This post is from staff writer Sarah Gilbert.
Halloween is a big expense for many Americans, with national average estimates for 2011 topping $70 per person for costumes, decorations, and candy, up about $6 from last year to over $6.8 billion nationally. For a family of five like mine, that means $350 (though I doubt my husband in Kuwait for the Army will spend any money, Halloween is also the beginning of care package season for soldiers stationed overseas). Still, it’s a lot of money, and if you consider yourself an average spender, setting aside $20 or $30 of that budget for trick-or-treating candy doesn’t seem out-of-bounds.
That $20 would buy a lot of bags of Hershey’s bars, Almond Joy, and Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups, three of my family’s long-time faves — enough for a couple hundred trick-or-treaters! But we won’t be buying anything like that this year, and it’s not just because I don’t consider myself an average spender. (If you count the jack-o-lantern pumpkins — many of which we end up eating later — we’ll probably spend $40 or $50 as a family on Halloween this year. I’m an aficionado of homemade costumes, and let’s just say my fabric inventory is overstocked.)
Forced child labor is one reason
Why are we changing our chocolate habits? Because of forced child labor, and many other problems associated with so-called “conventional” production of chocolate, sugar cane, and other tropical crops that go into American Halloween candy. After watching just five minutes of this recent BBC report on how many African children are sold, or “loaned,” by their relatives to harvest cocoa beans, I was ready to tell everyone I could (as Kristen Howerton writes) “to break up with commercial chocolate.”
It’s not just this one example of child labor that has me avoiding the big candy makers’ products. It’s a long history of ill treatment of the people and fertile land in the tropical regions where these crops (and others, like bananas and coconut and coffee) grow, bad treatment that was orchestrated by U.S. and European companies and supported by corrupt governments. A combination of environmental destruction and exploitation lead to famine, more poverty, and even more corruption as the only entities with money were the first-world companies and the people and government officials who catered to their need for cheap chocolate, sugar, bananas, coconuts, coffee, etc.
It’s bananas like bananas
Bananas are a great example of this; many say the conditions of sugar plantations are the worst, although not a lot of mainstream investigative work has been done on sugar growing. Peter Chapman’s book Bananas: How the United Fruit Company Shaped the World made the rounds a few years ago on public TV, radio, and talk shows. A review in the New York Times encapsulated the message like this:
United Fruit defined the modern multinational corporation at its most effective — and, as it turned out, its most pernicious. At home, it cultivated clubby ties with those in power and helped pioneer the modern arts of public relations and marketing… Abroad, it coddled dictators while using a mix of paternalism and violence to control its workers. “As for repressive regimes, they were United Fruit’s best friends, with coups d’état among its specialties,” Chapman writes. “United Fruit had possibly launched more exercises in ‘regime change’ on the banana’s behalf than had even been carried out in the name of oil.”
Tropical crops from bananas to chocolate to coffee are grown most cheaply when the rainforest is stripped, water is diverted to feed the crops, and petroleum-based fertilizers are trucked in. Everyone knows by now that these methods increase short-term yields cheaply at the cost of long-term environmental stability. But not everyone has gotten comfortable with how badly this may impact chocolate in the future; and is, in fact, already causing shortages and price hikes for cocoa.
But much like bananas, many of us are too cozy with their chocolate to give it up unless there is a clear example of how destructive it is. Could child slave labor be the impetus for us to re-think our Halloween (and year-round) spending on this commodity, or luxury, depending on your perspective?
How much giving it up costs
I started spending more for fair-trade and organic chocolate several years ago when I started doing research into sugar and coffee production. At the time, I was focused on the conditions in Western tropics like the Caribbean and Central American coffee growers — my sister has lived in Panama for more than a decade, and I couldn’t help focus on that region as central to my concerns. As chocolate and coffee have very similar cultivation and love similar climates, I extrapolated and decided to stop buying Hershey’s and Mars and start buying Equal Exchange, Endangered Species, and a Pacific Northwest company called Theo Chocolate. (My favorite of all of these is an Equal Exchange bar from Panama, appropriately!)
It’s not going to surprise you to hear that it’s far more expensive to buy fair trade, “child labor-free” chocolate than the stuff you can get in the supermarket or drugstore in the Halloween aisle. A 3.5-ounce bar, even on sale, will cost $3 or $4. I buy chocolate in bulk when it’s on sale, or through a buying club, so I spend about $40 a month for chocolate enough for me and my boys (two of them will happily eat dark chocolate; the third prefers milk chocolate, so I buy a few bars of that for him a month and they disappear fast).
How about Halloween?
Those big 3.5-ounce bars don’t really translate to trick-or-treat handouts. I called Theo Chocolate, as that’s the brand my kids like best, and they told me that as a small company with limited machinery and packaging options, small bars weren’t in their immediate future (they’re working on solutions for Halloween 2012 or 2013). But Equal Exchange is another matter, with dark chocolate minibars that go for 19 to 30 cents apiece, depending on how much you buy (roughly similar to the cost of a “fun size” Three Musketeers). They have an organization package called “reverse trick or treat,” where you can get large quantities to hand back to neighbors with a flier on fair trade chocolate.
I’m not much of a door-to-door evangelist. I prefer to write my beliefs! So I’d rather buy the minibars for trick-or-treaters, or another option like Sunspire’s Fair Trade Chocolate Earth Balls or Yummy Earth lollipops and drops. Again, the per-unit cost is between 19 and 30 cents each; making it about the same as commercial options and something I can feel way, way better about.
I don’t spend much at Halloween, but when I do spend, I want how I spend my money to be in line with the way I believe the world should work. I believe childhood should be a time of fun and learning — not hard labor. I believe that, when you grow crops sustainably, they’re not just better for the long-term health of their neighborhood and their planet, but they taste better (that Panama chocolate bar is the stuff of dreams). And I believe a little more cost per unit will keep me from overeating — I can’t afford it! — and I like my body this way.
In the end, in my opinion, there’s every reason to buy more expensive chocolate for Halloween, and the rest of the year, too.
GRS is committed to helping our readers save and achieve your financial goals.Savings interest rates may be low, but that’s all the more reason to shop for the best rate.Find the highest savings interest rate from Ally Bank, Capital One 360, Everbank, and more.
This article is about Consumerism, Food
Disclaimer: This content is not provided or commissioned by American Express. Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of American Express, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by American Express. This site may be compensated through American Express Affiliate Program.
Discover is a paid advertiser of this site. Reasonable efforts are made to maintain accurate information. See the Discover online credit card application for full terms and conditions on offers and rewards.
SEARCH FOR RECENT ARTICLES



Thanks for a thoughtful article. One reason I try to live frugally is because I believe that there is a moral component to spending. I am glad to see this perspective “voiced” on Get Rich Slowly.
loading....
My first thought on reading the article is : am i reading Getrichslowly.org for it seemed to be about ethical issue and as there is a big divide between rich and poor countries this will always be there. The fair trade option was a good one.
loading....
Sarah,
Thank you for a challenging article.
loading....
That will do nothing other than make you feel better about yourself. Now those kids will be without a job and they’ll be exploited in something else.
loading....
*sigh* while this article will not stop me from buying drugstore candy or candy at the check out line all it will do is make me feel vaguely guilty that i don’t feel guilty enough to stop, or care enough to buy free-trade, which i personally don’t think tastes better. maybe it is because i am used to the fillers and preservatives but i have had that chocolate from panama (my family is from there) and i still prefer hershey’s milk chocolate.
it was a well written article though.
loading....
I am also puzzled by the backlash. Isn’t conscious spending one of the long-running themes for this blog? For me, new information on which to base my spending decisions is valuable. I do wish there was more of a comparison of the big chocolate companies, so those of us who can’t afford the boutique small-scale stuff can at least opt for the least-evil brand at Target or wherever.
I will never be the house that gives out raisins or oranges or whatever because ugh, but my favorite house growing up was the one which gave out foreign coins in small denominations. I like that idea.
loading....
“I don’t spend much at Halloween, but when I do spend, I want how I spend my money to be in line with the way I believe the world should work”
So this should apply to everything from diamonds mined in Zaire to many pharmaceuticals (Google IG Farben), right? Those Siemens commercials on TV about Siemens health? Siemens ran slave labor camps under the Nazis. Don’t limit it to chocolate or coffee.
loading....
yes, this should apply to everything. we can’t obviously *know* everything and there are many things it’s hard to avoid consuming (take oil: even though I’m car-free, I often need to get a ride or take the bus somewhere. and oil goes into my bike inner tubes!). sometimes, I make choices to go ahead with consumption of the least-of-evils (unless I don’t want to be involved in the internet, I have to have a computer that includes — as many have mentioned — minerals garnered in questionable ways).
but when I have any choice in the matter, when I have information available, I’ll make the choice to spend my money in a way that supports business the way I think business should be done. and no, I don’t have a diamond. I made it very clear to my husband (and even my boyfriends before him) that a diamond was not in my dream courtship. my engagement ring is American sapphires and my wedding ring was my great-grandmothers
loading....
I have started giving anti-slavery parties focusing on chocolate (being a chocoholic, that is the focus of my passion). We briefly discuss how many different things slaves do, and then I ask how many people are overwhelmed by the issue. It IS overwhelming. I then remind them of the saying “How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time.” Slavery is an elephant, so you pick your first bite (mine was candy bars), and when you are ready, you pick the next bite. You do what you can.
loading....
Here is a translation from a local article who was published in February 2010 about a top chocolate company from Belgium. The current situation is quite frightening!
Almost 99.5 pc of Belgian chocolate sold in supermarkets contains cocoa harvested by child slaves, says Oxfam. Oxfam calls on Belgian producers to use cocoa beans from Fair Trade.
More than 70pcs of cocoa beans are harvested in West Africa, in countries like Ghana and Ivory Coast, where children are exploited for the harvest. Small farmers earn so little that they have no money to pay staff for the collection, said a spokeswoman for Oxfam. In West Africa, more than 100,000 children work in the cocoa sector. An estimated 15,000 children are slaves from neighboring countries like Burkina Faso, added the representative of Oxfam.
In Belgium, K***, the parent company of C*** , admits that child labor is a problem and says it is not able to guarantee that the chocolate was not produced with beans harvested by child slaves.
“Since November 2009, we work with beans certified by the Rainforest Alliance. Plantations using child labor automatically lose their certificate” says K***. “In 2012, all cocoa used for the C*** chocolate should have this label.”
loading....
I thought this blog was too off-topic and “political” for Get Rich slowly. Once in a while is fine, just hope it doesn’t become a permanent trend.
loading....