{"id":235916,"date":"2018-05-14T11:28:03","date_gmt":"2018-05-14T18:28:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/getrichslowly.org\/?p=235916"},"modified":"2023-12-05T14:23:43","modified_gmt":"2023-12-05T21:23:43","slug":"financial-rules-of-thumb","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.getrichslowly.org\/financial-rules-of-thumb\/","title":{"rendered":"18 favorite financial rules of thumb (and some useful money guidelines)"},"content":{"rendered":"
After twelve years of reading and writing about money, I’ve come to love financial rules of thumb.<\/p>\n
Financial rules of thumb provide helpful shortcuts for making quick calculations and decisions.<\/strong> You don’t always have time (or want to take the time) to create elaborate spreadsheets when choosing a course of action. In these cases, it’s nice to have some rough guidelines you can rely on.<\/p>\n You’ve probably heard of the “rule of 72”, for example. This shortcut says that if you divide 72 by a particular rate of return, you’ll get the number of years it’ll take to double your money. If your savings account yields 4%, say, it will take about 18 years for your nest egg to increase by 100%. But if you were able to earn 12%<\/em> on your investment, that money would double in six years.<\/p>\n Like all rules of thumb, the rule of 72 isn’t precise. It doesn’t give an exact answer but a ballpark figure. Financial rules of thumb don’t always hold true. But they’re true enough<\/em> for us to make loose plans based on them.<\/p>\n I have some engineer friends who’d get tense at this sort of sloppy guesswork, but most of the rest of us are happy to trade a bit of precision for speed. That’s what rules of thumb are all about!<\/p>\n The trick, of course, is knowing which rules of thumb to use. Most are handy, but some common guidelines do more harm than good.<\/p>\n In the past, you’ve probably seen my rant about some of my most-hated financial rules of thumb. Let’s look at three things I think conventional wisdom gets wrong (and what I believe are better alternatives).<\/p>\n For instance, I get frustrated when I hear financial advisers push the idea that you should base your retirement savings on 70% of your income<\/a>. Instead of estimating your retirement needs from your income, it makes far more sense to base them on spending<\/em>. Your spending reflects your lifestyle; your income doesn’t.<\/p>\n I think a better rule of thumb for determining retirement needs is this: When estimating how much you’ll need to save for retirement, assume you’ll spend as much in the future as you do now.<\/strong> Use 100% of your current expenses to calculate your retirement spending. (And if you want to build in a safety margin, base your future needs on 110% of your current spending.)<\/p>\n As I mentioned last week, another rule of thumb that makes me cranky is this common guideline espoused by all sectors of the homebuying industry: “Buy as much home as you can afford.” No no no no no!<\/em> Of all financial rules of thumb, this is probably the worst. It’s certainly one of the most prevalent. This is how folks end up house poor, chained to a mortgage they resent.<\/p>\n Lenders quantify this guideline by saying your housing payments should be nor more than 28% or 33% or 41% of your income. But, as David Bach wrote in The Automatic Millionaire Homeowner<\/em>, “You should generally assume that the amount the bank or mortgage company is willing to loan you is more than you should borrow.” A better rule of thumb? Spend as little on housing as possible. Spending less than 25% of your net income is best — less than 20% is even better.<\/strong><\/p>\n A third rule that bugs me is the one for determining how much life insurance you should buy. Different experts give different answers. Some say your policy should cover five times your annual income. Others say ten times. And Suze Orman recommends 20 times<\/em> annual income needs.<\/p>\n The truth is that not everyone needs life insurance. Like all insurance, it’s designed to prevent financial catastrophes. You only need it if other people — like a spouse or children — would face financial hardship when you die. If you don’t have kids, if your spouse has a good income, or you have substantial savings, then life insurance isn’t a necessity.<\/strong><\/p>\n Even if you do need life insurance, you probably don’t need to carry as much as your insurance agent is willing to sell you. To find out the amount that’s right for you, check out the Life Insurance Needs Calculator<\/strong><\/a> from the non-profit Life Happens organization. (How much life insurance should I<\/em> carry? According to this calculator, I shouldn’t have any at all. And I don’t.)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Financial rules of thumb usually aren’t this bad. In fact, most are useful. Here are eighteen of my favorites.<\/p>\n It’s important to remember that rules of thumb aren’t set in stone. They’re guidelines. They’re meant to help you make quick evaluations, not actual life-changing decisions. Financial rules of thumb are a starting point. Start with them, then adjust for your individual goals and situation.<\/p>\n Strictly speaking, rules of thumb deal with numbers. Still, there are a lot of non-numeric guidelines that I think are useful to know. If you’ve done any reading about personal finance, for example, you’ve probably heard the admonition, “Pay yourself first<\/a>.” While not strictly a rule of thumb, this guideline is very similar.<\/p>\n Here are some other useful financial guidelines:<\/p>\n<\/span>Rules Gone Wild<\/span><\/h2>\n
How much should you save for retirement?<\/h3>\n
How much should you spend on a house?<\/h3>\n
How much life insurance should you carry?<\/h3>\n
<\/span>Useful Financial Rules of Thumb<\/span><\/h2>\n
\n
<\/span>Other Useful Financial Guidelines<\/span><\/h2>\n