spending that to watch their favorite shows is worth every penny of today and the future opportunity cost.
The key is to consider today’s and tomorrow’s value of the money we are spending. We realized long ago that there much cheaper alternatives than cable for the little we watch TV, same with cell phones, etc. And yes JH@90, by being frugal with things that didn’t have enough “value” to us to justify the opportunity cost and with wise investing we have become millionaires several times over.
We never felt that we were “sacrificing” for later, we felt we were making wise choices in truly enjoying today’s dollars on things that mattered to us while planning for a great future. I don’t think the OP was trying to be holier than thou in his approach, just simply sharing that cable didn’t have that much value for him that would justify the future opportunity cost of his money.
Take away – analyze the cost benefit while weighing in the future valve of your money to make your purchasing decisions of today!
loading....
Hahaha. 25 years? They’ll probably figure out a way to broadcast the shows in my head directly by then. I seriously don’t try to think that far ahead. I think I’ll keep my cable sports package thank you.
loading....
Glad to see a post from Carl, sorry to see so much hyperbole in the comments. I enjoyed the post, and I get where you’re coming from.
That said, I don’t know that it’s necessarily applicable, if you are already on a good “pay your debts first” path as preached by people like The Motley Fool.
So after already storing away a reasonable amount for retirement, each month, then need is removed from the equation and it’s really coming down to time vs. money at that point. It it worth the time to do the Netflix/Hulu/network website hunt and peck to find, a few days after first-run, all the shows I want to watch or just pay a little extra to have them in a queue waiting for me the moment I am ready. Remember, you can get more money, but you can’t get more time.
loading....
People always encourage you to cut your cable and use the library for DVDs of your favorite shows. What no one ever seems to mention is that you have to wait quite a while for these. There is usually a long waiting list for anything popular at my library. Then you have to watch the whole thing really quickly before the due date. You also run the risk of one of the DVDs being scratched, which in my experience is common. I think I’ll stick with my DVR. You could also buy the DVD, watch it, and then sell it on half.com. I’ve done that successfully as well.
loading....
Great article… I recently did some analysis of my own to make some budget cuts in my life and found that I was spending way too much on FastTrack. On my way to and from work I have to choose between the 73 (toll road) and the 405 which is always bumper to bumper. For the past few months I’ve elected to take the 73, thinking that the hour saved is well worthl $5 each way. While $5 each way doesn’t seem like much, it’s end up being $60k in 25 years… and that’s without any interest. Thanks GRS!
loading....
We are looking to cut our cable to the bare-est form possible (i.e. channels 1-13) so we at least get local news. Warning: Netflix does NOT show current seasons of TV shows, but that’s something we really want. The solution? We are going to turn an older laptop into an entertainment center and run Hulu off of it to the TV to get our TV fix. Alternate solution? Hulu Plus is going to be offered on select Blue Ray players starting sometime this year. You have to pay for the service, but $8 a month is MUCH better than paying the cable company ten times that.
loading....
My roomies want the cable that costs $80/month. In my college apartment, we paid $80 for cable and internet together.
I don’t even get a chance to watch TV because they are so glued to it. I guess it’s worth it for them, but not for me. I consider it part of my rent though, because I think they’d hate me if I said I wouldn’t pay 1/3.
loading....
I cut my ties to the cable company about 3 years ago and haven’t looked back. It was one of the smartest decisions I’ve ever made – I read more, spend more time with my wife, and I feel great.
However, I still watch TV. Only now, I watch it for free from the set-top antenna I bought. I also subscribe to Netflix, which is great for catching up on old season’s of TV shows and movies. Lastly, I often check out hulu.com for shows, but I’m not sure how much longer that will last now that Comcast has taken majority share of NBC. For now though, it’s a great place to find a lot of popular shows that are carried on cable!
loading....