If you're new here, you may want to learn what this site is about. I encourage you to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
Here’s one of my dark financial secrets: even as I write about saving money by asking for rate reductions or cancelling services you don’t use, even as I post guest entries about the evils of television, I am paying $65.82 every month for cable TV that I rarely watch.
The High Cost of Cable
Our cable television bill is $65.82 per month. That’s $789.84/year. Comcast divides these charges as follows:
- $9.95 for a Digital Classic Package
- $47.15 for Standard Cable (which includes Basic and Expanded Basic)
- $5.00 for HDTV Advanced Set-Top Converter
Now $65.82 a month isn’t a fortune, but it’s a lot of money to pay for something that doesn’t get used. If we were big TV watchers maybe the cost could be justified. But we aren’t. And it can’t.
Kris watches Antiques Roadshow every week. Sometimes she watches What Not to Wear. She spends another couple hours per week watching news programs and the Food Network.
(During the summer she likes to watch the home-improvement shows.) So, on average, Kris watches about 16 hours of television every month.
How much TV do I watch? None. Zero. Zip. Okay, that’s not entirely true. I probably watch an hour a month of random stuff, but usually that’s just to kill time, or to catch something special. (I watched the Oscars the other night while writing this entry.) When we signed up, I believed I would watch English Premier League football (soccer), so I “needed” Expanded Basic. I also wanted high definition channels. “High definition looks awesome!” I told Kris. She was not impressed.
In total, we probably watch 250 hours of television a year, and we pay $789.84 to do it. That’s $3.16/hour. That’s dumb. I complain about how expensive movies are, but watching television is costing us just as much. One solution, of course, is to watch more television. That would lower our cost per hour! It should be no surprise that this idea holds no charm for me.
The Magic of Netflix
Our low television-viewing numbers are deceptive. For the past four years, we’ve been active Netflix users. We’re on the $17.99/month three-at-a-time plan. For some people, this is a recipe for disaster. We know three couples who signed up for Netflix, got their three movies, and then kept these same discs for several months, continuing to pay $17.99 for the privelege. We get our money’s worth.
- During 2004, we received 129 discs. We paid $245.68. Our cost per disc was $1.90.
- During 2005, we received 115 discs. We paid $215.88. Our cost per disc was $1.88.
- During 2006, we received 134 discs. We paid $215.88. Our cost per disc was $1.61.
From 2004-2006, we paid $677.44 and received 378 discs, for an average of $1.79 per disc. If you figure roughly two hours per disc, we pay $0.90/hour to watch video via Netflix. Netflix is a good deal for us.
How does this relate to television? It’s no secret that many people are beginning to abandon broadcast television in favor of DVD. In last week’s Newsweek, Devin Gordon wrote:
DVDs, meanwhile, have upended how we watch television, transforming shows from disposable weekly units into 8-, 12-, and sometimes 22-hour movies. “We get a lot of people who tell us they don’t even watch the show when it airs,” says Joel Surnow, co-creatore of 24. “They wait for the DVD and watch it all at once.”
This describes our viewing habits. Alias, The Wire, Upstairs Downstairs, Freaks and Geeks, Undeclared, Homicide: Life on the Streets, M*A*S*H, Six Feet Under, Sex and the City, Curb Your Enthusiasm, Arrested Development — we’ve watched all of these via DVD in the past few years. Getting our television programs via Netflix costs us less than a third of what it is costing us for cable.
The Future of Television
But DVD is not the way of the future — at least not our future.
Back in the dark ages — circa 2005 — we discovered that we could obtain shows from BitTorrent that we otherwise would have been unable to see. If Kris missed an episode of Lost, I could BitTorrent it. When the new Doctor Who premiered in the in the U.K., I could BitTorrent it. I wasn’t interested in pirating anything — my goal was to watch the stuff that the distribution channels were preventing us from seeing. And it worked. Kris got to keep up with Lost (she might otherwise have stopped watching the program sooner than she did), and I got to taste Doctor Who, Battlestar Galactica, and Extras long before they touched down on American soil.

Last fall I took a serious look at the television offerings available through the iTunes Music Store. This, my friends, is the future of television, at least in our household. A “season pass” for The Office, for example, costs $35 for 22 half-hour episodes (which are, in reality, 23-minutes long). That’s $3.18/hour, which is exactly the same as what we’re paying for our cable right now.
But that’s not the end of the story. For that $3.18/hour, we get to keep the episodes and watch them at our convenience. (Yes, they’re crippled with DRM, but I’m okay with that for now. I think that’s an issue that will sort itself out — in the consumer’s favor — during the next few years.) Also, minute-for-minute, the cost for hour-long programs is roughly half the cost for 30-minute programs.
There are drawbacks, of course:
- Selection at the iTunes Music Store is limited. Want to download The Wire? I do. But we’re out of luck. HBO doesn’t have any shows in the iTunes Music Store yet. We’re forced to choose between BitTorrent or waiting who-knows-how-long for the show to be released on DVD at Netflix.
- The files are crippled with DRM, which may cause problems for us in the future.
- We don’t have physical copies of these shows as we would on DVD. (This is both an disadvantage and a advantage.)
We currently watch two shows via the iTunes Music Store: The Office and Battlestar Galactica. I also subscribe to Heroes because:
- it’s about comic book-y stuff, and
- it’s supposed to be good
but I haven’t watched a single episode yet. In March, when the This American Life television show starts, I’m hoping it will be available on iTunes.
This American Life teaser trailer
It’s my goal to convince Kris that we can kill the cable connection completely. I will promise to buy her anything she wants from the iTunes Music Store if we can kill the cable. Why would I make this bargain? If our cable bill costs us $789.94/year, we could take that money and purchase 22 different programs from the iTunes Music Store. There’s no way we could keep up with that many shows. We could buy anything we wanted to watch from the iTunes Music Store and still pay less than we currently spend on cable television.
(Note: After reading a rough draft of this entry, Kris agreed we could drop everything but the local channels. This will reduce our cost to $12.01/month, or $144.12/year. I’ll call the cable company tomorrow.)
A Final Option
In an ideal world, we’d have Tivo and the cable company would offer channels a la carte. Who knows? The media companies may yet be forced to do this. The iTunes Music Store certainly applies pressure in that direction.
I hope it’s clear to everyone that the best way to save money on television is not to have one. This is near-heresy in the modern age, but there are people who make this choice, and they are the better for it. I enjoy the time I spend with Kris watching movies and television programs via Netflix or the iTunes Music Store, but I recognize that these are hours that could be used more productively.
This is an example of the kind of penny-pinching I think about on a regular basis. I’m not always able to put all of my ideas into practice, but I’m hoping that this is one that’ll become reality.
.jpg)

March 1st, 2007 at 5:33 am
Comedy Central’s website posts the most recent episodes of the Daily Show, Colbert Report, etc on its website. I don’t have a tv OR cable, so it’s nice.
March 1st, 2007 at 5:53 am
It was easy for my husband and I to get rid of our cable. I don’t like TV and he didn’t like the fact that he would waste a lot of time watching junk just because it was on. We rent DVDs and check out DVDs and videos from the library. If we want to watch hockey we go to a bar, where I enjoy watching the game as a group.
It’s funny when my friends complain about some annoying commercial, assuming that I know what it is, when that is just not part of my life. Sure don’t miss that.
March 1st, 2007 at 5:58 am
ABC offers many of their shows free for web viewing beginning on the day after the show has aired.
I recently dumped satellite in favor of Netflix (the 5-disc plan), but I still get my weekly “Lost” fix by watching it online for free.
Other available shows include Gray’s Anatomy, Ugly Betty, and Desperate Housewives. Not sure if any other networks do this.
March 1st, 2007 at 6:27 am
Why not pick up a high-def antenna and pull in the local channels for free? There was an article in the newspaper over the weekend that claimed that the over-the-air high def broadcasts were often higher quality than the cable/satellite high def.
At my last house I was able to get more channels in high-def over the air than was available on DirectTV, and I can vouch for the fact that the quality was amazing.
I’m contemplating doing the same at my new place, however Comcast is the only game in town for Internet, and adding basic cable to that hasn’t been -too- bad…
March 1st, 2007 at 6:33 am
[...] over at Get Rich Slowly has posted a great article offering up some good options when it comes to making your entertainment dollar count. The High [...]
March 1st, 2007 at 6:42 am
I’d love to drop our cable all together as well, except for one thing - live sporting events. Many of the games that I watch are on ESPN. You can’t replace that with DVDs as of now.
March 1st, 2007 at 6:46 am
Other shows to find via bittorrent: “Torchwood” (the Captain Jack X-Files like spin-off of Doctor Who - 13 episodes in the first season) and a cute little sitcom from Canada that I recently discovered (there have been 6 episodes so far) called “Little Mosque on the Prairie”…
March 1st, 2007 at 7:11 am
Actually, I did purchase a hi-def antenna when we got this TV a couple of years ago. It didn’t do anthing. But maybe I should try again. Maybe I was doing something wrong before. Thanks for the suggestion!
March 1st, 2007 at 7:13 am
This might not be for everyone, but more often than not, you can “encourage” your cable installer to install a bit more than the company thinks you’re getting.
For an extra $40 (one time), we wound up with extended ($50/mo) cable, and are paying for basic ($12/mo).
The worst the guy could say was ‘no,’ and if he had, I’d have just given up my beloved SciFi channel and stuck with basic.
March 1st, 2007 at 7:25 am
I’m a fan of online TV. It’s definitely the cheapest option - FREE.
March 1st, 2007 at 7:35 am
I had the full, expanded basic cable. Then I realized I was making $30K/yr, and not saving anything. That’s when I got into personal finance. I figured out I didn’t need to be watching that much television, so I called up Cox (my cable company) and asked to be dropped down to basic.
Since I live in an apartment, I didn’t need to be at home for them to do it, so I went ahead and gave permission for them to do it anytime. So I waited… and I waited… and I waited… and my bill got cheaper, but they never came to take away my channels.
Now, I pay $12.95 (not counting the cable internet) to Cox for expanded basic, because they made a mistake. It was the best cost-saving measure I’ve ever done.
Less money, without a reduction in services.
March 1st, 2007 at 7:43 am
Timely and interesting article. Thanks! Coincidentally, I just cancelled the “Movie Package” portion of my Digital Cable service. Saves us almost $30.00 per month. We very rarely watch it. I am now reviewing, carefully, the Digital service, as well. And… I intend to scrutinize all of my monthly expenditures in the same way. I thank you for your article, as it has motivated me to get it done !!!
Regards, Kevin, Toronto, ON Canada
March 1st, 2007 at 7:58 am
As Mac fanboy, I am tempted by the AppleTV, which is due out later this month. But upon closer examination, this is not a cost I can justify. It’s basically $300 for a wireless hard drive that connects to your television.
Kris and I have been watching Battlestar, etc. form m widescreen laptop. This works just fine. In fact, it’s rather convenient. We can catch an episode during dinner, or as we’re getting into bed. I’m sure that the AppleTV has its place, but it’s not something we need in our life right now.
March 1st, 2007 at 8:29 am
In some areas Comcast offers a Family Package that is in between limited basic (the ~$10-12 package) and the full package. It doesn’t have ESPN but it does have Food Network, National Geo, and an assortment of kid channels. They never advertise it. Always ask for the Rate Card when dealing with cable. It will list the full menu of choices some of which are never advertised. Did you know you can get HBO alacarte? ($15/mo).
March 1st, 2007 at 8:30 am
This is really a great post. I’m about to move into my new place and have decided not to hook my TV up to anything. I don’t want to deal with dish installation (assuming the condo board won’t fight with me about it) and I hate hate hate cable companies. I was toying with the idea of getting my shows elsewhere, and this post is so helpful.
In addition to the things you mentioned–Netflix and iTunes primarily–I’m also going to get shows for free from the networks’ websites whenever possible. The few shows that won’t be available at iTunes or the network’s website (Amazing Race, anyone?), I’ll watch at the gym. Nice way to get another use out of the gym membership, eh?
March 1st, 2007 at 8:30 am
I have to second the sports caveat - if you’re a sports fan, then getting the cable tier that gets you at minimum ESPN and whatever regional cable channels focus on your local teams is likely to result in a reasonable cost/hour (and certainly more so than going to a sports bar, which I did for “big games” one summer when I was subletting and had no cable). Depending on the sport, there may be online options, but usually local games are blacked out to make the cable companies happy, and watching it “live” is important.
That said, I did at least dump the additional hookup at my apartment and replaced that with a tv tuner for my computer, hooked up to a $10 antenna to pull in the terrestrial digital signals. The picture is great even for the ones that aren’t broadcasting in HD, better than the picture from cable, and when we get an HD broadcast, it’s fantastic. I’m lucky enough to live fairly close to the local stations’ towers and in a top floor condo, so I pull all the local options in easily - I don’t know if this would be as palatable an option for people in more remote or more obstructed areas.
March 1st, 2007 at 8:31 am
We took this very step and canceled our cable late last year. I wrote about it here: http://johnzeratsky.com/archives/001505.php
We’ve been watching some iTunes shows, some BitTorrented shows, some Netflix DVDs, and saving money overall (plus we don’t have to deal with Comcast, which is more than worth it!).
We also have a dedicated Mac mini for video, which is a one-time expense that needs to be factored in. It’s hooked up to our TV, and has Front Row built-in, so watching TV is still a very “TV-like” experience.
I too have considered the Apple TV, but I think we’ll stick with the Mac mini so we can continue to watch streaming shows from ABC.com or MTV.com (which we do from time to time).
March 1st, 2007 at 8:57 am
We tried a similar experience when we moved into our house last year. We can’t get DSL, and I need broadband for work. Our cable company give $10 off broadband if you have TV with them too. So, we effectively get basic cable (local + Discovery Channel) for $4/month. Add Tivo to that and for $20/month we get more shows than we can watch anytime we want.
(We also save money running Vonage over that broadband, keeping our phone bills down to $25/month.)
We never miss the other channels.
March 1st, 2007 at 9:00 am
Also, don’t forget that TV (cable) contains advertisements. We say that we turn the volume down during commercials or leave the room when they are on. The fact is, we see and hear commercials if we are watching cable television.
Studies have shown that the number of commercials a person watches is significantly related to the amount of unnecessary spending they do. For most, it is subconscious. I don’t have the stats at my fingertips at the moment. But for every hour of TV watched our spending increases by several hundred dollars per year.
It is important to factor in these psychological “costs” into your comparisons.
March 1st, 2007 at 9:17 am
Thanks for this entry! My live-in boyfriend has recently been trying to convince me to get cable (I’m the breadwinner, currently), but I’ve been resisting because I simply don’t have time to watch it! Also, I simply despise commercials, even if I can fast-foward through them with an (expensive) DVR.
Consider dropping your cable completely, even for local channels. My beau and I bought a new TV with a digital TV tuner in it. Now, we get high-definition digital reception channels with just a pair of cheap rabbit ears.
March 1st, 2007 at 9:20 am
I’m with Melsky; the public library is a great alternative. Here we can borrow DVDs for a week at a charge of a buck, and CDs are free. They have thousands in their collection. And don’t forget about books and the magazine swap table for alternatives to watching the gogglebox!
March 1st, 2007 at 9:24 am
We are using a Pinnacle PCTV (http://www.pinnaclesys.com/PublicSite/us/Products/Consumer+Products/PCTV/PCTV/) to pull HDTV out of the air. It’s awesome - we watched the Superbowl in high-def on my 17″ laptop. No static and a glorious picture, especially compared to the static-y reception on our tiny second-hand TV.
We got it on Woot! for about $80 (less than one month of our former cable TV bill).
We’d get rid of the TV entirely but my toddler is too interested in mashing the laptop for the little bit of TV time he gets.
March 1st, 2007 at 9:30 am
dude, downloading network shows via bittorrent *is* copyright infringement. It doesn’t matter if they are broadcast over the air freely. It doesn’t matter if NBC offers “Heroes” for free on its own site. It doesn’t matter if you own the dvd its on and just want a digital copy. It doesn’t even matter if its a show that will never ever go on sale on dvd in this country at all in a million years.
Unless those shows are in the public domain, or the copyright owners explicitly give you permission to obtain those exact copies, and what’s more important, DISTRIBUTE more copies, then you are breaking the law.
No amount of justification will change that.
That being said, I use bittorrent quite frequently, but I will be the first to admit it’s illegal, and possibly morally wrong, but I do it anyway. I’m not saying that you or anyone else should stop doing it (myself included), just that you shouldn’t delude yourself into thinking its perfectly OK.
by the way, I know that is not what the article was about, and I think your point about itunes-like distribution of tv being the future and costing less than cable is spot on.
March 1st, 2007 at 9:35 am
My fiance and I don’t watch television because we’re not interested in it. (We do have a TV, and we watch movies on it sometimes. And Alton Brown DVDs.) I have to admit it never occurred to me that that might be linked to our fairly limited spending. We don’t miss TV, though every so often someone will say to me “You know that commercial where…” and I’ll have no idea what they’re talking about, and they’ll be frustrated because they were trying to communicate a point. It strikes me as sad that commercials are expected to be part of our common cultural experience.
March 1st, 2007 at 10:03 am
::cries::
This article is killing me. We’re stuck in a crappy Direct TV contract (it was the only service we could get when we lived in NW Washington), and even if we dumped it (and paid their obscene $12 monthly fee), we still couldn’t go the online route: our damn computers aren’t fast enough to play the shows! (This I learned after spending two bucks on a download from iTunes.) So, word to the wise: make sure you’re not stuck in the compy processor slow lane before doing the switch.
March 1st, 2007 at 10:36 am
If it wasn’t for having a roommate who watches his own share of TV, I would simply drop my cable and stay on DVD on online stuff. I don’t mind waiting for a year for a show to come out on DVD, and with ABC putting there shows online (and even finishing otherwise canceled show) I can catch up with quite a few shows.
Frankly, I hope what ABC does catches on, even if the shows are online for only a week. I’ve found the service easy, convenient, and better the broadcast TV. At this point if I’m interested in a show I will check out the network website to see if they have online. Sadly most other networks have fairly poor online video.
And most of the video the BBC provides are limited to the UK. So even if they did offer Doctor Who that way, I still would have to wait for DVD or for the CBC to show it.
March 1st, 2007 at 10:57 am
I KNEW you’d come around to my way! I’ve been telling folks in the comments here and over at lifehacker and consumerist about the relative joys and inexpensiveness of what BrightHouse calls “Limited Basic Cable” at $15.01 per month. This gets me all local, plus AMC, TBS, PBS, QVC, yadda yadda.
$180.02 a year gets me my “Survivor”, “Heroes” and the newly remastered “Star Trek”.
Sweet.
Well played, sir. Well played.
March 1st, 2007 at 11:02 am
Okay, so how do you download stuff? Do you have a “Comcast” cable modem? Or are you using DSL? Or some free public wireless system?
March 1st, 2007 at 11:33 am
I’ll throw in my vote for OTA (over the air) HD, it is free and picture quality is excellent if you are in an area with good HD signals. I get excellent reception here in Los Angeles and record everything straight to my computer with a HD tuner card. You’d be getting your Office fix for free and at a higher quality than the iTunes stuff.
March 1st, 2007 at 11:39 am
Dude, fight the power!
March 1st, 2007 at 11:43 am
I just realized i’m in the same situation. I’ll be cancelling my tv cable service and opt for Netflix.
Thanks,
Miguel
March 1st, 2007 at 12:01 pm
I would like to second another commenter in stating that getting tv shows and movies via bit torrent is indeed copyright infringment.
There are a lot of alternatives to cable. Many tv networks post content on their own websites. UFC, WWE, FIFA, UEFA for the sports people.
In addition to getting hard product from netflix, they are rolling out a new service that allows you to stream movies to your own computer. From there, you can connect your computer to your tv, or go a step further and buy a windows media center PC. There are a number of sites that stream movies, Vongo and Movie link are two that come to mind.
The Xbox 360 allows you to purchase movie downloads, as well as streaming video, music, and pictures from your pc.
And finally, there is IPTV. IPTV is a technology, where the tv station transmits is content via the internet to special set top boxes or PCs so that you can watch content from around the world.
March 1st, 2007 at 12:28 pm
Check out this site “smashingtelly - the best full length free tv programs on the web, updated every day”:
http://smashingtelly.com/
Lots of great stuff there - all tagged for easy searching.
March 1st, 2007 at 1:57 pm
I’ve been blissfully without cable or satellite for 4 years. If you have children to me this is the only way to go. In another article you talk specifically of creating an environment where you aren’t subjected to advertising, therefore not tempted. By watching little / no TV and allowing my children to watch TV that is virtually ad free (PBS) I’m sure I’ve been saved from a lot of frivolous spending. The biggest upside of all of this is a 4 year old who can go to the store with me and not beg for crazy expensive cereal or whine constantly for the latest toy. HE ISN’T BEING BRAINWASHED!!!
March 1st, 2007 at 1:59 pm
My library system (City of Seattle) has a vast DVD selection. I pretty much haven’t done a search yet and not found the DVD. I go online, I search for the DVD, then I place a hold on it. Then, when it comes in, I get an email that it’s ready for pick up.
I get to keep them for 2 weeks.
There’s rarely more than a 2 week wait, and there’s no limit to how many to rent.
And the best part, obviously, is it’s free.
It’s worth checking out your local library system to see if they have something similiar…?
March 1st, 2007 at 2:37 pm
I dumped all but my most basic cable ($12/mo) a few years ago — it’s been great. Instead I periodically buy a favorite series on DVD or just do without.
My only “must see” TV is 24 and Medium. And I’d live without both.
I’m spending all my time working or building up my internet business anyway, so why spend money on a service I don’t need? (on the other hand I have a super-speed dsl package because I’m constantly on the internet).
March 1st, 2007 at 5:28 pm
I thought it was the law that all cable companies had to provide a basic (and cheap) service that just covers the basic channels up to 13 or whatever. I just now got off the phone with my cable company, Millenium Digital Media, and they said they do not offer anything smaller than the package I get, which is around $43 a month. She claimed their engineers had to put lines underground to offer anything else. Sure.
I watch one hour of television (Bones) per week, and only when the show is not a repeat. I believe it is available via the Fox web site to watch the most current ones, but the quality coming through on my computer was so horrid that I would never try that again. We have a decent DSL connection, but the pausing and stopping and weird things with the video drove me nuts.
I guess I pay over $10 per hour to watch my one TV show!
March 1st, 2007 at 5:37 pm
[...] The New Math: Cheap Alternatives to Cable Television How to save money on entertainment (these tips will work for non-US readers too). [...]
March 1st, 2007 at 6:07 pm
I don’t pay a cent for TV - never have - and I don’t feel deprived. The antenna on top of our house does just fine, and we get 15 channels (4 more if you count Spanish-only stations). We also have old-school Tivo - it’s called a VCR. We can watch programs any time we want and fast forward through commercials. I have found, through visiting with friends who have cable, that if you can’t find something to watch on 15 channels, there’s probably not much more to watch on 500. The Discovery Channel special that aired a few years ago on the lost Alexandria lighthouse that my mom wanted to see badly enough to have our neighbor tape it, just aired last week (maybe not the exact program, but very, very similar) on PBS. I babysit for my neighbor, and if I see the exact same episode of Diego one more time, I think I’ll scream! (The reruns are HORRIBLE.)
What really honks me off is a couple of years ago, I endured a friend literally crying to me about not having money to feed her 3 kids, yet she was still planning to pay their $100 cable/Internet bill for the month. UGH.
March 1st, 2007 at 6:40 pm
Well, after consulting with the husband (who watches less TV than me and owns a whole slew of DVDs he has never watched), I called up and canceled the cable. They asked why and I told them I only watch 1 hour per week and $10 an hour was too expensive for television.
My one show is on the internet via MySpace or something, and with luck it has improved over the last time I watched it on there. And I already planned to buy the whole season on DVD like I did last year. And my library gets lots of TV stuff on DVD, too.
I have baby hamsters. They are way more fun to watch than TV anyway.
http://weatherwitch.net/hams-n-bacons/
March 1st, 2007 at 8:15 pm
I have been cable free for well over a year at least now. The only current show on the air I like to watch is Law and Order.
Melsky: I agree about the commercial thing. Anyone I know that has cable talks more about commercials than any show they watch.. Guess we know where all the money goes in tv programing
March 1st, 2007 at 8:16 pm
hmm. i have to disagree i guess. im all for being frugal, but i have a high def tv, directv with high def package & dvr, march madness basketball package, nfl package. its pretty damn expensive but i consider it another utility. i like to watch football, im a big college basketball fan. my wife likes some shows, mostly on cable. regular channels dont cut it for us. i did give up my netflix subscription when we upgraded to the fancy tv setup, we were members for 4 years but had started to get to that point where the movies sit there for months - they eventually show up on tv so why pay both? before i got the sweet setup i would go out on sundays to watch the games and blow some cash anyway; now i stay home and my pals come over, their wives come over we cook out and hang. its all relative i guess.
March 1st, 2007 at 8:41 pm
Keep getting your shows over Bittorrent, don’t buy them. DRM isn’t going away or going to move in the consumers favor if people buy. Save money and download them over bittorrent. The first service that comes along without DRM or much less restrictive DRM, and has a show you want, support it with your cash. Thats how DRM will become obsolete.
March 1st, 2007 at 11:46 pm
Most of my cable bill is from the cable internet. I need some kind of higher speed internet. Cable was available in my area before dsl or any other service- I have been happy with it and stuck by it for several years. I have internet plus basic ( not digital, but a lot more expanded than what basic used to be) and +1Premium ( HBO). I could probably save $10 dropping HBO, but I would probably need to ADD somthing like Netflix to make up for it. I have actually never been into DVD rentals or the movies. I am the rare person that prefers TV. I also know dropping my cable tv would increase the cost of my internet- so not sure how much I could even save ( my cable bill is about as transparent as a self-pay hospital bill). For a lot of people this is probably a good idea ( I’m trying to focus on making more money though, since I already feel “cut back” about as much as I feel comfortable).
March 2nd, 2007 at 1:13 am
The world will be an infinitely better place when TV consumption is about pull, not push.
Choose your media, people. There is strength in numbers (as opposed to NUMBER5, or whatever…)
March 2nd, 2007 at 7:37 am
We have the ole rabbit ears. We miss the food network, hgtv, espn, history channel, nickalodean and disney. But my husband who loves sports is content to watch broadcast because of the money factor. Luckily we have 2 PBS stations in our area one of which has PBSkids all day long and both weekend mornings so my daughter doesn’t miss kids shows and they also have cooking shows and history programs and sometimes local college sports events.
Also, think about donating to PBS and get a tax deduction.
March 2nd, 2007 at 8:21 am
Great advice - we switched to Netflix and Bitorrent a while back. For those who are not keen on crowding around a computer or laptop monitor, make the $6 investment in an s-video cable, which connects your computer’s video output to your tv. Then just right-click on your desktop and switch your output to the external source. Your sound will still come from your computer speakers, but your picture will be on your tv. Not high-def quality, but better than staring at a 15″ monitor.
March 2nd, 2007 at 8:47 am
[...] - March 02, 2007 How to reduce your monthly cable costs JD at Get Rich Slowly has decided to switch to basic cable after crunching the numbers on his monthly [...]
March 2nd, 2007 at 10:42 am
“Keep getting your shows over Bittorrent, don’t buy them. DRM isn’t going away or going to move in the consumers favor if people buy. Save money and download them over bittorrent. The first service that comes along without DRM or much less restrictive DRM, and has a show you want, support it with your cash. Thats how DRM will become obsolete.”
Also, a cheap way to obtain fresh vegetables is to simply take them from random farmer’s fields (preferably at night). The only (fun) way to fight high grocery store produce prices is to steal…err…liberate it directly from the source. Plus, is that corn-rich farmer really going to miss another ear of corn? he has so many already!
Seriously, breaking the law to get cheap entertainment isn’t being frugal, its being cheap. As I said before, everybody does it, including me, but don’t pretend you are being frugal by infringing someone else’s copyright just because you don’t like the price they are charging. If you do it, fine, but its not scalable, and I think its not necessarily something to even be proud of.
Also, the only way DRM is going to become obsolete is if you don’t buy it AND don’t watch it at all. Downloading it from bittorrent still creates demand for the product, and still encourages the producers to want to try to protect their product. Probably even more so.
March 2nd, 2007 at 1:59 pm
[...] The New Math: Cheap Alternatives to Cable Television -Are you tired of paying through the nose for a lot of channels you never watch? J.D. takes a look at some alternatives. [...]
March 2nd, 2007 at 3:20 pm
March 3rd, 2007 at 1:04 am
My monthly TV costs are confined to the licence fee that everyone has to pay in the UK.
I use a Tivo. You can buy these things second hand, with the necessary subscription prepaid for life, for about £250, or $500, which is only a few months of cable fees.
It can catch up to 40 hours of recent free-to-air terrestrial tv, and keep it fresh, dumping old unwatched broadcasts and replacing them with new ones. It learns which programmes you like.
At any time, my machine has far more in it than I will ever watch, including films. So no DVD rentals, no cable or satellite costs.
March 3rd, 2007 at 7:00 am
[...] @ Get Rich Slowly talked about The New Math: Cheap Alternative to Cable TV in which he ponders the need for Cable TV if a) one doesn’t watch and b) he is a big user of [...]
March 3rd, 2007 at 9:32 am
Cable TV is doomed with things such as joost (www.joost.com) coming out this year. IPTV with ads will be completely free. Big name stations like MTV/Comedy Central and others have already signed on. All you need is a broadband connection.
I made the same discovery last year, that even when splitting with my roommate I spent over $700 a year on TV that I barely watch, and a landline phone that is used only for our front door buzzer. That money is now going to an emergency fund instead
March 3rd, 2007 at 10:37 am
We just watch over the air for the local channels - which is very rare so we didnt even bother going the hi-def route. We do love our dvd’s though and the library here is free for a week and the turnaround on the waiting list is pretty quick. Now if I could just reduce my cable bill but still have a reasonable speed I’d be happy (currently on Time Warner Road Runner)
March 3rd, 2007 at 11:58 am
Reading is the cheapest and best. Nothing can be as vivid as one’s own imagination.
March 4th, 2007 at 2:45 pm
The stupidest thing about cable is you pay money for a bunch of channels you don’t watch. It’s like going to the store for Newsweek magazine and also having to buy Sport Illustrated, Seventeen, Redbook, Highlights, Maxim, People, House & Garden, Spin, Car & Driver, etc. The cable companies don’t want people to get channels ala carte ’cause they get their payments whether you watch them or not.
I haven’t had cable for 15 years, with the exeption of a year after 9/11 when all the broadcast antennas on the World Trade Center were destroyed and reduced the metro NYC area to one over-the-airwaves channel. I wasted sooo much time that year flipping channels to find the least worst show to watch. The 24 hour news channels are such idiocy that I cringe anytime I hear those blowhards talk.
March 4th, 2007 at 4:24 pm
“Why not pick up a high-def antenna and pull in the local channels for free? There was an article in the newspaper over the weekend that claimed that the over-the-air high def broadcasts were often higher quality than the cable/satellite high def.”
Better yet, if you are a subscriber to cable internet, no need to buy an antenna to watch local channels, PBS or C-Span. You can get higher quality with a coax splitter and two lengths of coax (which can cost less than the high-def antenna). Most (or all?) cable companies don’t filter out the TV signal for the basic channels on the line going into your cable modem. All one has to do is split the line and send one to your modem and one to the TV set and presto! you have broadcast channels (ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, PBS, C-Span, and in many areas, the channels en Español) at your fingertip. This suits nearly all my TV needs, which include election returns, major news events, major sporting events, and occasionally a PBS show. Besides that, it’s way cheaper for me to buy/rent DVDs of TV shows (I’m into LOST right now).
March 5th, 2007 at 5:31 am
[...] Rich Slowly presents Cheap Alternatives to Cable TV. Various strategies, which work, even for a person like me who HAS NO TELEVISION AT ALL. How does [...]
March 5th, 2007 at 8:05 am
[...] Rich Slowly details the cost of cable versus using Netflix (or Blockbuster) for your entertainment needs, as well as the “No TV” option. If you know me, you know I have a love-hate [...]
March 5th, 2007 at 10:32 pm
…and a cultural barbarian comes wandering in.
“I hope it’s clear to everyone that the best way to save money on television is not to have one. This is near-heresy in the modern age, but there are people who make this choice, and they are the better for it.”
In the movie, Reuben, Reuben (1983), our hero overhears a comment about how wonderful speed reading is, how much time it frees up, how much more productive having the skill makes this person. Reuben proceeds to chastise this poor chlub, talking about how much money he’d pay to be able to read slower, to have the memory of wonderful books struck from his memory so that he could experience their glory again. To savor each word, again.
Contrary to the cultural elitism repeatedly laid at the feet of those who enjoy TV ( I’m guilty too: “Reality TV, who could enjoy that?!?” ). Watching TV isn’t an evil, it is an art form, and like alot of art, it is a matter of taste and measure.
What I wouldn’t give to experience watching Monty Python’s Flying circus again fresh. Or to be reintroduced to Robbie Coltrane in Cracker, Crime Story with more adult eyes.
I went more than a few years without TV, and only limited movie viewing, it ain’t all it is cracked up to be.
Now if you really want to save money, go on a regime of tofu and dietary supplements. No more of those expensive spices, overpriced meat, or exquisite gourmet items ( truffles, sun dried tomato pesto, dark roasted Yemen coffee, or delectable Dean & Deluca fresh ravioli )
Broadband, nah, you can pay 10 bucks a month for dial-up.
March 6th, 2007 at 12:41 am
[...] out this article from this personal finance blog, Get Rich Slowly. It confirms a trend that I’ve been [...]
March 6th, 2007 at 10:19 am
Carnival of Personal Finance #90 Recap…
…
March 9th, 2007 at 11:28 am
[...] Get Rich Slowly presents Cheap Alternatives to Television [...]
March 22nd, 2007 at 3:41 pm
I found this site searching for present-day antenna options so I can dump my cable all together. (I am not a techie) Thanks to “Matt” I found what I needed, a high-def antenna. Goodbye cable. I never watch it as it’s mostly all crap.
Great blog, I’ll be back.
March 31st, 2007 at 8:00 am
[...] Mar. 1st: Cheap alternatives to cable television [...]
April 1st, 2007 at 8:47 pm
I criticized your post about LeBron James, but this one is brilliant. Thank you…after reading I am at least going to downgrade my cable package.
Bravo…
April 1st, 2007 at 10:06 pm
[...] The New Math: Cheap Alternatives to Cable Television - Get Rich Slowly breaks down the cost of cable tv and alternatives. - (tags: television money) [...]
May 30th, 2007 at 8:49 pm
[...] Rich Slowly details the cost of cable versus using Netflix (or Blockbuster) for your entertainment needs, as well as the “No TV” option. If you know me, you know I have a love-hate [...]
June 20th, 2007 at 8:26 am
[...] do this sort of geeky number-crunching all the time. In March, I broke down the numbers to discover how much Kris and I were spending on television. I learned that it cost us $3.16/hour for digital cable, but only $0.90/hour for Netflix. We cut [...]
July 2nd, 2007 at 1:37 pm
JD, assuming you are somewhat close to a major metropolitan area and have ATSC tuners in your high-def TVs, ditch that basic cable ($11/month) and get a regular roof antenna. Huge savings and crystal-clear high def. More local channels than cable, because you will likely have some subchannels that cable doesn’t carry.
http://antennaweb.org will tell you what you need. It is simple and guaranteed to continue for free.
http://highdefforum.com is a good way to find out more.
July 21st, 2007 at 9:57 am
The idea of “Basic Only” cable is a good one. In most areas, you can still get anywhere from 4-9 channels of local and PBS. Some of them may even offer some national channels in that bundle. In most areas, that runs only $8-$12 a month, and was worth it when I lived by myself, especially in Florida during hurricane season and of course, NFL football. Maybe I can’t see Monday night games since they moved to ESPN, but then, I just don’t watch Monday games. When the NFL loses enough revenue, maybe they will return to the big 3.
If you really like to see decent movies, check out your local grocery store. Many of them will offer a $1 night during the week.
August 7th, 2007 at 8:21 am
JohnK, If you’re in a metro area, why have basic-only cable? A roof antenna gets you more channels with less compression for zero ongoing cost.
August 9th, 2007 at 7:12 am
In my city in Florida, I would be lucky to pick up 2 or 3 channels, and at least one of them is over 35 miles away. Also, tall trees very close to the property line on both sides of our property would prevent a good signal.
With local cable, you can get about 20 channels, including all the major local channels from 4 cities and a couple of national channels, all clearly received.
August 9th, 2007 at 9:01 am
Right, antenna makes sense only if you are within 30 or so miles of a major metro area.
August 17th, 2007 at 12:49 pm
I’m sure cable would be both better and cheaper if the industry wasn’t dominated by local monopolies. The book “Market Domination!” by Stephen G. Hannaford provides some interesting insights on national oligopolies (economies with very few sellers). The cable industry is only mentioned briefly but the book has some other very interesting on the structure of our a economy and what competition means these days. It seems in all industries companies are being forced to grow to keep up with their up-stream and down-stream partners.
September 5th, 2007 at 8:15 pm
Here’s how to get around DRM.
Create a playlist for the show, music file, audio book file or whatever.
Put the file in the playlist.
Then burn the playlist to DVD.
This has worked with audio books. I’ve never tried it with a TV show or movie.
October 3rd, 2007 at 3:58 pm
This was a great tidbit on how to save some money and relates to a lot of us.
But as we all know, while we are trying to save a buck or two, someone else is trying to make it.
My advice is.. the next time you see any cable service person in your area, ask how much for them to hook up your cable off the books.
I paid the guy $30 and got cable for free for my entire lease. Cheapest way, and hassle free!
October 30th, 2007 at 10:52 am
My tv got rained on and eventually died. I’m not getting another one because I’ve found out that I can live without tv. I’ve never subscribed to cable tv. I can live without cable tv. It isn’t a neccessity.
I use Netflix. That I can’t live without. Its great and it isn’t crippled with DRM.
I also got rid of my cable modem for $50 a month. Now I use my blackberry to connect my laptop to the internet or I go to the library and use their high speed connection for free.
November 6th, 2007 at 9:32 am
I dropped Comcast which was costing me a whopping $110 per month for Verizon Fios TV for $68 per month for the same channels. Plus the quality of the signal is better. I am contemplating dropping HBO and will save an additional $15 per month if I do that. I still feel that the $$ is worth it, because I don’t have Netflix and I watch lots of sports and ESPN, and my husband gets 8 channels of HBO for the $$.
December 4th, 2007 at 5:55 pm
Just wrote my angry email to Comcast tonight. Adelphia Cable may have cooked the books, but boy, did they offer better services than the people who bought them out (Comcast).
I refuse to be pushed into one of their “higher tier” offerings; they’ve removed three channels (HBO–free!, Shop NBC and Oxygen), and replaced them with the Golf Channel! Same price–60 bucks–less channels. I’m seriously considering alternative forms of viewing.
December 6th, 2007 at 1:40 pm
Great article. Problem is, we love our digital cable.
We love watching it. We love BBCA, Discovery, History, HSN, QVC, channel 12, etc.
So how does one quit the cable habit when one loves watching it?
December 6th, 2007 at 2:47 pm
I backup my iTunes by copying the iTunes folder to my USB drive (which is actually the half-height 40GB hard drive from an old laptop with an adapter). This is also useful for synchronizing iTunes content on different machines.
This does NOT get around DRM, but if you lose a hard drive or you computer dies, this gets the content you want to your new HD
December 6th, 2007 at 2:49 pm
Oh, and Craig - if you LOVE your cable, then by all means keep it! We still have expanded basic because hubby loves it. (I just stick on my headphones and hide in another room with a book
December 7th, 2007 at 11:22 am
hey, i have an antenna and get about 15 channels at no cost, and i live in the boonies. hows that for low cost
January 15th, 2008 at 4:07 pm
If you hook up an HD tv antenna to the roof and buy one of those boxes for digital conversion, will it just get you local channels or will you be able to pick up channels that are on extended cable? We have Comcast. Just got our bill today and it has increased yet again another 2.30. We’re closing in on $60/month for basic and expanded. May be cheaper than some areas but way too much for not watching most of the channels they offer. I HATE COMCAST. I’ve asked them to ala carte but they say no. We watch very few cable channels but really like the ones we do watch. Is the HD conversion box and antenna a way around freakin’ Comcast? I’d love to give them the boot — but good!
January 17th, 2008 at 3:36 pm
[...] money - ~$40 a month (we only had standard cable, no fancy digital stuff) - Get Rich Slowly has a good article about this, as well as alternatives to [...]
February 12th, 2008 at 10:13 pm
I watch the few TV shows i like on the websites now, they host them the next morning. the ones that i know do this are abc.com, nbc.com, fox.com, cbs.com and a&e.com
one important note is you need somewhat decent internet, otherwise it takes forever to load
February 15th, 2008 at 3:09 pm
You might want to consider an article that Scott Burns wrote on DVD watching. He comes at it from the time is money camp and discusses “time poverty.” Here’s a brief quote:
“I figure any DVD that costs $20 or less is competitive with going to a movie theater. It’s also likely to pay for itself in time value compared to watching it as a “free” movie on Television. The economics here are simple. Every hour of television is burdened with about 20 minutes of advertising. So a two hour movie will “cost” you about an hour of advertising. If you watch the DVD you can skip the advertising and gain an hour.”
February 17th, 2008 at 1:40 pm
[...] about to take it in the wallet) but it wasn’t until I stumbled upon this JD’s Cheap Alternatives to Cable Television post over at getrichslowly.org that I realized the full extent of the rip-offery. In my case, I [...]
March 23rd, 2008 at 5:59 pm
I’ve been cable free for years and happy. If you’re having trouble finding over-the-air HD broadcasts, check out antennaweb.org. You input your location, and it tells you what broadcasts are available, their direction relative to your location, and what type of antenna you’d need to pull in a usable signal.
I can watch Heroes for free every week when it’s on, and if I’m suitably motivated, I can record for future viewing via my MythTV system!
(Disclaimer: due to the nature of my work, my employer provides me with Internet access. This is provided via cable, not DSL, so technically I am not fully cable free. Just cable TV!)
April 6th, 2008 at 6:43 pm
I live in Brooklyn, and I don’t pay for cable. I picked up a $30 satellite dish that I put on top of our tv (it’s only 10 inches tall) and we get all the basic channels with minimal fuzziness. Not bad, considering the TV was also a gift. With the abundance of shows on the internet for free, I just can’t justify the ridiculous rates of Time Warner.
May 4th, 2008 at 4:46 pm
Patrick makes a good point. Check out those sites he mentioned if you are interested in OTA (over-the-air HD and SD channels). I know some HDTVs have a better built-in tuner than others, so you can actually pick up a pretty good tuner for $150-200 off amazon. This type of tuner, in theory, would grab more channels more clearly out of your antenna. Also, some of the earlier HDTVs did not include a built-in HD tuner, making an external tuner necessary.
May 12th, 2008 at 12:16 pm
Interesting article, and I missed it the first time around.
We don’t have cable at the moment while we’re students, but we’ve been back and forth on if we want it or not. It’ll probably partly depend on if we can get HD over the air or not.
In the mean time, we’re making due with shows downloaded for free (and legally!) with Miro Player. http://www.getmiro.com/ Miro has more indie and PBS type stuff, but it’s got lots of channels.
For more mainstream stuff, we watch the shows on http://www.hulu.com/