{"id":236079,"date":"2018-09-11T07:40:17","date_gmt":"2018-09-11T14:40:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/getrichslowly.org\/?p=236079"},"modified":"2023-12-05T14:21:21","modified_gmt":"2023-12-05T21:21:21","slug":"spending-rate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.getrichslowly.org\/spending-rate\/","title":{"rendered":"Spending rate versus saving rate"},"content":{"rendered":"
For years, I’ve argued that your saving rate<\/a> is the most important number in personal finance. “Saving rate<\/a>” in the world of personal finance is the same as profit in the world of business. We all understand that a company needs to earn a profit in order to grow and thrive, but what most people fail to realize is that people need profit too.<\/p>\n The greater the gap between your earning and spending, the faster you’re able to grow your wealth snowball<\/a> and achieve your goals.<\/p>\n Last week, the always-excellent Michael Kitces published an interesting article that argues spending rates matter more than saving rates<\/a>. He writes:<\/p>\n Most households struggle to save because there is no money left at the end of the month to<\/em> save in the first place. Because technically their problem isn\u2019t a savings rate that\u2019s too low; it\u2019s a spending rate<\/em> that\u2019s too high.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n When I began reading Kitces’ article, I thought he was picking nits. After all, saving rate and spending rate feel are two sides of the same coin. Turns out, however, Kitces has a good point.<\/p>\n Your saving rate — and note that it’s not<\/em> “savings rate” — is calculated by dividing your profit (your income less your expenses) by your income.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Your spending rate is calculated by dividing your spending by your income.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n As you can see from the equations, saving rate and spending rate are simply the inverse of one another. If you have an 80% spending rate, then you have a 20% saving rate. If you have a 5% saving rate, then you have a 95% spending rate.<\/p>\n Because of this, it’s easy to dismiss tracking your spending rate as a needless exercise. That number is implicit in your saving rate!<\/p>\n But Kitces argues that shifting the attention from saving to spending makes sense because saving is, essentially, a side effect. The two numbers you actually control in this equation are your earning and spending. Saving is a byproduct. It’s not a primary factor but a secondary one. This observation is subtle but it’s important.<\/p>\n For the past couple of years, I’ve led what seems like a futile crusade to convince folks that they ought not make debt elimination a primary financial goal. That might seem crazy, but I have reasons.<\/p>\n I’ve seen many instances where folks make it their mission to get out of debt<\/a>, but once they’re debt-free they fall right back into poor financial habits. Similarly, I’m now seeing people pursue financial independence<\/a> as a goal, and some who achieve it realize it’s not the panacea they had hoped for.<\/p>\n To me, both debt reduction and financial independence ought to be treated as side effects<\/em>. They’re the byproducts of other more-important financial choices. If you boost your income and cut your spending, you will<\/em> get out of debt. It’ll happen without you making it a goal. And if you’re clear on your personal mission<\/a>, then you will<\/em> achieve financial independence \u2014 if<\/em> FI is aligned with that particular mission. (FI doesn’t fit every purpose in life.)<\/p>\n Kitces helped me to see that saving rate is a side effect too. “The real key to saving isn\u2019t actually the ‘saving’ itself, but setting reasonable and prudent spending<\/em> guidelines,” he writes. He’s right.<\/p>\n In the fundamental wealth equation, the two variables that you control are your income and your spending. You don’t directly control your saving. That rises or falls depending on the other two factors.<\/p>\n If you want to save more, you can’t tell yourself, “This month, I’m going to focus on setting aside 10% instead of 5%.” In order for your saving to increase, you have to adjust your spending<\/em> (or your income). To set aside 10%, you need to spend 90% of your income instead of 95%.<\/p>\n The biggest reason I like the shift from “saving rate” to “spending rate” is that it puts the focus on what you can actually do<\/em> to improve your situation. You can’t directly improve side effects. You have to make adjustments to primary causes, and in this case the primary causes of your saving rate are your income and your spending. Of these two, you have much more control over your spending.<\/p>\n Don’t get me wrong. You should absolutely do whatever you can to earn more money<\/a>. Become better educated. Work harder and smarter. Learn how to negotiate your salary. But opportunities to boost income are infrequent. Opportunities to reduce spending happen every day.<\/p>\n I believe that becoming proactive<\/a> is the number-one skill to improve your financial life. You can practice being proactive by reducing your spending rate. How?<\/p>\n So, does<\/em> spending rate matter more than saving rate? Do I agree with the premise of Kitces’ article<\/a>? Yes \u2014 and no.<\/p>\n Because spending rate is the mathematical inverse of saving rate, you can’t really argue that one is more important than the other. They’re essentially the same thing, but looked at from different angles. That said, saving is<\/em> a side effect, not a primary factor. I like the fact that an individual can directly affect her spending.<\/p>\n I appreciate that Kitces introduced me to the idea of a spending rate. It’s a fascinating concept. But the truth is: I’m going to keep the conversation at Get Rich Slowly focused on saving rates. (For now, anyway.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" For years, I’ve argued that your saving rate<\/a> is the most important number in personal finance. “Saving rate<\/a>” in the world of personal finance is the same as profit in the world of business. We all understand that a company needs to earn a profit in order to grow and thrive, but what most people fail to realize is that people need profit too.<\/p>\n The greater the gap between your earning and spending, the faster you’re able to grow your wealth snowball<\/a> and achieve your goals.<\/p>\n<\/span>Saving Rate vs. Spending Rate<\/span><\/h2>\n
<\/span>Saving as Side Effect<\/span><\/h2>\n
\n
<\/span>Control What You Can Control<\/span><\/h2>\n
\n