I'll address your post. But first I'll pose the same questions I made to DoingHomework.
The issue I have with the concept as portrayed today of “tolerance” is that liberals want Christians to be tolerant while not tolerating Christian values or morals. It is okay to agree to disagree. Sure. As long as you don’t disagree with a liberal.
Do I believe the earth is only 10,000 years old? Sure I have faith that my God created the universe in about that time. This is my opinion. Definitely not billions and billions of years. You are free to believe so. This is your opinion.
I have my values and belief system. You have yours. I present my beliefs and values. I don’t try to push my belief system on you. Yet the opposite is not true would you agree? Why must Christian values/morals often be attacked, Christians deemed idiots (or other colorful language), and simply dismissed as not having a brain?
Explain to me as a forward thinking, intelligent, logical, tolerant human being how this is tolerant behavior please?
And yet you fail to address the guy's other videos. Why would you take him as a trusted source in one area but decline to address his statements in another? I fear, Eagle, that you're the kind of person who only hears what he wants to hear. That's close-minded.
What would you like for me to address? Honestly, I just liked the way he worded what I was thinking and trying to say. He just said it in fewer words.
Also interesting, while I've acknowledge the liberal bias of MSNBC and outlined the reasons why I believe CNN to be neutral and why I believe that, you've declined to explain why you consider FN a credible source despite queries in multiple threads about this. You yourself have failed to discredit FUD from those MSNBC and CNN yet you've seen us dispel FUD from FN multiple times. If you want people to take you seriously, you're gonna have to give as good as you get.
Personally, I don't have time nor am I interested in pointing out how CNN is not neutral. Do the reasearch there is plenty out there. It is common knowledge. However, for the sake of argument here's a report that says that most people believe that there is a natural slant one way or the other for most major networks:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/news-reporting-is-perceived-as-biased-though-less-agreement-on-whether-it-is-liberal-or-conservative-bias-57036137.html
You just have to wade through the various news agencies to try to get some semblence of balance on whatever news you are interested in. Woudl you agree?
If you choose not to take me seriously that's fine.
It won't hurt my feelings.