I just got a chance to look up the Lending Club. So you are:
1. investing about 1/3 of your savings in, essentially, junk bonds
2. investing in a product, more specifically, with barely five years of history
3. paying at least 1% in fees, and up to 30% if the loans go to a collection agency
4. doing this with a 25% tax drag
This is insane. Junk bonds have a level of risk similar to stocks, but with very limited upside in comparison due to the nature of fixed-income. This is why all researchers (even people on the fringe like Taleb and Zvi Bodie) conclude that you should take your risk with equities and use fixed-income to keep the rest of your money safe.
I would liquidate your investments at the Lending Club, come up with a more conventional asset allocation (common stocks and investment-grade bonds) for your whole portfolio, and implement it in a low-cost, tax efficient manner.
By the way, I'm reminded of something written on the BadMoneyAdvice blog a few years ago about p2p lending (after the author failed to get any return on his investment)...
Quote:
What could we have possibly been thinking? Granted, it is pretty clear that in the middle of the last decade those professional loan officers did not do a very good job. But they screwed up by being too permissive, not by missing out on opportunities to lend to our trustworthy and wholesome peers.
Tim