GRS Home  Forum Home
Bank Rates Center
   Savings Account Rates
   Money Market Rates
   Highest CD Rates
Insurance Rates Center
  Auto           Health
   Life              Home
Mortgage Rates Center
  Mortgage Rates
  Mortgage Quotes

Last visit was:
A place for Get Rich Slowly readers to ask questions
and exchange ideas
It is currently Thu Jul 24, 2014 1:03 pm




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Dave Ramey and Suze Orman are WRONG
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:28 am 

Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:27 am
Posts: 1
I am a fan of Dave Ramsey and Suze Orman, but I think they are completely wrong about what they say about whole, universal, and permanent life insurance.

I've written a blog about it at [spam link removed since kombat quoted text in his reply]

Let me know what you think.


Top
Offline Profile E-mail   
 Post subject: Re: Dave Ramey and Suze Orman are WRONG
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 11:24 am 

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:19 pm
Posts: 1716
Location: Ottawa, Canada
The blog post doesn't really explain how this "new" type of policy addresses Dave's or Suze's concerns. In fact, it doesn't even really explain how this "new" policy works. Here's the only part of the post that even vaguely references how the policy is structured:

Quote:
"An example of a cash value life insurance policy that is within the bounds of Dave Ramsey and Suze Orman’s restricts [sic] is Genworth Financial’s new universal life insurance policy that adds another variable for customers to control the premiums they pay.

Typically life insurance plans combine insurance coverage and tax deferred savings, but they cost more than the popular term life insurance. With this new universal plan the insured are allowed to guarantee the death benefit payments up to age 110."


Putting aside the awkward grammatical errors, all it says is this new policy "adds another variable" for consumers to control the premiums, and that the "death benefit payments" are guaranteed up to age 110.

What's this mystery "variable?" Why is having a death benefit payment guaranteed to age 110 worth the steep cost differential compared to term? Why would anyone want/need life insurance when they're 110 years old anyway? Does this new policy beat the principle argument Dave and Suze make against whole life policies - that is, that if you buy term and invest the difference, you'll end up with vastly more money overall? I can't tell - the blog post doesn't say.

I was tempted to delete this post as spam, but I'm leaving it here as it presents a good opportunity to review why whole life policies are terrible.


Top
Offline Profile   
 Post subject: Re: Dave Ramey and Suze Orman are WRONG
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:54 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 9:14 pm
Posts: 238
Location: Orygun
Leaving up only because kombat took the time to reply.

_________________
If life gives you tomatoes, make pico de gallo.


Top
Offline Profile   
 Post subject: Re: Dave Ramey and Suze Orman are WRONG
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:32 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 10:05 am
Posts: 960
I actually looked at the blog. I agree with kombat the explenation was somewhat fuzzy.

So Term Life is best? ;)

_________________
~ Eagle


Top
Offline Profile E-mail   
 Post subject: Re: Dave Ramey and Suze Orman are WRONG
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 8:11 am 

Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 8:14 pm
Posts: 1749
Ummm...guys...the blog belongs to an insurance brokerage. Click on the About Us link. They're fishing for clients.


Top
Offline Profile   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ]  Moderators: kombat, bpgui, JerichoHill


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Theme created StylerBB.net & kodeki