An Introduction to Making Money Selling Digital Photos

Who doesn’t want to make a little extra cash these days? The price of digital cameras is dropping on what seems to be a daily basis. Why not put yours to some use? For the past five years, I have been selling royalty-free stock photographs and will share my thoughts, ideas and concepts with you, along with some suggestions for getting started.

What is stock photography?

The Wikipedia entry for stock photography states:

Stock photography consists of existing photographs that can be licensed for specific uses. Book publishers, specialty publishers, magazines, advertising agencies, filmmakers, web designers, graphic artists, interior decor firms, corporate creative groups, and other entities utilize stock photography to fulfill the needs of their creative assignments. By using stock photography instead of hiring a photographer to perform on location shooting, customers can save valuable time and stay on budget.

Everything for commercial use these days has some sort of marketing on it; often this marketing takes the form of a photograph. Take a look at your cereal box — there’s a photo on it. Flip through any magazine — someone took the photographs in all those ads. This website often uses images to help describe a story better — someone had to take those. You cannot legally just right-click and save an image from the Internet and use it on a website, print article or magazine. A marketing firm based in Florida may need a photograph of snow-capped mountains. They obviously don’t have mountains in Florida, so they turn to stock photos, which they can purchase at a reasonable rate. The photographer makes a percentage of that image sale.

How can you start making money?

This is the first question everyone asks, but there are some precursor questions that should be answered first:

  • Do you have the time to invest (perhaps as much as four hours per week)?
  • Can you capture images other then your immediate surroundings?
  • Will friends and family be willing to sign model release forms?
  • Is your camera of high enough quality?
  • Do you know how to properly edit a photograph?
  • Will you be able to associate keywords to go along with your photo?
  • Will you be willing to invest more into gear and cameras?
  • Can you be objective with yourself?
  • How well do you handle rejection?
  • Are you willing to invest time to learn continually?

Do you have the time to invest?

Editing photos takes time. So does giving them full descriptions and uploading full-sized images. This is aside from actually taking photographs. When I was doing this on a regular basis, I would often spend an hour or more a day just editing photographs, another two hours to upload and catalog them.

Can you capture images other than your immediate surroundings?

In order to sell a photograph, you need to give the buyer something they can’t grab themselves. This rules out most of your everyday surroundings, including everything at your desk, kitchen, living room, even your sock drawer. Thousands of these images exist in stock catalogs already.

Will friends and family be willing to sign model release forms?

One of the best ways to sell a photograph is to have somebody in it. In order to do this, the models in the images need to sign off their rights to collect any money for them. Often times, I will do a trade with friends and family. I’ll agree to bring my camera to so-and-so’s birthday party and photograph the event for them if one or three agree to give me an hour or two time around the house, at the park or wherever to pose and let me photograph them, and sign the model release form. This works out well for both parties.

Is your camera of high enough quality?

Many online stock sites now have minimum requirements for files they will accept. Generally speaking, the baseline where you want to start is a 5mp camera. A digital SLR camera, one that you can change lenses on, is much more desirable as they produce better quality images. More megapixels doesn’t always mean better images; the quality of the sensor has a lot to do with it.

Do you know how to properly edit a photograph?

Photographs can often be improved by making adjustments to them, such as:

  • Cropping
  • Color
  • Density
  • Shadow detail
  • Sharpening

A basic photo-editing program will be needed, as every image that comes out of your camera can always be tweaked a bit for better quality. I’ve been using Photoshop for years now, current version is CS2, but Photoshop Elements is acceptable. You might also like the GIMP, which is free for both Windows and Mac users. Any corporate name will also need to be edited out of an image. Logos, text or other copyrighted material cannot appear in a photograph that will be sold as stock.

Will you be able to associate keywords to go along with your photo?

Stock photography sites use their own internal search engines; you find an image you’re looking for by putting in descriptive words. Nothing magical about that. It is when you need to convey more then what is physically in an image. You could associate 50 or more keywords with an image. This light bulb is an example of a stock photograph. If this were my photo for sale, some of the keywords I would associate with it are:

  • Light bulb
  • Glass
  • Red
  • Clear
  • Transparent
  • Illuminate
  • Idea
  • Copy space

As you can see, some are descriptive of the actual item, others are there as adjectives. The key wording “game” is directly related to how well people will be able to find your images. This will be covered in greater detail later on.

Will you be willing to invest more into gear and cameras?

As you progress, you will find yourself needing better cameras and lenses, more gear such as studio lights, tripods and just spending more money. You may not make the money back for several months, maybe not at all, but would you be willing to make a small investment? I found myself shooting three cameras and in a studio paying rent for it at one point. It was very much worth it.

Can you be objective with yourself?

Self-editing can be a photographer’s biggest downfall. I don’t mean editing the photographs in an image editor like Photoshop — I’m referring to selecting the best possible image from a group. The photographer who took the above light bulb photo more then likely has a dozen of them at slightly different angles; however, she chose what she thought would be the best example of that group. Uploading 15 photos of essentially the same photo all at slightly different angles doesn’t give buyers more choices, it confuses them and often leaves them second-guessing. Only show and sell your very best of the best images. I’ve found myself doing shoots with models with 400 or more shots from a two-hour session. When it was all said and done, I had about twenty I was really happy with and that’s all anyone ever saw.

How well do you handle rejection?

More then likely you are going to get images rejected. How often? Don’t be surprised if 50% or more of what you submit gets rejected. Don’t let this get you down, use it as a tool to help build upon your growing portfolio.

Are you willing to invest time to learn continually?

Whether you are new to photography or have been shooting for years, learning is part of the game. I’m on several different forums on a regular basis chatting with other photographers about how to shoot, tips, techniques and most importantly, critiques. Books and now DVDs are becoming increasingly more important tools to mastering different techniques as well and I often reference them prior to doing a shoot.

Conclusion

As this series continues at my own site, I will be writing articles on specific topics, giving examples and suggesting ideas to really maximize a hobby into a source of income. Your comments and suggestions are welcome.

Much of this information is applicable to making money from any hobby. This article originally appeared at Randomn3ss in a slightly different format. The second part of this series gives a brief overview of a photographer’s workflow. The third part discusses types of images that sell well.

More about...Side Hustles

Become A Money Boss And Join 15,000 Others

Subscribe to the GRS Insider (FREE) and we’ll give you a copy of the Money Boss Manifesto (also FREE)

Yes! Sign up and get your free gift
Become A Money Boss And Join 15,000 Others

There are 46 comments to "An Introduction to Making Money Selling Digital Photos".

  1. GG says 05 March 2007 at 11:12

    Here’s a response to “Is your camera of high enough quality?” and “Will you be willing to invest more into gear and cameras?”

    http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/notcamera.htm

    I’m not a pro photographer or anything. I’m probably more along the lines of a terrible photographer, but I’m under no illusion that spending thousands of dollars on cameras and lenses is going to produce any better pictures.

  2. Charlie Park says 06 March 2007 at 09:57

    This is an interesting post, Mike, but what kind of money can you make selling stock photography through these channels? $1 per photo? 10 cents? $30? Maybe I missed it, but I don’t know that you ever covered that.

  3. Elissa says 06 March 2007 at 12:12

    Charlie, the amount of money you make selling stock photos depends on where you’re selling them and how well they are selling.
    Different stock photography websites pay different amounts for each photo sold/downloaded. Some pay $.25 per download, some pay $1 per download.

    It may not seem like much to only get $.25 per download, but if it’s a popular photo that gets purchased/downloaded 20 times a week on average, you’ll have made about $20 in a month on one photo. The more photos you have, the more people purchase them, the more money you make. 🙂

  4. Mike Panic says 07 March 2007 at 08:52

    Charlie, as mentioned, it depends on who you sell with. All of the stock I sell is through Istockphoto and I am an exclusive photographer with them, meaning I don’t sell stock to any of the dozens of other stock sites. Istock is considered a micro stock site, meaning it can cost as little as $1 to download. I get a bigger cut of that $1 because I am exclusive. For a while, Istock had a big brother, Istockpro, where you set the price and split it 50/50 with Istockpro, most files sold between $50-200 per download but were not downloaded as often as on Istockphoto. When Getty bought Istockphoto last year, they started to phase out the Pro site and work more into their own, Getty Images, which caters to higher end, higher quality stock.

    To directly answer your question, it varies. When I started out, it only cost a quarter to download an image of any size and my take was a nickel. Today there are different resolutions for different sized files at tiered prices. I’ll be covering the money side of things in an upcoming article, but won’t be giving exact info out. I will say that I’ve had a few files alone make me well over $250 a year and on a month to month basis I make somewhere between $50 and $400. The more quality photographs you have, the more money you can make. Some photographers build an entire website dedicated to showing off their Istock portfolio’s so that when they meet someone, they can give them a business card with their own domain name on it and a real email, even if the website does nothing but shows a gallery of their stock photos, it is easier to remember then, go to this website, search for my username, blah blah blah.

    I’ll be covering all these topics directly in future articles. If you are looking for more specific items to be covered, please leave a comment on the article I wrote for Randomn3ss.com or get ahold of me via the Contact page there.

  5. theBagg says 07 March 2007 at 20:12

    I have a couple of questions to look at for your next article:

    1) Should we or shouldn`t we be selling our photos that we also have setup in a flickr account? That is publicly viewable.

    2)Could you supply an example “Model Release Form” and explain a little more in detail how many times we have to give this out, etc.

    3) What are the common methods of payment from stock photography sites?

  6. Mike Panic says 07 March 2007 at 21:39

    theBagg – Great points. I just got done publishing Part III but will most definatly get your questions answered in the next article. To give you the quick answers

    1. I still don’t have a Flickr account, haven’t had a need. My imediate thoughts would be to limit the resolution size you upload to them, watermark them and if possible, provide a link directly to the site you are selling the stock photo on in the image description if someone does want a larger version.

    2. The model release form that I use is available from iStockphoto directly, I think you may need to be a memeber before you download it.

    3. I only have experiance with iStock, but they will either transfer funds to your PayPal account or issue you a check once you have earned $100. The other thing you can do is buy download credits, so if you are both a photographer and a designer, you could get images for free, simply by uploading your own images first.

    Thanks for the questions, look for a post this week on Randomn3ss.com.

  7. Seshu says 08 March 2007 at 14:13

    This is a timely post as I begin thinking about selling images that I usually shoot at either multi-ethnic or Indian weddings. Thanks for the inspiration.

  8. Kim says 09 March 2007 at 03:10

    Tought you guys might want to visit http://www.dphotojournal.com/sell-photos-online/

    That guy makes an average of $2000/month..and he’s doing it part time.. not bad for some extra cash..

  9. ZoofyTheJinx says 10 March 2007 at 10:47

    This article was really helpful. Thanks! 🙂

  10. China Trade Study says 13 March 2007 at 14:22

    Very nice article! It reminds me to pick up my camera and start shooting. A little incentive may help me achieve the goal of polishing my skill.

  11. Udi says 13 March 2007 at 15:02

    this site has a huge (huge) list of micro stock sites

  12. Tracy says 16 May 2007 at 05:03

    Hi Mike,

    I have recently been asked to take a number of photographs for some brochures and website usage for a safari lodge in Zambia but have no idea what I should charge them. Do you or any one have idea’s what would be a reasonable price? I know that they would like to use them at least for a couple of years for marketing purposes.

    Mnay thanks Tracy

  13. Mike Panic says 19 May 2007 at 20:01

    Tracy,

    I sent you a message via your site, but wanted to follow up here as well. There are many factors which you should look into, but this rate calculator, which was posted on my forums years ago, is a great place to start figuring out what your price point will be.

    There is a fine line to walk though, bid too high and you could loose the client, bid too low and you could not only be taken advantage of, you are also under-cutting your fellow photographers, in turn driving the average price of your work down.

  14. Ric says 20 June 2007 at 09:28

    Is there a need to invest on a 19″ pc monitor to be able to edit and sell fotos?

    Or is it enough having a 15´4 laptop at the moment?

  15. Jordan says 28 June 2007 at 03:50

    I am also trying to earn money from photos online.

    Most of my photos are not good enough to be accepted as stock images…

    I went down the route of making all my images free (and available to hot-link to) at a resolution of 1024×768.

    Most of the money I earn is from Google Adsense adverts on my web site.

    I earned $520 from Adsense last month (May 2007).

    Check my Make Money From Photos Online Blog which I will keep updated with current earnings etc…

    Thanks.

  16. Ryan VanZan says 02 July 2007 at 13:36

    This is a great article. Thanks for the tips!

  17. Mike Panic says 27 July 2007 at 14:49

    Ric,

    Heres the thing about laptops, you won’t see accurate colors with them if you change your angle of view, use them in a different place of your home or office or be able to change a video card in them.

    The first thing I would do would be invest in a hardware color calibration unit, like the eye-one. They run around $150. This will be able to get your laptop color calibrated and that will be a vast imporvement over what you have now. That said, you will need to calibrate it where you plan on working on image editing. I could go on and on about color management and light sources, etc., let me know if you need a seperate article about that stuff.

    As for using an external monitor, that would be a wise investment, they hold color much better and offer better control of color and color profiles. I’d skip right over the 19 though and get as big as you can. There are often deals on 20″ widescreens for under $200 and 22″ widescreens for around $300. If you are looking at a higher end monitor, check out Samsung 226bw. Most of the higher end Dell monitors are great too, look at the Dell Outlet for a refurb or closeout special.

    Jordan,

    Great sites! My problem with giving stuff away is in how it will be used. Granted that your stuff won’t make good prints (I’ve had several stock prints published in books, magazines, posters and flyers), but they could be used on a high traffic site, which makes a ton of money. For me, it’s the “how” my images are getting used that worries me.

    Additionally, you also have to have some strong marketing to get the kind of traffic your blogs bring in. While they might be high traffic for you, they pail in comparison to sites like iStockphoto or Getty. That is where the value for me lies, they are doing the marketing and driving the traffic in.

    Thanks Ryan!

  18. Jordan McClements says 30 July 2007 at 05:28

    Mike, thanks for the reply.

    I take it that if your image is downloaded from one of the stock sites and then used inappropriately (i.e. someone claims it as their own and tries to resell it on a high traffic web site) – then the stock photo site will handle legal proceedings on your behalf?

    If this is the case then that is a major plus right enough.

    With regards to marketing – I have not spent a single penny on this. I do get tiny amounts of traffic compared to the stock photo web sites – but I still think it is a good way to monetize photos that the stock photo web sites will not accept..

  19. Mike Panic says 30 July 2007 at 11:40

    I take it that if your image is downloaded from one of the stock sites and then used inappropriately (i.e. someone claims it as their own and tries to resell it on a high traffic web site) – then the stock photo site will handle legal proceedings on your behalf?

    Correct – bear in mind that they aren’t always out policing this stuff, you will be responsible for doing some of it on your own. If you put your images on several stock sites, there could be a problem finding out where the image was downloaded and what can be done. That is part of the reason I’ve chosen to stick with one agency.

    With regards to marketing – I have not spent a single penny on this. I do get tiny amounts of traffic compared to the stock photo web sites – but I still think it is a good way to monetize photos that the stock photo web sites will not accept..

    Again, you are correct, it is a good way to monetize stuff that the agency’s won’t take, but you could only hope to get the type of traffic they do. I also use my personal site to help promote my images on iStock, some people have their entire site built around their images on iStock to help bring more traffic to them and make more money.

  20. Jordan McClements says 30 July 2007 at 12:55

    OK. Cheers.

  21. Seth says 08 September 2007 at 07:59

    How can you justify selling your images for a couple pennies?? Why would people who want to get into photography spend good money on equipment, setups and props, just for $.25 an image?? Sites like istockphoto are ruining the quality and integrity of an industry. Not to mention demeaning the value of a photographers efforts.

  22. Mike Panic says 08 September 2007 at 08:55

    Seth,

    I’m sorry to say, iStock isn’t ruining the stock image marketplace, they’ve changed for good. I took a look at your stuff on shutterpoint, most seems to be around $50, mind if I ask how often your images get downloaded?

    Clearly there is a business model for micro stock photography, as well as super high-end stuff, ala Getty and Corbis. Point is most of the microstock stuff is way more available to people not willing to pay gobs of money for blogging and inner-office memos. While I’m aware that stuff on iStock gets used in books, magazines and billboards, more often than not it’s used in web graphics. As a blogger myself, I’m more likely to go to iStock and pay $3 for a poker image, than the $50 asking price you have. If I was doing a magazine article, I’d consider buying yours, but for $6 I can get a high quality, nice image from iStock. As someone who would be looking to make a profit and keep costs down (as most buyers are), I’m likely to go the cheaper route.

    I’m not going to stand on a soapbox and defend iStock, they tried a “pro” version where shooters set their own prices (most around $100) and split profits 50/50 with iStock, it failed. I would love to make Corbis money; I don’t have a portfolio good enough.

    My personal opinion is that anything being sold as royalty free stock under $500 per use is considered microstock, if one chooses to go that route, I suggest using the biggest and best [in my opinion], iStock.

  23. J.D. says 08 September 2007 at 09:48

    I have to echo Mike Panic’s comments. As a blogger, I could never afford to use $50 images. iStockPhoto rocks because for a buck (or less!) I can download an image to jazz up a piece that would otherwise remain plain vanilla. In fact, I’m off to download an image now…

  24. Seth says 09 September 2007 at 07:19

    I share you sentiment about making “Corbis Money”, Getty even told me that they like my port, but, they have a 10-12Mp MINIMUM for submissions, which equates to gear I cant afford yet. (That really burned me up 🙂 )

    I get 3-5 downloads a month, but, unlike alot of my Shutterpoint counterparts, I dont just post my images and HOPE they sell. I actively email (Individually, not in spam fashion) all kinds of casino/poker related sites and companies and let them know my images are there.

    A point I try to get across to others, and this is important, that it is not the responsibility of the stock site to market the images. That duty is still on the photographer. The stock sites only try to market themselves, maintaining search rankings, etc.

    In any case, it’s a buyers market. Places like istock exist because of this, but just remember, iStock has over a million images on their site, which means their making thousands of dollars a month, if not more and only giving their sources (the photographers) a few
    peanuts for it. I’m not saying we should all be charging 50-500 dollars an image, but at least, get your moneys worth.

  25. Seth says 09 September 2007 at 08:02

    A case in point-
    istock made it almost impossible to find a specific photographer, I went lookin for ya Mike, but couldnt find you.

    I finally found your website through you forum
    iPhotoForum.com, (nice by the way, will be joining) Your work was good enough visually, was there a different issue that they werent accepted by the “Big Boys”?

    Cool to see another Philly boy on the web!

  26. Mike Panic says 09 September 2007 at 08:24

    Seth,

    Yes, Corbis has always had large file size requirements, they prefer drum scans from 120/220 negs if possible, that is why I never bothered. I’ve been selling stock since 2002, back then I couldn’t afford to shoot that much film just to hope it sold, I was mostly doing freelance photography. I’m pretty sure I covered this in my article, if not, stock is not my main income. I do work a regular job, but I’ve been doing freelance photography for the last 7 years. Most of the stock stuff I sell is left overs from other jobs, vacations or just out having fun. It’s a way to profit from otherwise “wasteful” images. Nowadays, with 10mp DSLR cameras under a grand, anyone can be a photographer and anyone can shoot quality images for stock.

    My 2 cents, for what they are worth, if you are marketing directly via email / phone calls for your images on shutterpoint, you might as well just add a gallery to your own website and paypal buttons, why bother splitting your profits? I know a few people that do this, but it is a lot more work than its worth.

    You are also right, it’s not the responsibility of the stock agency to market, however iStock does. Open any design or Mac magazine and there are ads for iStock. They have also been in the Alexa top 100 sites for a few years now. Like I said, I’m not on a soapbox defending them, however they have done a really good job of making the site search engine friendly, and I mean Google search engine friendly. They’ve also won several awards for their PHP coding of the site and search engine technology, including the ability to search images based on a color palette. With over 2 million images, clearly they have one of the largest selections. I can tell you that when I did work for them, one of my images was number 15,000. They very much were one of the small guys. If I’m going to put my images somewhere, I’d prefer that they are going on a site with tons of traffic.

    While I do have a page on my personal website that shows the last 10 images I’ve uploaded, I’ve always done really well by focusing on keyword selections instead of direct marketing.

    The get your moneys worth is an interesting quote. What is it worth? Where else could you sell an image with almost no effort outside the photography and get paid on a regular basis? I’m not saying getting a quarter per image is where its at, but when I joined iStock it was 25c to download any image and the photographer got a nickel. The exposure alone on the site, back then, led to several freelance jobs outside of iStock.

    Glad you found iPhotoForum too =)

  27. Seth says 09 September 2007 at 12:09

    I agree with quite a bit of what you are saying and I’m certainly not “preaching the glory of the all powerful shutterpoint” 😛

    But I get 85% of sales, dont have to pay for a shopping cart, build all the pages, (I do that enough at my day-job), or wait for approval from someone I dont consider qualified to decide what are good stock images. I used to use iStock a few years ago (the plot thickens) but I really thought shutterpoint was better for what I was doing.

    Yes you right, istock has a lot of good search features for the designer and layman alike, but nothing for finding a specific artist, if theres one you like.

    The other thing I do like about SP is I can iframe/include my catalog at SP on my site, in there own separate categories. Bear in mind, there are alot of things about SP that I DONT like, but it works for now.

    When I mentioned marketing, I meant that stock agencies dont advertise the photographers on their websites. I have seen iStock’s ads in more and more magazines all the time, and i agree, being on a very popular site and getting alot of exposure is half the battle!
    But let me ask you, dont you think there comes a point when theres too much competition from “millions of photographs”

    S

  28. Mike Panic says 09 September 2007 at 12:15

    Yes, I think there is too much competition, this has in turn forced me to look at what I have and what I put on the site. It has in some ways forced me to step my game up.

  29. Nilesh says 17 September 2007 at 00:28

    You can checkout more info about selling images on the site given below:
    http://sellimages.blogspot.com

  30. Alex says 19 February 2008 at 08:00

    There is a Lens on Squidoo about selling pics to microstock agencies:

    http://www.squidoo.com/sellingpics

  31. Mike Panic says 19 June 2008 at 07:24

    Just published Part VI to the series.

  32. codes says 04 September 2008 at 09:32

    Interesting article. We discussed this subject at a recent class for my photography course. I think it would be extremely competitive but if I was needing extra income then this would be an area worth checking out. I offer my images totally free now and don’t plan to change that.

  33. Ryan K from Going Carless says 29 September 2008 at 22:16

    I used to get a lot more downloads on my http://www.dreamstime.com portfolio.

    Now, as more and more people are uploading images the downloads are becoming scarce.

    I have to post more and more just to keep the downloads at the same level.

    I’ve gone a different route. I’ve gone the way of senior pics and wedding shots. That’s where the real money is.

    http://www.goingCarless.com

  34. PennySeeds.com says 20 December 2008 at 15:51

    Looks like a good idea – I might give it a try since I wanted to do some nature trailing. I like taking photos anyway – So if I snap anything particularly nice I can throw it up there.

    If I don’t make anything it’s no biggie anyway.

  35. The Almost Millionaire says 17 January 2009 at 05:22

    Quick question, where do you actually sell the photos once you have taken them and made them of a higher quality? Thanks for the tip.

  36. Mike Panic says 17 January 2009 at 07:46

    @The Almost Millionaire – I’ve been using http://www.istockphoto.com since 2002.

  37. The Almost Millionaire says 17 January 2009 at 13:45

    Excellent,
    Thanks!
    Brandon

  38. Katja Heber says 24 April 2009 at 14:11

    Hi there,
    I recently joined Alamy, which lets you sell your images as licensed or royalty free. I just wondered if anyone could give me any tipps on what kind of images would be better selling as licensed and which are better to be sold as royalty free images.
    Thanks for any tipps.
    Katja

  39. Lincoln32 says 19 April 2010 at 13:44

    Your own site to sell downloadable art is another route to take. That way you can use the site to both promote yourself/your work, and use it to sell downloadable files of your art. MadBeeTech at http://www.madbeetech.com includes a site builder that makes it fast and easy to set up your own site that includes support for fully automated digital download selling. Buyers end up at your PayPal page, so their money goes right into your PayPal account. No middleman to take a cut. Very inexpensive. I have two sites with them (one selling graphics, one selling ebooks) and it works great for me!

  40. Marianne says 02 July 2012 at 14:10

    If you know what to shoot, stock photography can be a very lucrative business. It’s a $2 billion industry.

    This video shows which are the top selling stock photos and why: http://www.pocketstock.com/academy/the-concepts-behind-images-that-sell-in-their-thousands

    If you’re interested in other useful stock photography videos, you can also check out our Pocketstock Academy:
    http://www.pocketstock.com/academy

  41. Peter collins says 03 October 2012 at 04:41

    Sorry but I have to say, stock libraries are VERY exploitative. They pay FRACTIONS of what a photographer would get paid for say, an editorial commission.
    Example stock may pay cents- a few dollars.
    An editorial commission may pay approx $800-2000.

    Some difference.
    If you are good enough to be accepted by a stock library then chances are good enough to sell your work editorially.

  42. chris says 23 November 2012 at 00:02

    I will be getting my own DSLR camera soon and is interested with stock photography. I don’t have an idea of the numbers yet on how much one can earn per month on average.

    Can someone give me an idea? Thanks

  43. jafar says 16 December 2012 at 22:49

    i have been using http://www.easemysell.com for sell my digital photos online , its easy and convenient to use and payment terms is also good

  44. Keith Campoy says 12 February 2013 at 22:47

    I loved the article! I totally agree with what you’ve said, and found some really useful tips here as well.

  45. kostum badut maskot says 25 September 2013 at 01:45

    This Article very useful. It’s a good inspiration. I can Bookmark it. Thank you.

  46. Sell photos online says 09 March 2014 at 10:01

    Here’s a one more great tutorial – how to sell photos online, Registration to Microstocks, Uploading the Photos to Microstocks:
    http://sellphotosgetmoney.com

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*