|
Hello,
We're late bloomers, I'm 43 and my wife is 38.
I'm entitled to a state pension, but only for the years I've lived in my home country. That would be about EUR 400/month for me. And as my wife also is a late starter, her pension won't be that great either: about EUR 1000/month, provided she'll keep paying into this pension fund until she's 65. Which is not likely as we hope to retire earlier than that, therefore we calculate with EUR 600/Month for her pension (this includes a small state pension for her home country), making a total of EUR 1000/Month.
Due to the nature of our work, we'll be able to save up a lot of money in the years to come (we did manage a cool EUR 100.000 in the last two years), so we're not too worried about our retirement income. Though we will also need income between the date we actually retire and when we reach retirement age (and thus the pension starts being paid).
Based on our current expenditures (over the last 5 years), we would like to have at least EUR 2000/month (USD 2600), but are using EUR 2500 (USD 3300) as calculating value. (We don't NEED the extra 500/month, but it would enable us to go on holidays more often etc.)
We are considering two scenario's:
Scenario A) A two-tiered saving plans 1) After retirement income save up to amount X which provides additional income (interest/return/?) when we are retired (and we use my wife's age as the marker). This money would sit somewhere and would not be touched at all. 2) Earlier retirement income save up to amount Y which would cover the years between actual retirement and when the pension starts getting paid.
Number 2 is easy. Provided we have reached the first goal, for each EUR 30.000 we save, we can retire one year earlier before retirement age.
Number 1 is more difficult to calculate, because the amount we need depends on the return we manage to get and the taxes we have to pay over it. If we stick it all in a savings account, we might be able to get 3%. This would mean EUR 3000 before taxes per annum for each EUR 100.000 we have. Assuming 40% taxes it drops to EUR 1800/year or EUR 150/month. With these numbers we'd need to save up to almost a million... (and if we take our minimum, it would be EUR 650.000 to have EUR 2000/month). Higher interest/return of course would mean a lower total amount; if we can get 5% then we'd need to save EUR 600.000 to have our EUR 2500/month.
The big advantage seems to be the security: no matter how long we live, there's always sufficient income.
Scenario B) Save up and withdraw. 1) After retirement income Assume we'll live another 25(!) years after my wife reaches retirement age. This is 300 months. Our goal is EUR 2500/month and our pension is EUR 1000/month. So if we save 300 * 1500 = EUR 450.000 and start withdrawing EUR 1500/month when my wife turns 65. This approach has as advantage that it doesn't matter how much return we get nor how high taxes of these returns are. And of course the amount we need to save is substantially less than for scenario A. 2) Earlier retirement income It's the same as B.1.: the more we save the earlier we can stop working, where the only difference is that we need to calculate the full EUR 2500/month as our pension will not be paid yet.
(For both scenario's) My biggest concern is inflation, I know what it is, but I'm a bit lost on how to incorporate that into our retirement planning. And I'm also not sure if inflation would be a bigger factor in either scenario.
Another issue I'm not sure how to take into account is our health. Presumably when we get older, we'll need to rely more and more on healthcare, thus increasing costs.
Further complicating this is that we also don't know where (country) we will retire; though this is likely going to be an European country. Though I do think that when we're getting close to retiring, our actual financial situation will be an important factor in our choice.
We don't have kids, so we don't have a need to leave something, though it would be nice to leave something for our nieces. (We do realize that for scenario A when we die, a substantial amount of our money will go to the state. But in all honesty, we're dead so we don't really care.)
Finally, not sure how important that is, we're not very keen on taking risks with our money.
As I'm not financial expert, I'm really not too sure how solid these plans are and I'd very much like your -financial savvy people as you are- input on both scenarios, what the drawbacks are, the pitfalls, possible alternatives, etc.
Thanks,
Bob
|