What Do You Care What Other People Think?

Yesterday afternoon, I shared a biking vs. driving calculator that tries to show how much you could save if you gave up your car in favor of other forms of transportation. Whenever I post a story about biking more and driving less, some readers feel judged. They worry that those of us who drive less think we’re somehow better than they are.

Yesterday, for instance, Elaine wrote:

I must say that articles like these bruise my ego a bit. I WANT to do everything possible to minimize my impact on my financial health and the health of the environment, so it bothers me somewhat to continually hear about biking, when it’s just not realistic to my life.

And Annie said:

I’m glad that some people have the opportunity to reduce their gas dependence by walking and/or biking, but I wish that the non-vehicle enthusiasts would remember that not all of us have that same opportunity.

Elaine and Annie’s concerns are valid. Sometimes we do forget that others don’t have the same options we do. But it’s also true that some of us become indignant when we read stories about living in a tiny house, owning only 100 possessions, growing all of our own food, or having a DIY wedding. We feel judged. That’s unfortunate, because getting defensive can get in the way of noticing other lessons that might be applicable in our own lives.

Nobody’s perfect

When I write that I am trying to reduce my driving, I’m not arguing that everyone should do the same. Sure, I believe you should try to find ways to cut back, if possible, but I realize that not everyone shares my values and not everyone has the same life circumstances. If you live in Phoenix with a family of four, biking everywhere probably isn’t practical. So, when I share what I’m doing in my own life, I’m not judging anyone. Besides, what room do I have to judge? Because I’m too lazy to complain, I’ve been paying $45 a month for DSL the speed of dial-up. (Fixed last week!) I let too much food spoil. And Kris still digs my cans out of the garbage to put them in the recycling.

I’ve made many mistakes with money, and I’ll continue to make them. I often choose the sub-optimal financial path. But I’ve gradually reduced my mistakes, and I’m slowly learning to try new things — even when I don’t think they’re going to work. As a result, I’ve discovered new ways to save and, more importantly, new ways to make my life more fulfilling.

  • I can’t bike everywhere, nor do I want to. But I can bike some places, and I can walk to others. Turns out I enjoy the process; that it saves me money is just a bonus.

 

  • I’m not willing to live with only 100 things, but I can certainly live with less. So, I conduct experiments like my one-year wardrobe project, and I purge books from my library.

 

These are ways I choose to save. Others have different methods. That’s one reason it’s fun to host reader stories. They let me learn how other people practice thrift in ways that I might not expect. But I don’t feel judged when I read that someone builds her own furniture or sews his own clothes. I admire the ingenuity and file away the idea for possible use in the future.

I do my best in my own life, so I try not to worry about what other people think. In a way, the fear of being judged is the flip side of keeping up with the Joneses. It’s another form of comparing yourselves to others. Down both paths awaits the same destination: unhappiness.

Do what works for you

When you read what other folks do to save money, don’t feel judged. In real life, listen to what others are thinking or saying, but don’t let their notions bring you down. They’re not you. They aren’t living your life. They have their own strengths and weaknesses, just as you have yours. Make the most of what you have. Do what works for you. Instead of comparing yourself to others, compare your Present Self to your Past Self. Your goal is to constantly improve your own life, if only in little ways.

When I post a tip or technique at Get Rich Slowly, I’m not saying you’re a financial failure if you don’t follow it. I’m simply trying to share ideas that have worked for others, or ideas that have worked for me. Apply the ideas to your own life in your own way. Or don’t. Take what you want and leave the all the rest behind.

It’s easy to become your own biggest critic, especially when you think others are doing better than you are. Don’t do that. Don’t beat yourself up for what you’re not doing. Don’t think that everyone around you is living with a net carbon deficit, reading 400 books a year, helping to end world hunger, and clipping coupons to buy the ingredients needed to make phyllo dough from scratch. Because they’re not. We’re all muddling our way toward frugality.

Instead of criticizing yourself, notice what you’re doing right. Be your own personal fan club. Choose your values and follow them as best you can. Keep growing, learning, and stretching. Live well by living wisely. Be nice to yourself. And remember that it does not matter what other people think.

More about...Psychology

Become A Money Boss And Join 15,000 Others

Subscribe to the GRS Insider (FREE) and we’ll give you a copy of the Money Boss Manifesto (also FREE)

Yes! Sign up and get your free gift
Become A Money Boss And Join 15,000 Others

There are 181 comments to "What Do You Care What Other People Think?".

  1. LifeAndMyFinances says 28 June 2011 at 04:06

    I don’t agree with the points made by the non-bike enthusiasts. We can all choose to ride a bike rather than drive our car.

    You might say, “but I live in the country and everything is 20 miles away!” Well, that was your choice. By making the choice of where to live, you (at the same time) made the choice not to bike.

    My wife and I are making a move into the city and I am ecstatic! I can’t wait to bike everywhere! Not only will it be better for the environment, I will also save a ton of money in gas! 🙂

    • leslie says 28 June 2011 at 04:24

      That isn’t really a fair statement. There are hundreds of different reasons why people choose to live where they do and for a large number of people the ability to bike everywhere doesn’t even begin to enter the decision process for a variety of reasons. I would love to bike more places but at the stage of life I am currently in, that is just not practical or even close to a top ten priority.

      This kind of comment is exactly why people for whom biking everywhere does not fit in their life feel judged. Yes…I could have made other decisions to make is more practical and in a perfect world I would love to be less dependent on my car. Future me likely will be able to make those choices. But for now please understand that your choice is not the only option or even always the best one.

      • Rosa says 28 June 2011 at 08:28

        But it’s still a choice. We all make choices. It’s the pretending to be powerless that’s frustrating.

        I don’t say to people “I can’t come to your event because the interstate is IMPOSSIBLE to drive on at that time of day and the air quality inside the car is too bad for my precious child!” I say, “I’m sorry to miss it, but I really hate driving out there.” People routinely say to me that they can’t go places that are more bike/bus accessible because they just can’t possibly get therel, can’t afford parking, etc. Own the choice, take responsibility for what you do, don’t pretend it’s just out of your hands.

        • Stefanie says 28 June 2011 at 14:57

          Sometimes it really is not a choice.

          Physical and mental disabilities, financial status, and the ability to buy, own, store, and take care of a bike that is suitable for riding on one’s own or with children are just a few “non-choice” reasons why this might not be possible.

        • Rosa says 28 June 2011 at 17:20

          So is taking care of elderly relatives, which someone else pointed out.

          But I was addressing the many, many people who are only talking about where they live and where they work, and the infrastructure in between. Which are all changeable.

        • phoenix says 28 June 2011 at 19:08

          I don’t understand your argument that using the words “I can’t . . .” means that I am not “owning” my decision. If I’m invited to a party but have another commitment, I’ll say, “I can’t come because I have another commitment.” Sure, it’s a choice and I owned the choice. I could have cancelled on the first engagement, but made the choice not to. If somebody declines to meet me at a pool because she can’t swim, I don’t think she’s not owning the decision.

          If somebody said they couldn’t go somewhere because they could not afford parking, how have they not owned the choice? Or are you wanting a person to instead state some sort of specific wording like, “I will not meet you at x because it has a high parking fee and meeting you there is not worth spending that amount of money”?

          It feels we all get caught up in games of semantics because people phrase things differently or because they attempt to state things diplomatically.

      • kate says 28 June 2011 at 09:27

        Cycling isn’t practical for everyone on every trip, but usually when I hear someone say “I can’t” it usually means “I haven’t tried”. Just give cycling a try on a few small trips–to your mom’s house, to your friend’s house 5 blocks away, to the grocery, etc. You dont have to give up driving, but maybe you will find it is fun, you like it, and you can do it more often. Or, even better, you can find a group who bike for transportation, like a bike pool, and you can get a few places as a team.

        And then, you can feel judged by all the drivers out there who have plenty in their heads when they see cyclists on the roads. It goes both ways.

        Try it before you say you can’t!

        • Paularado says 28 June 2011 at 10:58

          To those of you who say that we all should just try it….you really have no concept of how other people live. Do you really think that everyone is just like you?

          The nearest grocery store is 25 miles from my house. There’s a whole wide world out there called RURAL AMERICA. Maybe you’ve heard of it but didn’t think that people actually lived there. Well, I assure you, we do.

        • Betsy says 28 June 2011 at 13:34

          But how many people live in “rural America” because they have to … because they make a living doing something connected to the rural economy?

          Maybe you are a farmer, a sawmill operator, an equipment repair person, a large-animal vet, or a forest manager.

          But probably 90% of people “living in the countryside” commute to a job in a TOWN. And it’s totally a personal choice to live in the country if that is the case.

        • khadijah says 28 June 2011 at 16:33

          Who says that choosing to live in the city rather than the rural areas is better for the environment?

          Flocking to the metropolitan cities adds to congestion and strains the ecosystem in other ways such as energy and land demands. Therefore using a bike is just a way to offset those demands. Its not to be better than using a car in rural areas.

          Sure its a choice. But I can’t judge a fat person because I think being small, slim and fit is more efficient, uses less energy, has smaller carbon footprint, and is both economically and environmentally friendlier. I can’t just tell everyone to be small, slim and fit because I think my idea is correct and superior to other people. that, is the biggest mistake, is to say that your idea is superior… like JD said, do what works for you.

        • barnetto says 28 June 2011 at 16:57
        • Katelyn says 29 June 2011 at 09:10

          I understand that biking everywhere does not work for everyone. However, I haven’t seen a comment yet on combining bike and bus. In Seattle all the public buses are equipped with 3 bike racks (I rarely see more than one rack in use at a time). So, even if you live really far away from work, grocery store, etc. if you can ride to a bus stop, you can get to where you are going without a car. Again, perhaps your area doesn’t have adequate public transit. Maybe your buses or trains aren’t bike compatible. Maybe you just like sitting in a car on your morning commute. I’m not judging, just offering a suggestion.

    • Jenny says 28 June 2011 at 04:58

      Well some people can’t find a job close enough to were they live that will let them walk or bike. Some people work weird shifts where even if they could bike it would be in the dark (which does make some people nervous.) Maybe someone would like to move but they can’t sell their house. And I say this all as someone who moved 200+ miles away to a bigger city with good public transit so I could get rid of my car and walk/bike/bus every where. (Though in all honesty I really wanted to move to the big city and the desire to get rid of my car did guide my job search/apartment hunt.) Not everyone can make the same choices you did. And not everyone should.

    • phoenix says 28 June 2011 at 05:17

      So how do I transport my children to their schools and activities on a bike? And get groceries for a week on a bike? And what about people with health issues? But for me, my mind was made up when I was at the scene of a bike fatality. Those graphic images will never leave my mind.

      But what I find most ironic in a post about people learning to use this site without getting defensive over suggestions is that you tell anybody that they SHOULD be exactly like you–in a post that has the exact opposite POV

      • Matt B. says 28 June 2011 at 06:50

        To phoenix (#9): These are questions my wife and I struggled with for a couple of years, until we decided to modify her bicycle with a “long-bike” extension that can hold our two kids, plus a week’s worth of groceries in the saddlebags. We don’t use it as much as we would like (we also have a car and sometimes that seems so much more convenient, especially in the cold Chicago winters – baby steps!), but it has kept us from having to buy and maintain a second car, which is a huge financial bonus.
        As for the bike fatality, remember that over 40,000 people die in car accidents in the U.S. every year.
        Like J.D. said, I don’t judge anyone who makes different choices, but I love reading stories about people who are trying new things. Even if I choose not to follow them, I’m still inspired to find my own way to improve my family’s quality of life. Take care.

        • E. Murphy says 28 June 2011 at 09:22

          1. I can’t begin to imagine riding in traffic with two little children on the back of my bike.

          2. What will you do when they’re too heavy for her to haul around that way?

        • Julia says 28 June 2011 at 10:09

          To E. Murphy,

          When children grow too big for bike trailers, they can sit on a trail-a-bike bike extension, or a tandem or… very quickly they can ride their own bike, too! There are so many options out there.

          I am hearing a lot of “I can’t”-s and reasons why something may not be possible or feasible. We don’t get very far in life or as a society when everyone takes that attitude. What is feasible? Walking to the drugstore to pick up medications? (I did that this morning.) Taking the bus to work, and riding your bike home? (My husband is doing that today.)

          There are so many possibilities out there. Ask yourself what you could do. Ask others how you can do it, if you hit obstacles.

        • Coley says 28 June 2011 at 17:53

          You need to compare bike fatalities to auto fatalities as a function of passenger-miles traveled. Far more people drive far more miles in cars, therefore, there are more car fatalities. That doesn’t mean that cars are more dangerous.

          Very few people died last year riding unicycles down the interstate–that doesn’t make it a safe thing to do

        • Saskia says 29 June 2011 at 01:47

          I even had 3 little children on my bike, a baby in front and a 2 and 3 year old on the back of my bike, in special made seats. In my country (Western Europe)a lot of children go to school by bike, so when they’re 4 of 5 years old, they have their own bike. Because it’s so common here, car drivers are used to it and are extra careful. We also have a lot of bicycle paths.

        • barnetto says 29 June 2011 at 06:24

          I’m not going to go searching for the bike fatality numbers, seen them before, didn’t phase me. Somewhere, per mile, of 3-10x as high as for cars (but I think including children? I imagine car fatalities would be a lot higher if we let children drive). And if you look at per trip instead of per mile, the odds of dying on a bike vs by driving are lower.

          The thing is, if I don’t give a second thought to jumping in my car and driving <6 miles a way (to the grocery store, library, pool, work) what does it mean to say that an activity is 5x as dangerous? Its nothing to me when I have approximately zero anticipation of dying in that <6 mile distance.

          As humans we are horrible at estimating risk. Guns vs swimming pools, which is more dangerous if you have a child?

      • Canadian says 28 June 2011 at 07:24

        People in Europe don’t shop once a week, they shop more frequently and only buy small amounts. This is what I do.

        In my city most supermarkets offer delivery for a few dollars. I take advantage of this about once a month to stock up on heavy or bulky items. When my parents lived in a city without this practice, my mother took her groceries home by taxi once a week. Much cheaper than owning a car.

        Kids do not need to be carted around to various activities. They can learn to be self-reliant. They can entertain themselves. They can draw. They can read. They can explore. Have you heard about “free-range kids”?

        Getting to school can be done by bicycle. Or on foot. If safety is a concern, there is the “walking school bus” concept.

        There wouldn’t be bike fatalities if there were no cars. And plenty of car drivers/passengers die in crashes too — far more than cyclists.

        There is such a thing as car sharing too (Zipcar and similar programs) which can be useful for those exceptional times when you need a car.

        • E. Murphy says 28 June 2011 at 09:18

          And some people chose not to limit their childrens to only home based activities. How about music lessons, sports, museum trips?

          Lots of schools are not within walking distance these days.

      • barnetto says 28 June 2011 at 07:33

        Number of bike fatalities I’ve personally seen: 0
        Number of car fatalities I’ve personally seen: At least 3, more than likely more (but only three confirm-able since I saw a news story about it the next day).
        Number of people I did not witness but personally know who have been killed while bicycling: 0.
        Number of people I did not witness but personally know who have been killed while driving: 4

        Your reason not to bike is based on emotion. I am not going to stop driving because I’ve seen or know so many people who have been killed while driving. I am not going to base my transportation decisions on gruesomeness or emotion.

        I think LifeandmyFinances put things in an inflammatory manner. Here’s how I would put things:

        When people say “I can’t bike because of reason X” (where X is something like living 50 miles from work) what I hear is equivalent to someone complaining, “I can’t get a job as a teacher because I never went to school.”

        Well, why don’t you go to school now? (ie, why don’t you move closer to your work, kid’s school, grocery store, etc)

        Because I like all the free time I have right now. (ie, because I like my large house and big yard and I don’t want to uproot the kids from their friends and school).

        When people write into a bike discussion to say they can’t ride their bike because they live 50miles away from work, I really have to wonder why they’re bothering to tell the rest of us that. I seriously don’t know what people are looking for. Are they looking for me to tell them, “hey, living 50miles away sounds perfect for me too! Then I wouldn’t have to ride my bike to work.”?

        • Shane says 28 June 2011 at 08:36

          I completely understand what you are trying to say, but this is something that not every person can be fit into the same mold.

          For me, I live about 17 miles from my job, which is in the city. I could live in the city so I could commute by walking or the transit system, but my cost of living would actually double, due to the costs of renting or buying in the area. Instead, I own a modest rancher with my mortgage, taxes, and insurance all equaling less than most people’s rent in the suburban area, let alone the city. I also own a 97 Saturn SL which still gets 35 mpg, and commute to work with my girlfriend.

          I would love to ride my bike to work. I have even considered riding it the 17 mile stretch, except for the fact that I can’t ride it on highways, and an alternate route would be much longer, and my girlfriend wouldn’t be able to make the trip.

          It might seem like a clear cut decision for you, but the city environment makes me miserable, and I would be losing about $500 a month to give up my car and move there for the single reason of commuting.

          I would enjoy riding my bike to work, but the cost/benefit of taking the steps to do it isn’t worth it. I do however bike or run wherever I can to not use the car. So please don’t judge us “non bike riders”, because we don’t all fit into your stereotype.

        • barnetto says 28 June 2011 at 08:40

          Shane, who are you replying to? I can see its right under one of my comments, but I can’t see how it relates to anything I said. I assume you’re replying to someone else.

        • Rosa says 28 June 2011 at 08:41

          People are really irrationally convinced that cars are safe. Even just look at the last article – how many people said to JD “Be safe! Don’t read and walk!” but not one person said to Tyler “Be careful! If you’re driving 60 miles at a time and zoning out with the fancy radio and looking at scenery, you could get in an accident! Safety first!”

          As if WALKING were less safe than driving. Come on. JD might walk into a pole but he’s not going to kill himself or anybody else.

          (and weather. Biking on ice is a pain but driving on ice kills people on a pretty regular basis.)

        • Michael says 28 June 2011 at 09:00

          There are more boat wrecks than car crashes at the lake. Is boating more dangerous than driving?

          Anecdote is still not the plural of data.

        • phoenix says 28 June 2011 at 10:48

          I’ve actually been at the scene of 3 bike fatalities, but I count only 1 because in that one, I stopped to help the man from bleeding to death on a hot summer day. Some towns have bike lanes and have lots of bicyclists, and some are not.

          However, for me, its not just an emotional response (although that is one aspect), but also a logical decision. I understand that numerous people die in cars, but in the fatality I witnessed, if the person who caused the accident had bumped into another car (as opposed to a bike), it barely would have been a fender bender, if that. The car was an average car so it likely weighed 4000 pounds, and traveled the speed limit (50 mph), as opposed to a 30 pound bike with an average man on it.

          In a car, the occupants are protected by a steel frame, which in many cases in engineered so any force of a crash will be absorbed by the car itself and portions of the car will actually crumple. In addition, the occupants have 3-point seat belts and air bags/air curtains. Even the steering wheel will collapse. Cars are tested for safety by the NHTSA. Even then, with all those safety features, people die in car accidents.

          As opposed to that, a biker has a helmet but it really doesn’t provide much protection when hit with a traveling car. The person absorbs most of the impact. A helmet is a necessity, but the more significant the impact, the less likely that the helmet can protect the rider.

        • Megan E. says 29 June 2011 at 11:43

          It’s not a black and white issue. I live 30 miles from work. My husband lives 16 miles – in the other direction! We live where we do because it’s inexpensive housing and a (somewhat) fair commute for us both.

          We *could* bike – sure, but the extra time cost, food cost, clothing cost, bike maintenance cost, etc would add up as well. Biking is NOT a free activity.

          What I do is take the bus most days – this increases my commute from 45 minutes each way to 90 minutes each way. That’s a whole extra hour I can’t spend with my husband, I can’t spend doing chores, I can’t spend at work, etc. So yes, I do see that there are some choices, but you have to weigh the cost of them all. And sometimes the choices are taken away even more – I have a severe hearing loss so chances of me hearing a car behind me is slim to none. I have friends that are blind, chances of them being able to bike that far are slim to none. I have a bad knee, that much biking would probably put me into traction.

          So please, to you and everyone else, stop making it a black and white issue. While everyone should think about ways to improve the environment, their wallet, and their health, the same choice is not right for everyone.

        • barnetto says 29 June 2011 at 12:25

          …I’m not make biking a black and white issue. I’ve written enough in comments on the various posts that that fact will be obvious to anyone who wastes their time to go back and read everything through.

          I am black and white on people presenting what is their choice as an insurmountable obstacle. If the solution is to change a choice, but the person chooses not to, then it isn’t that they can’t ride their bike but that they won’t. The difference is between can’t and won’t. I have nothing to say to won’ts.

          Okay, I do have something to say to won’ts. OWN your decision. If its something to be proud of, maybe in your/Megan’s case it is that you and your husband are both in jobs you love and you get to see the love of your life everyday at your house 16 and 30 miles respectively from work, then be proud of it. Instead people come in with their won’ts and make them sound like can’ts. They piss off the pedal pushers because they don’t seem to listen/understand and the pedal pushers piss them off because we don’t understand that people complaining about an inability to bike don’t actually want to change their choices. They end up feeling judged when we don’t externally validate the tiny portion of their lives their comment reveals.

      • Paularado says 28 June 2011 at 10:48

        Phoenix,

        I too arrived on the scene just after a cyclist was killed by a drunk driver in the middle of the afternoon. I’ll never feel safe riding on the road again.

        • Rosa says 28 June 2011 at 10:57

          But you’re fine with driving on the roads with these people? That is the part I don’t get.

    • Suzanne says 28 June 2011 at 05:19

      Not to mention that weather can make biking dangerous at times in all but the mildest of climates.

    • Anne says 28 June 2011 at 05:41

      I love city life. I love being able to walk to nearby shops and buy what we need or want. I often walk and take public transit by choice, since we do own a car.

      Walking is even CHEAPER than biking.

      But I have to say – who will grow your food if everyone lived in cities? At the very least farmers would need cars to get out to the fields every day. There’s a certain diversity to modern American life. And I’m glad that some people live rurally and that I don’t have to. But someone who was born and raised rurally might not feel it is much of a choice. It is just their life. I never once considered moving to the country, why should I assume that someone raised there should necessarily consider city life.

      And I have great sympathy and respect for anyone finding themselves pinched by rising prices. I am pinched too. Except gas isn’t a big deal for us because we can easily cut back on our gas expenses when we need. But it might be a big problem for someone else who needs gas to run their business and home.

      I hope they can find ways to reduce that expense that make sense for their lives.

      • Rosa says 28 June 2011 at 09:06

        It’s not farmers who are driving 60 miles to work each way, though.

        And in my experience, farmers are the most careful about gas use of anyone, because they are used to thinking about input costs.

    • Elizabeth says 28 June 2011 at 05:53

      I too was going to cry foul on that comment, but I can see the point. Cycling year round hasn’t been practical for me (due to climate and health reasons), but I when I was a student I chose where to live based on being able to walk to destinations or have easy access to public transportation — a big money saver as I couldn’t afford a car.

      I do have a car now, but I’m mindful of my fuel consumption and prefer to use my feet as much as possible. I don’t imagine that makes me any better or worse than anyone else. It just works for me.

    • Becka says 28 June 2011 at 07:50

      As a cyclist, allow me to say:

      This is an utterly judgmental comment.

    • Chris P. says 28 June 2011 at 08:48

      You seem like the type of biker that I wouldn’t hate hitting on accident (if it weren’t for all the paperwork). You also make me feel better about myself. Most likely, if you’re living at the extreme, you’re crazy.

      • barnetto says 28 June 2011 at 08:53

        “Henceforth, unduly nasty comments on readers stories will be removed or edited.”

        Not even remotely called for.

      • kate says 28 June 2011 at 09:30

        oh good, some non-judgemental advocating for violence. seems like we have already forgotten that people getting around in vehicles different from ours are HUMANS and could be your neighbors, daughters, doctors, priests, etc. Keep that in mind, y’all

      • jlg3rd says 28 June 2011 at 12:43

        You probably can’t even ride a bike, let alone squeeze into your car!

      • Betsy says 28 June 2011 at 13:38

        That’s sick. I hope your car falls off a cliff, but that you don’t get hurt.

    • El Nerdo says 28 June 2011 at 09:09

      @Life & etc:

      Every decision has a myriad consequences, some intended and some unintended, so our choices are not really binary when you take into account their repercussions.

      The only way to make biking 100% possible is if you make that your first priority in life, and It’s rather idiotic to assume that everyone is going to do that. Usually people will make choices based on their career, family, etc., and if the bicycle fits, you have the choice, but if it doesn’t, it doesn’t.

      Also, it wold be hilarious if you got run over by a delivery truck due to inexperience with city traffic.

      • Chris P. says 28 June 2011 at 09:49

        I’m glad I’m not the only one who thinks so.

      • jlg3rd says 28 June 2011 at 12:45

        or you get nailed by an train while texting.

    • Gerard says 28 June 2011 at 10:06

      We CANNOT all choose to bike everywhere. Try biking in LA in the summer, or in Vegas in the summer. Or in Detroit in the winter.

      And that is without considering the snide that we can alle choose where we live. Yeah right, because jobs are available once we move somewhere.

      • Abby B says 28 June 2011 at 13:52

        I bike to and from school every day and it’s summer in Saudi Arabia so I’d say that’s at least as hot as LA or Las Vegas. For the average healthy person, this isn’t unreasonable. Granted it’s nowhere near as nice and comfortable as an air-conditioned vehicle, but “can choose” and “want to choose” are different. It’s ok if you don’t want to ride, but that doesn’t mean you can’t.

    • Craig says 28 June 2011 at 10:22

      I don’t have a choice at the moment. Missing the whole point of the article OP.

    • Ely says 28 June 2011 at 10:27

      Really not the point of this article. He should have added, do what works for you, and don’t judge others for doing what works for them!!

      • chacha1 says 28 June 2011 at 12:30

        Exactly.

        Do what works for you.

        If what someone else is doing wouldn’t work for you, shrug it off.

        Don’t start in with defensive “well I can’t do that because.” It doesn’t accomplish anything except make the commenter sound like a whiner.

        And if what you are doing works really *well* for you, don’t start in with “everyone else should at least TRY it.” It also doesn’t accomplish anything except put other people on the defensive!

        What J.D. was saying, and what so many are STILL missing, is STOP JUDGING.

        Stop judging YOURSELVES for not being in a position to try every frugal fix, and stop judging EVERYONE ELSE who does things a little bit differently from you.

        • jlg3rd says 28 June 2011 at 12:48

          well said chacha1, most people on this forum making snide remarks probably don’t even own a bike.

        • barnetto says 28 June 2011 at 12:50

          This!

        • Evangeline says 29 June 2011 at 04:26

          Well said, chacha1. If we just took the time spent on picking everyone (including ourselves) apart and put it to better use, we’d all see some improvement in our quality of lives. It’s all about choices and how we move through our own lives with the decisions we’ve made

    • Paularado says 28 June 2011 at 11:04

      Dear “Life and my Fiances”

      You are right. People do make choices about where they live. So, what about you? Obviously you’ve made the right ones and we should all follow suit. But wait, what about your house? Mine is passive solar made with renewable materials such as cork floors and walls constructed of logs killed by pine beetles. Oh, yours isn’t? What? You don’t have enough sun where you live? Well, that was your choice to live there. You should relocate.

    • Amanda says 28 June 2011 at 11:56

      Statements that include all or nothing are generally incorrect. I feel judged by this statement and I biked to work, when I worked.

      *disability
      *extreme weather
      *family

      are likely just a few reasons why some people would not find biking useful.

      I would also say that when determining where to choose a home (sometimes in a state/city/town where they grew up) MOST individuals don’t have “great biking distance” on their list of pros & cons. It’s not exactly something most real estate agents are pointing out!

    • LifeAndMyFinances says 28 June 2011 at 13:52

      Wow! I didn’t know my comment would strike such a debate, or prompt others to hope that I get run over by a delivery truck…. (didn’t appreciate that by the way).

      All I meant was, yes, it may not be practical for you to ride your bike into work or to the market because you live far away. You might have a great reason to live where you do, but don’t blow off the article on biking just because you live in the pucks.

      Biking is a great idea and should be considered even if you aren’t using it for a grocery run or to ride to your friend’s house; rather, just take your bike out for some good exercise! Country roads are great for that!

      • El Nerdo says 28 June 2011 at 14:53

        Don’t worry, I don’t have the power to hex people, and I don’t wish you death, it’s just that the mental image was a good comedic counterpoint to your narcissistic sanctimony. “Oh, what a wonderful boy I am, I’m going to the city and I’m going to bike”. Cue delivery truck banana peel…

      • imelda says 28 June 2011 at 20:43

        Well, your comment went completely against the spirit of JD’s post. Why are you surprised?

        As soon as I read your comment I was like, wow, total reading comprehension!fail. And then I saw the ridiculous discussion below and…. Well. You can see my capslock frustration below.

    • imelda says 28 June 2011 at 20:38

      I CAN’T BELIEVE THIS THREAD!!!

      For pity’s sake, people, STOP JUDGING. Everyone is not like you. Some people are out of shape. Some people live in the country. Some people like driving. Some people don’t know how to ride a bike. Some people have busy mornings and don’t have time to bike. Some people drop their kids off on the way to work. Some people live really far from their offices/shopping options/etc.

      THERE ARE A MILLION REASONS WHY PEOPLE DON’T BIKE. ARGUING WHETHER IT’S A CHOICE OR AN IMPOSSIBILITY IS PEDANTIC. JUST STOP.

      …Please???

      I guarantee you that every one of these people is more green and/or economical than you in some way. I guarantee there’s something you do that’s not good for the environment/ not the smartest financial move. How would you feel if people constantly tried to argue you out of one of your comforts whenever you opened your mouth?

      My god. And just as a disclaimer? I live in a small town in Japan, where it’s really convenient to bike everywhere. I’m young, and fit, and single. So I bike places. I would NEVER assume that everyone else in this town – the elderly, busy parents, working folks who take the train for 2 hours each way – should do the same thing. Jeez louise.

    • Courtney Jones Media says 30 June 2011 at 09:29

      Such a great post ever i seen. I agree with you “lifeandmyfinances” .

      I am on my own, and i know what i am, what i can do. I always listen to my intuition, my heart. We all should be.

  2. STRONGside says 28 June 2011 at 04:56

    When i see a post like the one yesterday it is very easy for me to go off on a tangent. I easily slip into the mindset of ” well should I be doing that? or how could I do that?” I think it is important to always question the things that I do and the choices I make, but at some point you have to remember that you have to do what is best for you. Like JD said, nobody is perfect, and if we all followed a strict set of standard rules and lived little cookie cutter lives, we would all be miserable. There are many roads to frugality, prosperity, success, (whatever your goal is) and we need to remember to enjoy that road, and do what works for you.

  3. Jane says 28 June 2011 at 04:58

    Point taken. Just because someone makes different decisions than you doesn’t mean that they are judging you for not making the same one. But sometimes they are! And readers can pick up on that. I didn’t read the biking story yesterday, so I can’t speak to that. But the DIY wedding story over the week-end stated explicitly that doing things yourself makes your wedding more meaningful and memorable. That is the language she used. This more than implies that people who make a different choice are being judged in some respect. Here’s a direct quote from the article: “But I’ve attended a lot of formulaic weddings, and despite the large sums of money thrown at them; they’ve been utterly forgettable.” How can you say this is entirely free of judgment?

    Look, we all want to think we don’t judge, but the reality is that we do. That’s okay. A world without judgment would be a pretty rudderless place. But it’s also okay for a reader to get on the defensive or to respond with a critique in their comment. I wouldn’t want them to internalize it and let it affect how they feel about themselves, but I would hate for your post today to shut down or discourage readers who disagree with the writer to express their opinions.

    • J.D. says 28 June 2011 at 05:24

      Good points, Jane.

      Obviously, GRS isn’t entirely free of judgment. And you’re right: A world without judgment would be pretty chaotic. My point is that we need to do judge less and worry about ourselves more. And, on the flipside, that we need to stop worrying what other people think. This is tough, of course. I still worry sometimes about revealing how I use my money, even when I’m doing my best. “Ohmygosh. J.D. still uses ING Direct? Doesn’t he know that Capital One bought them out?” And so on. But, in the end, I’m doing my best for myself using the knowledge and skills I have, and that’s what matters most, right?

      • julia says 28 June 2011 at 15:39

        Completely off the subject of the post but I do wonder how JD feels about Capital One buying ING.

        • J.D. says 28 June 2011 at 16:53

          I have no real opinion. Yet. I like ING Direct, and I don’t want to see their service change. Maybe it won’t. Maybe it will. But I know many readers are concerned (they’ve e-mailed me about it), so I did new savings account research last Sunday. Look for the post on Friday.

  4. Kestra says 28 June 2011 at 04:59

    Good reminder. I think for almost everyone avoiding comparing yourself to others and not worrying about judgment is next to impossible. Even if lots of things don’t bother you, there is always that particularly sensitive issue. And the issue doesn’t always make sense.

    For example, I’ve recently decided to learn how to wear a bit of make-up (I’m 34). For a “normal” person, it’s the not wearing make-up that is stressful and prone to judgment. But for me, being a staunch avoider of make-up my entire life, I’m embarrassed to admit to my coworkers that I want to learn. It’s a perfectly normal thing but it’s one of my sensitive areas. Silly, but the truth.

    • slccom says 28 June 2011 at 15:45

      Many women who don’t like makeup have a condition called “faceblindness,” or prosopagnosia. You may want to look them up and see if you are one of us.

      I hated makeup and fancy hair styles because I literally didn’t recognize myself. I once cut my hair from down to my shoulder blades to about 3 inches long, and I didn’t recognize myself in the mirror for 6 weeks.

      • Kestra says 28 June 2011 at 17:07

        Interesting. I do have some degree of this, I believe. It takes me a long time to recognize people and it’s hard to tell two people apart until I’ve seen them for quite a long time if general features are similar.

        But that’s not really the reason I don’t wear make-up. I just never have ever and see no reason to start. It just makes me feel unauthentic.

  5. Bipp says 28 June 2011 at 05:00

    Great response to yesterday’s comments, JD.

    People will find themselves in a huge spectrum of current life arrangements. It is a question of values and what parts of your life you are willing to sacrifice to enhance other parts. For me I very actively chose a minimal-commute lifestyle, which allows for a nearly car-less existence (and the cost savings associated with it).

    Other people may really really want a house in the woods with lots of land. That is a priority for them, and I can see the draw.

    I do question, however, when people comment that they “CAN’T” do this or that, as far as organizing their life. It is almost always that they have (consciously, or unconsciously) chosen to optimize for some other set of criteria. They have other priorities, and that is fine, but modulo some relatively rare medical conditions, almost any life change is possible. It may be extremely challenging and therefore not a change someone is willing to pursue, but it is not impossible!

    • Nancy L. says 28 June 2011 at 07:05

      As Courtney said yesterday, this argument starts getting into semantics. When one side of a decision is so negative that it becomes foolhardy to pursue it, it may technically still be a choice, but outside of purposely choosing to pursue a negative outcome, the “choice” is little more than a formality. So you are correct in arguing that the person still has a “choice” but the other person is also correct in saying that a particular option was (essentially) impossible to pursue given the specific situation.

      • Rosa says 28 June 2011 at 08:34

        So why mention it? If it’s such a no-brainer for your life, why read the article/post a comment? If the people who hate bikes stayed off the bike articles (and the people who won’t consider couponing stayed off the coupon articles, etc) then it wouldn’t be an issue.

        • Nancy L. says 28 June 2011 at 09:00

          Well personally, I don’t, lol. But I suspect some people do out of the process of having a dialogue to see if maybe they’ve missed something. Using the bike example (although from a previous post’s responses), some people suggested driving partway and biking from that point as a compromise. That is a solution that wouldn’t provide the full benefit, but would provide *some* benefits and could be adopted by people in situations where they can’t bike the full distance. I also suspect that some people are bothered when a post makes something sound as easy as pie, and want to point out that it’s not always that simple for others.

      • Anne 2 says 28 June 2011 at 09:14

        Yes, exactly. My 86-year-old father with Alzheimers lives with me, and I also take care of a 97-year-old lady in my home. Neither can be left alone. So apart from starting a rickshaw service [for humor-challenged readers, this is a joke], there is no choice about how to go to town, even though it is only 3 miles away. Sure, I chose to take care of these people, but if one wishes to frame it terms of biking vs. caring for my elders …. it just becomes ridiculous.

        • Rosa says 28 June 2011 at 11:32

          I’m going to assume, since this is an easy and obvious choice for you, you’re not one of the people who feels guilty or attacked or whatever by the idea that many people could save money by biking, though.

        • Amanda says 28 June 2011 at 12:07

          LOL Anne, thanks for lightening up the discussion.

  6. Ru says 28 June 2011 at 05:13

    The flipside of this is that if you don’t want to be judged, you should stop judging other people.

    How many times do we see a comment along the lines of “my sister just had a baby and she WASTED $6000 on stuff she doesn’t even need for it!”. It’s her money, who are you to judge?

    I dislike obese people and I dislike people who don’t care about the environment, so I do tend to get a bit judgemental when people get all like “Walk to the store?! But it’s a mile away!!”. “Cook from scratch?! But it’s so difficult!”
    I’m trying to be less judgemental but all it leads to me is thinking mean thoughts like “well, enjoy being fat and poor then”

    Is it really wrong to be judgemental of people who are appallingly bad towards the planet? Everyone has to live here, you know…

    • J.D. says 28 June 2011 at 05:27

      One thing I try to do in these situations is to offer solutions. “Here’s how I learned to walk to the store. Here’s how I learned to cook from scratch.” Most of the time, the advice falls on deaf ears, but at least I tried, right?

      Is it wrong to be judgmental of people who are appallingly bad toward the planet? Maybe it’s not wrong to be judgmental so much as it is to act upon it. You’re holding them to your own standards, which may not be the standards they live by. You don’t want them holding you to their own standards, right? You don’t want them judging you by their own moral code.

      Instead, as I said above, I think it makes more sense to lead by example, and to persuade gently instead of with condemnation.

      • Martin says 28 June 2011 at 07:50

        Wasn’t it Gandhi who said you must be the change you want to see in the world? Thanks for this entry. I’m not sure, but I think it touches on a point that’s vexed me about self-help blogs in general. I wrote about it once on my blog (there’s a trackback to GRS back in March if you care to look), but I think I’ll need to revise a little based on this insight. Funny thing, I knew this. I knew that in the final analysis, it isn’t really about what you’ve done over and against others but rather what you’ve done to better yourself that matters. Yet it is so hard not to compare, particularly with blogs like this one that seem to be here to help. People show up looking for help or some sort of solution to an existing problem, and so the writings become a sort of blueprint for success. Then when they cannot do what’s suggested for whatever reason, it gets equated into personal failure. That’s a mistake, and I think I understand why. I need to hold that understanding in the forefront though. Subconsciously, it gets forgotten, and I’ll wind up depressed for not not meeting some idea of success that doesn’t even apply to me. Sorry for being long-winded. Thanks again for the post, and for all your work–I can see where this would sometimes be a thankless endeavour.

    • Suzanne says 28 June 2011 at 05:28

      Nevermind. JD responded.

    • phoenix says 28 June 2011 at 05:56

      Ru, it sounds like you’re saying people should not be judgmental unless they hold your same judgments and then it’s OK to be judgmental. I’m not sure why you’re so judgmental about people who are obese (they don’t necessarily have an impact on the planet, any more than anybody else).

      And from my personal experience, you have no idea as to that person’s journey. I am at the cusp of being obese, but I HATE to eat and rarely eat more than 1500 calories (usually closer to 1000-1200). I also do interval training 4 times a week for 35 minutes each. Yes, I know I should exercise more, but that’s what fits into my life. In looking back at myself in grade school and college, I was average weight, but at that time, I actually exercised 10 hours a day because I was on the swim team and we swam 2 hours a day 5 days a week. (Never really won much and was probably one of the bigger girls-a size 6-8 at the time.) Now that I have a desk job instead of an active job, I’ve moved up to a size 12.

      I have a lot of skinny friends who eat SO much more and don’t exercise at all, and yet, I hear so much judgments from people who think everybody who is overweight is that way because they don’t like to exercise and eat all the time, and that skinny people have healthier habbits. But that’s not always true. There are times I think it unfair that one of my skinny friends doesn’t have to worry about it at all, but the reality is that I have to learn to be happy with the choices I’ve made, which are healthy.

      • Tazz says 28 June 2011 at 06:34

        I am blessed to have inherited my dad’s “skinny genes” but at the same time, wish I had gotten some of my mom’s “plump genes”. I get a lot of comments from friends, colleagues and even strangers about how lucky I am to hv skinny genes, considering I do eat a lot and never had to worry about calories etc. I even worked at a donut store before, eating tons of donuts (they were free!) But didn’t really gain much weight.

        However, I do get hurtful comments (I look like a skeleton/famine victim/picky eater etc) just based on my thin frame. It hurts and I wish I can put on more weight because I eat a lot (6 times a day usually, consuming rice and meat for the most part) and the only exercise I do is the walking up and down the 3 story school building I work at.

        I guess my point is there’s always some other side(s) to a story. Just because I’m thin, doesn’t mean I am too watchful of what I eat (I’m not anorexi etc) but sadly some people had thougt that I was just based on how thin I am (about 100lbs.).

        As long as I am healthy (yearly healthy checkup at my doc’s) then all them other people can put their comments where the sun doesn’t shine for all I care 🙂

        To each his own. We do what makes us happy because at the end of the day, we are the ones who have to live with ourselves.

        • Shari says 28 June 2011 at 11:38

          The story of my life! It is amazing that people don’t think calling someone too skinny is an insult. I used to come home from school crying because people teased me, called me “bones”, a skeleton, freaky, whatever. (I was 5’4″ and 85 pounds). I COULD NOT gain weight. I had teachers following me into the bathroom after lunch to make sure I wasn’t throwing up, and digging my lunch bag out of the garbage to make sure I ate all my food. I didn’t mind the concern (my own son looks like that now, and I can’t say I’m not a little bit concerned) but I did mind the teasing. In college (by which time I was up to a whopping 95 pounds) a girl actually told me that I should start eating more because no guy would ever be attracted to me until I put on some weight. But my mother always told me that those weren’t insults because I should be happy to not be fat. ?????? Not insults???? Whenever you are telling someone they need to change because something about them isn’t right, that is an insult.

          Sadly, I don’t have that problem anymore! My metabolism has slowed down with age and childbearing, and now I have to watch what I eat….in fact last year I had to drop 20 pounds. Now I am quite comfortable at 114 pounds: enough to not look like a skeleton, but not overweight. Still, it is amazing how other people’s opinions color how you feel about yourself.

      • LauraElle says 28 June 2011 at 07:11

        Honey, you don’t have to justify your choices to some nitwit on the internet. You’re doing great by taking care of your body and health.

        • Vanessa says 28 June 2011 at 08:05

          “Honey, you don’t have to justify your choices to some nitwit on the internet.”

          I think this would’ve been a better title for this article 🙂

      • Ru says 28 June 2011 at 07:36

        Actually obese people DO have a bigger impact on the planet because they require more food to be grown which uses more land/water/chemical fertilisers. They are less likely to walk, more likely to drive. Use more cloth for their clothes. etc etc etc
        My main reason for disliking obese people is because my taxes pay for their healthcare. The NHS has to somehow fund bigger ambulances, bigger beds, find more consultants for their high risk pregnancies, find the money for gastric bypasses and so on. That’s not fair because my taxes for universal healthcare are supposed to stop children dying of leukaemia and patch up people in car accidents.

        I like what JD said about standards though, that’s actually helped me see things differently. When I hear someone condemning gay marriage or access to abortion I usually think “what a controlling bigot”. I guess most likely they would think exactly the same if they heard some of my opinions.

        • The Other Brian says 28 June 2011 at 08:11

          Unless you live in a 100% solar-powered cave and survive by eating only things you grow, you should really stop judging others “carbon footprint” now….

          There are about 5.5 billion people on this planet who could have a justifiable problem with YOUR (and mine as well) lifestyle.

        • mapster says 28 June 2011 at 11:02

          Wow! Just Wow. I don’t even know if I can find the words for this. You’ve got me fired up, but I will try to remain in the realm of “nice” instead of saying what I really want.

          I would like to present you with a case study:

          Me & my sister:

          Me: Couch potato for the most part aside from family walks or bike rides a couple times a week, eat whatever I want, whenever I want, Body type: Slim

          My sister: At the gym 4-5 times/week, watches what she eats, Body type: Obese. The clincher – A TUMOR on her pituitary gland that if it can’t be controlled by meds, will eventually require BRAIN SURGERY. But there are people like you out there who will judge based on her body size because, of course it MUST be all her fault that she has a tumor growing on the one tiny part of the brain that controls all hormones and brain interactions with her body. She wasn’t always big.

      • Rosa says 28 June 2011 at 08:32

        Try being a fat biker. You get it from all sides!

    • LauraElle says 28 June 2011 at 07:09

      I’m trying to be less judgemental but all it leads to me is thinking mean thoughts like “well, enjoy being fat and poor then”

      Wow, just wow. The above statement is the most obnoxious thing I’ve ever read on GRS.

      • Ru says 28 June 2011 at 07:40

        At least I’m honest about being a horrible person.

        If people make their own suffering, do they really deserve sympathy?

        • Naomi says 28 June 2011 at 08:50

          Just because you’re honest about being a bigot doesn’t make it right to be a bigot.

        • LauraElle says 28 June 2011 at 09:29

          Yes, a human being that hurts themselves deserves sympathy, even if they’ve done it to themselves. Sympathy is not enabling, sympathy is feeling compassion for someone suffering.

        • Jaime B says 28 June 2011 at 12:27

          Here’s the thing Ru … when you see a stranger on the street who is obese, you have no way of knowing their situation. Full stop.

          That is why it is better to be kind.

          For all you know, you’re looking at someone doing all the right things who has already lost 7 stone (~100lbs) but still has 7 stone to go to be at a healthy weight. You’ve just judged, and if you did it to their face, and possibly demoralized someone who has done a tremendous job becoming healthier.

          For all you know, they could be like mapster’s sister with a medical condition, or recovering from a debilitating car accident that prevented them from their regular exercise. Maybe they’re dependent, for medical reasons, on someone else to cook for them and that someone doesn’t cook healthy food?

          The point is that there are a million reasons why someone who looks obese may NOT be the resource drain you so obviously think they are. And yes, plenty of Us obese people are obese because of a poor diet and lack of exercise that are a direct result of our poor choices. But that’s still no reason to be rude or mean towards someone.

          As for resource use … when “healthy” weighted people stop getting sick, breaking bones, spraining joints, falling down stairs, getting beat up (or beating people up), getting cancer, getting hypertension, getting diabetes (yes, it happens), getting heart disease, getting genetic diseases, birth defects, having car accidents, ingesting poisons, snake bites, having babies, etc etc … then you can say that obese people use up too many resources. Cause I have news for you – healthy or unhealthy, we ALL use our various nations resources.

          Obesity from poor diet and lack of exercise is a serious problem, but it won’t go away by disliking fat people and berating them for their choices. Any more than people who’ve gotten themselves into massive consumer debt are helped by heaping condemnation on them for their poor, past choices. You have to encourage and help them to make better choices in the future to effect that change.

        • KS says 28 June 2011 at 13:18

          Fat people pay for accidents and illnesses incurred by skinny people too – I know a lot of skinny soda-drinking smokers.

          Wow is right. Enjoy your skinny, lonely, smug, angry life.

        • Susan D. says 28 June 2011 at 16:30

          Guess what–honesty isn’t an all-encompassing virtue.

      • Josh says 28 June 2011 at 08:55

        The truth is not always polite.

    • Amanda says 28 June 2011 at 12:14

      Ru, the $6000 on baby stuff example is exactly the same as your eating out/poor example. If someone is on food stamps and had been eating only fish from their freezer for 3 months before that and complaining about it, wouldn’t it be logical for them to quit spending money on things that aren’t necessities? What if you knew that this person also had $10,000 credit card debt and a car with over 100,000 miles that’s just about to die?

    • PawPrint says 29 June 2011 at 15:33

      And is it wrong to be judgemental about people who dislike people automatically because of their size rather than the person’s character or personality? In my book, that’s a huge character flaw so I say no.

  7. phoenix says 28 June 2011 at 05:35

    I generally take most of the suggestions on this site as a big brainstorming session. When you brainstorm with a group, everybody throws out tons of ideas–some will work, some won’t, some will work for only some.

    I think the problem comes in when judgments get thrown into the mix, even if they are subtle. I work outside the home and am a mom. I know many other moms who don’t work, and I’m not offended that they made different life choices, nor do I think negative of them because they have a difference choice. The fact that we make different choices doesn’t offend me. But as much as I wish it didn’t, it would bother me very much if somebody else thought I was a BAD mom because I work and have children.

    It’s not the fact that others make different choices, but the thought that others judge you negatively for something you are not doing or something you are doing. Sometimes, it can be simply be that another person uses the word “mistake” to describe a deliberate choice you’ve made. I think it’s easy to fall into a trap thinking our choices are the right ones. But the reality is, it’s just like the radio. Some people like pop, some like country music, some like talk. We need to focus on the individual self.

    For me personally, I used to be on a quest for perfection–thinking if I just make small steps twoard certain goals, I’d be “improving” myself. But the more I turn my gaze inward twoard myself, the more flaws I will always see. My goal now is to learn to love the journey–I’m changing constantly, but the goal isn’t to find a “better” me. I’m fine just as I am–and a part of me needs to constantly change in small incremental ways.

    • J.D. says 28 June 2011 at 05:49

      I love this!

      I generally take most of the suggestions on this site as a big brainstorming session. When you brainstorm with a group, everybody throws out tons of ideas—some will work, some won’t, some will work for only some.

      That’s how I think of it too: a giant brainstorming session. Thanks! 🙂

      • Brent says 28 June 2011 at 12:19

        Something I found interesting in a Public Relations course I am taking this summer is -brainstorming in the public relations world is allowing input from anyone but without critiquing the input as this can hinder the creative thought process.

        The critiquing process would take place at a different level.

        I thought that was interesting.

      • Jaime B says 28 June 2011 at 12:35

        At the beginning of Amy Dacyczyn’s Tightwad Gazettes, she makes a point to say that the purpose of the newsletters aren’t to tell you to do XYZ necessarily, it’s to get you thinking creatively. She wants people to challenge their status quo, to start examining all the little things they consider set in stone and realize they are more flexible than they knew.

  8. Erin says 28 June 2011 at 05:36

    If you feel judged by an article written on the internet, it’s probably because you feel guilty about some aspect of your own life. Everyone has their own opinion and if you are uncomfortable, it probably means you need to examine why the article/opinion makes you uncomfortable. People have judged me for things I’ve done, but I’m confident enough in most of my decisions that I don’t have to feel weird about what that person says to me. This is a problem with our society. There are so many different opinions and people aren’t confident and open-minded enough to listen to one another without getting offended.

    • Monique Rio says 28 June 2011 at 06:20

      This is exactly what I was thinking. Whenever you feel defensive, it usually means something’s not right in your life. That has certainly been the case for me. Other people judging you is not something you can control either. Better to practice not letting it bother you rather than trying to make it stop. You could actually succeed with the first one.

      Also the bikers and minimalists and DIY wedding people are judged too. Some people in my family think I endanger myself by biking, am cheap when I get excited about having avoided buying something unnecessary, and truly wish my wedding had been more conventional. No matter what you do you cannot escape judgement.

  9. Jean says 28 June 2011 at 05:43

    Man, I hate it when people tell me not to worry so much what other people think! It makes me feel all over-sensitive and thin-skinned, like I’m somehow not reading things right. I am such a failure. I hate this post.

    (One of my wiser friends once told me that I would worry far less about what others thought of me if I realised how seldom they did. Words to make one laugh and wince at the same time.)

    • J.D. says 28 June 2011 at 05:50

      Ha! 🙂

      I recently heard somebody say this: “In my twenties and thirties, I worried what other people thought about me. In my forties, I stopped caring what they thought. In my fifties, I realized they weren’t thinking about me at all!”

      • Crystal says 28 June 2011 at 06:59

        And the truly wise figure it out way before their fifties, lol.

      • jlg3rd says 28 June 2011 at 12:53

        exactly

    • fetu says 28 June 2011 at 18:48

      Yep. Everybody is too busy worrying about their own problems. I remember as a kid having to give a talk at church. I would be in a panic worrying about it. Then I figured out that I could hardly remember who talked last week and I did not care who it was and how they did it. So the congregation would not be worrying about me either.

  10. Michael says 28 June 2011 at 05:45

    The big lesson here is that you’re more likely to succeed if your goal is to reduce the severity of mistakes instead of eliminating them. Standing more while reading on the Internet vs. buying a standing desk, or eating smaller, higher quality portions vs. a crash diet for example.

    I’ve had more luck with tracks than targets, and the idea seems to be spreading. 🙂

    • Becka says 28 June 2011 at 07:55

      “reduce the severity of mistakes instead of eliminating them.”

      I really like this way of putting it. You put too much pressure on yourself when you try to be perfect; just try to be better.

  11. Jacq says 28 June 2011 at 06:03

    I think that whenever someone makes a strong statement, it would probably be ideal if they preceded it or ended it with the words *for me*. But the writing would sound kind of odd then so that’s not a very good solution.

    There’s another saying: “When you point a finger, take a look at your hand because there’s three fingers pointing back at you.”

    Your blog does a good job in not sounding judgmental of anyone’s chosen lifestyle – much better than TSD or ERE (to me). Lifestyle preferences are just that – preferences of that person. All we can do is be grateful we’re not married to them.

    However, I am horrified that you throw your cans out. I’d be grubbing in the garbage along with Kris. 😛

    • Cam says 29 June 2011 at 07:12

      Why not put in “for me” yourself if it’s not stated explicitly? Kinda like “in bed” with fortune cookies? Because really, who made the poster arbiter of how everything must be?

      Breathe, people. You don’t have to have other people protect you from your own thinking. “Well, if they said it this way, then I wouldn’t have to think this way so it’s their fault!”.

      • Jacq says 29 June 2011 at 13:12

        I’d rather just not drink the kool-aid that the preachers are serving.

  12. jackowick says 28 June 2011 at 06:07

    I’d like to see people not get so defensive and feel like they’re being accused of something by driving a car (that’s a 2 way street, no pun intended, for who’s responsible for making someone feel that way).

    With many “greener” initiatives, it’s important to remember the intent and opportunity is better than nothing. I was at the beach last weekend with my girlfriend and we rode our bikes all weekend due to the proximity of locations of interest. It was great to know that for 2 days, the car didn’t move or use gas. During the week, I live too far from work and “local” stores to bike, but I had the chance. I may drive 363 days this year, but if everyone finds 2 days (or more) of the year to use alternative transport, it adds up.

    I bring a mug to work; I still sometimes use paper cups in the kitchen because I’m “lazy”, but it’s better to know I’ve cut my waste more or less in half than none at all.

    So people, don’t feel guilty.

    And don’t make others feel guilty either.

    • Michael says 28 June 2011 at 06:30

      The underrated alternative to making a huge lifestyle shift is switching to an older car that did its production-based damage to the environment long ago.

      I drive a little Saturn S series that gets about 30MPG. Sometimes I feel like a cyclist with how people act when I don’t treat it like a sports car, but I don’t worry about it with crumple zones between me and their anger. 🙂

  13. SF_UK says 28 June 2011 at 06:12

    I decided not to comment on the last post because I didn’t want to get into the argument. I’m lucky. I live in a lovely town that’s extremely bike-friendly, my commute is probably faster by bike because I can take routes a car can’t (the centre of my town could accurately be described as car-hating), and the weather and my health are such that this is practical 99% of the time (the 1% being illness or snow/ice). I love the fact that I don’t have to go to a gym (I hate gyms), that I have no parking issue, and that my employer gets me subsidised bike repair and membership of a car club (for those times when a car is necessary).
    Like I said, I’m lucky. I grew up in a beautiful rural area, which I loved. But it was on top of a steep hill, and the nearest shop is 5 miles away. Hell, the nearest bus stop is a mile away, and is served by 1 bus that runs on an extremely idiosyncratic and impractical timetable. We needed a car. Having said that, we could, and did, walk places (yes, even that 5 miles was a walking commute for me when I had a summer job at the shop), and my parents now cycle for some errands using an electric power-assist bike to overcome the hill and distance issues. It’s not practical for them to go car-free, but I’m actually amazed at how little they actually *need* it.
    It’s always worth considering other options – you may find they suit you. Or not. At least you are making an informed decision either way.

    Oh, also, if you are thinking about reducing car use, some insurers (at least in the UK) offer reduced rates for low mileage users. I don’t know how it’s defined, but may be worth looking into if you need a car for occasional use (like grocery shopping), but are mostly travelling by other means.

  14. Kevin @ Thousandaire.com says 28 June 2011 at 06:28

    I could bike some places, but getting a nice street bike is about a $1,000 up front investment. I don’t want to drop that much cash knowing that I won’t use it all that often. I also don’t want to buy used because I’m weird like that.

    • Becka says 28 June 2011 at 07:58

      You can get a perfectly serviceable bike new for much less than that! My Trek hybrid was around $500, and I’ve been very happy with it, and you can go even lower if you shop around or wait for end of season sales (same timeline as cars, I believe).

      • Shari says 28 June 2011 at 11:44

        I’ve never paid more than $100 for bike in my life. Am I missing something? Shopping in the wrong places? Or the right places?

        • Becky P. says 28 June 2011 at 12:16

          Chuckle, chuckle. I think you could probably find a bike at a yard sale for under $20 that would get you from point A to point B.

          🙂

          One thing about PF blogs is that the varying differences in family sizes/rural-city thing and cultures so affects writing style. Many people in Poland bike for one of two reasons…1. to get places 2. for fun–to enjoy the fresh air/get out of the house. Biking for health reasons is growing, but not so many do it for that reason. However, we see grandmas on bikes, and grandpas as well. It’s just different here.

          I really am not keen on the idea of my kids riding on roads in the states where people go very fast (55-60 mph), and there is no extra room on the side for them to get off the road. Seems like a great way to get hit/killed.

          I do think that many times people in the cities in the US forget that the rest of us exist. (It seems like most mysteries I’ve read are set in Los Angeles or NY or some place close to one of those two places.)

          I don’t live in the heart of Warsaw. The thought of it makes me shudder. I could bike places but I don’t. Many people here don’t have cars, but it is usually a financial thing, not a “carbon emissions” thing. As soon as they can afford it, they get a car–esp. if there are small children involved. As a mom with 5 children, owning our own vehicle is superior to going on buses and trams with 5 kids, 9 and under.

          There is one situation that I still sometimes get flashbacks of our early stay here. One of my little ones got his foot caught in the bus–inside the bus, when I had two little ones outside on the sidewalk, and the bus started to close its doors to go on its way. We were new to Warsaw, and knew no Polish. Thankfully the people in the bus yelled at the driver to stop–but I didn’t know what to do…where to be–out on the street with my 2 and 4 year olds, or in the bus with my 6 year old?

          But I do like to garden and stay home more. I do find that Americans are very wasteful when it comes to throwing away food and perfectly good items. (I know that my perspective has changed from living in Poland for almost 17 years.)

        • Becka says 28 June 2011 at 12:22

          A bike is a fairly complex piece of machinery, and the quality of the parts and manufacturing make a very big difference. You can get a very good bike USED for $100 (because more people than you can count buy a thousand dollar bike and never ride it, then unload it for cheap), but new, definitely not. I would be willing to buy a store brand bike for, say, a child who’s going to outgrow it in a few years and never going to ride it more than a couple miles at a time, but for me, if you’re spending $100 on a new bike you’re really going to RIDE, you’re wasting money, not saving it. My dad just replaced his Trek, after – get this – 17 years and 70K miles. Yes. Seventy. Thousand. I’d guess it cost him maybe $600-700 new. Because Trek offers (offered?) a lifetime warranty on the frame, which is what failed, he got a whole new bike for free, for another 70K miles. You’d never get that out of a store brand bike. You’d never get that out of six store brand bikes.

        • jlg3rd says 28 June 2011 at 13:07

          you shop at yard sales. how’s that old Schwinn with the banana seat treating you?

  15. Louisa says 28 June 2011 at 06:41

    I don’t have a lot of patience when I read that someone wants others (not even real people in their life, but connected only in a surreal digital world, represented by black lines on a screen) to communicate differently so that the person won’t feel defensive. People from other cultures often tell me, “Americans are so sensitive!” and this whole post reflects that. People are going to say things that will sound insensitive. So what? That’s life. Take what you like, leave the rest. (This very comment is a judgment!) 🙂

    • Jane says 28 June 2011 at 07:13

      Fair enough. But the writer in cyberspace should then not be surprised when they get flak or equally passionate responses back. It’s a two way street!

  16. Crystal says 28 June 2011 at 06:57

    It is nice to be reminded that defensiveness is usually there for a personal reason. I almost chimed in with “but bicycling in Houston isn’t realistic” and then almost immediately realized that THAT WASN’T THE POINT.

    I choose not to bike, but I see others braving the roads (sorry, but I am usually cussing at them in my head to get off the damn roads…there aren’t bike lanes and it is frustrating for the bikers and drivers alike).

    So yes, differing opinions is not the same as being attacked. It’s a lesson we all probably technically know, but sometimes everybody can be helped to be reminded. Thanks JD!

  17. Justin says 28 June 2011 at 07:10

    Society reinforces the perception that we care what others think (and get defensive when we think we are being attacked/judged even when we aren’t). Why do you think marketing is so effective?

  18. Pamela says 28 June 2011 at 07:11

    Sometimes we forget that we are products of our own culture. The American ethos is one of individuality and a constant quest for improvement. A side effect of the desire to always get better is judgment and guilt.

    We don’t always have to strive. Sometimes we can just “be.” And let others “be” too.

  19. Canadian says 28 June 2011 at 07:15

    No, not everyone can do X (“X” in this case being biking more, driving less) but we have far more control than we might at first think.

    In my case, the reason that I am able to be car-free is the result of deliberate choices I have made:

    – to live in a city rather than a suburb, rural area, or small town
    – to live in this particular city: one with good public transit, rather than the place I grew up in
    – to choose an apartment within walking distance of a subway station
    – to only apply for jobs that are easy to get to via public transit

    If someone else chooses to live in the suburbs of a sprawled-out city, well that is the choice they have made, and driving less might not be realistic but it is the result of the choice they have made.

    There are downsides to my choices:

    – It’s hard to make bulky purchases
    – I can’t afford a house with a yard (without moving to the suburbs)
    – Can’t go places that need a car to get there (There is a car-sharing program but I don’t actually have a driver’s licence)
    – Sometimes it takes longer to get places

    But I accept those consequences as going along with the choices I have made. The person who chooses to live in a different setting needs to accept their consequences too.

    Yes, some people need to live in rural areas and grow our food. But in the past people in rural areas didn’t expect to be able to go wherever they pleased all the time. In the 50s my mother’s farming family went to town once a week. In earlier times it might have been even less frequent. You had to be more self-reliant if you lived in the country. Now many farming families don’t even have a vegetable garden.

  20. sarahkincheloe says 28 June 2011 at 07:30

    Biking just seems to get people riled up, for some reason. People get bristly any time the subject comes up, and bikers and non-bikers and those in between think they’re being judged or criticized. The only other thing that even seems to come close is talking about vegetarianism – I don’t usually tell people I’m a vegetarian because some people view that simple statement as judgment of them.

    I look at the articles here and elsewhere as advice. If the advice seems bad, I don’t take it.

    • barnetto says 28 June 2011 at 07:45

      Quit judging me! If animals didn’t want to be eaten they wouldn’t be yummy!

      😛

  21. leaf (the indolent cook) says 28 June 2011 at 07:36

    Great post. I just don’t get why people get so defensive. As someone who doesn’t have a bike, I don’t have any problem with the occasional “cycle and save money” article. I may not apply it to myself (I’m sticking to public transport for the foreseeable future) but I still enjoy reading a well-written article, and who are we to deny something that could really help and encourage others who are interested in taking the leap?

  22. Stacey says 28 June 2011 at 07:48

    this article – and the comments remind me of how country folk (like me!) view people who take a walk down a gravel road. You WILL be approached by everyone driving by asking if you need a lift so if you want to just “walk”, the saying goes you MUST carry a gun: then everyone will think you are hunting and leave you a lone. Same goes for biking in the VERY rural part of the country I live in: people think you’re broke if you’re biking everywhere. Nothing wrong with that – it just goes to show that everyone in this country is influenced by the attitudes of where they live/grew up. So if they “think” they should be biking everywhere but can’t do it, of course they are going to get defensive! I see a post like this though and move on… I love to bike but realistically it’s not going to happen!

    • Annemarie says 28 June 2011 at 17:45

      Very true. I live in the country and walk everywhere since for medical reasons I can’t drive.

      I was very surprised to learn, years ago, that people thought my husband was a very strict Christian and wouldn’t let me drive. There were many sympathetic comments and a few anonymous brochures on spouse abuse or brainwashing attached to our door.

      Matters were cleared up promptly.

  23. Patrick says 28 June 2011 at 07:54

    JD, I think you’re just being a bit too nice here, I personally don’t find Elaine’s comment representative of recent GRS posts or being particularly productive in any way.

  24. jesinalbuquerque says 28 June 2011 at 07:55

    Other people’s judgments = the reason god gave me a middle finger.

  25. Jo@simplybeingmum says 28 June 2011 at 08:03

    “Do what’s right for you” Bang On! We all get a bit twitchy when a post from one of our fave blogs touches a nerve – but we have to remember that we all have different priorities and situations. If a post about biking just gets every reader to clock up an extra 5 mile on their bike that week then job done. “Nobodys Perfect”!
    Your comment about letting food spoil freaked me out though 🙂 Check out my No Waste Tastes Great Challenge for inspiration.
    Just off to oil my chain, may just do a couple of miles tom – Jo

  26. Tyler Karaszewski says 28 June 2011 at 08:16

    “What Do You Care What Other People Think?”

    Not much. “Other people” are wrong as often as they’re right, and they’re almost unfamiliar with my own (or your own) personal situation.

    Just the other day, after I told someone at work, “I don’t watch many movies” he replied, “just wait till your kid’s born — you’ll be watching Dumbo 27 times in a row.”

    I couldn’t reply with anything else but, “I don’t even see how that will be possible since I don’t have a TV, it might make that difficult.”

    Other people are clueless, it doesn’t matter what they think.

    • Lyn says 28 June 2011 at 10:39

      Excellent comment. Reminds me of a saying that I try to keep in the top of my memory pile: “What other people think of you is none of your business.”

  27. Jess J says 28 June 2011 at 08:47

    Isn’t expressing your thoughts and opinions the point of being able to comment on a post? In the quote, Elaine was simply doing that: expressing that something was bothering her. Whether she knows that she has the ability to choose to stop being “bothered” by others’ comments, is up to her.

    True, we judge; and true, we don’t like to be judged. Fortunately, I’ve found that having compassion for myself and others greatly lessens the negative impact of judgements – whether I’m the judge or the one being judged. For example, judging obese people does not benefit me at all… so I don’t do it. Instead, I consider what life might be like if that were me. This makes me more appreciative of my situation, but also helps to remind me that they are a whole person, with their own full life. (This also works for the cycling/non-cycling topic.) Coming from this place of compassion, I able to remember that everyone is trying to do the best they can, and is no less deserving of respect from the next person – regardless whether I agree with their choices.

  28. Sara says 28 June 2011 at 09:02

    I really think that a lot of it depends on the tone of the author. I didn’t read the biking article yesterday (I don’t bike, don’t plan too) so I can’t comment on that, but some articles come across as very judgmental, and some don’t. Like Ian’s video and article on being debt free and building his house – that was awesome! The tone of the article was clearly “this is something really cool that I’ve done, and I want to share.”

    It’s like the difference in tone between:
    I’m a SAHM. I love being there for my kids and taking care of my family!

    And:
    I’m a SAHM and love it. If you just stopped eating out and buying lots of fancy toys for your kids, then you wouldn’t have to miss out on seeing their first steps or let them be raised by strangers.

    There’s a clear difference in tone.

  29. El Nerdo says 28 June 2011 at 09:07

    I don’t give a damn about what any of you think.

    Please carry on.

  30. Amanda says 28 June 2011 at 09:16

    Zillow.com gives each house a walk score, the higher the better. Something to look at before buying a house. We really like being able to walk to restaurants, the grocery store and the like. My husband could ride the bus to work for $1.25/week, much less than driving and it only takes about 10 minutes more a way. He has debated it many times and always comes to the conclusion that he likes driving and it’s worth it to pay more. That’s ok, it’s one of our spluges and we can cut back in other ways. It’s nice to know we have another option if the car breaks down…

    • Anne says 28 June 2011 at 10:50

      1.25 a week? Where do you live? Where I live, one trip with a discounted ticket isn’t 1.25.

      • Amanda says 29 June 2011 at 12:11

        Glendale, Ca, the Beeline is a quarter a way and all buses are free in La Canada, Ca where my husband’s work is.

  31. Joseph mwangi says 28 June 2011 at 09:30

    Let me chime in here if i may- as lots of other people have commented. We are emotional and relational beings- like it or not. That is why it matters a lot what your parents told you when you were a toddler. If they called you a fool, looser good for nothing @#$#- you probably became successful just to prove them wrong, or have lots of bitterness as a result.
    What difference does it make to toddler vs an adult? Very small!
    We- human beings still need a person or people who can believe in us and that is why it matters what other people think.
    My second point is culture – The western culture thrives on ‘self-containment/individualism’ -Where you can do ‘bad or good’ by yourself or be who you want to become – and nobody is supposed to give a damn about it. The Eastern culture on the other hand, thrives on the notion of community. In this eastern culture it matters alot what others think about you, and in particular what you own. It’s hard to change a culture but may be possible to change mindset.
    That being said, i agree with the author that “It’s easy to become your own biggest critic, especially when you think others are doing better than you are.” i’ve been a victim of this am still work in progress.

  32. Matt B. says 28 June 2011 at 09:43

    To E. Murphy (#79): We “chose” to live in an urban neighborhood where the kids’ school is less than a mile away and there have been dedicated bike lanes installed on all the major thoroughfares. The new mayor is also working on installing over 100 miles of new, protected bike lanes throughout the city. When the kids are older, they can bike themselves or walk to school. I understand that not everyone has this option, but hopefully in the future the physical patterns of suburban and urban living will continue to change to allow for more transportation options for families, as the current (read: past 50 years) models of suburban development are becoming increasingly unsustainable.

  33. Jennifer 2 says 28 June 2011 at 09:50

    I think part of the problem with this is the sanctimonious tone that sometimes accompanies these conversations (such as biking vs. driving). Somehow, that discussion seems to usually be missing an understanding that what works for you doesn’t always work for everyone else and it’s not always a callous disregard for what is (obviously!) a superior way to live that makes people make different choices.

    It also unconsciously touches on some class differences. Uprooting yourself to move to a city simply for an ideal is a decision that cannot be made by people living closer to the margins. It, by definition, imposes some serious upfront costs for those people who aren’t there already. Having a DIY wedding of the sort that the poster over the weekend describes relies on family and friends with plenty of spare time and applicable talent to throw your way – also not always the given so many presume it is.

    These are not negligible differences and a slightly less preachy tone goes a long way towards encouraging people to do what they can rather than what you would ideally have them do.

    (All this is said as a bike-commuter and crafter. However, I understand that I’ve got some advantages on both of those fronts that simply aren’t always there)

    • Shalom says 28 June 2011 at 13:25

      Thanks, Jennifer. For me that’s exactly it. (And it’s why I abandoned TSD several years ago but stuck with GRS.)

      • Jennifer 2 says 28 June 2011 at 13:35

        Yeah, I occasionally swing by TSD (I’m a sucker for advice columns) but the preachiness is off-putting. It makes me start to feel positively Marxist as I run through the reasons why a person who’s on the lower end of things really would have difficulties making those choices. What Trent has done for himself is impressive, but not everyone can live the Horatio Alger myth. Without ranting too much, I feel as though many people will present this idea (e.g. biking) as a great money saver and then turn around and say to someone who’s struggling: well, you’re not using my wonderful ideas. Obviously you’re not committed to getting out of poverty.

        We’re very judgmental about poverty and its causes, and though it’s often subtle, PF blogs can have a lot of it.

    • Rosa says 28 June 2011 at 18:59

      I don’t necessarily buy the class thing, because I am from a poor-ass little town where most people have to move away, just to get a job. A friend of mine did a few years in the mill then high-tailed it to the same city I ended up in – just to find that half our graduating class was already here. I know a lot of middle-class kids who stayed where they grew up (often working in the industries their parents are in, or in the small companies their parents own) but working-class jobs have disappeared so bad, the rest of us had no choice but to move.

      • Jennifer 2 says 28 June 2011 at 20:40

        The class thing basically comes in to play when you have to make a change. When you’ve just graduated from high school and have relatively few responsibilities and dependents, it’s cheaper (and thus more feasible) to uproot yourself in hopes of something better. Taking that risk isn’t for everyone, but it is fairly doable. Once you throw dependents or other responsibilities (that you may be doing in exchange for help elsewhere in your life in part of the non-monetary give and take you get into in settled neighborhoods) there’s both social pressure and your safety net to think of.

        If you’ve got ready cash, that can make it work. But if you’re struggling, then coming up with the start up costs is a challenge. Over at Cracked (not affiliated) Robert Brockway recently did a more humorous than I can write description of the challenges of moving when poor. It’d be worth looking up.

        I guess I just get the most irritated when people propose something like this as an obvious solution – move to a more bike friendly city. If you’re in the West, for instance, the closest bike-able city with jobs could be thousands of miles away or prohibitively expensive. Telling people that they have to make up for the fact that their municipalities were designed in the era of the almighty car and that down that bike path is the way to prosperity simply ignores far too many relevant details.

  34. Sarah says 28 June 2011 at 09:58

    What if we chose to live our American lives by pretending we live in Europe? http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/27/science/earth/27traffic.html

    This article has made me try to create a shift in my own life. Convenience is just a matter of adjusting one’s expectations.

    • Frugal Texas Gal says 29 June 2011 at 07:31

      As someone who spent seven years in Germany and has considered retiring there. I would say that downtown pedestrian zones are true heaven. However, every town, large or small has safe, reliable, 24 hour public transportation as far away is the outer suburbs and even the country. Without that, expecting people to “park and drive” to shop or go to dinner is unrealistic.

      And while germany is probably as environmentally perfect as a country gets overall, lets not forget that no speed limit on the autobahn stuff (is that why im still getting traffic tickets four years later??)

  35. Eileen says 28 June 2011 at 10:15

    Careful, JD, your ego is showing.

    What I mean is, some recent posts seem rather devoid of substance. Sure, it’s your blog and you can do what you want. Yes, I like it because it’s more personal than other blogs and I really connected with your story. And fine, each entry is carefully written and edited to a degree superior to many news sites. But….please avoid these entries that are so focused on the needs of a few members of this community, lest it become insular. We want more substantive money lessons and less whining (and/or acknowledgement of others’ whining). Don’t feed the trolls.

  36. KM says 28 June 2011 at 10:20

    Wow, what a battle in the comments!

    I’m surprised at the number of people commenting who seemed to entirely miss JD’s point here–that the ideas in the blog aren’t provided so people can one-up each other in the virtuousness department, but just as plain old money-saving ideas that people are free to use (or not) as they work (or not) for them.

    Sometimes a money-saving suggestion is just a money-saving suggestion, you know? If it makes you mad, maybe you should check your baggage.

    I’d never bike to work–too many kids to haul around and other issues that prevent it from being practical for me. But why would it make me mad to see others suggesting it as a way to save money/the environment? I’m boggled.

  37. L says 28 June 2011 at 10:32

    I thought the article was about making the choices that work for you and your circumstances. But, apparently others think it’s still about the bike vs. the car. Obviously it’s a choice, no matter the level of practicality or convenience involved, there’s always a choice. That doesn’t mean you have the right to judge the person that makes a different choice than you. Sheesh!

  38. Mike J says 28 June 2011 at 11:31

    I agree with KM (comment 90) I think many people have missed the plot here!

    I wouldn’t bike to work but I see why people would do as it’s a great way to help the environment.

    I think JD was just sharing a simple money saving tip and some people totally got the wrong end of the stick, it wasn’t supposed to be judgemental!

  39. suzanne says 28 June 2011 at 11:52

    This is a silly dialogue… Of course we’ve all made decisions, that doesn’t make the pro-bike/walk group any more important, or LESS important than the folks who are unable… or just dont WANT to transport themselves in any manner aside from an automobile.

    Why is society today becoming so black and white? Right and Wrong… one way or another. Why does one group have to be RIGHT and the ones who don’t feel that way HAVE to be wrong.

  40. rail says 28 June 2011 at 11:52

    Wow JD your topic got highjacked again! I didnt know bicycle riders could be so antagonistic. It realy suprised me because I bicycle! Look folks, I ride a bike when I can, were I can. I dont ride to work because I work on call 24/7 with a 1.5 hr call time. I live 15 miles from work. Remember this is on 3 miles of gravel road and in Iowa. Snow,cold,tornados,blizzards etc. put a downer on riding all the time. On the plus side we live only a mile or so from town so I can make lots of errands on the bike. Sometimes I dont start a car for 2 days. So it all equalls out in the long run. Have a great summer and good gardening!

  41. chacha1 says 28 June 2011 at 12:37

    I mean seriously.

    Someone feels bad to read about biking, because biking isn’t practical for their life?

    Do they feel bad when they read about someone with curly hair, because theirs is straight?

    That just makes NO sense to me. If it isn’t practical, just file it under “not practical” and move on!

    No need to tell the world it makes you feel bad. All you’re doing is confirming to yourself that you feel bad, for no reason, and to no purpose.

    Are you looking for reassurance? “Oh, it’s okay if you don’t bike, we understand everybody’s life is different” … ’cause that’s what J.D. says ALL THE TIME. Why do you need to have your position validated? Why do you care what other people think?

    Hence … this article!

  42. EMH says 28 June 2011 at 13:15

    Let’s put an end to this debate. Here is what you can do with your bikes.

    http://www.bicycles-for-humanity.org/Introduction.php

  43. Say What?! says 28 June 2011 at 13:39

    From reading some of the comments, me ‘tinks some people missed the point of the article…and umm I feel so JUDGED right now! LOL!

  44. Meep says 28 June 2011 at 14:40

    Some people will not be fully happy until they are cycling home to their compostable cardboard mini-houses and growing food using their own manure and carefully re-arranging their 100 items in the evenings before they go to bed at dusk and wake naturally with the dawn. It’s almost like some sort of new fetish.

    • barnetto says 28 June 2011 at 16:48

      ^_^

      While being childless and working to save the whales.

  45. Melanie says 28 June 2011 at 17:11

    Bike, don’t bike. Who cares? Do what’s right for you.

  46. Darwin's Money says 28 June 2011 at 17:33

    It’s real easy to be overly judgmental about others, especially with the anonymity that the web provides. People tend to say things online that they would never say to your face. I’ve been guilty of this myself in both my posts and my comments. Thanks for the reminder!

  47. [email protected] says 28 June 2011 at 17:55

    Yep–I love the last paragraph–“instead of criticizing yourself, notice what you’re doing right.” It seems that approach would generate a lot more energy and positive emotion, and that, in turn, would support motivation and persistence rather than sabotaging them.

  48. Jaime says 28 June 2011 at 18:06

    Hi J.D. well sometimes people project their insecurities on others or think other people are judging them when they’re not.

    I live in Nebraska and you really need a car to get by. Frankly I prefer a car. The whole bike vs. car argument is old. I’ve realized there will always be people who judge you, whether you bicycle or not.

    You have to be confident that you’re making the right choices for your life. Personally I don’t want to bike anywhere. Not even if I lived in Portland. I like my car. Some people like their cars. So what?

    ooh I like driving a car. big deal. 😛

    • Kevin says 29 June 2011 at 08:15

      “Personally I don’t want to bike anywhere. Not even if I lived in Portland. I like my car. Some people like their cars. So what?

      ooh I like driving a car. big deal.”

      Exactly.

      Personally, I don’t like having to drive my used motor oil and turpentine back to the garage to be disposed of “properly.” So I just dump it down my sink. And I don’t like recycling, so I just throw all my paper and plastic in the garbage. Also used batteries. And I don’t like paint rollers, so I paint all the walls of my house entirely with aerosol paints. When my car’s tires wear out, I don’t want to lug 4 heavy, dirty tires to the landfill and pay a fee to have them handled. I’d rather just burn them in my back yard.

      Big deal.

      It’s “what works for me.” You shouldn’t judge.

      • Jaime says 02 July 2011 at 01:00

        lol. I got the point 😉

  49. Jynet says 28 June 2011 at 18:55

    I’m amazed that the first comment on a post about not judging each other is judgemental. And so is the second… and so many others.

    Or maybe I’m not amazed… just disappointed.

    I am very good friends with a Vegan Organic farmer who lives an hour outside of the city (driving time) but who still uses a bike to get to most places. He bikes many miles farther in a day than I would think of biking in a week (or a year, honestly, lol). He grows almost all of his own food, and trades with friends for a lot of the rest. And lives a full and fulfilling life on 1/10th of what I earn in a year. I also out weigh him by about 40lb even though he is a FOOT taller than I am.

    HE doesn’t judge me because I live in the city, or because I drive a vehicle to see him and not bike. He doesn’t even judge me because I eat non-organic as often as I eat organic, or because I eat meat when he doesn’t even eat dairy. Or because I’m not keeping my weight in the healthy range. Or even because I some of the work that I do benefits the oil companies that my friend protests against.

    If HE can keep his mouth shut about my ‘failings’ and at the same time help me find new ways to live my life that make me (and him, lol) happier, can’t you?

    If you feel judged by something a stranger writes on a website about what works for THEM… maybe you should have a look inside of YOU and decide what it is that you are feeling guilty about and work on that instead of blaming the writer.

  50. Elaine Huckabay says 28 June 2011 at 21:14

    Perhaps it’s all semantics at the end of the day, but I take great lengths to separate my “ego” from my “identity” and so in saying that the article hurt my “ego,” I was in no way, shape, or form implying that I care what other people think about me. In fact, I was implying that while I wished I could bike more often and even get rid of my car (desire), it’s not possible for my life, so to align that with my values, I choose to drive a cheapy old car that gets great mileage and isn’t anything special/expensive. Thus, my ego is hurt when I am reminded that I am making choices not entirely in line with my values. I care about what I (and only I) think about my situation, and I know that a car is largely out of line with my values, but something I can’t get rid of at this point. I in no way detest or judge your decision to ride a bike, I am in fact envious of it (again, the ego in action here). Interesting that you took my statement and made an entire article about what “other” people think, when I couldn’t care less.

    I guess after some thought (on my daily commute, har har), I should have said “while this article is interesting, perhaps an article about how you minimize your car spending would be beneficial for those of us that aren’t able to make the switch to a bike?” I know that you are making such choices, such as diverting the future car fund to travel fund and choosing to drive your current car longer.

    Good articles, though, and it’s obvious this leads to some heated debate 🙂

  51. DeeAnn says 29 June 2011 at 00:59

    I didn’t think the article seemed judgemental at all. I thought it was one of those articles giving frugalites ideas to fit their own lifestyle. My DH is a professional driver and a car guy. You think he’s going to give up driving or cars for the sake of frugality? No way! He saves in other areas of his life to do this. It’s called balance. I on the other hand hate to drive. I just hate it, hate it, hate it. I am terrible at it too. I don’t drive and have no desire too. Yet, I get judged constantly with little snarky comments like “How do you survive?” “Your not an independent woman because you don’t drive and your husband takes you everywhere.” The last comment really irks me because if you knew me I am extremely independent with a mind of my own. So, what if I don’t drive. My DH can buy a Porsche to fix up without worrying about me wrecking a car. Trust me the way I drive it would happen. 🙂 Don’t worry I didn’t find your article judgmental. I think in today’s recession people are becoming confused what’s the difference between saving money to survive and living frugality. Frugality is a choice. Frugalites are very rich or barely make ends meet. We all have one goal to live a frugal lifestyle to enjoy our lives to the fullest.

  52. cherie says 29 June 2011 at 01:24

    Boy, I came here to say, Gee how silly it is to have been bothered by someone else’s choice or the decision to write about it.
    Then I came here and read the comments and I understand. There are definitely comments that make me feel attacked or debased for MY choices, I guess people can turn anything into a competition!

  53. bobj says 29 June 2011 at 02:01

    “Wheely”?

  54. Martha says 29 June 2011 at 06:50

    Think of what all of us could accomplish if we put all of the energy generated by this post into concentrating on our own lives, and doing the very best we can do to live more environmentally responsibly/frugally. Some of these comments demonstrate concreteness taken to an extreme- the point of the article seems to me to be that peoples’ lives in this vast country of ours are diverse and complex and we can all make some changes to make things better. Judgment (of ourselves and others)is a smokescreen that (generally)keeps us from doing that.

  55. Jeremy says 29 June 2011 at 09:45

    First off, great title. I love Richard Feynman!

    In our house, the quote goes, “What other people think of you is none of your business.”

    As to the article… I work for a Merchandising company, live far from my work, in a town I chose because my mother is there and needs help, and I have two children. I need a car for my lifestyle, but I do realize that it’s a choice – just a very obvious one in my case!

    I also have a bike, but rarely have time for a ride. I’d like to ride more, but it’s obviously not a high priority (or I would do it more), and my priorities reflect my values (or I’d have different priorities). And if it gets more important to me to ride, that will change my priorities, and I will ride more.

    Reasons that feel more like excuses are limiting. Take responsibility for your choices, and empower yourself. Every day we re-make our previous decisions by not changing them. Every decision you’ve made, you can re-make. Yes, including marriage (divorce) and children (adoption) – and re-making those decisions every day makes me appreciate my family so much more.

  56. Vale says 29 June 2011 at 09:45

    Ummm, I just hate riding bikes and that works for me. 🙂

  57. Funny about Money says 29 June 2011 at 18:54

    If we’ve got to be judgmental human beings — some of us just can’t help it 😉 — surely there are better things to look down our noses at!

    Me, I love riding my bicycle and would ride it everyplace if it were safe and feasible to do so.

    As I write this, it’s 110 degrees and muggy outdoors. Temperatures will not drop much below 90 during the dark tonight. Today’s fairly cool, though — we hit 115 a couple of times this week. At the age of 66, if I tried to ride around under the blazing sun in 110- to 118-degree heat, it would kill me. And that is not an exaggeration. Do I care what someone else thinks? Well, no.

    My compromise is to drive as little as possible, staying in the house several days a week and, when forced to go out, combining errands along the route in a single trip. Living through the summer here is sort of like being snowbound inside a furnace…

    There are people who do ride bicycles through this heat. I admire their stamina and determination. And I’m sure they can understand why an old lady would rather drive, thank you.

  58. Clint says 30 June 2011 at 10:28

    How I wish there had been no comments to your wonderful post. That would have been an indication that people got your point. Instead, all we get is more sniping. Both pov are narrow. Many of the bicycle enthusiasts are pushy in their comments. Many on the non-bikers are easily offended and push back. Listen to what J.D. is saying and lighten up. It’s all right here:

    “When you read what other folks do to save money, don’t feel judged. In real life, listen to what others are thinking or saying, but don’t let their notions bring you down. They’re not you. They aren’t living your life. They have their own strengths and weaknesses, just as you have yours. Make the most of what you have. Do what works for you. Instead of comparing yourself to others, compare your Present Self to your Past Self. Your goal is to constantly improve your own life, if only in little ways.”

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*